Links |
|
Links |
|||
|
Globalization | ||||
|
Immanuel Wallerstein | ||||
|
World Systems Theory | ||||
|
Americanization | ||||
|
Economic Policies on Globalization | ||||
|
Global Content | ||||
|
The Effects of Globalization | ||||
|
The Effects of Globalization in the US | ||||
|
Low Wages | ||||
|
Global Village | ||||
|
Global Apparel | ||||
|
Textile Sweat Shops | ||||
|
Global Office | ||||
|
Global Banking | ||||
|
Global Auto | ||||
|
Global Assembly Line | ||||
|
The Steel Industry & Globalization | ||||
|
Intl Div Labor | ||||
|
Trade Policy . | ||||
|
Fordism | ||||
|
A Socio Historical Overview | ||||
|
Industrial Age | ||||
|
The Era of Global Capitalism | ||||
|
The Post Industrial Age | ||||
|
Stratification in the Industrialism | ||||
|
World Agencies | ||||
|
Asian Pacific Econ Cooperation (APEC) | ||||
|
European Union (EU) | ||||
|
International Monetary Fund (IMF) | ||||
|
World Bank | ||||
|
World Econ Forum | ||||
|
World Trade Organization (WTO) | ||||
|
Countries List | ||||
|
Costa Rica | ||||
|
Ecuador | ||||
|
Germany | ||||
|
Japan | ||||
|
USA | ||||
|
Stagnation, Globalization & the NWO |
Links |
|
Links |
|
- Project: Globalization & the Standardization of Culture |
|
||
|
GLOBALIZATION IS THE INTERCONNECTEDNESS OF DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE WORLD THROUGH ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL, POLITICAL, CULTURAL, ETC. CONVERGENCE & CHANGE |
|
|
|
Globalization is a trend whereby production, competition, & economic exchange increasingly occur on a worldwide scale |
|
|
|
Given the impact of globalization, there is almost no remote place on Earth |
|
|
|
The effects of globalization include the growth of multinational corps., an increase in international trade, the creation & mystification of global content, the internationalization of capital markets, the creation of nascent world govt. & global regulatory agencies, the homogenization of culture, creating a global western culture, and the polarization of culture, creating a clash of cultures aka, cultural wars |
|
|
|
See Also: The Effects of Globalization | ||
Globalization has been going on since international trade began | |||
Wallerstein's world systems theory views world capitalism as beginning in the middle ages as the Europeans began their "Age of Exploration" & such nations as Italy, Spain & Portugal became world powers based on international trade & colonization | |||
The trend of international trade & globalization is in a period of unprecedented acceleration | |||
Researchers Chase Dunn, Kawano, & Brewer (2000) found that world trade, in relation to domestic production, grew rapidly over a 160 yr. period during the 1800s & 1900s | |||
Researchers Chase Dunn, Kawano, & Brewer found that the long term trend of globalization, there are three distinct surges of globalization: | |||
- about 1845 to 1880 | |||
- about 1900 to 1925 | |||
- about 1970 to present | |||
|
Economics & culture are perhaps the strongest globalizing forces
How? |
|
|
|
The global economy is specializing through locational flexibility |
|
|
|
The global economy is specializing in some countries or regions
through:
- extracting raw materials - processing raw materials - manufacturing the raw materials into parts - assembling parts - consuming finished good |
|
|
|
- Examples of globalized production include the Plastic Hoover vacuum & the Ford "World Car" |
|
|
|
There are over 800 mm people who are tied directly to global mkt in the US, Europe, & Japan |
|
|
|
The core nations have totally globalized economies & many other peripheral & semi peripheral countries are partially globalized | ||
|
Global culture(s) are rising & falling
Strong cultures are infectious Which culture is the most well known word in the world? |
|
|
|
Global forces are so powerful, they are affecting the global physical env |
|
|
|
THERE ARE FIVE FEATURES OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC & CULTURAL SYSTEMS INCLUDING: COMPLEMENTARITY, INTL DIV OF LABOR, ECON OF SCALE, TRANSFERABILITY, DIFFUSION |
|
|
The features of global econ & cultural systems include | |||
|
1. complementarity, which occurs when demand in one place is complemented by supply in another |
|
|
|
2. the international division of labor, which is the specialization of labor by country |
|
|
|
3. economies of scale, which are efficiencies created by world scale operations |
|
|
|
4. transferability, which is the ability to move capital, skills, technology, or products creates deindustrialization in the core & economic development in the periphery |
|
|
|
5. spatial diffusion, which is expansion, relocation, hierarchical: the way things spread through space over time |
|
|
FACTORS AFFECTING GLOBALIZATION INCLUDE TECH SYS, CONSUMER MKTS, DIV OF LABOR, & FINANCE | |||
|
There are FOUR factors affecting globalization & local economic development, including the international |
|
|
|
1. technical systems, which today are almost all international in scope |
|
|
2. consumer markets, which today are characterized by global patterns of consumption as seen in people around the world who enjoy McDonalds, Coke, etc. |
|
||
|
As late as the 70s only a few peripheral nations were open to intl trade & only 33 % of the wkrs in centrally planned econs: SU, China, etc. |
|
|
As late as the 70s in the core countries only 33 % of the wkrs were not in the world sys because of trade barriers, etc. | |||
|
In the 00s, only 10% of the entire world's wkrs are outside of the global econ |
|
|
|
3. division of labor, which today results in complex & simple products being constructed w/ parts from several nations, assembled in another nation, & sold in another | ||
|
4. finance, which operates 24 hrs a day following the business day in Am, Japan, Asia, & Europe | ||
|
Americanization is a powerful quality of globalization | ||
GLOBALIZATION THEORIES INCLUDE SUSTAINABLE DEV TH, MODERNIZATION TH, DEPENDENCY TH, & WORLD SYS TH | |||
Sustainable development theory examines how nations can encourage economic growth in a way that will benefit those nations & their people & not just multinational corporations in a manner that can be sustained over the long run w/o further damage of the environment | |||
Sustainable development theory asks who really benefits when international corps build plants or extract natural resources in developing countries | |||
Modernization theory examines how both the corporations & those who live in developing countries benefit because of the jobs & new markets that are created by the investment of multinational corps. | |||
Dependency theory argues that corporations take wealth out of the developing countries & gain control of resources that could otherwise have been developed & benefited from by the people living in the countries | |||
World systems theory holds that all of history may be understood as a conflict btwn three sets of nations, the core, the semi periphery, & the periphery, all of whom may form strategic alliances to further their own interests |
|
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
|
The problems of globalization are many & the econ policies of govts & the strategies of multi-national & supra-national corps may either help or exacerbate those problems... or both |
|
|||
|
See Also: Deindustrialization | ||||
|
See Also: Stagnation, Globalization, & the New World Order | ||||
|
American firms respond inadequately to the heightened competition |
|
|||
For most elites & corps, the econ policies & business strategies on globalization appear to be rational; i.e., good for their profits | |||||
For most non elite classes & nations, the econ policies & business strategies on globalization appear to be irrational, i.e., bad for their economies | |||||
Rationality is a world view that does not always operate universally in that what is rational for one, may not be rational for another | |||||
See Also: Rationality | |||||
See Also: Epistemology & Theories of Knowledge | |||||
In general, econ policies include both govt laws & regs as well as major business strategies | |||||
|
Am firms respond to globalization w/ FOUR main strategies, including exporting jobs, driving down wages, deskilling, & paper entrepreneurialism |
|
|||
|
