Internal
Links

Top

  Review Notes on  IS Lecture 2:  Methods
External
Links
  Examples of Social Science Research  
Link
   Research on 16 & Pregnant, & Teen Mom   
Link
   The Social Causes of Teen Pregnancy  
Link
   The Social Causes of Juvenile Delinquency  
Link
   Puritan Boston & Quaker Philadelphia  
Link
   Durkheim's Suicide  
Link
An Introduction to Methods
 
Link
   Research Design  
Link
   The Scientific Method  
Link
   Qualities of the Scientific Method  
  Validity & Values in Social Science Research  
Link
   Hume     1711 - 1776  
Link
   Weber on Values & Other Problems in Research
 
Link
   Gender & Research   
Link
   An Intro to Ethics & Research  
Link
   The Hawthorne Effect & Placebos  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Research on 16 and Pregnant, & Teen Mom
External
Links
  -  Project:  Research on 16 & Pregnant, & Teen Mom 
Link
  The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.  Science Says 45:  Evaluating the Impact of MTV's 16 and Pregnant on Teen Viewers’ Attitudes About Teen Pregnancy
Link
  Oct, 2010
 
  Retrieved on Jan 26, 2014.
 
  http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/resources/pdf/SS/SS45_16andPregnant.pdf
Link
  Indiana University at Bloomington (IUB):  Study: Heavy viewers of 'Teen Mom' and '16 and Pregnant' have unrealistic views of teen pregnancy by Nicole Martins & Robin Jensen
Link
  Jan 9, 2014.  Study to be published in the Journal of Mass Communications & Society   
  Retrieved on Jan 26, 2014.   
  http://news.indiana.edu/releases/iu/2014/01/16-and-pregnant-teen-mom-shows-encourage-teen-pregnancy.shtml 
Link
 
CNN:  Study: MTV's '16 and Pregnant' led to fewer teen births 
Link
  Jan 13, 2014 
 
  Retrieved on Jan 26, 2014. 
 
  http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/13/health/16-pregnant-teens-childbirth/ 
Link
  Slate.com  No, Teen Mom Is Not Helping to Lower Teen Birth Rates 
Link
  Jan 13, 2014 
 
  Retrieved on Jan 26, 2014. 
 
   http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/01/13/_16_and_pregnant_and_teen_mom_two_new_studies_on_how_the_mtv_shows_impact.html 
Link
  New York Times:  MTV's ‘16 and Pregnant,’ Derided by Some, May Resonate as a Cautionary Tale by Annie Lowrey 
Link
  Jan 13, 2014   
  Retrieved on Jan 26, 2014.   
  http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/13/business/media/mtvs-16-and-pregnant-derided-by-some-may-resonate-as-a-cautionary-tale.html?_r=0 
Link
 
Media Influences on Social Outcomes:  The Impact of MTV's 16 and Pregnant on Teen Childbearing 
Link
  Melissa S. Kearney 
Department of Economics 
University of Maryland 
and National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
 
  Phillip B. Levine 
Department of Economics 
Wellesley College 
and National Bureau of Economic Research  (NBER)
 
  University of Maryland, Wellsley College & the National Bureau of Economic Research 
 
  http://www.wellesley.edu/sites/default/files/assets/kearney-levine-16p-nber_submit.pdf 
 Link
  THE FINDING OF THE NBER & IUB STUDIES APPEAR TO CONTRADICT EACH OTHER BUT ACTUALLY DO NOT B/C 16 & PREGNANT DOES NOT GLAMORIZE TEEN PREGNANCY WHILE TEEN MOM DOES   
  The NBER study found that there was a 5.7 % decline in teen pregnancies due to watching 16 & pregnant  
  The IUB study found that "Students in the study attended schools that were chosen because demographically, the median annual household income and racial makeup of each school was consistent with the national average: $52,000 and 80 percent white. Participants ranged in age from 14 to 18. There were nearly even numbers of boys and girls."  
  The NBER study focused on only the 16 & Pregnant show for it's 1st 18 mos while the IUB study included the spin off Teen Mom   
  16 & Pregnant focuses on a different teen each week focusing on the teen for a few mos before & after the birth of the child  
  Teen Mom focuses on only a few teen mothers, & the show itself has actually created celebrity & success for the moms, making their life not only successful, but glamorous   
  METHODOLOGY FOR THE NBER STUDY USED DATA FROM NIELSON RATINGS (TV), BIRTH RECORDS, & MEGA DATA & CONTENT DATA FROM TWITTER & GOOGLE TRENDS   
  The basic methodology used in the NBER study was to judge the impact of the show by looking at Nielson TV ratings, twitter, & Google trends, & then to judge the impact by looking at birth records & what teens said about the show's impact on their behavior  
  Researchers tracked Nelson television ratings to determine how many people, esp teens, watched each episode over the 1st 18 mos of the show  
  For each episode, the researchers tracked the number of tweets & Google searches about the shows, demonstrating the level exposure & interest in the show   
  Then researchers analyzed the content of the tweets & the Google searches in relation to each show   
  Finally the researchers tracked birth rates from data from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) & other sources   
  METHODOLOGY FOR THE IUB STUDY USED ONLY THE SURVEY METHOD   
  The basic methodology used in the IUB study was to survey high school students   
  The researchers of the IUB study surveyed 185 high school students about their perceptions of reality TV and teen pregnancy; they were not allowed to ask questions about the students' sexual behavior   
  Students in the study attended schools that were chosen because demographically, the median annual household income & racial makeup of each school was consistent w/ the national average: $52,000 & 80 percent white   
  Participants ranged in age from 14 to 18 & there were nearly even numbers of boys & girls   

