Internal
Links

Top

Lecture Review Notes 12:
Emile Durkheim
1858  -  1917 
External
Links
Link
An Overview of Emile Durkheim   1858 - 1917  
Link
    Durkheim & St Simon  
Link
    Durkheim's Methods  
Link
    Durkheim on Mechanical & Organic Solidarity  
Link
    The Divsion of Labor  
Link
Durkheim on Suicide & the Cult of the Individual  
Link
    Alienation & Anomie  
Link
    Durkheim on Society & Religion  
Link
Deviance  
Link
    Social Control  
Link
    Durkheim on Social Order & Deviance  
Link
    Durkheim on Crime  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 An Overview of    Emile Durkheim    1858  -  1917
External
Links
  -  Project:  Theory & Your Project 
Link
Link
-  Biography & Major Works   
  INTRODUCTION:  Durkheim, who is considered to be a 'father of sociology,' saw Rousseau as the father of sociology.  Saint Simon, Comte, Tocqueville & Spencer all utilized sociological concepts & some form of the scientific method, but Durkheim was first to make sociology a scientific discipline   
  SUMMARY:  For Durkheim, one of the main problem for the social sciences, which he answers w/ his theory, was 'What creates social order?'
During the modern era, there is a problem w/ maintaining social order
Durkheim makes SEVENTEEN major points
1.  Society & social behavior could & should be studied scientifically
2.  Social facts are observable 'phenomena' that allow the study of society
3.  Social cohesion is the force that unites a society, creating congruity, consistency, etc. 
4.  Mechanical solidarity is the type of cohesion based on traditional relationships 
5.  Organic solidarity is the type of cohesion based on self determination 
6.  The division of labor is the basis of organic solidarity today, in that every member participates in it & every member benefits from it 
7.  Collective consciousness consists of the knowledge, beliefs, values & norms that we hold in common 
8.  The cult of the individual represents society's unprecedented hi level of individualism 
9.  Anomie is the social condition of a weakened or absent common morality 
10.  Integration is the process of bringing new individuals & social phenomena into society 
11.  Regulation is the process of controlling, directing, or ruling society 
12.  Common morality consists of the beliefs, values, & norms that we hold in common 
13.  Religion is a primary type of traditional cohesion
14.  Durkheim opposed political socialism, but believed in a greater level of cohesion or cooperation in society
15.  Occupational associations are optimal institutions for achieving social reform 
16.  Modern society was displacing traditional society & mech solidarity was dissolving, but organic solidarity is slow to develop 
17.  Organic solidarity  is not totally in effect, therefore there is a great risk of anomie & social instability 
 
 
DURKHEIM IS A PROGRESSIVE FUNCTIONALIST:  I.E. ADVOCATED CHANGE 
& FOCUSED ON REGULATORY & INTEGRATORY PROCESSES 
 
  Saint Simon was the most influential social theorist on Durkheim's thinking   
 
Durkheim built on Saint Simon's work of sociology as a 'science,' social evolution, etc.   
 
Durkheim is usually categorized as a functionalist because many of his ideas have been utilized by that discipline   
  Functionalism is usually considered to be conservative, especially when compared to conflict theory   
 
Durkheim is a progressive functionalist   
  Durkheim believed that contemporary philosophy should be constructive & organizational, NOT critical   
  Contrary to what is taught by many sociologists, Durkheim was not a conservative; Durkheim was a progressive thinker who had a deep interest in socialism & social change   
  Durkheim is less interested in economics than Marx or Weber, but like Marx & Weber, Durkheim was very interested in the industrial revolution & urbanization  
  For Durkheim, one of the main problem for the social sciences, which he answers w/ his theory, was 'What creates social order?'   
 
Many issues that Durkheim studied stem from his concern w/ the inevitable results of the development of modern society 
 
  There are SEVENTEEN fundamental principles of Durkheim's theory   
  1.  SOCIETY COULD & SHOULD BE STUDIED SCIENTIFICALLY   
 
Society & social behavior can be studied scientifically   
  Durkheim was first to make sociology a scientific discipline   
  Durkheim believed that society made individuals not vice versa   
  2.  SOCIAL FACTS ARE OBSERVABLE 'PHENOMENA' THAT ALLOW THE STUDY OF SOCIETY   
 
Social facts include relationships, institutions, groups, statistical patterns, as well as more abstract concepts like culture & social structure   
  Durkheim conceived the idea that there were such things as 'social facts' that were observable 'things' that enabled the study of society   
  Durkheim's famous 1st principle of sociology was to 'study social facts as things'   
  When Durkheim advocated study social facts as things he was advocating that social life can be analyzed as rigorously as object or events in nature   
  3.  SOCIAL COHESION IS THE FORCE THAT UNITES A SOCIETY, CREATING CONGRUITY, CONSISTENCY, ETC.  
 
Cohesion is necessary in both pre industrial & industrial society   
  The social forces, the cohesion that holds pre industrial & industrial societies together are different   
  4.  MECHANICAL SOLIDARITY IS A TYPE OF COHESION BASED ON TRADITIONAL RELATIONSHIPS   
 
Mechanical solidarity is the type of cohesion in pre industrial society   
  Cohesion is based on tradition culture   
  Mechanical solidarity is based on a relatively narrow division of labor, which creates relatively high level of independence combined w/ nearly all relationships being primary   
  5.  ORGANIC SOLIDARITY IS A TYPE OF COHESION BASED ON SELF DETERMINATION   
 
Organic solidarity is the type of cohesion in industrial society   
  Cohesion is based on mutual interdependence   
  Organic Solidarity is based on a very broad division of labor, which creates relatively high level of mutual interdependence combined w/ nearly all relationships being secondary   
  Durkheim considered organic solidarity to be the cement of a society   
  Much of Durkheim's theory was based on his conception of organic solidarity   
  6.  THE DIVISION OF LABOR IS THE BASIS OF ORGANIC SOLIDARITY TODAY, IN THAT 
EVERY MEMBER PARTICIPATES IN IT & EVERY MEMBER BENEFITS FROM IT 
 
 
The division of labor is the primary type of mutual interdependence in society today  
  Durkheim elaborated on Saint Simon's scheme of the new industrial class to develop his ideas on the division of labor  
  The division of labor resulted in development of modern society ( see below )  
  Durkheim perceived the ideas behind the industrial system as possessing an inherent unity  
  7.  THE COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS CONSISTS OF THE KNOWLEDGE, 
BELIEFS, VALUES & NORMS THAT WE HOLD IN COMMON
 
  Collective consciousness is our strongly held common morality
 
  8.  THE CULT OF THE INDIVIDUAL REPRESENTS SOCIETY'S UNPRECEDENTED HIGH LEVEL OF INDIVIDUALISM   
  The cult of the individual is strongly held individual morality  
  Individualism is the opposite of collective consciousness  
  Individualism increases the chance of suicide  
  The cult of the individual was a source of societal disorganization  
  9.  ANOMIE IS A WEAKENED OR ABSENT COMMON MORALITY   
  Anomie is a condition of normlessness in society  
  Durkheim coined term anomie  
  Individuals are confronted w/ anomie when they are faced w/ insufficient moral constraints  
  For Durkheim, anomie is the social condition of a weakened or absent common morality which leads to deviance, crime & possibly even social chaos / revolution  
  Modern society has made old morality obsolete, but new morality is in flux & thus weak or absent  
  Compared to the absolute power of "the old morality" people in modern era do not have a clear concept of what is & is not proper & acceptable behavior  
  10.  INTEGRATION IS THE PROCESS OF BRINGING NEW INDIVIDUALS & SOCIAL PHENOMENA INTO SOCIETY   
  Society is becoming more integrated as it develops internalized social control
 
  Integration is the degree in which collective sentiments are shared; i.e. degree to which people feel part of social groups  
  11.  REGULATION IS THE PROCESS OF CONTROLLING, DIRECTING, OR RULING SOCIETY   
  Regulation is externalized social control
 