Am firms began to respond directly to globalization in the 1990s by increasing product quality, focusing on the development of human capital, & increasing investment in workers' training & R & D |
|
|||
|
Paper entrepreneurialism (Reich, 1992) is the manipulation of balance sheets, profit margins, stock prices, etc. in lieu of the development of profit producing assets such as capital investment, tech, & people |
|
|||
|
Paper entrepreneurialism occurs when corps buy & sell companies to make a profit rather than building solid businesses |
|
|||
|
Paper entrepreneurialism & even globalization itself depend on the increased, worldwide mobility of capital |
|
|||
|
The mobility of capital has been increased by FOUR factors, including the technology of the internet & communication systems, by the globalization of banking & financial systems, by the development of transportation systems, & by the changes to laws & regs allowing for mobility of capital |
|
|||
|
See Also: Global Banking | ||||
|
Few laws & regs have been developed to deal w/ the globalization of banking & trade & most have been written to streamline such transactions for the elites w/ little thought to security or how such transactions affect the lower classes |
|
|||
|
Since 9-11, there is a commitment to bringing global financial transactions under govt control, but little has been done |
|
|||
|
The concentration of capital continues to increase, but is becoming concentrated globally as major multinational corps, that previously had some type of national allegiance, such as Chrysler, merge w/ foreign multinationals to become supranational corps w/ no allegiance to anyone except the global elites that control & own them |
|
|||
|
Examples: BP Amoco, Daimler Chrysler (now just Daimler) |
|
|||
|
See Also: Market Concentration | ||||
The growth of supranational corps, the concentration of capital, globalization itself is both a cause & effect of capital mobility & the changes is laws & regs that govern such transactions | |||||
Large corps have the financial power & political leverage to take advantage of new worldwide networks of production & mkting | |||||
Historically capital was less mobile than labor because it was capital investments such as factories had a long life & could not easily be moved to a new location because the skills to build a particular local factory were also local | |||||
Today, capital is more mobile because factories have a shorter life & the skills to build them can be imported; e.g. little Americas in Saudi Arabia | |||||
Historically capital was less mobile than labor because it was risky to invest in a foreign locale because of unknown laws, because of currency exchange problems, etc., & because of the animosity towards foreigners, | |||||
Today, capital is more mobile because laws are being synchronized worldwide, & are well understood, & because currency exchange is now completely routinized & nearly all risk can be hedged | |||||
Today, there is still animosity towards foreigners, but many more nations are attempting to moderate such animosity because they understand there econ development is dependent upon it | |||||
Historically capital was less mobile than labor because it was difficult & expensive to ship raw materials for production, as well as finished products for sale | |||||
Today, capital is more mobile because global transportation systems have been developed to such an extent that anyone can ship a package anywhere in the world in a few days for under $50, & likewise it is possible to ship goods to the mkt for a very reasonable amount | |||||
Historically, labor was more mobile than capital because the working class had little property ownership & workers had little to lose except for the very important family network that sustained them at home | |||||
Historically, the mobility of labor was dependent on imperialism to subdue local populations to accept foreign labor; e.g., the European working class colonizing the US, the British colonizing India, etc. | |||||
Historically, despite imperialism, labor moving to a new nation was extremely risky | |||||
|
Today, labor is less mobile than capital because the working & middle class has an investment in their home, & because the decline of imperialism makes it difficult for a person or family to move to another country | ||||
Two typical corp strategies for globalization that create stagnation in the US are relocation of plants to new regions or nations & low wage businesses | |||||
Relocation creates tax & depreciation breaks for the new business, but the costs of new schools & public services, & moving families are externalities that must all be borne by those other than the corps | |||||
See Also: Externalities | |||||
Part of the corp strategy of relocation is to entice communities to offer the best deal to attract companies | |||||
When firms relocate, the communities experiencing the closed firm also experience a lost tax base, increased welfare, crime, etc., & the closing schools & other public services | |||||
The low wage strategy has created a declining middle class w/ commensurate growth in lower & upper classes | |||||
In constant $s, average wages increased steadily in U.S. until the 70s when they peaked at $12 | |||||
Since then they have fallen 15% to $10. The first real uptick in wages was in 1997 when wages increased 1% | |||||
Will it continue? The present generation of new workers future depends on it | |||||
|
The strategy of driving down the wages of Am workers is carried out through the demands for concessions from unions |
|
|||
|
If corps can break or cow a union, they can control nearly all the labor in a region |
|
|||
|
Threats of bankruptcy, plant closings, transference to a new region or nation, etc. back up threats to lower wages & benefits |
|
|||
|
A key corp strategy to adjust to global competition is downsizing | ||||
|
Workforce downsizings are now common, & a mgr or consultant may specialize in downsizing; i.e., the hatchet man | ||||
|
Firms downsize core employment, force the remaining workers to do more, & subcontract many functions to other regions or nations | ||||
The upside of downsizing is that efficiency does often rise, but there are always the externalized costs of relocation, & sometimes the costs of overwork | |||||
See Also: Externalities | |||||
Firms are also utilizing the flexibility strategy through matching their resources to mkt needs | |||||
W/ the advent of mass mfr w/ the industrial revolution, flexibility & the parallel wide choice of product types & quality had decreased w/ the decrease of small flexible producers | |||||
W/ the advent of flexible mfr, some of this flexibility & product choice has returned | |||||
As discussed above, because rationality is circumscribed, the business strategies of exporting jobs & reducing wages at home has secured profits for some firms, but this strategy is costly for the Am econ as a whole |
|
||||
See Also: Stagnation, Globalization, & the NWO | |||||
For most of the middle- & lower classes, govt policies & business strategies which a rational policy focusing on increasing productivity rather than exporting jobs & driving down wages is preferable to the current policies on globalization | |||||
|
What has been good for supra-national corps has not been good for the economy |
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
The concept of global content denotes that products in the globalized market place are frequently a mixture of labor, parts, resources, etc. from a variety of nations |
|
||||
Content, in economics, usually refers only to the nation of origin |
|
||||
Frequently the few nations that require content labeling only require the listing of one producer, the largest single producer out of all of the producers of one product | |||||
An "American" car today may be made of parts assembled in Canada, Mexico, France, & Japan, as well as the US |
|
||||
Cars from any nation usually have major portions produced in several nations |
|
||||
Multinational corps are multinational not only in the sense that they sell their products worldwide, but also in the sense that they produce their products worldwide |
|
||||
While the primary issue related to global content is often the labor & resources that make up a product, other issues are becoming increasingly important including child labor, sweat shop labor, hormonal & chemical additives, genetic engineering, disease prone products (e.g. mad cow), & more |