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the Social Causes of Teen Pregnancy
External
Links
  McLanahan, Sara, and Larry Bumpass. 1988.  "Intergenerational Consequences of Family Disruption."  American Journal of Sociology 94:  130-152.
 
  McLanahan & Bumpass (M & B) asked what factors contribute to / cause teen parenthood
 
  M & B verified many other researchers' findings that teenage girls from single parent homes are more likely than other girls to have babies
 
  The hypothesis M & B want to test is
  Single parent homes are correlated w/ a higher rate of teen pregnancy
  Single parent homes   ::   Higher rate of teen pregnancy
 
  But are single parent homes the primary cause, or even a cause at all?
 
  M & B speculated that there are other possible factors influencing rates of teen pregnancy, such as: income level & education
 
  M & B used education as a control variable & found the following relationships
 
  Low education      ::  Single parent homes   ::  Higher rate of teen pregnancy
 
  Low education       ::  Two parent homes     ::  Higher rate of teen pregnancy  
  Middle education  ::  Single parent homes   ::  Middle rate of teen pregnancy
 
  Middle education  ::  Two parent homes     ::  Middle rate of teen pregnancy
 
  High education      ::  Single parent homes   ::  Lower rate of teen pregnancy
 
  High education      ::  Two parent homes     ::  Lower rate of teen pregnancy
 
  Holding Education constant at a low level, M & B found that the rate of teen pregnancy was higher in both single & two parent families than in families w/ higher educational attainment rates
 
  Holding Education constant at a high level, M & B found that the rate of teen pregnancy was lower in both single & two parent families than in families w/ lower educational attainment rates
 
  The correlation btwn Single Parent Homes & rates of Teen Pregnancy is Spurious, that is, there is an apparent, although false, association btwn two or more variables caused by some other variable
 
  M & B found that the education level of the teen & of the teen's parents was the most important factor in teen pregnancy  
  See Also:  Out of Wedlock Births  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the Social Causes of Juvenile Delinquency
External
Links
  Social scientists of the Chicago School, circa 1900, were interested in urbanization & the social problems associated w/ it
 
  Through years of research & hundreds of studies they eventually concluded that there is a correlation btwn population density & delinquency
 
  Many Chicago theorists believed that crowding caused delinquency
 
  And indeed even today we see that delinquency rates are high in densely populated neighborhoods
 
  But as early as the 1930s, some social scientists began to question the correlation btwn delinquency & population density 
 
  In 1984, Fischer demonstrated that virtually all the correlation btwn crowding & delinquency disappears if income is controlled
 
  Chicago School found that 
 
        Hi Crowding is correlated Hi Delinquency
 
        Lo Crowding is correlated Lo Delinquency
 
  Fischer found that 
 
        Lo Income  ::  Hi Crowding :: Hi Delinquency
 
        Lo Income  ::  Lo Crowding  ::  Hi Delinquency
 
        Hi Income  ::  Hi Crowding  ::  Lo  Delinquency
 
        Hi Income  ::  Lo Crowding :: Lo Delinquency
 
  In other words, Fisher found that the Level of Income is correlated w/ the level of crowding, which is correlated w/ the level of delinquency  
  Fischer used a research technique called control, where he held constant all relevant variables except one in order to clearly see its effect
 
  Fischer used Income as a control variable
 
  Holding income constant at a low level, Fischer found that delinquency was high in both crowded & uncrowded areas
 
  Holding income constant at a high level, Fischer found that delinquency was low in both crowded & uncrowded areas
 