  Regulation is the degree of external constraints on people   
  W/o regulation, a person experiences anomie  
  12.  COMMON MORALITY CONSISTS OF THE BELIEFS, VALUES, & NORMS THAT WE HOLD IN COMMON   
  Common morality decreased during the modern era  
  There is a problem w/ maintaining social order  
  Disorder was viewed, generally, as an automatic consequence of an economic system in which every individual pursues his/her own interest unless such a system had a common morality of organic solidarity, the division of labor, etc.  
  See Also:  Durkheim on Crime  
  13.  RELIGION IS A PRIMARY TYPE OF TRADITIONAL COHESION   
  The source of religion is society's shared sentiments  
  The nature of society's religions were also affected by the transition from mechanical solidarity  to [ traditional solidarity ] organic solidarity [ rational solidarity ]
 
 
14.  DURKHEIM OPPOSED POLITICAL SOCIALISM, BUT BELIEVED IN 
A GREATER LEVEL OF COHESION OR COOPERATION IN SOCIETY 
 
  Durkheim's studies of socialism were to be an "analysis of the causes of an idea."  
  Durkheim used the concept of socialism to emphasize or highlight his theoretical scheme  
  While Durkheim was not a socialist in Marxist sense, he, like Weber, is having a debate w/ 'the ghost of Marx'  
  One cannot say merely that Durkheim opposed Marxism because he accepted many basics & rejected many others  
  Durkheim especially opposed any revolutionary doctrine, which he feared would only result in anarchy & moral disruption  
  Durkheim also refused to recognize the class character of society as being center of conflict in society, but did recognize that equalization of classes was necessary  
  In essence, Durkheim synthesized works of St. Simon & Marx  
  15.  OCCUPATIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ARE OPTIMAL INSTITUTIONS FOR ACHIEVING SOCIAL REFORM  
  Occupation associations (OAs) are similar to business unions, but have much more authority in the workplace & in society   
  OAs are organizations of professionals in a particular field who organize to advance their own interests & the interests of society  
  Today one of our most powerful OAs is the American Medical Assoc (AMA) which regulates doctors, the healthcare field for the benefit of themselves, the patient, & society as a whole   
  16.  MODERN SOCIETY WAS DISPLACING TRADITIONAL SOCIETY & MECH
SOLIDARITY WAS DISSOLVING, BUT ORGANIC SOLIDARITY IS SLOW TO DEVELOP 
 
  Durkheim viewed the development of the modern era with hope, but later became disillusioned  
  The development of modernity was especially dangerous because it broke down traditional society, which was held together by mechanical solidarity  
  Durkheim believes that modern society is not fully developed, which is a position which Habermas now embraces  
  17.  ORGANIC SOLIDARITY IS NOT TOTALLY IN EFFECT, THEREFORE 
THERE IS A GREAT RISK OF ANOMIE & SOCIAL INSTABILITY 
 
  Because of the transition from tradl soc to mod soc, i.e. the trans from mechanical to organic solidarity, & because societies change at different rates, & because some societies have lost tradl soc but have not adopted mod soc values, we are experiencing a crisis or breakdown   
  At the personal & social level the crisis of the transition from tradl to mod society is experienced as anomie, i.e. an absence of a common morality   
  For the most part Durkheim did support the development of modernity, but after "the Great War" his son was killed & he had great doubts that modern society could ever function as well as traditional society  

 
Top  

Emile Durkheim
1858  -  1917
Born in France 
Resided in Germany
Son died in The Great War
( known today as WW I )
Deeply hurt Durkheim,
Became cynical about society & died soon after

DURKHEIM, Emile (1858-1917). A pioneer social scientist, Emile Durkheim established sociology as a separate discipline, or field of study. He was the first to subject the specific events of everyday life to close sociological study and to determine specific scientific methods of examination. 
   Emile Durkheim was born on April 15, 1858, in Epinal, France. He studied philosophy at the prestigious Ecole Normale Superieure in Paris. Upon graduation in 1882 he taught in secondary schools until 1887, when he was appointed to a lectureship especially founded for him at the University of Bordeaux. This was the first course of social science officially provided in a French university. 
   Durkheim's first book, 'The Division of Labor in Society', published in 1893, focused on the problems of new technology and the mechanization of work. This division of labor, according to Durkheim, made workers both more alien to one another, as their jobs were different, and more dependent on one another, as none any longer built the whole of a product. The methods to be used to examine society in this new discipline Durkheim laid out in 'The Rules of Sociological Method' (1895). 
   His classic 'Suicide' (1897) examines the ties that bind individuals to the society in which they live, and their breakdown. Suicide appeared to be more frequent in societies where individuals are less a part of the life around them, as in modern industrial societies. He distinguished three types of suicide: In egoistic suicide the individual shuts himself off from other human beings. Anomic suicide comes from the belief that the world has fallen apart around one. Altruistic suicide springs from great loyalty to a cause. 
   In 1902 Durkheim was appointed to the University of Paris, becoming a full professor in 1906. He taught there until his death on Nov. 15, 1917. 

---------------------------------------------------------
Excerpted from Compton's Interactive Encyclopedia
Copyright © 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997 The Learning Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Top  

Major Works of Durkheim
Suicide
The Division of Labor in Society
The Rules of Sociological Method
The Elementary Forms of Religious Life,   1915

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Durkheim  &  Saint Simon
                  1858 - 1917        1760 - 1825 
External
Links
  SOCIAL INEQUALITY   
  For both D & StS, the major soc problem is social inequality
 
  The fundamental problem for StS, Durkheim & others is how to reconcile the structured inequality of mod soc w/ the requirements of social solidarity
 
  D & StS recognized that the greater level of social inequality inherent in mod society creates tensions not experienced in earlier forms of society  
  To D & StS, the social problems created by social inequality could be addressed in two manners including decreasing inequality or by increasing common morality  
  a.  Society could try to reduce the social inequality & indeed both D & StS supported policy to increase the middle class, & reduce the upper & lower classes  
  An example of D & StS's policies might be to increase inheritance taxes  
  b.  D & StS advocated fostering a greater common morality to bond people together  
  D & StS believe the most functional society forms a moral, class based society  
  Durk believed that StS recognized class conditions but felt it could be developed into a hierarchical but none the less organic order of soc peace & stability   
  For D & StS, integration was to be achieved by instituting moral ideas  
  For D & StS, morality is equivalent to social solidarity  
  The concept of morality becomes central to Durk's analysis of society  
  PROGRESS   
  For StS & Durk, the progress of soc depended on developing a moral order to suit new social & techl conditions  
  For D, following the ideas of StS, moral ideas are cement of society  
  For D & StS, society needs a common morality to embody common social relations, ways of living, lifestyles, etc.  
  POSITIVISM  
 
Durk recognized StS's positivism as an advancement of the soc sci
 
 
Durk acknowledges StS's positivism as an imp discovery, placing it btwn metaphysics & the specialized sciences
 
  Thus Durk agrees w/ StS that the soc sciences should not just look at social problems; the soc sciences should also look at the positive aspects of society & try to develop policies to advance society  
  SOCIAL EVOLUTION   
 
Durk & StS are social evolutionists in that they believe & work to see that society changes in what they see as a progressive direction 
 
 
Durk accepts StS's social evolutionist view & says:  "...the ancient social system gave way, another was formed in the very bosom of the first. The old society contained within itself a new society...   But these two organizations are necessarily antagonistic to each other .. the first calls on faith and imposes beliefs...  The second calls on reason and even trust...  Only with the enfranchisement of the communes, the emergence of a class of independent producers, and the subsequent growth of an industrial system under the impact of scientific and technological advances, did the feudal organization become evidently anachronistic"
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on Durkheim on  Methodological Rules & Values
External
Links
  Durk identified 2 types of social facts:  material & nonmaterial social facts
 
  Social facts are ways of thinking, acting, or feeling & social structures & cultural norms & values, which are external to the individual & have the power of coercion over him/her
 
  a. Material soc facts are those that become materialized so far as to become an element of the external world
 
  Examples of material sical facts include fashion, architecture, entertainment, etc.
 
  b. Nonmaterial social facts are those shared mental phenomena that become an integral part of society in the common morality, the culture, etc.
 