|
||||
Meat products from the US have frequently been banned from Japan because of the fear of mad cow disease |
|
||||
Wood products from Canada have been banned from the US because of govt subsidies of the Canadian timber industry |
|
||||
The US govt is constantly surveying imported products to eliminated those w/ child labor & sweatshop labor |
|
||||
US dairy products have been banned from the EU because the US allows the use of the hormone BGH in dairy production & thus it is in our milk, cheese & other dairy products |
|
||||
The US dairy industry has managed to defeat every attempt to have the content of its products labeled, even in the US, as to whether it contains BGH or not |
|
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
- Project: Video: CNN 5: The Hispanic Economic Gap |
|
||||
- Video: CNN 5: The Hispanic Economic Gap 2:10 min |
|
||||
GLOBAL COMPETITION HAS OUTPERFORMED MANY US INDUSTRIES | |||||
As a result of globalization & other social, political, & economic factors, the US has lost its econ dominance |
|
||||
After WW2, the US became the unchallenged econ superpower, dominating manufacturing & services |
|
||||
The 1950s & the 1960s were the US's econ & cultural heydays |
|
||||
As other core nations recovered from WW2, & as developing nations grew, more & more countries developed the capacity to produce products of comparable or greater worth than the US |
|
||||
An example of the falling econ dominance of the US & the rising economic influence of other nations is that the 1960s, Japan & Korea had almost none of the world or US auto mkt, today they have a substantial proportion of both the US & world auto mkt |
|
||||
In 2003, Toyota displaced Ford at the number two car seller in the US |
|
||||
In 2007, Toyota surpassed GM & became the largest auto seller in the US | |||||
In the early 1950s, the US produced about 60% of the world's manufactured products, & by the early 1980s, the US produced less than 30% of the world's products |
|
||||
In 2000, the GNP of the EC is greater than that of the US |
|
||||
In the 1990s, Japanese per capita income exceeded that of the US, & thus w/ less than half of the US's population, Japan had 2/3s of the GNP of the US |
|
||||
OTHER ECON POWERS SUCH AS JAPAN HAVE HAD INDUSTRIES OUT COMPETED | |||||
Since the late 1990s, Japan & other Pacific rim countries have an economic crisis, resulting in loss of Japanese econ power |
|
||||
In general, nations have a competitive advantage in the world mkt if they pay lower wages, though low wages create severe disadvantages that are often externalized economic costs, falling on the national govt. & the national social structure |
|
||||
An example of a competitive advantage in low wages is seen in the Korean Hyundai corp who pays its workers less than comparable workers in the US, Europe, & Japan |
|
||||
Low wages are not the only competitive advantage a nation may have |
|
||||
The US & many core nations have exported jobs to the semi peripheral & peripheral nations where wages are at their lowest |
|
||||
GLOBAL CORPS LOOK FOR NOT ONLY CHEAP WAGES BUT ALSO 'CHEAP WKING CONDITIONS' | |||||
While the US has exported jobs to nations around the world, the northern border region of Mexico has gained more US jobs & factories than any other single nation |
|
||||
Foreign owned plants in northern Mexico are called maquiladores |
|
||||
The US owned maquiladores are notorious for low wages, unsafe working conditions, envl degradation, & large profits | |||||
|
In the maquiladores, workers are paid 15 to 20% of what US workers earn | ||||
In the maquiladores, lax environmental & safety controls lower costs for the owners, but raise costs, which are usually economically externalized to the national govt. & the national social structures | |||||
See Also: Low Wages |
Links |
|
Links |
|||
- Supplement: Articles on the Living Wage Debate |
|
||||
IN THE US, BUT NOT MOST OTHER CORE NATIONS, A FULL TIME WKR MAY NOT BE ABOVE THE POVERTY LINE | |||||
In 2000, 12% of poor people worked full time |
|
||||
The number of of the working poor more than doubled since 1978, because the minimum wage rarely increases at the rate of inflation |
|
||||
In 2001, the minimum wage was $5.15 / hr. or $10,712 / yr. |
|
||||
In 2003, the minimum wage is $5.50 / hr. or $11,440 / yr. |
|
||||
The minimum wage will does not provide a living above the poverty line for a couple & is more than $7,000 below the poverty line for a family of four |
|
||||
Because of low pay, many military families live below the poverty line & are eligible for food stamps & welfare |
|
||||
The minimum wage & military pay are political footballs & therefore they have not been raised regularly to adjust for inflation |
|
||||
In 1996, the minimum wage had only 2/3s of the purchasing power that it did in 1968 | |||||
MIN WAGE PROPONENTS HOLD THAT IT COULD BE USED TO ELIMINATE POVERTY; OPPONENTS HOLD THAT IT IS UNFAIR TO BUSINESS & IT SLOWS JOB GROWTH | |||||
Opponents of the minimum wage believe that it costs small & corporate business too much money, resulting in fewer low wage jobs, & thus ultimately hurting the people it is supposed to help |
|
||||
Proponents of the minimum wage believe it helps the poor, should be higher, & has little effect on the number of low wage jobs because these jobs are rarely mechanized, businesses cannot operate w/ less of these jobs, & the costs can generally be passed on the the customer |
|
||||
Because of deindustrialization & other changes in the economic structure, low wage jobs were one of the fastest growing sectors of the econ in the 1980s & 90s, & there was little growth in middle class jobs |
|
||||
|
Deindustrialization, the growth of low wage jobs, & slow growth in middle class jobs has resulted in falling incomes for the lower & middle classes, & a lower median income |
|
|||
|
In 2005, real wages for US wkrs fell 1/2 %, continuing the trend of falling wages that has characterized the 1st world wkforce since the late 1970s (except for a brief 3 yr period during the end of the Clinton Admin when wages rose) |
|
|||
WELFARE REFORM HAS MADE IT MORE DIFFICULT FOR THE WKING POOR TO RECEIVE ANY KIND OF AID | |||||
|
A major goal of the Welfare to Work Program is to move people off of welfare to work, & to provide a living for them |
|
|||
|
The Welfare to Work Program has moved many people off of welfare, but has not provided a living for them in that they earn wages at or below the min wage |
|
|||
Welfare to Work Programs have moved many people from govt subsidies to minimum wage jobs, w/ no health benefits or chances for advancement | |||||
Jobs, w/ no health benefits or chances for advancement cannot sustain an individual or family in the long term because one cannot save for or weather any of life's emergencies or make any of life's major purchases such as an auto & home | |||||
Jobs, w/ no health benefits or chances for advancement are called dead end jobs | |||||
The living wage movement is attempting to eliminate dead end jobs by raising minimum wage to a point where one has health benefits & the possibility of saving | |||||
The living wage movement is not operating at the national level trying to get Congress to increase the minimum wage | |||||
The living wage movement is operating at the state, local, & the individual enterprise level & thus small groups of dedicated individuals are having an impact |
|
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
Sweatshops are shops in which workers are employed under the sweating system |
|
||||
The sweating system is the industrial method involved in employing workers at low wages, during overlong hours, under unsanitary, in unsafe or otherwise unfavorable conditions, often w/ reference to work let out by contract to middlemen, to be done in inadequate workshops or at the home of the workers |
|
||||
The archaic meaning of sweat is to exert one's self strenuously, to work hard, labor, or toil |
|
||||
A sweatshop usually is illegally organized; operates in the underground economy; employs workers at low wages & long hours; operates in unsafe working conditions; uses exploited groups of people such as people w/ no options for other jobs, immigrants, women, & children |