  The correlation btwn crowding & delinquency is spurious, that is, there is an apparent, although false, association btwn two or more variables caused by some other variable  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on Puritan Boston & Quaker Philadelphia
External
Links
  The award winning study, Puritan Boston & Quaker Philadelphia, by E. Digby Baltzell (1979) examined which regions in the US had produced more notable individuals, & why certain regions produced more notable individuals
 
  Baltzell created his research topic through induction & serendipity  
  Baltzell happened to visit Bowdoin College in Maine & was surprised to see that in one year, 1825, Bowdoin had graduated three notables:  Hawthorne, Longfellow, & Pierce
 
  Baltzell wondered how such a small college in a relatively small state could produce so many famous people
 
  Baltzell decided to do an analysis of the Dictionary of American Biography, which was comprised of records of more than 13,000 men & women in 20 volumes
 
  The Dictionary gave Baltzell a broad measure of who was great  
  Baltzell also needed a measure that would help him judge levels of greatness
 
  To do this, he counted the number of lines in each record, assuming, as did the editors of the Dictionary, that the greater the person, the longer their record
 
  Thus, Baltzell chose to examine the 75 men & women w/ the longest record in the Dictionary
 
  Baltzell found:
 
       Massachusetts had the most famous people:  21
 
       Pennsylvania had 2
 
       New England States had 31
 
       Mid Atlantic States had 12
 
       The Boston area had the most famous people
 
  Baltzell found that Weber's theory as delineated in the Protestant Ethic & the Spirit of Capitalism explained the variations in the locations of famous people  
  Weber believed that a person's life chances were largely the result of their religious beliefs
 
  Boston was a Puritan settlement, founded by people dedicated to the pursuit of public achievement
 
  Puritans celebrated hard work as a means to glorify god, & looked upon public prominence as a sign that one was in god's grace  
  Philadelphia was settled by Quakers, who shunned elitism & displays of achievement
 
  Quakers believe that all people are inherently good & so saw little need for strong social institutions to "save" individuals from sinfulness  
  While many Quakers became wealthy, their egalitarian way of life made everyone look upon everyone else as a social equal  
  Quakers discourage one another from standing out by seeking fame or pursuing public office  
  Baltzell describes Boston & Philadelphia as "social test tubes" into which two different cultures were poured:  Puritanism & Quakerism  
  For centuries later, we can see that different "chemical reactions" occurred in the "social test tubes" of Boston & Philadelphia  
  The two different belief systems of personal achievement shaped the history of each region  
  Even today, cultures seem influential in determining life chances / success  
  The Kennedy's, who are Catholic, demonstrate the Puritan pursuit of fame & leadership  
  Suggestions for further research suggested by Baltzell's work on fame & culture include  
  a.  a comparison of regions by religion & achievement  
  b.  a utilization of  the entire 13,000 famous people in the Dictionary to determine whether the religion  ::  achievement correlation holds  

 
Internal
Links

Top

Emile Durkheim on  Suicide:
The Cult of the Individual
External
Links
  -  Supplement:  Suicide Risk Assessment 
Link
  -  Supplement:  Suicide Number One Killer of Students (& Soldiers) Highland Cavalier (Nov 11, 2011) 
Link
  -  Project:  Causes & Prevention of Suicide 
Link
  DURKHEIM STUDIED SUICIDE TO SHOW THAT 'THE MOST PERSONAL ACT' HAD A SOCIAL COMPONENT RELATED TO THE DEGREE OF CONNECTION ONE HAS IN SOCIETY & THE AMOUNT OF CONTROL ONE EXPERIENCES   
  Introduction:  Durkheim is known for establishing the 1st sociology dept. 
This was at the University of Paris 
Durkheim is known for establishing sociology as a social science 
He did this through applying the scientific method to social facts in his study of suicide 
 
  Suicide was written by Durkheim in 1897   
  Durkheim conducted the research on suicide in order to establish sociology as a social science on par w/ psychology   
  Durkheim was the first to carry out a study involving the large scale collection of data to test a social theory   
  For Durkheim, suicide is perhaps "the most personal act" any human can undertake  
  Durkheim believed that if he could show that the most individual of acts, which had previously been attributed to psychological causes, had social causes, then he would validate the power & worth of sociology  
  In writing Suicide, Durkheim reviewed the literature, examined appropriate theory, & employed common sense:  
  Durkheim believed a society had to accomplish two major functions to be successful  
  a.  INTEGRATION IS THE DEGREE TO WHICH COLLECTIVE SENTIMENTS (KNOWLEDGE, BELIEFS, VALUES) ARE SHARED BY MEMBER IN SOCIETY   
  The opposite of social integration is isolation in a society  
  b.  REGULATION IS THE DEGREE OF EXTERNAL CONSTRAINT ON PEOPLE 
 Regulation is the common norms people live under
    Regulation      vs      Lack of Regulation in a society
 
  The widespread failure of integration or regulation in society yields societal collapse
The occasional failure of integration or regulation in society yields an increased rate of suicide
 
  What are some common causes of suicide?
Why do some people commit suicide & others don't?
What are some possible explanations?
 