  Examples of nonmaterial society include norms, values, suicide, mechanical solidarity, organic solidarity, or more generally culture
 
  Nonmaterial facts can include soc relationships such as the relationships around suicide, the div of labor, mechanical solidarity, organic solidarity, etc.
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Durkheim's Mechanical & Organic Solidarity
External
Links
  MECHANICAL SOLIDARITY   
  2a. Mechanical solidarity:  Solidarity is based on the narrow division of labor, which creates relatively high level of independence combined w/ nearly all relationships being primary
 
  In pre industrial societies, mechanical solidarity, i.e. the social forces that held society together consisted of  traditional, unquestioned beliefs  & forced conformity 
 
  Mechanical solidarity had both good & bad aspects
 
  Modern society w/ its high division of labor & large anonymous, urban populations destroyed mechanical solidarity
 
  What holds mechanical society together according to Durkheim?   
  In a mechanical society, i.e. a traditional society,  the bond is that the members of society are engaged in similar activities & have similar responsibilities thus having a common goal & identity  
  Durkheim believes that the process of modernization is the process of replacing mechanical solidarity w/ organic solidarity
 
  ORGANIC SOLIDARITY   
  Organic solidarity is the solidarity based on very broad division of labor, which creates relatively high levels of mutual interdependence combined w/ the fact that nearly all relationships being secondary
 
  Organic solidarity is based on absolute reliance, trust, dependence, & anonymity
 
  The forces of interdependence create a cohesive society
 
  The very nature of large cities, make us all interdependent
 
  Modern society has a much greater & more refined division of labor
 
  People in modern society occupy more specialized positions & have a much narrower range of tasks & responsibilities
 
  What holds organic society together according to Durkheim? 
 
  In an organic society, i.e. modern society,  the bond is that members of society have different tasks & responsibilities to perform that are highly specialized & therefore they need one another to survive
 
  Organic solidarity consists of cohesion based on mutual interdependence & has FOUR features
 
  FEATURES OF ORGANIC SOLIDARITY   
  1.  The division of labor was a central feature in society which created order in modern industrial society 
 
  Durkheim also recognized other factors as crucial to industrial society including professional associations, religion, social boundaries, etc. 
 
  2.  Professional associations are modern soc institutions that allow for rationalization in society & as Weber noted, a system which minimizes the negative effects of oligarchy & alienation 
 
  3.  Religion: For Durkheim, a religion is a reflection of the collective consciousness of the society  
  Thus religion builds solidarity & maintains social order because as people adhere to its tenets, they are affirming the tenets of the society  
  4.  Society creates boundaries / deviants in order to determine what is & what is not acceptable  
  Deviants & criminals are "internal threats" that create social cohesiveness  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the  Division of Labor  ( DOL ) 
External
Links
  -  Project:  The Division of Labor, Solidarity, & Social Problems 
Link
 
The division of labor (DOL) is highly specialized economic activity
 
  The DOL is workplace relationship where different workers carry out different steps in producing a product  
 
The DOL is a characteristic of most societies in which different individual or groups specialize in different tasks
 
 
The DOL is the specialization of work tasks, by means of which different occupations are combined w/in a production system
 
  DOL = SPECIALIZATION = EFFICIENCY = COMPLEXITY   
  An example of the DOL can be seen in assembling bicycles in that one person performing all six required steps in assembling a bike, can make one unit in the same amount of time as it takes six people, each specializing in one of the six steps, to make 12 units   
  In 1776 Adam Smith argued that the DOL produces efficiencies because of the increased dexterity of the worker as he or she specializes in one task, because of the time save "in passing from one sort of work to another," and because of the introduction of machinery  
 
All societies have at least some rudimentary division of labor, especially btwn the tasks allocated to men & those allocated to women
 
 
W/ the development of industrialism, however, the DOL becomes vastly more complex than in any prior type of production systems.
 
 
In the modern world, the DOL is international in scope, hence globalization
 
 
The most fundamental change in the nature of work over time has been the increasing DOL
 
  EARLY DOL  
 
In hunter gatherer societies, each member engaged in more or less the full range of work activities except as labor as divided by gender & age
 
 
See Also:  Hunter Gatherer Society  
 
See Also:  Gender in Hunter Gatherer Society  
  It is believed that the earliest form of the DOL was that btwn men & women, & btwn children & adults  
  The child adult DOL began in the hunter gatherer era wherein children would tag along as adults did their tasks, learning the tasks & helping as their skills enabled them to help  
  The child adult DOL continued until factory work began & adults went out of the home to work, whereby child became a consumptive liability for a family rather than a productive asset  
  Until factory work began, the workplace orgl structure was identical w/ the family & extended family grp structure  
 
In the Feudal Era, most workers were in agriculture, but some specialized in a single product & had occupations such as tailors, cobblers, bakers, etc.
 
 
See Also:  The Feudal Era
 
  SDOL  
  The social division of labor (SDOL) is the DOL into different crafts or trades  
  The SDOL began in the Feudal Era, but became widespread in the Early Industrial Age  
 
In modern industrial societies, work has become so specialized that each trade is broken down into seemingly innumerable specialties
 
 
In the meat packing industry one can specialize as a large stock scalper, belly shaver, crotch buster, gut snatcher, gut sorter, snout puller, ear cutter, eyelid remover, stomach washers (sometimes called a belly bumper), hind puller, front leg toenail puller, & oxtail washer (Wilensky & Lebeaux, 1986)
 
 
Specialization creates new lines of work that require new & different skills; however, the DOL often reduces the range of skills needed to perform jobs
 
 
The DOL often results in the deskilling of workers
 
 
For example, a much narrower range of skills is needed to be a "gut snatcher" than a butcher
 
  DOL, INDL REV, BUREAUCRACY   
 
The DOL is a basic feature of industrialization, & the DOL as we know it today developed during the Industrial Revolution
 
 
The limited development of the DOL had occurred in eras previous to the Ind Rev  
 
Bureaucracy had existed in limited forms previous to the Industrial Revolution, but w/ this change, bureaucracy, like the DOL became widespread  
  The DOL is one of the fundamental characteristics of bureaucracy  
  Bureaucracy as we know it could not exist w/o the DOL  
  See Also:  Bureaucracy  
  See Also:  Weber  
  Durkheim held that the DOL is a fundamental, defining feature of modern society  
  Durkheim believes that modern society could not exist w/o the DOL  
  One of Durkheim's most important insights was that the DOL & industrial interdependence, which he characterized as organic solidarity, replaced mechanical solidarity wherein each person / family is relatively independent when compared to today's people  
  See Also:  Durkheim  
  See Also:  Mechanical & Organic Solidarity   
  MDOL  
  Most work in industrial society is organized in terms of the manufacturing DOL (MDOL)  
  Under the MDOL, the different activities in each craft are separated  
  For example a cobbler would make soles, then make tops, & then stitch them together while w/ the MDOL workers would divide these two tasks into many  
  Early scholars of work in the 1800s conducted analyses of labor where they studied craftsmen in order to determine how to divide the labor among unskilled workers  
  The analysis of labor continues today wherein each manufacturer must conduct exhaustive studies to determine the optimal MDOL  
  Analysis of labor consultants often work closely w/ production engineers to optimize the way products are designed so that the components can be efficiently assembled  
  The MDOL often involves the increased efficiencies from the assembly line  
  The DOL allows some workers to be paid less than other workers & has resulted in large, stratified orgs w/ a tall  hierarchy  
  The MDOL creates the preconditions for mechanization  
  Mechanization creates its own MDOL because workers must learn to operate various machines  
  EFFICIENCY VS. ALIENATION   
  Starting w/ Marx, it became well known that an extensive DOL frequently negated some of the increased efficiency because of the alienation & lost enthusiasm of the workers  
  The DOL is administered through direct personal control, foreman control, or technical control  
  See Also:  Workplace Control  
  The DOL reached some limits in the 1970s in that jobs were so finely dissected, & wkrs were so alienated that even mgt sought alternative methods of job org  
  Modern indl society has developed the DOL to such a great extent via Scientific Mgt., bureaucracy, etc. that workers literally go insane  
  Since the 70s, there has been some limited reversal of the trend of an increasing DOL, in some industries such as auto manufacturing  
  In the 2000s, job enlargement & the recognition that "big picture people" give orgs an advantage is more than apparent   