|
||||
Sweatshops were originally a result of the putting out system, & both were then replaced by the early factory system |
|
||||
In the core nations, factory conditions eventually improved due to the Labor Mvmt & public outcry from books & exposes such as Upton Sinclair's The Jungle & from workplace tragedies such as the Triangle Fire |
|
||||
Sweatshops have reemerged in the textile & garment industries in the core nations as a result of the competitive of globalization & as a result of the "unregulation" of much of the economy which was caused by govt downsizing which began under the Reagan admin in the early 1980s | |||||
In the 1970s there were fewer than 200 garment sweatshops, by the 1980s there were btwn 3,000 & 4,000 sweatshops in NY employing 50 to 70 K workers |
|
||||
Today sweatshop workers are often illegal immigrants from the Caribbean, Latin Am, & the Orient |
|
||||
Ross & Trachte, 1983, consider sweatshops to be a vital link in the processes of corp, global capitalism |
|
||||
Sweatshops have sprung up on the West Coast employing Asian & Latin Am illegal immigrants |
|
||||
College students have become aware of the roll of sweatshop labor in the production of popular brands of clothing because of such orgs as the United Students Against Sweatshops |
|
||||
See Also: United Students Against Sweatshops www.usanet.org |
|
||||
Some mfr's such as Nike have responded by establishing regulations limiting sweatshop labor, child labor, unsafe working conditions, & other conditions that core nations would consider to be exploitative |
|
|
|
Links |
|
Links |
||||||||||||
DURING THE POST INDL ERA, THE GLOBAL AUTO IND DOMINATES MEANING THAT IN ALL MAJOR NATIONS THERE IS SIGNIFICANT FOREIGN COMPETITION | ||||||||||||||
During the 1980s, Japanese companies created over 10,000 jobs in TN | ||||||||||||||
|
The development of the early auto industry, i.e. pre globalization, was characterized by an industry of small, entrepreneurial businessmen & inventors | |||||||||||||
In the pre globalized auto ind, many carriage makers, bicycle makes & mechanics were early innovators | ||||||||||||||
GLOBALIZATION DEVELOPED AS RATIONALIZED PRODUCTION SYSTEMS MATURED | ||||||||||||||
The early success of American auto industry is traceable to pioneering efforts in the creation of formally rational systems | ||||||||||||||
There were FOUR early innovations in the formal rational systems
of the auto ind, including:
|
||||||||||||||
Japanese industrialists transported rational system techniques to Japan | ||||||||||||||
General MacArthur & an industrialist named Demming to head the Japanese Ministry of Industry & Technological Innovation ( MITI ) | ||||||||||||||
Demming also brought QCC's to Japan because the idea was rejected by Am auto makers | ||||||||||||||
The Japanese added TWO formally rational systems, which Americans have
since adopted, including:
a. the just in time inventory system b. permanent employment |
||||||||||||||
The Japanese also developed the other three types of rational systems including substantive rationality, intellectual rationality, & practical rationality | ||||||||||||||
See Also: Rationalization | ||||||||||||||
a. Substantive rationality is seen in the Japanese auto ind in that they utilize the value of subordination of the individual to the group & even subordination of the individual to the corporation | ||||||||||||||
|
Japanese wkrs were motivated by assembly line controls & group solidarity | |||||||||||||
The Japanese worked hard not only because of the demands of the formally rational assembly line such as surveillance, pay incentives, etc. | ||||||||||||||
J wkrs also wanted to advance the interests of their work group & the corporation | ||||||||||||||
b. Intellectual rationality is seen in the Japanese auto ind in that they created & used more engineers than the US | ||||||||||||||
Japanese accorded a significant role to intellectual rationality in the auto industry as a result of their societal value for learning & education | ||||||||||||||
c. Practical rationality is seen in the Japanese auto ind in that they developed QC's to involve line workers in product improvement | ||||||||||||||
JAPANESE AUTO MAKERS RATIONALIZED UTILIZATION OF PROFL WKRS ON THE PRODUCTION LINE VIA WKR PARTICIPATION TECHNIQUES | ||||||||||||||
Japanese auto developed QC's to involve line workers in product improvement | ||||||||||||||
Japanese utilized practical rationality via Quality Circles aka Quality Control Circles | ||||||||||||||
Workers meet, usually on their own time & discuss ways to improve production in their day to day activities | ||||||||||||||
Developing all 4 forms of rationality means developing systems, corporate values, & hi & low skilled workers | ||||||||||||||
Thus, the Japanese utilize the skills of their least skilled workers & their best trained workers | ||||||||||||||
Americans have largely ignored both sets of workers, expecting little more than a mindless eight hour work day | ||||||||||||||
|
Japanese auto outperformed US auto by developing hyper rational systems while Americans continued w/ formally rational systems | |||||||||||||
Japanese industry exploited all four types of rationality to create a hyper rational system | ||||||||||||||
Americans relied almost exclusively on formal rationality | ||||||||||||||
Hyper rationality allowed Japanese auto to catch up to & then far outdistance American auto in the 1970s & 80s | ||||||||||||||
The US auto inc began to copy some Japanese techniques & so begin to catch up... to a limited extent | ||||||||||||||
Hyper rationality in the auto industry was one major factor that allowed it to develop into a global system | ||||||||||||||
See Also: Rationalization & Hyper rationalization | ||||||||||||||
See Also: Globalization | ||||||||||||||
The global auto industry produces 40 mm vehicles yearly from 10 global corps | ||||||||||||||
GLOBALIZATION OFTEN MEANS MERGERS & BANKRUPTCIES AS FORMER COMPETITORS JOIN FORCES, & SOME PRODUCERS GO OUT OF BUSINESS | ||||||||||||||
GM, Ford Toyota, VW, Nissan, Fiat, Peugeot Citron, Honda, Mitsubishi, Renault, Chrysler (which merged w/ Mercedes in 2000) | ||||||||||||||
In 1996, the top 41 largest auto mfr's had 244 strat alliances to share parts & establish joint ventures | ||||||||||||||
|
Ford Motor Company developed the first global assembly line | |||||||||||||
The Ford Fiesta was the first in series of Fords "world cars" | ||||||||||||||
The "World Car" became a negative selling point during the deindustrialization of the 70s | ||||||||||||||
Some Fords are now produced in 15 nations on 3 continents | ||||||||||||||
Ford's world car is designed to sell in Europe, So Am, No Am, Asia | ||||||||||||||
Ford's world car is assembled in several location from parts manufactured in an even greater number of locations | ||||||||||||||
Fiesta followed by Escort, Mondo, Contour | ||||||||||||||
Escorts are made & assembled in 15 countries in 3 continents | ||||||||||||||
Ford's international subsidiaries once were independent, now are functionally integrated | ||||||||||||||
See also: Fordism | ||||||||||||||
Volkswagen's global assembly line produces in 16 nations on 5 continents | ||||||||||||||
The Rabbit / Golf, which has been in production since 1975, uses hub model w/ the main plant in Wolfsburg, Germany | ||||||||||||||
VW sends parts for the Rabbit / Golf & finished vehicles to:
|
Links |
|
Links |
|
The international division of labor makes the global assembly line possible |
|
||
Most global corporations are conglomerates who produce a variety of products |
|
||
In 1973, global stagflation, a combination of stagnated a economy (recession) & inflation, resulted as OPEC raised oil prices | |||
As of the 2000s, there has never been another case of global economic woes | |||
In 73, global strategies did not seem so efficient | |||
Global commodity chains are global networks of
- labor - raw materials - production processes - markets which results in delivery of finished product |
|||
Commodity chains have grown longer, into global dimensions | |||
There are FOUR advantages of global assembly lines | |||