 
 

 

 
  Depression                   Terminal illness
Spouse leaves them      Picked on by peers
Lost job                        Loneliness
 
  DURKHEIM'S HYPOTHESIS WAS THAT PEOPLE, AS A GROUP, WOULD BECOME MORE SUICIDAL TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY EXPERIENCED EXTREME INTEGRATION OR REGULATION   
  Durkheim then uses the deductive method to develop his thesis & hypotheses:  
  Durkheim's hypothesis is that suicide would be highest among single, Protestant, men because these groups are less integrated & less regulated  
  Other groups w/ a tendency toward suicide are those who are highly integrated or over regulated  
  Durkheim's method was to travel from parish (country) to parish & examine death certificates of suicides & record demographic info, & the circumstances surrounding the death  
  Durkheim rode from parish (county) to parish in France in the 1890s  
  Durkheim collected data on social background of suicide victims, e.g. demographic information including age, religion, class, job, work history, income, wealth, gender, etc.  
  Then Durkheim grouped people according to suicide rates & each social factor; & he did this by hand ( a computer would do this today )  
  Durkheim's types of suicide include altruistic, fatalistic, egoistic, & anomic  
Link
Table on Durkheim's Four Types of Suicide   
 Link
1.  ALTRUISTIC SUICIDE IS CORRELATED W/ HIGH INTEGRATION INTO SOCIETY   
  When social integration is too strong, the individual is literally forced into committing suicide   
  Hero suicide occurs when a parent dies while pushing their child out of the way of a car  
  With altruistic suicide, death is deliverance  
  Altruistic suicide springs from hope, for it depends on the belief in the beautiful afterlife  
  A suicidal person who dies for a cause is exhibiting characteristics of altruistic suicide  
  EXAMPLES OF ALTRUISTIC SUICIDE   
  Non Extreme Examples  
  - a soldier jumping on a grenade or charging a hill  
  - a policeman dying in the line of duty  
  - a parent pushing a child from path of a car  
  Extreme Examples:   
  - Kamikazes  
  - radical arab bombers  
  -  in 1996, men emolating (burning) themselves to protest the Miss World pageant in India  
 
-  Supplement:  The followers of Reverend Jim Jones at the People's Temple in Jonestown, Guyana
Link
  -  Supplement:  Jonestown, Guyana Conspiracy
Link
 
-  Supplement:  The followers of David Koresh & his followers of the Branch Davidians in Texas
Link
  -  Supplement:  Waco Investigation
Link
Link
2.  FATALISTIC SUICIDE IS CORRELATED W/ HIGH REGULATION BY SOCIETY   
  Persons w/ pitilessly blocked opportunities & passions, violently choked by oppressive discipline are more likely to commit fatalistic suicide  
  Fatalistic suicide was little mentioned by Durkheim  
  EXAMPLES OF FATALISTIC SUICIDE  
  Examples of someone more likely to commit fatalistic suicide include:  
  - slaves  
  - prisoners  
  - overworked college students  
  - American middle class working men  
  - American middle class house wives  
  - School age suicides/killers who cannot stand the harassment by the in crowd, because they are different  
  - over-worked Japanese employees  
  - over worked American executives   
Link
3.  EGOISTIC SUICIDE IS CORRELATED W/ LOW INTEGRATION INTO SOCIETY  
  Individuals who experience a sense of meaninglessness are more likely to commit egoistic suicide  
  Egoistic suicide is often found in societies where individuals are not well integrated into the society; i.e., modern, developed nations  
  The personal feeling or emotion often associated w/ low integration into society is depression, loneliness, & a sense of meaninglessness  
  For Durkheim, egoistic suicide stems from the social currents of incurable weariness & sad depression  
  Society is where we "learn," internalize via socialization, or imprint our norms & morals  
  Members of a society internalized norms & morals into the self & thus become integrated into the society by both the processes of socialization, as well as by the particular shared norms & morals  
  Therefore, w/ egoistic suicide, a person may also appear as if they are out of control  
  People prone to egoistic suicide lack an internal control of the self, an internal "locus of control"  
  Durkheim notes in his analysis of suicide that if people are left to pursue their private interests in whatever way they wish, they are likely to feel considerable personal dissatisfaction  
  For Durkheim, people are not satisfied even when the are left to pursue their private interests in whatever way they wish because all needs cannot be fulfilled by the individual, many needs can only be fulfilled by the group, collective, or society  
  For Durkheim, the self as constructed by society, is nearly insatiable  
  Needs that are satiable simply lead to the generation of more & more needs  
  EXAMPLES OF EGOISTIC SUICIDE   
  - People prone to egoistic suicide having a low level of integration into society can be seen in the fact that unmarried individuals  have higher rates of suicide than married people  
  - People prone to egoistic suicide having a low level of integration into society can be seen in "lone wolf suicide,"  i.e. a higher rate of suicide, depression, etc., by loners  
  - Teens prone to egoistic suicide can be seen in the high rates of suicide in high school & college students  
  Lonely, troubled young men in high school or college are:  
  -  generally isolated
-  not popular
-  harassed or teased by others
 