 
Internal
Links

Top

Emile Durkheim on  Suicide:
The Cult of the Individual
External
Links
  DURKHEIM STUDIED SUICIDE TO SHOW THAT 'THE MOST PERSONAL ACT' HAD A SOCIAL COMPONENT RELATED TO THE DEGREE OF CONNECTION ONE HAS IN SOCIETY & THE AMOUNT OF CONTROL ONE EXPERIENCES   
  Introduction:  Durkheim is known for establishing the 1st sociology dept. 
This was at the University of Paris 
Durkheim is known for establishing sociology as a social science 
He did this through applying the scientific method to social facts in his study of suicide 
 
  Suicide was written by Durkheim in 1897   
  Durkheim conducted the research on suicide in order to establish sociology as a social science on par w/ psychology   
  Durkheim was the first to carry out a study involving the large scale collection of data to test a social theory   
  For Durkheim, suicide is perhaps "the most personal act" any human can undertake  
  Durkheim believed that if he could show that the most individual of acts, which had previously been attributed to psychological causes, had social causes, then he would validate the power & worth of sociology  
  In writing Suicide, Durkheim reviewed the literature, examined appropriate theory, & employed common sense:  
  Durkheim believed a society had to accomplish two major functions to be successful  
  a.  INTEGRATION IS THE DEGREE TO WHICH COLLECTIVE SENTIMENTS (KNOWLEDGE, BELIEFS, VALUES) ARE SHARED BY MEMBER IN SOCIETY   
  The opposite of social integration is isolation in a society  
  b.  REGULATION IS THE DEGREE OF EXTERNAL CONSTRAINT ON PEOPLE 
 Regulation is the common norms people live under
    Regulation      vs      Lack of Regulation in a society
 
  The widespread failure of integration or regulation in society yields societal collapse
The occasional failure of integration or regulation in society yields an increased rate of suicide
 
  What are some common causes of suicide?
Why do some people commit suicide & others don't?
What are some possible explanations?
 
 
 

 

 
  Depression                   Terminal illness
Spouse leaves them      Picked on by peers
Lost job                        Loneliness
 
  DURKHEIM'S HYPOTHESIS WAS THAT PEOPLE, AS A GROUP, WOULD BECOME MORE SUICIDAL TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY EXPERIENCED EXTREME INTEGRATION OR REGULATION   
  Durkheim then uses the deductive method to develop his thesis & hypotheses:  
  Durkheim's hypothesis is that suicide would be highest among single, Protestant, men because these groups are less integrated & less regulated  
  Other groups w/ a tendency toward suicide are those who are highly integrated or over regulated  
  Durkheim's method was to travel from parish (country) to parish & examine death certificates of suicides & record demographic info, & the circumstances surrounding the death  
  Durkheim rode from parish (county) to parish in France in the 1890s  
  Durkheim collected data on social background of suicide victims, e.g. demographic information including age, religion, class, job, work history, income, wealth, gender, etc.  
  Then Durkheim grouped people according to suicide rates & each social factor; & he did this by hand ( a computer would do this today )  
  Durkheim's types of suicide include altruistic, fatalistic, egoistic, & anomic  
Link
Table on Durkheim's Four Types of Suicide   
 Link
1.  ALTRUISTIC SUICIDE IS CORRELATED W/ HIGH INTEGRATION INTO SOCIETY   
  When social integration is too strong, the individual is literally forced into committing suicide   
  Hero suicide occurs when a parent dies while pushing their child out of the way of a car  
  With altruistic suicide, death is deliverance  
  Altruistic suicide springs from hope, for it depends on the belief in the beautiful afterlife  
  A suicidal person who dies for a cause is exhibiting characteristics of altruistic suicide  
  EXAMPLES OF ALTRUISTIC SUICIDE   
  Non Extreme Examples  
  - a soldier jumping on a grenade or charging a hill  
  - a policeman dying in the line of duty  
  - a parent pushing a child from path of a car  
  Extreme Examples:   
  - Kamikazes  
  - radical arab bombers  
  -  in 1996, men emolating (burning) themselves to protest the Miss World pageant in India  
 
-  Supplement:  The followers of Reverend Jim Jones at the People's Temple in Jonestown, Guyana
Link
  -  Supplement:  Jonestown, Guyana Conspiracy
Link
 
-  Supplement:  The followers of David Koresh & his followers of the Branch Davidians in Texas
Link
  -  Supplement:  Waco Investigation
Link
Link
2.  FATALISTIC SUICIDE IS CORRELATED W/ HIGH REGULATION BY SOCIETY   
  Persons w/ pitilessly blocked opportunities & passions, violently choked by oppressive discipline are more likely to commit fatalistic suicide  
  Fatalistic suicide was little mentioned by Durkheim  
  EXAMPLES OF FATALISTIC SUICIDE  
  Examples of someone more likely to commit fatalistic suicide include:  
  - slaves  
  - prisoners  
  - overworked college students  
  - American middle class working men  
  - American middle class house wives  
  - School age suicides/killers who cannot stand the harassment by the in crowd, because they are different  
  - over-worked Japanese employees  
  - over worked American executives   
Link
3.  EGOISTIC SUICIDE IS CORRELATED W/ LOW INTEGRATION INTO SOCIETY  
  Individuals who experience a sense of meaninglessness are more likely to commit egoistic suicide  
  Egoistic suicide is often found in societies where individuals are not well integrated into the society; i.e., modern, developed nations  
  The personal feeling or emotion often associated w/ low integration into society is depression, loneliness, & a sense of meaninglessness  
  For Durkheim, egoistic suicide stems from the social currents of incurable weariness & sad depression  
  Society is where we "learn," internalize via socialization, or imprint our norms & morals  
  Members of a society internalized norms & morals into the self & thus become integrated into the society by both the processes of socialization, as well as by the particular shared norms & morals  
  Therefore, w/ egoistic suicide, a person may also appear as if they are out of control  
  People prone to egoistic suicide lack an internal control of the self, an internal "locus of control"  
  Durkheim notes in his analysis of suicide that if people are left to pursue their private interests in whatever way they wish, they are likely to feel considerable personal dissatisfaction  
  For Durkheim, people are not satisfied even when the are left to pursue their private interests in whatever way they wish because all needs cannot be fulfilled by the individual, many needs can only be fulfilled by the group, collective, or society  
  For Durkheim, the self as constructed by society, is nearly insatiable  
  Needs that are satiable simply lead to the generation of more & more needs  
  EXAMPLES OF EGOISTIC SUICIDE   
  - People prone to egoistic suicide having a low level of integration into society can be seen in the fact that unmarried individuals  have higher rates of suicide than married people  
  - People prone to egoistic suicide having a low level of integration into society can be seen in "lone wolf suicide,"  i.e. a higher rate of suicide, depression, etc., by loners  
  - Teens prone to egoistic suicide can be seen in the high rates of suicide in high school & college students  
  Lonely, troubled young men in high school or college are:  
  -  generally isolated
-  not popular
-  harassed or teased by others
 