1. One advantage of a global assembly line is that standardized global production maximizes the economies of scale | |||
Corporations push the creation of global, standardized markets | |||
2. One advantage of a global assembly line is the utilization of least cost methods | |||
Wages in core countries are 25 to 75 times the wages in peripheral
countries
$50,000 = $25 / hr in core 2,000 = 1/hr in periphery |
|||
Thus production assembly can be done where labor is cheapest, while accounting for nearness to raw materials & markets | |||
3. One advantage of a global assembly line is that mfrs gain independence from single source suppliers | |||
Today business to business e-bidding is the fastest growing sector of internet | |||
Business to business e-bidding was hailed by the then Fed Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan as a great efficiency creator | |||
W/ business to business e-bidding, corp's put a bid on the internet for the cheapest product or service | |||
Corps used to have loyalty to suppliers, but that is fading | |||
4. One advantage of a global assembly line is that strategic alliances are possible | |||
Global assembly lines have FOUR advantages, including: | |||
a. allowing transnational corps to link up w/ local "insiders" to tap into local markets | |||
b. quick, inexpensive means to exchange info about technology, products, & processes | |||
c. the reduction of the costs of product development | |||
d. spreading out the costs of market research | |||
Peripheral govts encourage subcontracting to their nation's businesses | |||
Peripheral govts offer incentives to transnational corps
including:
- tax holidays - export processing zones (EPZ's) - minimization of govt bureaucracy - no foreign exchange controls - plentiful factory space, etc. |
|||
The US & the World Bank back regimes that support globalized production & have pushed for austerity programs to make labor cheap in peripheral countries | |||
The desire of many peripheral countries is to follow path of economic development from labor intensive industry to capital intensive, hi tech goods as have Singapore & So Korea |
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
|
The division of labor is workplace relationship where different workers carry out different steps in producing a product or the specialization of work tasks, by means of which different occupations are combined w/in a production system |
|
|||
THE IDOL IS THE PARTITION OF WORK TASKS AMONG NOT ONLY WORKERS, BUT ALSO REGIONS & NATIONS | |||||
|
The international division of labor (IDOL) is simply the workplace relationship where the differentiation of production steps & specialization of work tasks is carried out in different nations around the globe | ||||
|
The international division of labor has always existed, but evolved rapidly on EIGHT fronts since the late 1950s |
|
|||
|
There are TEN FEATURES of the IDOL including:
1. the decline of the US 2. deindustrialization & globalization 3. producer services 4. globalization of consumer mkts 5. trade blocks 6. supra natl corps 7. NGOs 8. hi tech 9. harm to some in core nations 10. harm to some in non core nations |
||||
|
1. THE US HAS DECLINED AS AN INDUSTRIAL, ECONOMIC, & POLITICAL POWER RELATIVE TO THE REST OF THE CORE NATIONS |
|
|||
|
The US has declined because of loss in economic power because of our military adventurism, unwise strategic political & econ decisions, & growing intl competition |
|
|||
|
The US spends more on its defense than the rest of the world combined | ||||
|
The US has gained & lost power in various spheres such as:
- the gain of power in the form of global western culture - the collapse of the USSR & its transformation into Russia & other nations - the ascendancy of Euro & Jap as powerful econ competitors - militarily the rise of our techl prowess but limited success, failure, in regional wars |
|
|||
|
2. THE INTERNATIONAL DIVISION OF LABOR HAS OCCURRED VIA DEINDUSTRIALIZATION & GLOBALIZATION |
|
|||
|
Mfr production has been decentralized & transferred, beginning in the 1970s, from core to peripheral countries |
|
|||
|
One reason for the IDOL & deindustrialization is cheaper wages in non core nations |
|
|||
|
See CG OH Figure 2.20 International differences in wages |
|
|||
|
The mvmt of mfr jobs to non core nations is called deindustrialization by US intellectuals & it signifies that US lost industry to the periphery |
|
|||
|
Deindustrialization is the relative decline in industrial production & employment in core regions as a result of the development of information technology & the export of traditional industries to semi peripheral & peripheral nations | ||||
See Also: Deindustrialization | |||||
|
The processes of the IDOL & deindustrialization are part of a larger phenomenon called globalization, which is occurring at all levels of social structure & culture including, as discussed here, the econ sector, but also including politics, culture, religion, & more | ||||
Globalization is the interconnectedness of different parts of the world through economic, environmental, political, cultural, etc. convergence ( change ) | |||||
See Also: Globalization | |||||
3. PRODUCER SERVICES ARISE & REPLACE THE CORE MANUFACTURING CORE INDUSTRIES | |||||
|
Producer services arise, such as info analysis, insurance, mkt research, banking, etc., which have replaced mfr in core, which are easily & profitably subject to the development of the IDOL & outsourcing |
|
|||
|
Global trade, which is a service, has grown even faster than global production |
|
|||
|
International finance is one of the fastest growing services |
|
|||
|
See Also: Global Banking | ||||
4. THE GLOBALIZATION OF CONSUMER MKTS BOTH CREATES & FULFILLS INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL CONSUMER TASTES | |||||
The US mkt. is now accustomed to foreign goods (after 20+ yr.), & the rest of world is moving that way | |||||
|
5. THE CORE & SEMI PERIPHERY ORGANIZES INTO TRADE BLOCKS AS OPPOSED TO THE OLD POLITICAL BLOCKS DURING THE COLD WAR |
|
|||
|
Some major trading blocks include:
NAFTA: No. Am Free Trade Agreement EU: European Union ASEAN: Assoc. of SE Asian Nations |
|
|||
|
See CG OH 2.26 Tripolar Cores |
|
|||
6. SUPRA NATIONAL CORPS DEMONSTRATES THE DISCONNECT BTWN CORP & NATIONAL INTERESTS | |||||
|
The development of the supra national corporation heralds the disconnect btwn corp & national interests as corps define their interests as being independent of any national interest |
|
|||
In the past, many corps had followed Henry Ford's famous dictum, "What's good for Ford is good for America," but today this no longer holds | |||||
7. NGOs ARE ESTABLISHING GLOBAL LAW & REGS, AS A NASCENT 'WORLD GOVT' DEVELOPS | |||||
|
Other global organizations, so called non governmental orgs (NGOs) are becoming more powerful & are serving to develop some level of regulation over both political & economic adventurism IMF WTO UN World Bank GATT |
|
|||
8. HI TECH & THE IDOL COMBINE TO MAKE THE GLOBAL ECON A REALITY | |||||
The six major hi tech firms in MA, for example, employ 28% of their wkforce overseas | |||||
Advanced tech contributes to an unequal occupation distribution made up of a few highly paid jobs & an increasing share of poorly paid, relatively alienating jobs | |||||
Hi tech jobs are esp easy to outsource internationally & thus are subject to the IDOL | |||||
One example of hi tech & the IDOL is in the growing industry of hi tech service call centers in that these centers are increasingly found in foreign nations, esp India & Puerto Rico | |||||
In 2004, US firms employed about 7 mm wkrs overseas, 80% of whom were in mfr jobs | |||||
Pay for apparel jobs in 2002 averages about $10.06 per hr. in the US; $4.49 in Hong Kong; & $0.15 in Indonesia | |||||
|
9. CRITIQUES OF THE IDOL IN RELATION TO CORE NATIONS ARE THAT IT HURTS THE MC, CREATES TRADE & OTHER ECON PROBLEMS, FOSTERS CONSUMERISM, & IS ENVLY UNSUSTAINABLE |
|
|||
|
For workers there is competition w/ low wage workers |
|
|||
|
For the economy there are many "technical problems" |
|
|||
For the consumer there are product problems | |||||
In core countries, workers expect rising unemployment & wage inequality | |||||
The higher level of unemployment makes workers hostile to foreigners creating dysfunctional levels of xenophobia, ethnocentrism, nationalism, & isolationism | |||||