  - Millionaire suicide occurs because of low integration into suicide because they feel lonely because they often believe that 'people only like me for my money'  
  The loneliness of wealth, & millionaire suicide can be seen in Richie Rich, the poor little rich kid   
  The loneliness of wealth, & millionaire suicide can be seen in the fact that people who gain sudden wealth often have a hard time adjusting socially & often lose spouses & friends  
 
- Star egoistic suicide can be seen in the loneliness of fame that leads many stars to suicide
 
  Examples of star egoistic suicide might include:   
  Marilyn Monroe
 
  -  Supplement:Janis Joplin of Big Brother & the Holding Co.      d. 1970
Link
  Jim Morrison of the Doors.  
  -  Supplement:Kurt Cobain of Nirvanna  b. 1967   d. 1994
Link
 
For Durkheim, religion insulates one against suicide because it integrates people into society
 
  For Durkheim, religion insulates one against suicide because religion limits wants  
  Two groups are the most prone to suicide, young men aged from 14 to 24, and middle age men aged 45 to 55  
  Young men & middle age men may have high levels of suicide because they are likely to experience overwork or sense of failure  
  Young men just finishing their education or starting their career are suddenly stratified into their position in life & that position may not be as high as they believed it would be  
  Middle age men are just at the pinnacle of their career & they may not have risen as high as they expected or they may feel that it was all for naught  
  Young & middle age men are often the most isolated in our society  
  Young men may feel isolated because they have just left home & have not integrated into a new community  
  Middle age men may feel isolated because their family is now grown & they are not integrated into their community  
Link
4.  ANOMIC SUICIDE IS CORRELATED W/ LOW REGULATION BY SOCIETY   
  Anomie is the experience where culture ( common knowledge, beliefs, values, norms ) does not exist & / or has become ineffective
 
  For Durkheim, culture may be thought of as the collective unconsciousness  
  In comparing anomie to alienation, alienation is the separation or isolation from existing culture whereas anomie is the condition where there is no culture, i.e., no culture to be separated from
 
  See:  Anomie
 
  See:  Alienation
 
  See:  Culture  
  Societal disintegration leads to currents of depression & disillusionment  
  The moral disintegration of society predisposes the individual to commit suicide, but the currents of depression must be there to produce differences in rates of anomic suicide  
  But even though social forces may be weak, an individual is never totally free of the collectivity  
  Disruptions in  regulative powers of society leaves people dissatisfied because they have little control over their passions  
  So people are allowed to run wild in an insatiable race for gratification  
  Success can significantly reduce the regulation that one experiences:  The newly rich may quit their job, move to a new community, perhaps find a new spouse  
  These changes disrupt regulatory effect of old structures & the person may not yet feel new regulatory effects  
  EXAMPLES OF ANOMIC SUICIDE: 
 
  - I am so weak, I have nothing left to lose  
  - suicide from a great loss such as a lay off  
  - a Bum who believes, 'I can do whatever I want because no one can hurt me'
  "Freedom is just another word  for nothing left to lose"  Janis Joplin
 
  - the belief, 'I am so powerful, I cannot lose'
 
  - the college student away from home, family, friends, for the first time, becomes wild party animal, & dies of overdose, car wreck, etc. believing, at some level, that they cannot be hurt or controlled  
  - the person moving to big city for first time who believes they are powerful, & becomes dangerously manic  
  - the Millionaire who believes, 'I can do whatever I want  because I am so powerful: No one can tell me what to do'
 
  - a suicide from great gain such as finally "making it big" career wise
 
  - a superstar, or anyone who dies "accidentally" in that they were not depressed, despondent, etc.  
  People who die of anomic suicide, live the wild life, feel free, & feel little societal control or fear  
  - Jimi Hendrix
 
  -  Supplement:  James Dean
Link
  - John Belusi?  
  Social or natural crises reduce regulation & people feel they have nothing left to lose, no reason to live
 
  Periods of disruption unleash currents of anomie, moods of restlessness & normlessness
 
  Rates of anomic suicide may rise w/ almost any social crises such as a storm, a war, an economic boom, an economic depression, etc.
 