  - Millionaire suicide occurs because of low integration into suicide because they feel lonely because they often believe that 'people only like me for my money'  
  The loneliness of wealth, & millionaire suicide can be seen in Richie Rich, the poor little rich kid   
  The loneliness of wealth, & millionaire suicide can be seen in the fact that people who gain sudden wealth often have a hard time adjusting socially & often lose spouses & friends  
 
- Star egoistic suicide can be seen in the loneliness of fame that leads many stars to suicide
 
  Examples of star egoistic suicide might include:   
  Marilyn Monroe
 
  -  Supplement:  Janis Joplin of Big Brother & the Holding Co.      d. 1970
Link
  Jim Morrison of the Doors.  
  -  Supplement:  Kurt Cobain of Nirvanna  b. 1967   d. 1994
Link
 
For Durkheim, religion insulates one against suicide because it integrates people into society
 
  For Durkheim, religion insulates one against suicide because religion limits wants  
  Two groups are the most prone to suicide, young men aged from 14 to 24, and middle age men aged 45 to 55  
  Young men & middle age men may have high levels of suicide because they are likely to experience overwork or sense of failure  
  Young men just finishing their education or starting their career are suddenly stratified into their position in life & that position may not be as high as they believed it would be  
  Middle age men are just at the pinnacle of their career & they may not have risen as high as they expected or they may feel that it was all for naught  
  Young & middle age men are often the most isolated in our society  
  Young men may feel isolated because they have just left home & have not integrated into a new community  
  Middle age men may feel isolated because their family is now grown & they are not integrated into their community  
Link
4.  ANOMIC SUICIDE IS CORRELATED W/ LOW REGULATION BY SOCIETY   
  Anomie is the experience where culture ( common knowledge, beliefs, values, norms ) does not exist & / or has become ineffective
 
  For Durkheim, culture may be thought of as the collective unconsciousness  
  In comparing anomie to alienation, alienation is the separation or isolation from existing culture whereas anomie is the condition where there is no culture, i.e., no culture to be separated from
 
  See:  Anomie
 
  See:  Alienation
 
  See:  Culture  
  Societal disintegration leads to currents of depression & disillusionment  
  The moral disintegration of society predisposes the individual to commit suicide, but the currents of depression must be there to produce differences in rates of anomic suicide  
  But even though social forces may be weak, an individual is never totally free of the collectivity  
  Disruptions in  regulative powers of society leaves people dissatisfied because they have little control over their passions  
  So people are allowed to run wild in an insatiable race for gratification  
  Success can significantly reduce the regulation that one experiences:  The newly rich may quit their job, move to a new community, perhaps find a new spouse  
  These changes disrupt regulatory effect of old structures & the person may not yet feel new regulatory effects  
  EXAMPLES OF ANOMIC SUICIDE: 
 
  - I am so weak, I have nothing left to lose  
  - suicide from a great loss such as a lay off  
  - a Bum who believes, 'I can do whatever I want because no one can hurt me'
  "Freedom is just another word  for nothing left to lose"  Janis Joplin
 
  - the belief, 'I am so powerful, I cannot lose'
 
  - the college student away from home, family, friends, for the first time, becomes wild party animal, & dies of overdose, car wreck, etc. believing, at some level, that they cannot be hurt or controlled  
  - the person moving to big city for first time who believes they are powerful, & becomes dangerously manic  
  - the Millionaire who believes, 'I can do whatever I want  because I am so powerful: No one can tell me what to do'
 
  - a suicide from great gain such as finally "making it big" career wise
 
  - a superstar, or anyone who dies "accidentally" in that they were not depressed, despondent, etc.  
  People who die of anomic suicide, live the wild life, feel free, & feel little societal control or fear  
  - Jimi Hendrix
 
  -  Supplement:  James Dean  
  - John Belusi?  
  Social or natural crises reduce regulation & people feel they have nothing left to lose, no reason to live
 
  Periods of disruption unleash currents of anomie, moods of restlessness & normlessness
 
  Rates of anomic suicide may rise w/ almost any social crises such as a storm, a war, an economic boom, an economic depression, etc.
 
  Individuals experience the sensation of anomie as the fear or anxiety that society is breaking down, that the old rules no longer apply
 
  Either an econ boom or an econ depression make society incapable of exercising its authority over individuals  
  For an anomic society, the old norms no longer apply, but new norms are not yet in place  
  Losing a job can cut the individual off from the Regulation that the company, the job, the workplace friendships may have had  
  Being cut off from the economic sector, or family, religion, the state, etc. leaves a person rootless  
  FINDINGS:  DURKHEIM CONSTRUCTED A PROFILE OF A SUICIDAL PERSON THAT IS STILL VALID TODAY:  MALE, YOUNG OR MID AGED, PROTESTANT, VERY POOR OR RICH   
  Men commit suicide more than women
Women make more attempts at suicide, but men succeed more often
 
  The young, mid teens to mid twenties & the middle aged, late 40s & 50s are the most suicidal age groups
 
  Protestants are more likely than Catholics or Jews to commit suicide
 
  Durkheim theorized that Protestants would be more likely to commit suicide than Catholics or Jews because Protestant religions are more individualistic while the Jews & Catholics have a stronger community orientation  
  People of all classes have about the same rates of suicide, except for the extreme rich & poor, which have a higher rate of suicide
 
  Those who have been recently laid off more likely to commit suicide
 
  If you are male, young, mobile/ in transition, & Protestant, you are at high risk for suicide  
  If you are male, middle age, Protestant, & laid off, you are at high risk for suicide
 
  Durkheim's findings are still valid today & yet most of the focus is on psychological causes, not sociological causes of suicide
 
  Durkheim's study has been confirmed by many other researchers & its generalization is very widespread
 
  Similar patterns of suicide can be found today in the US as Durkheim found in nineteenth century Europe  

 
Top
 
Table on Durkheim's Four Types of Suicide
 
High 
Low
Integration
1.  Altruistic suicide
3.  Egoistic suicide
Regulation
2.  Fatalistic suicide
4.  Anomic suicide

 
Internal
Links

Top

  Outline on the  Definition of Alienation & Anomie
External
Links
  ALIENATION IS THE RESULT OF BEING SEPARATED FROM THE PREDOMINANT CULTURE  
  Many theorist have contemplated the meaning of alienation  
  Hegel            1770  -  1831  
  Feuerbach     1804  -  1872  
  Marx             1818  - 1883  
  Blauner         contemporary  
  Alienation is a state of being, a relationship ( mental & physical manifestations ) characterized by the separation or isolation from existing culture ( knowledge, beliefs, values, norms held in common ) caused by an estrangement from idealistic and/ or materialistic factors  
  While both Hegel & Feuerbach discussed the nature of alienation, Marx built upon these to develop his own dialectical- material view of alienation  
  Alienation, as defined by Marx, is the separation or isolation of workers from the products of their labor Contemporary definition:  feelings or the experience of emotional distance, isolation, powerlessness, loss of control  
  ANOMIE IS THE RESULT OF A WEAKENED OR ABSENTCULTURE / MORALITY  
  For Durkheim, anomie is weakened or absent common morality; a condition of normlessness in society  
  Durkheim developed his concept of anomie to explain the condition in modern society where the old culture or common morality, break down, but have not yet been replaced by its modern form, in the form of organic solidarity as manifested in a societal div of labor  
  Anomie is a state of being, a relationship, with mental & physical manifestations, characterized by the lack of a controlling culture ( knowledge, beliefs, values, norms held in common ) caused by the destruction, ineffectiveness or rejection of culture  
  Anomie is the lack or weakness of the usual social or ethical standards in an individual or group  
Link
Examples of alienation include: 'I am alienated if there is a strong culture, but I cannot become part of that culture' or 'I am anomic if culture has basically disintegrated or is ineffective'  
  Durkheim, taking the term from the Greek anomia which means lawlessness, argued that anomie could result from rapid social change  
  FOR MERTON, ALIENATION IS THE RESULT OF NOT BEING ABLE TO ACHIEVE THE NORMAL LIFE GOALS OF A SOCIETY   
  Some US sociologists, in particular Robert K. Merton (1910- ), have maintained that anomie can lead to deviance  
  For Merton, when an individual or group is prevented from achieving widely accepted goals, law-breaking may result  
  Both alienation & anomie exhibit any number of psychological & political manifestations
  - depression                                  - thievery
  - anger                                          - violence
  - revolutionary political ideals    - deviance
 