At the national level, there
- are balance of trade problems - are dependencies on foreign nations for critical goods such as oil, electronics, etc. - is the exportation of pollution |
|||||
10. CRITIQUES OF THE IDOL IN RELATION TO NON CORE NATIONS ARE THE SAME AS THE CORE NATIONS W/ THE ADDITION OF EXPLOITATION AT THE INDIVIDUAL & NATL LEVELS | |||||
At the consumer level, there are:
- unsafe products: e.g. pesticide, radiation, etc. - unethically produced products resulting from child labor, slaves, sweat shops, & more |
|||||
At the wkrs level, there are:
- stagnate wages as compared to core nation's wages - hi levels of exploitation by multi national corps - low safety standards - low levels of worker rights because there is little unionization, or procedures to resolve grievances, sex harassment, etc. |
|||||
At the national level there is
- increased pollution - the need to meet corp demands or face deindustrialization |
|||||
At the consumer level, the local people:
- cannot buy the products they produce - lose indigenous small businesses as foreign competitors move in |
Links |
|
Links |
|||
|
Protectionism is a trade policy that denotes that many countries need protection against price competition from products produced cheaply in other countries due to their comparative advantages or due to low wages, lack of workplace safety, or exploitation of the environment |
|
|||
|
Free trade is a trade policy that denotes that there should be not laws or regulations limiting trade in any manner because ultimately the mkt itself should regulate who produces what products & services, & who consumes what products & services |
|
|||
|
Fair trade is a trade policy that denotes that free trade should be permitted subject to rules about the labor & environmental practices |
|
|||
|
Critics of free trade hold that: |
|
|||
- core countries ultimately benefit from globalization because they can sell more of their products abroad | |||||
- globalization causes increased exploitation of local workers in many non core countries because multinational corps. have greater power than even many non core nation's govts | |||||
- core workers must compete w/ non core workers where wages are much lower, & are often not even a living wage | |||||
- because of low wages, unsafe working conditions, lack of envl protection & job loss in core countries, everyone loses except the owners of capital | |||||
|
Critics of protectionism hold that protectionism: |
|
|||
- makes the protected economies inefficient & only forestall the inevitable effect of globalization at which time the protected nations will be in worse condition than before protectionism | |||||
- often leads to retaliatory restrictions on US exports ot other countries, thus depriving US corps of markets | |||||
- leads to reduced productivity & higher prices in the US | |||||
- denies US consumers the cheapest goods | |||||
- makes US producers, especially the oligopolistic producers, less competitive & efficient in the long run | |||||
|
Critics of fair trade hold that fair trade is just protectionism in disguise |
|
|||
|
SUPPORTERS OF FAIR TRADE ADVOCATE A WORLD MKT W/ ECON DEV & W/O HUMAN & ENVL EXPLOITATION | ||||
|
Supporters of fair trade hold that their purpose is to level the playing field as guided by principles that are different from those of protectionism |
|
|||
|
Supporters of fair trade hold that |
|
|||
|
- global mkts should be established & equalized over a period of decades not years |
|
|||
|
- all nations should, at a minimum, pay a living wage |
|
|||
|
- all nations should have safe workplaces |
|
|||
|
- all nations should require protection of the env |
|
|||
|
- child labor should be closely regulated & slave, & indentured labor should be prohibited |
|
|||
|
- the ultimate conditions of free trade should create a level playing field based on fundamental workplace rights |
|
|||
|
Despite the negative effects of globalization & free trade on non core countries, many of their govts. & many of their workers believe that efforts to restrict free trade is an effort by core countries to maintain a monopoly over world econ production |
|
|||
|
The non core countries see the efforts by the core to demand envl protection in their economy, to demand workplace safety, to prevent child labor, etc. are all meddling by the core |
|
|||
|
Thus, in general non core countries want free trade, but labor advocates point out that the workers are frequently given the choice of non living wage, unsafe jobs, or no jobs |
|
|
|
|
Links |
|
Links |
|
GLOBAL CAPITALISM IS A ECON SYSTEM WHERE CORPS ARE TRULY TRANS NATIONAL, OPERATING ON A GLOBAL SCALE, & NOT SIGNIFICANTLY LINKED TO ANY NATION STATE OR MKT | |||
The previous era, the industrial age, ( circa 1700 - present) saw the development of modern capitalism | |||
|
In the era of global capitalism, this economic system, accompanied w/ the development of technologies w/ a global reach, became truly global in scope reaching to the farthest corners of the planet |
|
|
|
The Chart on the Characteristics of the Stratification System of Global Capitalism demonstrates that this system has a wide range of equality, w/ some regions w/ high equality & other regions w/ low equality |
|
|
|
During the era of global capitalism, Pax American replaces Pax Britannia |
|
|
After WW 2, the US emerged as the dominant state | |||
The seeds of the Cold War are planted during WW2, sprout in the 1940s and by the late 1950s, the Soviet Union was a superpower w/ equal status to the US | |||
Decolonization started in the 50s and smoothed out in 60s, but was complicated by the cold war | |||
The Cold War creates neo colonialism | |||
Neo colonialism is an economic & political strategy whereby the colonizers indirectly gain/maintain influence in the periphery via | |||
a. international financial regulations | |||
b. commercial relations | |||
c. intelligence operations | |||
d. international corporate imperialism via transnational corporations which established overseas subsidiaries | |||
|
Corporate imperialism is the process whereby nations or regions are dominated & controlled economic rather than military force |
|
|
THE MAJOR CORPS ARE MORE POWERFUL THAN 3 / 4s OF NATIONS | |||
By the mid 90s, 40,000 transnational corporations, of which 90% are headquartered in the US, had 180,000 subsidiaries w/ $6 trillion in sales, which is equal to the US's total output | |||
International corporate imperialism exercises considerable power, & frequently adversely affecting the periphery | |||
|
- Supplement: The Fortune 500, 1998, 1 - 50 |
|
|
- Supplement: The Fortune 500, 1998, 51 - 100 |
|
||
- Supplement: The Fortune 500, 1998, Overview of GM |
|
||
|
- Supplement: The Fortune 500, 2000, 1-50 |
|
|
- Supplement: The Global 100, 1998, 1-51 |
|
||
|
- Supplement: The Global 100, 1998, 51-100 |
|
|
- Resource: The Table on a Comparison of Corporations' & Nations' Income, 2005 |
|
||
The Table on a Comparison of Corporations' & Nations' Income, 2005,
demonstrates that of 500 corps & 181 nations:
- the top 10 corps are larger than 140 nations - the top 200 corps are larger than 100 nations - the top 500 corps are larger than 80 nations |
|||
FIRST WORLD NATIONS (US, EURO, JAP), & THEIR CORPS, ARE CONSTITUTED BY 1 / 3 OF WORLD POP, & THEIR ECONS ARE IMPACTING SECOND WORLD NATIONS; LEAVING ONLY SOME THIRD WORLD NATIONS OUTSIDE OF GLOBALIZATION | |||
|
"The Gulf Widens btwn the Fast & Slow Worlds" |
|
|
|
The catch phrase on the fast & slow worlds means that the gap in income & quality of life btwn the rich & the poor in the core & peripheral nations increased by three btwn the 1960s & 1990s |
|
|
|
An example of "the gulf" is that 5% of world has 40% of telephones |
|
|
An example of "the gulf" is that 10% of the world uses 90% of its resources | |||
Does the fast world, western culture, affect entire world? | |||
The fast world now encompasses everywhere, but not everybody... | |||
An example of the pervaisiveness of the fast world is that poor Mexicans are aware of details of international soccer, music, film, fashion, etc. | |||
An example of the pervaisiveness of the fast world is that poor Appalachians are aware of details of NASCAR racing, music.... | |||
