1.  In relation to a Marxist socio historical analysis, change in the form of social evolution is  ___________________________________  , directional, immanent, continuous, & derived from uniform causes

2.  One of the components of the mode of production is the  ____________________________________  of each class; i.e. their worldview, culture etc. including their work ethic, views on mobility, views on the legitimacy of the merit system, etc.

3.  Marx, following Morgan, realized that Hunter Gatherer society was egalitarian because they had no surplus, but did have " _______________________________________ "

4.  In relation to Marx & the Asiatic Mode of Production, the Asiatic mode was extremely  _________________________  because irrigation was under the control of the govt

5.  In relation to Marxist history during the ancient era, for the retinues,  ____________________________  became end in itself

6.  In relation to Marxist history during the feudal era, serfdom did not create  ____________________________

7.  In relation to Marxist history during the capitalist era, capitalism is therefore linked to the processes that separated the serf from the land which culminated in the  ___________________________________  Movements

8.  Nisbet held that all social evolution models are based on the metaphor of  __________________________ , analogy of growth/change in society as compared to growth/change of individuals
         SciHum/History/00SocEvolFB            TC06f           ANSWER  growth

9.  In relation to Morgan & the development of the patriarchal family, Morgan believed that  _________________________  was established when agriculture created a surplus 

10.  In relation to Marx & Engels on the origin of the family, property & the state, quasi private & private associations formed to make  ______________________

Essays should be two, average length, hand written pages long.  Be sure & answer all parts of the question.

1.  For social evolutionists, change is natural, directional, immanent, continuous, & derived from uniform causes.  Review a Marxist socio historical analysis demonstrating how it is, & is not social evolutionist