  While the concept anomie is similar to Marx's concept of alienation, there are significant differences btwn the two including the fact that anomie is a condition of a lack of, or a vacuum of common culture, while alienation is a condition where a person or group is separated from an existing common culture  
  For Hegel, alienation was only a phenomenon of mind caused by an estrangement from the dominating ideas of the time  
  FOR MARX, ALIENATION IS A COMMON CONDITION IN CAPITALIST SOCIETIES BECAUSE PEOPLE, RATHER THAN BEING ABLE TO MANIFEST THEIR CREATIVITY THROUGH WORK AS THEY SHOULD, ARE EXPLOITED AT WORK   
  For Marx, alienation is a condition in which a person's own powers appear to be controlled by independent forces or entities     [ Marx & his contemporaries were called the young, or left Hegelians ]  
  Marx believed that people find their humanity through labor, not religion, not sex, not anything else  
  Marx believed that the failure to realize our human nature results in alienation  
  We are what we do  
  Our labor becomes objectified in our products  
  Craftsperson, or the primitive hunter gatherer produces, controls the products & either consumes it, or sells it themselves  
       See Also:  Species Being  
  In the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, Marx writes Human Estrangement is rooted in the social structure which denies people their essential human nature   

 
Top
 
Examples
Hippie is alienated because they cannot fit in or become part of middle class America
For the street urchin there is no dreams of middle class America
For him there is no such culture in existence-- he is anomic
He embraces a gang counter culture
PW

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Durkheim on the Sociology of Religion
External
Links
  For Durkheim, religion is created by separating the sacred from the profane
 
  Durkheim defines religion as "... a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say things set apart and forbidden, beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a Church, all those who adhere to them."
The Elementary Forms of Religious Life,   1915
 
  Religion is the formalized behavior that is directed toward the sacred, usually involving rituals, a system of established rites & ceremonies
 
  For Durkheim, a religion is a reflection of the collective consciousness of the society
 
  Thus religion builds solidarity & maintains social order because as people adhere to its tenets, they are affirming the tenets of the society
 
  For Durkheim, the source of religion is society's shared sentiments
 
  Religion is defined by separating sacred from profane
 
  Durkheim saw religion as the ultimate non material soc fact
 
  Religion is defined by three elements: a.  sacred & profane beliefs, b. practices, c. a moral community
 
  A.  SACRED & PROFANE BELIEFS 
 
  Some beliefs or practices are sacred which means they are set off from the normal, everyday life, or even forbidden
 
  Some beliefs or practices are profane which are secular, irreverent, common, vulgar; unconsecrated, unholy, heath, pagan, or blasphemous  
  The sacred includes those beliefs & things assoc w/ supernatural, that inspire awe, reverence, fear, or deep respect  
  B.  PRACTICES   
  Practices are the rules of conduct, i.e. rituals, & objects which prescribe how a person should carry themself in presence of the sacred  
  C.  MORAL COMMUNITY   
  While a Church, Mosque, Synagogue, Temple, etc. is merely physical rep of people in common religion w/ sacred & profane & rituals, the moral community is made up of a group of people, their sacred & profane beliefs, & their moral practices  
 
STUDYING RELIGIOUS LIFE 
 
 
The elementary forms of rel life could best be studied in tribal cultures
 
  ETHICAL PRINCIPLES   
  Rel provides a set of rules that tells believers how they are expected to behave in everyday life  
  Rel rules differ from everyday rules & norms in that they are considered sacred in origin  

 
Internal
Links

Top

Outline on  Deviance
External
Links
 
- Video:  Deviance     2:15 
Link
 
- Video:  Conflict Theory on Deviance    1:30 
Link
 
- Video:  Soc Change, Ruling Class, Deviance      3:47 
Link
  - Video:  Functionalism & Other Theories on Deviance    10:02 
Link
 
Project:  The Qualities of Your Deviance 
Link
  -  Project:  Video: Durkheim on Deviance 
Link
  DEFINITIONS OF DEVIANCE: DEVIANCE IS THAT BEHAVIOR OR CULTURAL ARTIFACT THAT IS DEFINED BY SOCIETY AS BEING OUTSIDE OF THE NORMAL RANGE, I.E. A VIOLATION OF NORMS / SOCIETY'S INFORMAL RULES   
 
Deviance is behavior or ideology that does not conform to the prevailing norms of society   
  Deviance is defined as the recognized violation of cultural norms   
 
The functionalist perspective in deviance & social control is best represented by Emile Durkheim & Talcott Parsons 
 
  One category of deviance is crime, the violation of a society's formally enacted criminal law   
  What all deviant actions or attitudes have in common is some element of difference that causes us to regard another person as an "outsider"   
  Not all deviance involves action or even choice   
 
Dev is the violation of norms & expectations   
  Dev is the violation of norms accepted by either a significant number of people in a community or society, or those w/ the power to enforce them   
  Just as there are important differences among situations in which norms are appropriate, there are also important differences about the relative seriousness of types of norm or law violating behavior   
  Deviance, like conformity, is shaped by society   
  The concept of deviance has TWELVE qualities / social foundations   
  1.  DEVIANCE IS DEFINED BY SOCIETY   
  Deviance / norms are created or defined by society, i.e. a general consensus   
  Thus, what is deviant is NOT a property inherent in the thing or act   
  2.  DEVIANCE IS NON-CONFORMITY   
  Deviance does not conform to expectations & norms that exist w/in a society   
  Deviance varies according to cultural norms   
  3.  GROUP INTERESTS DEFINE DEVIANCE   
  Group interests play important role in defining deviance   
  4.  POWERFUL GROUPS DEFINE DEVIANCE   
  Large or powerful segments of society determine norms & thus determine what is or is not deviant   
  Both norms & the way people define them involve social power   
  People at the bottom of the socio economic scale are most often labeled as deviant, because the powerful in society determine what is deviant   
Link
However "deviant" something may be, unless the powerful disapprove, it is not deviant   
  Thus a behavior participated in by all or a majority of people can still be considered deviant   
  For conflict theorists, deviance is defined & enforced in a way that perpetuates the dominance of elites over the less powerful or powerless   
  Studies of the sociology of rule making show that what is defined as deviant is the outcome of a political process   
  Group interests play an important role in defining what behaviors are considered deviant or normal   
 
Conflict theorists agree that a disharmony of interests exists in modern society   
 
From the conflict perspective, norms don't involve agreement among a majority of people, norms reflect the interests of people w/ enough power to enforce norms
 
  POWER INFLUENCES SOCIAL NORMS   
  Soc norms are strongly influenced by the divisions of power   
  The grp w/ the most power can define the norms   
  The dominant group tries to enforce its norms, but not everyone agrees w/ the dominant grp   
  The existence of power points to the existence of inequality  
  Some grps may follow norms & values even though they don't agree w/ them   
  For some grps, norms & values are not in their best interest   
  Conflict & inequality are created when grps follow norms & values even through they don't agree or when those norms & values are not in their best interest   
  5.  DEFINITIONS OF DEVIANCE VARY BY WHO DOES THE ACT  
  Observations of social interaction reveal that definitions of deviance tend to vary according to who performs the act   
  6.  MOST PEOPLE VIOLATE RULES 
 
 
Few people are arrested & processed as criminals, self report surveys reveal most people violate rules 
 
  7.  THE EFFECT OF DEVIANCE IS OFTEN MAGNIFIED BY THE LABELING EFFECT WHERE PEOPLE ARE MORE IMPACTED BY THE LABEL OF BEING DEVIANT THAT THEY ARE BY THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DEVIANT ACT   
  People become deviant as others define them that way 
 