Even in the fast world, the core, there are significant regions of the Slow World, i.e. regions that have peripheral economic development | |||
The next significant historical era is the post industrial age, circa 1970 - present | |||
See Also: Globalization | |||
See Also: International Division of Labor | |||
See Also: Gender & global capitalism |
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
The transition to the Post Industrial (P-I) economy has eliminated hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs & created hundreds of thousands of service jobs | |||||
The P-I economic transition has divided the labor force into two unequal segments |
|
||||
One new segment in the P-I economy consists of doctors, lawyers, researchers, financial specialists, technicians, engineers, etc. |
|
||||
The P-I professional segment is relatively well paid, well educated, & has high prestige |
|
||||
One new segment in the P-I economy consists of service workers, clerical workers, retail sales people, etc. |
|
||||
The P-I service segment is paid less than were many workers under the industrial economy, is less educated, & has lower prestige |
|
||||
The P-I economy is creating greater socioeconomic inequality |
|
||||
The more advanced segment of the workforce is creating the demand of services which the lower segment of the workforce provides, such as self fulfillment services, healthier, food preparation, etc. |
|
||||
In 1977 approximately 13% of meals were eaten outside the home while in 1995 approximately 27% of meals were eaten outside the home |
|
||||
The education & professionalism of at least part of the P-I workforce is an impetus towards democratization |
|
||||
In P-I Society, more people
- demand to be informed - refuse to follow rules blindly - object to discrimination - think all people should be free |
|
||||
Inequality & the amount of stratification has increased in P-I Society because lower paying service jobs have replaced higher paying manufacturing jobs |
|
||||
In SW Va, in 2003, on average
- mining jobs paid $46,000 - construction jobs paid 34,000 - service jobs paid 28,000 |
|
||||
In SW Va, in 2003, mining jobs are being steadily replaced by service jobs resulting in a decline in pay income for the area |
|
||||
"Deindustrialized", "down sized" workers often cannot afford the education to gain professional employment |
|
||||
Deindustrialized workers are often older & find it difficult to undergo education & career change |
|
||||
The number of professional jobs in the P-I economy are not sufficient for all of the deindustrialized workers |
|
||||
Deindustrialized workers often have a home & roots in a locale & find it unrealistic to relocate to where the new jobs are | |||||
|
The share of income going to the working or lower classes has fallen sharply whereas those in the upper & upper middle classes have gained income | ||||
|
It is fair to say that compared to industrial society, in P-I society, the rich have gotten richer & the poor have gotten poorer, & the middle & working classes are smaller |
|
|||
|
Nielson & Alderson found that internationally in P-I society, the rich have gotten richer & the poor have gotten poorer, & the middle & working classes are smaller |
|
|||
|
Nielson & Alderson found that inequality declines w/ the development of industrial society, then levels off, & then increases w/ the development of P-I society |
|
|||
|
The transition from industrial to P-I Society has hurt the industrial workers & their families who once had high paying manufacturing jobs, but have since become unemployed or moved to low paying service jobs |
|
|||
|
With deindustrialization, blacks, Hispanics, poor whites, etc. in the Midwest & Northeast have had difficulty finding employment as the mfr jobs disappeared |
|
|||
|
See Also: Wilson: The Declining Significance of Race |
|
|||
|
See Also: Going Into Debt for College |
|
|||
|
The increasing stratification of P-I Society is seen in the further development of the professional class, which may be seen as a subclass of the middle & upper middle classes |
|
|||
|
The pay & prestige of the professions are generally enhanced in P-I Society |
|
|||
Professionals generally have the quality of:
- greater autonomy on the job - greater status on & off the job - higher pay - extensive & specialized training to enter the profession |
|||||
See Also: Professionals | |||||
The "classic professions" historically included only doctors, lawyers, accountants / banker, & professors | |||||
Today nurses, social workers, teachers, & others are also labeled as professional | |||||
Professionalization is the process whereby an occupation attempts to be recognized as a profession by increasing education, licensing, regulation, etc. requirements | |||||
Some social theorists would call nurses, social workers, teacher, & others semi-professionals | |||||
Police, firefighters & others are attempting to professionalize | |||||
Police, firefighters & many other occupations are called blue collar professionals by some social theorists | |||||
The proportion of professions in the workforce has risen steadily during the development of the P-I economy |
Links |
|
Links |
|||
|
The Asia Pacific Econ Cooperation (APEC) | ||||
|
The European Union (EU) | ||||
|
The Intl Monetary Fund (IMF) |
|
|||
|
The World Bank (WB) |
|
|||
|
The World Economic Forum (WEF) | ||||
|
The World Trade Organization (WTO) |
|
|
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
- See Also: The IMF http://www.imf.org/external/index.htm |
|
||||
- Supplement: About the IMF |
|
||||
- Supplement: What Is the International Monetary Fund? |
|
||||
- Supplement: IMF Member, Quotas, Governors, & Voting Power General Department & Special Drawing Rights Dept |
|
||||
- Supplement: IMF Organization Chart |
|
||||
- Supplement: IMF Photos |
|
||||
|
- Supplement: IMF at a Glance |
|
|||
- Supplement: IMF: How We Lend |
|
||||
- Supplement: IMF: Executive Board Selects Horst Köhler as IMF Managing Director, March 23, 2000 |
|
||||
|
THE IMF LENDS MONEY TO THE SEMI PERIPHERY & PERIPHERY TO PREVENT ECON COLLAPSE, BUT THEY ARE OFTEN EXPLOITATIVE DEALS |
|
|||
|
The IMF & the WB grew out of what were called the Bretton Woods talks in 1944 after WW 2 |
|
|||
The idea of the IMF & the WB was to organize the world econ to prevent world depressions as occurred during the 30s |
|
||||
The function of the IMF is to be the banker of crisis in the world, lending money to nations in econ trouble to keep them from sliding into collapse that would hurt other nations & the world econ |
|
||||
The IMF & the WB are not democratic orgs |
|
||||
Since the founding of the IMF & the WB after WW 2 there has been a "gentleman's agreement" btwn the US & Euro corp class that the WB will always be headed by an Am while the IMF will be headed by a Euro |
|
||||
Behind the scenes meetings are carried out, w/ power plays & demands made by Eros & Am corp leaders |
|
||||
Japan, the world's second largest econ, is completely left out, as is Russia, China, & all other nations |
|
||||
Thus, the IMF & the WB are controlled by the US & Euro corp classes, & to a lessor degree, their pol leaders |
|
||||
Many believe the US dominates even the Euros because even the Euros needed the approval of the US for their appointee to lead the IMF |
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
- See Also: The WB http://www.worldbank.org/ |
|
||||
|
- Supplement: The World Bank |
|
|||
- Supplement: About the World Bank |
|
||||
- Supplement: Why do we need a World Bank? |
|
||||
- Supplement: Who Runs the World Bank? |
|
||||
- Supplement: What is the World Bank's Mission? |
|
||||
- Supplement: Why do we need a World Bank? |
|
||||
- Supplement: World Bank Programs |
|
||||
- Supplement: What does the World Bank do? |
|
||||
- Supplement: Development Is Everyone's Challenge |
|
||||
- Supplement: What is the World Bank? |
|
||||
- Supplement: Where does the money go? |
|
||||
|
THE WB LENDS MONEY TO THE SEMI PERIPHERY & PERIPHERY TO PREVENT ECON COLLAPSE, BUT THEY ARE OFTEN EXPLOITATIVE DEALS |
|
|||
|
The WB & the IMF grew out of what were called the Bretton Woods talks in 1944 |
|
|||
The WB is an org that provides funds to poor nations for development projects |
|
||||
The WB & the IMF are not democratic orgs |