  Individuals experience the sensation of anomie as the fear or anxiety that society is breaking down, that the old rules no longer apply
 
  Either an econ boom or an econ depression make society incapable of exercising its authority over individuals  
  For an anomic society, the old norms no longer apply, but new norms are not yet in place  
  Losing a job can cut the individual off from the Regulation that the company, the job, the workplace friendships may have had  
  Being cut off from the economic sector, or family, religion, the state, etc. leaves a person rootless  
  FINDINGS:  DURKHEIM CONSTRUCTED A PROFILE OF A SUICIDAL PERSON THAT IS STILL VALID TODAY:  MALE, YOUNG OR MID AGED, PROTESTANT, VERY POOR OR RICH   
  Men commit suicide more than women
Women make more attempts at suicide, but men succeed more often
 
  The young, mid teens to mid twenties & the middle aged, late 40s & 50s are the most suicidal age groups
 
  Protestants are more likely than Catholics or Jews to commit suicide
 
  Durkheim theorized that Protestants would be more likely to commit suicide than Catholics or Jews because Protestant religions are more individualistic while the Jews & Catholics have a stronger community orientation  
  People of all classes have about the same rates of suicide, except for the extreme rich & poor, which have a higher rate of suicide
 
  Those who have been recently laid off more likely to commit suicide
 
  If you are male, young, mobile/ in transition, & Protestant, you are at high risk for suicide  
  If you are male, middle age, Protestant, & laid off, you are at high risk for suicide
 
  Durkheim's findings are still valid today & yet most of the focus is on psychological causes, not sociological causes of suicide
 
  Durkheim's study has been confirmed by many other researchers & its generalization is very widespread
 
  Similar patterns of suicide can be found today in the US as Durkheim found in nineteenth century Europe  

 
Top
 
Table on Durkheim's Four Types of Suicide
 
High 
Low
Integration
1.  Altruistic suicide
3.  Egoistic suicide
Regulation
2.  Fatalistic suicide
4.  Anomic suicide

 
Internal
Links

Top

  An Introduction to   Methods: How the Social Sciences are Done
External
Links
 
-  Project:  Surveying 
Link
  For Macionis, there are 3 types of methods in the social sciences including scientific methods, critical methods, & interpretative methods; however in practice most social scientist employ many of these types simultaneously   
  THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD IS AN APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING BASED ON SYSTEMATIC OBSERVATION & GENERALIZATION, WHICH IS USED TO GENERATE EXPLANATIONS & MAKE PREDICTIONS   
  Science is a logical system that bases knowledge on direct, systematic observation   
  Scientific knowledge is based on empirical evidence, meaning facts  we verify with our senses   
  Scientific methods of the social sciences are the most widely used & are what we are using when we speak of hypothesis, theories, statistics, validity, etc.   
  THE INTERPRETATIVE METHOD  IS AN APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING BASED ON SYSTEMATIC OBSERVATION & GENERALIZATION, WHICH IS USED TO UNDERSTAND THE MEANINGS PEOPLE EXPERIENCE   
  For many social scientists, science as it is practiced today to study the natural world, misses a vital part of the social world: meaning   
  Human beings do not simply act; we engage in meaningful action   
  Weber, who pioneered this framework, argued that the focus of sociology is interpretation   
  See Also:  Weber   
  Interpretative sociology is the study of society that focuses on the meanings people attach to their social world   
  The interpretative sociologist's job is not just to observe what people do but to share in their world of meaning & come to appreciate why they act as they do   
  CRITICAL SOCIOLOGY FOCUSES ON WHAT IS IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND & EXERCISE SOCIAL CHANGE   
  The importance of social change in & of itself became noteworthy by Marx who rejected the idea that society exists as  a "natural" system w/ a fixed order   
  Critical sociology is the study of society that focuses on the need for social change   
  As Marx believed the point of the social sciences are not merely to study the world as it is but to change it   
  W/in the practice of critical methods, the general public often confuses social science findings w/ politics & so scientific social scientists object to taking sides, charging that critical social science is political & gives up any claim to objectivity   
  Critical methodologists would refute the objections of the so called scientific social scientists by noting that not only is critical social science political, but ALL science, whether it be natural or social, is political   
  METHODOLOGICAL CONCEPTS ARE TOOLS FOR SCIENTIFIC EXPLORATION   
  The deductive method of analysis begins w/ theory & builds a question ( hypothesis ) based on that theory   
  The hypothesis is usually tested using some form of the experimental method to test some part of the theory   
  The inductive method of analysis begins w/ gathering generalizations from data, & theory is then created to explain the generalizations   
  Research can be used to test a theory or generate a theory, but research cannot "find out the truth"   
  A theory is a set of interrelated statements about reality, usually involving one or more cause effect relationships   
  Theories are made up of verifiable statements about reality that, with the right information, can be tested   
  Theory refers to a set of interrelated statements about reality, usually involving one or more major cause effect relationships   
  Ideally, a theory can be tested through research   
  A law is a theory or part of a theory that is well established and therefore has greater acceptance by the scientific community   
  A hypothesis is a research question, that always takes the form of a statement that must be able to be disproved   
  A hypothesis is a testable statement   
  When social scientists use research for theory testing, they usually make use of a hypothesis   
  A hypothesis always takes the form of a statement   
  A hypothesis usually involves some kind of cause effect relationship between two or more variables   
  A hypothesis is used because a theory is usually too large and complex to test at one time   
  A correlation is a relationship by which two or more variables change together   
 