 
See Also:  Labeling Theory   
  8.  DEVIANCE VARIES ACROSS CONTEXTS   
 
Behavior must be context appropriate:  what is normal in one context may be deviant in another 
 
  9.  DEVIANCE VARIES CROSS CULTURALLY  
 
The nature of deviance changes from culture to culture 
 
 
The nature of deviance changes from culture to culture due to the fact that behavior is socially labeled as deviant or normal & the individual cultures & societies define deviance in their own ways 
 
 
Cross cultural analysis indicates that notions of right & wrong vary among cultures 
 
  10.  DEVIANCE VARIES HISTORICALLY  
 
Deviance is noticeable historically because the nature of deviance changes over time 
 
  11.  ABSOLUTISM DOES NOT APPLY TO DEVIANCE SINCE IT IS DEFINED BY SOCIETY & NOT BY ANY PARTICULAR STANDARD   
 
Deviant behavior is not a violation of anything absolute i.e., it is not inherent in any particular forms of behavior 
 
  12.  RELATIVISM DOES NOT APPLY TO DEVIANCE BECAUSE WHILE SOCIETY HAS NO ABSOLUTE STANDARD, IT ALWAYS HAS SOME STANDARD, & THUS NEVER HAS NON EXISTENT OR RELATIVE STANDARDS   
 
In an analysis of deviance, the concept of relativism denotes that no behavior is "naturally" or morally deviant / bad 
 
 
All behavior is socially labeled either as deviant or normal, but this does not mean that any behavior is acceptable 
 
 
Relativism is the contention that what is deviant in any society is the consequence of social or political processes 
 
Link
Examples of Deviance as a violation of social norms 
 

 
Top  
Examples of behaviors that were approved of  by large or powerful segments of society
Slavery
Discrimination based on sex & race
School segregation
Holocaust in Germany

 
Top  
Examples of Deviance & Norms
Men w/ long hair, women in pants    Dress
Norms:
    Folkways:  dressed in casual clothes for formal occasion
    Mores:       no shirt in dept. store
    Laws:
        Criminal:         no shirt, no shoes in food store
        Civil:               copying super model's look

 
Internal
Links

Top

Outline on   Social Control
External
Links
  -  Video:  Social Control                  1:26
Link
  -  Video:  Norms & Conformity      6:53
Link
  Social control is the control of individual behavior by society or the control of social institutions in the interest of the whole society  
 
Soc con is an important part of soc stability
 
  All of us are subject to social control, attempts by society to regulate people's thought & behavior  
 
Much of soc control is done through culture, socialization, & formal control by authorities
 
 
Soc controls are organized methods for teaching & enforcing conformity
 
  Cases of serious deviance may provoke action by the criminal justice system, a formal response by police, courts, & prison officials to alleged violations of the law  
 
Durkheim held that in modern society social control was slipping because the old forms, found in traditions, which he called mechanical solidarity, had not yet been replaced by the new form, found in the interdependence of society, which he called organic solidarity
 
  See Also:  Durkheim  
  Where soc control fails, we see deviance, collective behavior, soc mvmts, crime, alienation, other social problems, & other forms social behavior that are outside the norm  
Link
Examples of Deviance as a violation of social norms  
  A.  FOLKWAYS are the most informal of norms  
 
Examples of folkways include manners, etiquette, customs, normal behavior, etc. 
 
  B.  MORES are serious norms that may or may not be written into law  
 
Examples of a more include flag burning, questioning someone's religion or politics, etc.
 
  C.  LAWS are a type of norm w/ the support of the state / govt sanctioning either criminal or civil punishment  
  iCRIMINAL LAW is law which the state will prosecute
The body of rules or principles prescribed by authority or established by custom, which a state, community, society, or the like recognizes as binding
 
  iiCIVIL LAW is law which allows one citizen to prosecute ( sue ) another  
  SOCIAL CONTROL   
  Social control includes all social processes used to minimize deviance from social norms; e.g., culture, norms, socialization, law, etc.   
  There are TWO Types of Social Control  
  FORMAL OR DIRECT SOCIAL CONTROL is regulation through the enforcement of normative standards 
It is often done by a person(s) w/ authority & responsibility
 
 
Formal con is defined by legal sanctions & enforced by instits such as the police, the courts, & the various local, state, & fed legislatures
 
  The formal enforcement of norms is done through the threat of & implementation of rewards or punishments by those who represent an org or instit or the whole society  
  The formal agents of socialization act on the basis of rules & laws most of which are written  
 
See Also:  Formal or Direct Social Control  
  INFORMAL OR DIRECT SOCIAL CONTROL is regulation through ideological or cultural manipulation 
It is often done by surrogate human authority such as rules, customs, laws, even machines
 
  Indirect social control is accomplished through socialization  
  Indirect social control is the most powerful type of social control  
 
At the heart of informal social controls are relationships w/ significant others (SOs)
 
  Review:  For Mead, SOs are people whose affection & approval are very important  
  SOs will reward, punish, or use other methods of socialization to enforce the norms of society  
Link
Examples of direct & indirect control  
  Sanctions are rewards for conforming behavior & punishments for nonconforming behavior   
  There are FOUR Types of Sanctions  
  1.  A FORMAL POSITIVE SANCTION  is a formal reward, etc. is applied by a socially recognized actor ( person, organization, institution, etc. ) empowered to give that reward  
  Formal Positive Sanction are well defined & can only be applied by people w/ proper institutional credentials  
Link
Examples of Formal Positive Sanctions  
  2.  An INFORMAL POSITIVE SANCTION is an informal reward, etc. by almost any actor  ( person, organization, etc. )  
  The Functions of Positive Social Control Methods are social control, inducement, & reward  
Link
Examples of Informal Positive Sanctions  
  3.  A FORMAL NEGATIVE SANCTION is a formal punishment, etc. by a socially recognized actor ( person, organization, institution, etc. ) empowered to give that punishment  
  Formal sanctions are well defined and can only be applied by people with proper institutional credentials  
Link
Examples of Formal Negative Sanctions  
  4.  An INFORMAL NEGATIVE SANCTION is an informal punishment, etc. by almost any actor ( person, organization, etc. )   
  The functions of negative social control methods are social control, deterrence, & punishment  
Link
Examples of Informal Negative Sanctions  
Link
Chart of Examples of FOUR Types of Social Control  
  For Durkheim, the positive consequences of deviance and social control include increased solidarity
 

 
Top
 
Chart of Examples of FOUR Types of Social Control
 
Formal
Informal
Positive
Formal Positive
Pay, grades, awards
Informal Positive
Tip, praise, smile, inclusion
Negative
Formal Negative
Fine, pay cut, bad grade, note in a file,
Excommunication from a religious organization, expulsion from high school, & criminal punishment 
Informal Negative
No tip, criticism, scowl, ostracism

 
Top  
Examples of Deviance & Norms
Men w/ long hair, women in pants    Dress
Norms:
Folkways:  dressed in casual clothes for formal occasion
Mores: no shirt in dept. store
Laws: 
Criminal:  no shirt, no shoes in food store
Civil:  copying super model's look

 
Top  
Civil law
Body of law proper to the city as distinct from that common to all nations
Also, the whole system of Roman law
Hence the body of private law developed from Roman law
Law pertaining to the citizen as an individual

 
Top  
Examples of direct & indirect control

Factory Work: 
Supervisor harangues or beats workers to work faster
Supervisor issues penalties
Computer measures output w/ pay proportional to this output
Elementary school:  Teacher constantly making sure child turns in work
College:  Prof establishes goals.  It's up to the student to achieve them


 
Top  
Examples of Formal Positive Sanctions

A raise
An awards dinner
A certificate of achievement
A reward


 
Top  
Examples of Informal Positive Sanctions

Giving an "atta boy"
Taking someone out to lunch for a reward
A pat on the back
A big thank you