|
||||
Corp class leaders demand that recipient nations follow their rules & their views of how capitalism should operate |
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
|
- The WEF http://www3.weforum.org/en/index.htm |
|
|||
- Supplement: The WEF Exec Summary. Retrieved on Aug 28, 2009 http://www.weforum.org/docs/AMNC09/AMNC09_ExecutiveSummary.pdf |
|
||||
|
THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM ( WEF ) IS A GLOBAL AGENCY W/ LITTLE POWER OTHER THAN THE 'BULLY PULPIT' |
|
|||
The WEF brings together an exclusive group of intl corp & pol leaders each yr for discussion & consensus blding |
|
||||
The WEF has little power beyond that generated by the dynamics of meeting together & the publications of their discussion |
|
||||
The WEF's discussions reflect important conflicts among natl interests |
|
||||
The mission of the WEF, in their own words is "Reviving economic growth is the most important priority for policy makers and business leaders in 2009. Efforts that prevented a collapse of the international financial system failed however to avert a global collapse of demand for goods and services. A crisis in manufacturing has now followed the financial one, which in turn has led to a widespread crisis of confidence." | |||||
The participants in the current WEF include 400 global growth corps, 300 CEOs, 150 "young, global leaders," 100 public figures, 100 Media figures, 60 tech pioneers, 60 young scientists, 50 members of the Global Agenda Councils |
Links |
|
Links |
|||
- See Also: The WTO http://www.wto.org/ |
|
||||
THE WTO IS A DEMOCRATIC ORG, CONSISTING OF MOST OF THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD, WHOSE GOAL IS TO REG & FOSTER TRADE |
|
||||
The WTO has ironically become the focus of intl protest |
|
||||
The WTO is somewhat democratic in that most nations of the world are members & have representatives |
|
||||
The WTO was created in 95 out of the old General Agreements on Tariffs & Trade (GATT) |
|
||||
The GATT was created to help org the world econ after WW 2 |
|
||||
There are more than 150 member nations of the WTO who are able to vote on trade issues, w/ no nation able to veto any decision of the membership body |
|
||||
The core nations are able to bully the semi periphery & periphery nations into decisions, & the semi periphery & periphery nations often lack experience & knowledge about the world econ to allow them to protect their interests as well as the rich nations |
|
||||
The WTO is not the ruler of global capitalism & exploiter of poor nations to the extent many would suggest |
|
||||
The recent dispute btwn core & semi periphery & periphery nations over who would be elected as head of the WTO, the core nations had to compromise & the next head of the WTO will be a rep from a semi periphery nation: Thailand |
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
- Supplement: List of Independent States as complied by the US State Dept |
|
||||
Bahrain |
|
||||
Belize |
|
||||
Cayman Island |
|
||||
|
Costa Rica | ||||
|
Ecuador | ||||
|
Germany | ||||
|
Japan | ||||
Labuan |
|
||||
Panama |
|
||||
|
USA | ||||
Vanatu |
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
ALTERNATIVE TOURISM IS AN IMPORTANT & RAPIDLY GROWING INDUSTRY |
|
||||
Alternative tourism is one of the major industries in Costa Rica |
|
||||
One quarter of the land is in biosphere protection & wildlife preserves |
|
||||
The large amounts of protected biosphere attracts tourists |
|
||||
The 800,000 annual tourists' generated income exceeds the income from banana exports |
|
||||
THERE ARE MANY 'OFFSHORE BENEFITS' AVAILABLE TO AMERICANS |
|
||||
Retirees from No America flock to Costa Rica because of the climate, alternative tourism, strong health system, low taxes, & inexpensive living conditions |
|
||||
Costa Rica is developing a public health system |
|
||||
There are no taxes on pensions, dividends or trust funds |
|
||||
50,000 Canadians & 120,000 US citizens partake in some form of offshore benefits |
|
||||
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
ECUADORIAN ALTERNATIVE TOURISM IS STRONG DUE TO NATURAL LANDSCAPES & A DIVERSITY OF LIFE WHICH ENTHRALLED DARWIN |
|
||||
While being relatively small, Ecuador has 6 natl parks, 7 nat reserves, & 20 private protected areas |
|
||||
Ecuador has some of the oldest rain forest in the world |
|
||||
Ecuador has many active volcanos |
|
||||
Native Amazonian tribes still survive in the rain forest |
|
||||
The plant & animal wildlife in the Galapagos Islands is world renowned & attracted Darwin & many other naturalists to the area |
|
||||
The native Andean culture continues to thrive |
|
||||
Ecuador has taken many steps to preserve the legacy of Spanish colonialism |
|
||||
Two thirds of tourism is run by the private sector while the govt & ensures sustainable dev thru env awareness |
|
||||
|
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
|
- Supplement: List of Independent States |
|
|||
|
GERMANY IS A CORE NATION W/ A MIDDLE PATH IN THE WES COMPARED TO THE US & JAPAN; W/ MID LEVELS OF REGS, TAXES, SAFETY NET, LABOR RELATIONS, INCOME INEQUALITY, ETC. |
|
|||
Germany is the 3rd largest econ, & is more similar to the US than Japan |
|
||||
Since WW 2, Ger has had extensive labor laws such as the Works Constitution Act, co determination laws, strong works councils in every company, along w/ powerful unions |
|
||||
Ger wkrs have much more influence in the wkplace than wkrs in any other nation |
|
||||
Ger wkrs indulgence how each corp is managed & operated, as well as much influence in how the overall econ is run |
|
||||
While most capitalists in the US would tell US that you cannot create a strong econ w/ hi levels of wkr 'interference,' & yet the Germans have done just that |
|
||||
W/ these relations of production, Germans have rebuilt their WW 2 war torn nation into the 3rd largest econ power |
|
||||
Ger has much less income inequality; the lowest of the indl nations |
|
||||
GERMANY HAS THE HIGHEST BALANCE OF POWER BTWN CORPS & LABOR IN WHAT MAY BE CALL A NEW DEAL OR CORPORATIST SYSTEM |
|
||||
Ger, & most nations in Euro are relatively more influenced by class interest below the corp class as compared to the US |
|
||||
Euro nations tend to have strong & effective labor unions, & govt controls protecting the wking class, Y even significant ownership of stock in major corps that give classes below the CC a means of influencing corps through govts |
|
||||
While the term 'New Deal' comes from FDR's policies in the US in the 1930s, Germany's system best exemplifies this model today since the US moved away from it to Reaganomics |
|
||||
The New Deal polices of Germany embrace govt regs limiting corp mkt concentration, i.e. monopoly power, maintaining a balance of power btwn corps & Labor, a social safety net, reg of financial sector of business, etc. |
|
||||
See Also: The New Deal |
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
|
- Supplement: List of Independent States |
|
|||
JAPAN HAS BEEN AN INDUSTRIALIZED, CORE NATION SINCE THE 1800s |
|
||||
Even w/ Japan in stagnation since the early 1990s, the rapid econ growth of the other Asian nations means that Asia will again acct for more of the world's GDP |
|
||||
Japan has the second largest econ in the world, at about 1 / 3 the size of the US; $ 4 tt & $ 12 tt respectively | |||||
Most projections see China as having the biggest econ, followed by India, the US, & Japan in 40 yrs |
|
||||
China, India, the US, & Japan are expected to acct for over half the global econ |
|
||||
JAPAN HAS THE MOST UNIFIED POPULACE & ELITES OF ANY CORE NATION |
|
||||
Japan has elites who are more unified & influential than anywhere else but it also has much less democracy |
|
||||
Japans econ is a planned econ organized by permanent govt bureaucrats who still dominate the Japanese corps |
|
||||
Japanese corps are monopolistic w/o significant private family ownership |
|
||||
JAPAN HAS THE MOST REGS OF ANY CORE NATION |
|
||||
Japan, like most other Asian nations has a natl govt that restricts the freedom of its CC more than the US or Euro |
|
||||
In the Japanese sys, the govtl bureaucracy results in more decisions being made in the natl interest than in the interest of the CC alone |
|
|
|
The End
|