A concept is an abstract idea that represents some element of the world 
Lnk
Link
A variable is a concept that can take on different values or that has two or more categories from case to case   
Link
Independent variables influence or cause the dependent variable & are sometimes called the predictor variable   
  The independent variable is the variable that the researcher thinks is the cause   
Link
Dependent variables should be the effect in the cause effect relationship   
  The value of the dependent variable depends on the value of the independent variable   
Link
A positive correlation occurs when both variables change in the same direction   
  A negative correlation occurs when the variables change in opposite directions   
  A control variable is a variable that is held constant in order to observe the effect on two or more other variable   
  A spurious correlation is an apparent, although false, relationship btwn two or more variables caused by some other variable(s)   
  The control variable  is introduced to determine whether the relationship btwn the independent & dependent variables is spurious   
  MEASUREMENT IS THE PROCESS OF ASCERTAINING THE EXTENT, DIMENSIONS, 
QUANTITY, ETC. OF SOMETHING ESP BY COMPARISON TO A STANDARD 
 
  1.  An operational definition is a precise statement of the measuring of a variable or of the categories of a variable for purpose of measurement   
Link
2.  Reliability is established when the researcher is using a method that demonstrates consistency of the measurement; the method produces the same results if it is used repeatedly or if a different investigator uses it   
  Professor Hairball has repeated his study on hair magazines every year for ten years.  He has always gotten the same results.  Therefore, Hairball believes his study is very reliable   
  Reliability is the consistency of the measurement   
Link
3.  Validity indicates that the researcher is measuring the concept they intended to measure; that the methods utilized yield accurate info about the phenomenon being studied   
  Validity is established by  measuring the concept you intend to measure   
  The strong emphasis on valid & reliable methods is one important distinction btwn the social sciences & journalistic accounts in newspapers, magazines, on the TV news, the internet, etc.   
  The strong emphasis on valid & reliable methods is one important distinction btwn the social sciences & humanistic accounts of social phenomenon such as novels, an expose', videos, docudrama, etc.   
  Social scientists such as post modernists, et al, believe that if social science is to be effective, it must connect w/ the subject, i.e., the phenomenon being studied, & the object, i.e. the person or people examining the research   
  An emotion laden research project is not necessarily unreliable or invalid, but special care must be taken 
 
Link
4.  Constructs are concepts that are abstract and at least to some extent must be formulated by the researcher   
  Constructs are created by researchers when they are attempting to measure abstract concepts such as intelligence 
 
  Examples of constructs include intelligence, happiness, power, satisfaction, quality of life, etc.   
  PROBLEMS IN RESEARCH STEM FROM THE FACT THAT PEOPLE REACT TO BEING STUDIED   
Link
Reactivity is the tendency of people being studied to react to the researcher or to the fact that they are being studied   
Link
The Hawthorne effect is a form of reactivity where people being studied attempt to please the researcher   
  The Placebo effect is a form of reactivity where people, as a result of being studied, behave differently, i.e. as the test subjects do, when in fact nothing has changed   
  Objectivity is a state of complete personal neutrality in conducting research   
  Bias is non objectivity in research; personal involvement in conducting research whether intentional or unintentional   
  THE USE OF EXISTING DATA SOURCES IS THE METHOD OF USING INFO THAT HAS BEEN COLLECTED BY OTHERS TO CONDUCT RESEARCH   
  Sometimes a social scientist need not collect original data to study an issue or a problem b/c the necessary data have already been collected   
  There are various public & private data archives such as the US Census, the National Opinion Research Ctr (NORC), Gallup, the Inter University Consortium for Political & Social Research (ICPSR), & thousands more   
  Professional orgs often conduct surveys of participants in their professions & sometimes make such data available to researchers w/ related interests   
  An example of the use of an existing source would be continuing a survey that was started 50 yrs ago, & using the data from the old survey as a comparison or bench mark from which to judge data info from the new survey   
  General library research, using books & journals to write a research paper or construct the research background for the present research is also a form of using existing sources 
 