 
Top  
Examples of Formal Negative Sanctions

Bad Grades
Expulsion from High School
Prison
A ticket


 
Top  
Examples of Informal Negative Sanctions

Taking someone to the woodshed
A talking to
A frown
Ostracism


 
External
Links

Top

Durkheim on  Social Order & Deviance
External
Links
  -  Video:  Durkheim on Deviance      1:35 
Link
  -  Project:  Durkheim on Deviance, Social Control, & Social Order 
Link
  SOCIAL ORDER IS NOT AUTOMATIC; IT MUST BE MAINTAINED THROUGH A NUMBER OF SOCIAL PROCESSES WHICH ARE ACTIVE EACH & EVERY DAY   
  The key insight of the structural functional approach is that deviance is a necessary element of social organization, especially in establishing social order   
 
Durkheim believed that a major sociological question was the question of social order, which considers how society might establish & maintain social stability & cohesiveness 
 
 
Dev behavior keeps society stable by estbing boundaries, the boundaries btwn normalcy & dev   
  Dev beh establishes boundaries btwn rewarded behavior & punished beh   
  For Durkheim, some amt of dev is a normal part of social organization   
  For Durkheim, social control can help maintain norm violating w/in some limits but it cannot eliminate it   
 
If dev were eliminated, society would be less stable   
 
Regardless of what we do in the name of social control, there will always be some deviance   
  For Durkheim, there is nothing abnormal about deviance in the sense that deviance is found in every society   
  Deviance performs essential social control functions for society   
  THE FUNCTION OF DEVIANCE, BROADLY SPEAKING, IS TO HIGHLIGHT WHAT IS 'NORMAL,' I.E. SOCIAL ORDER, W/ WHAT IS ABNORMAL / DEVIANT / CHAOS   
  A function of deviance is that:   
  a.  it affirms cultural values & norms   
  b.  responding to it clarifies moral boundaries   
  c.  responding to it brings people together   
  d.  it encourages social change   
  The kind of deviance people generate depends on the moral issues they seek to clarify   
  IN COMPARING DURKHEIM W/ OTHER THEORISTS ON SOCIAL ORDER, THERE IS A RANGE OF PROCESSES MAINTAINING IT, INCLUDING:  SOCIAL APPROVAL, FORCE, CIVIC PARTICIPATION, ECON INCENTIVES, ETC.   
  In relation to the nature of social order, Durkheim contrasts his own view to Hobbes, the utilitarians, St. Simon, & Comte   
  Hobbes believed that social order is result of fear of a Leviathan, a central power   
  St. Simon & Comte both advocated a Hobbesean solution to problem of order   
  In relation to the social order, many social theorists w/ Hobbesean leanings believe that because of industrial development, conflicts of interest, urbanization, etc., society is tearing at the very social fabric that holds it together 
 
  For the many social theorists w/ Hobbesean leanings concerned w/ maintaining the social order, the solution was often state imposed social peace   
  Utilitarians such as JS Mill & Harriet Taylor were diametrically opposed to the Hobbesean state 
 
  Utilitarians believed that central authority must be eliminated 
 
  For Durkheim, social order & harmony resulted from the division of labor 
 
  Order was an automatic consequence of economic system where every individual pursues their own interests 
 
  The modern era is characterized by laissez faire capitalism wherein the economy works best when left alone & will create the "greatest good of the greatest number" 
 
  See Also:  false/class consciousness, ideology, interests 
 
  Durkheim recognized the successes & the failures of the utilitarian position 
 
 
THE SOCIAL ORDER IS BASED ON MECHANICAL OR ORGANIC SOLIDARITY 
 
  Durkheim developed the concepts of mechanical & organic solidarity to denote the "social glue" which held the respective traditional & modern social fabrics together   
 
See Also:  Mechanical & Organic Solidarity 
 
  For Durkheim, the problem of social order occurs primarily when, during the process of modernization, mechanical solidarity breaks down, & is not yet replaced w/ organic solidarity 
 
  The problem of social order may also occur when a given traditional or modern society becomes so stressed that solidarity is weakened or destroyed 
 
  Anomie, deviance & crime exist in all societies as they change at the margins & for boundary maintenance, etc., but they become social problems when solidarity breaks down 
 
  Deviance is so crucial to social order that societies lacking a given amount of it would redefine acceptable behavior to create deviance 
 
  Regarding deviance & dysfunctions, Durkheim believed that deviance, beyond a certain level, threatens the social order and can be dysfunctional 
 
  For Durkheim, high levels of immigration may be a major social problem, but not because of economic or job issues 
 
  Immigration is a major problem in our modern society because immigrants do not know the norms & laws of this country & therefore are a source of social instability 
 
  The instability fostered by immigration can be functional if it is limited & the society can absorb & integrate the new culture 
 
  The instability inherent in immigration can undermine the old order creating conflict, instability, anomie, crime, deviance, etc. 
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on   Durkheim on Crime
External
Links
  -  Project:  Public Punishment 
Link
  DURKHEIM & MANY FUNCTIONALISTS HOLD THE CONTROVERSIAL POSITION THAT CRIME IS FUNCTIONAL FOR SOCIETY   
  Durkheim viewed a limited amount of crime as functional for society, however if crime became too pervasive, this was a symptom of anomie & the breakdown of the social order   
  Durkheim believed that an affinity for crime was the result of social forces   
  Durkheim, as he often did, developed his own position in direct opposition to other prevailing ideas of his time (late 1800s) 
 
  Durkheim directly refuted the positions that an affinity for crime was the result of something that is in individuals' psychological or physiological makeup   
  1.  DURKHEIM'S ANOMIC EXPLANATION OF CRIME HOLDS THAT THE BREAKDOWN OF NORMS CAUSES CRIME 
 
  Durkheim developed the concept of anomie, which is a condition of normlessness in society   
  In a society, w/in the normal range of anomie we find that there are always some people who are outside the system 
 
  In a society, outside of the normal range of anomie we find that people engage in more deviant behavior, crime, riot, revolution, etc.   
  Anomie occurs at some normal level in society, but becomes socially pathological when the social order breaks down & anomie becomes widespread creating waves of deviance, crime, chaos, etc.   
  See Also:  The Problem of Social Order   
   2.  DURKHEIM'S SOLIDARITY EXPLANATION OF CRIME IS THAT DEVIANCE EXISTS BECAUSE SOCIETY MUST HAVE A SET OF BEHAVIORAL EXPECTATIONS THAT HELP TO DEFINE THE CHARACTER OF THAT SOCIETY 
 
  For Durkheim & the functionalists there are positive consequences of deviance & social control:   
  Deviance / crime promotes solidarity in mainstream society 
 
  Deviance / crime sets boundaries   
  Deviance is so crucial to social order that societies lacking it would redefine acceptable behavior to create deviance 
 
  Conflict theorists would note that deviance has many other positive consequences, i.e., it is a source of innovation 
 
  There are also dysfunctions of deviance in that deviance beyond a certain level threatens the social order 
 
  DURKHEIM HOLDS THAT PUBLIC PUNISHMENT IS FUNCTIONAL BECAUSE IT SETS BOUNDARIES & ALLOWS US TO VIEW CRIMINALS AS DEVIANTS / OUTSIDERS   
  Public punishment is good for society 
 
  Public punishment is good for society not for the thrill, but because it allows us to see us as good & others as bad & the experience of a communal punishment against an offender builds solidarity   
  Public punishment is functional for society because it creates an in group w/ a norm of obeying the law; i.e. creates solidarity around the law   
  Public punishment is functional for society because the communal experience of punishing builds solidarity   
  Durkheim's view of the purpose of punishment is NOT to deter or correct the offender, rather it is to maintain the fundamental values of the community   
  Functionalists, including Durkheim, argue that the use of coercive social control is legitimate because laws are enacted by representatives of the people in the interest of the people   

The End
 
Top