  THE MOST COMMON TYPE OF PRIMARY RESEARCH METHOD IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IS THE SURVEY:  ASKING A POPULATION SET A SERIES OF QUESTIONS BY A RESEARCHER WHO THEN ANALYZES THE ANSWERS   
  A survey is the method of selecting a particular subject & compiling a series of questions that will best resolve any research objectives, ie questions or postulates, that will satisfy the query   
 
An example of a survey is one that the military uses to evaluate the command climate of a unit of soldiers   
  The survey is the most widely used method in sociology   
  The kinds of surveys are the:
- closed end questionnaire 
- open end questionnaire 
- telephone interview 
- personal interview 
 
 
DIFFERENT QUESTION TYPES MEASURE DIFFERENT SOCIAL MATERIAL 
 
  Fixed response questions in a survey are like multiple choice exam questions   
  The Likert scale form of surveying gives a clear range of choices on a 5 or 7 point scale 

Strongly Agree   Agree    Neutral / No Opinion    Disagree     Strongly Disagree 
     ______          _____                _____                    _____             ______ 
 

 
  In open ended questions the respondent states or writes an answer to the question in their own words.  (Similar to an interview)   
  There are FOUR types of questions typically used in surveys & interviews, including: 
- Background  (demographics) 
- Activities 
- Knowledge 
- Sentiments (opinions, values, attitudes, feelings, etc.) 
 
  When writing survey questions, 
- use short statements 
- begin w/ 'easy' questions 
- use 'hard' questions near the end of the survey 
- end w/ open ended questions 
 
Link
Sampling is the random selection from a general population to establish a sample group, which should represent the entire population   
  AN EXPERIMENT IS A SCIENTIFIC EXPLORATION IN A CONTROLLED / LIMITED SITUATION   
  Experiments are carried out in a situation that is under some control of the researcher, such as a lab or classroom   
  An example of an experiment is testing the integrity of a group of men against a group of women by placing money on a sidewalk & observing what % would pick the money up & keep it compared to who would turn it in, or ask who dropped the money in the first place   
  The steps in the experimental process include:
Sampling to determine the 
Control & experimental groups 
Pre-test 
Experimental manipulation 
Post-test 
Debriefing 
Analysis 
 
 
The experimental group goes through an experience or manipulation 
 
  The control group does not experience a manipulation of an independent variable & receives the pre-test & post-test   
  Lab experiments are done in setting w/ almost total control by researcher   
  The TWO types of field experiments are natural experiments & social experiments   
  In natural experiments, the researcher gives pre- & post-tests around a natural event, or the tabulation data before & after a natural event   
  In social experiments, the researcher gives pre- & post-tests around a social policy   
  INTERVIEWS ARE ORAL SURVEYS   
  The strength of an interview over a survey is that researcher can follow leads to unplanned questions   
  In structured interviews, the questions are pre planned   
  In unstructured interviews, the unplanned questions follow the flow of the conversation   
  FIELD OBSERVATION IS ATTENTIVENESS TO SOCIAL MATERIAL TO MEASURE IT IN SOME MANNER   
  The FOUR qualities of field observation include obtrusiveness, unobtrusiveness, participant & non participant   
  In obtrusive field observation, the researcher is seen, recognized as a researcher;  open or overt   
  In unobtrusive observation, the researcher is hidden or not recognized as a researcher;  secret or covert   
  In participant observation, the researcher is, during the research, participating in the activities of the subjects   
  Participant observation allows the researchers to observe a person or a group of people in their everyday activities   
  An example of this would be going to a Baptist church on Sunday to see how people in that area worship   
  In non participatory observation, the researcher is not participating; remains separated, aloof   
Link
Content analysis is an analysis of narrative data from open ended surveys, interviews, books, press, media, etc.) that looks for regularity   
  Statistical analysis is an analysis of existing data (census, govt records, etc.) or data you have collected (surveys, experiments, interviews, etc.) to determine correlations   
Link
Multivariate analysis is the sorting out many factors to determine most important factors   

 
Top
Examples of Variables

  age                    religion                     education level            env concern
  gender              political party             race                           satisfaction in the workplace
  income             marital status             occupation                  effective decisions


 
Top
Examples of Independent & Dependent Variables

Abuse & stress
Lack of social integration & suicide
Number of autos & global warming
Education & environmental concern
Income & environmental concern
Openness & satisfaction in the workplace
Number of guidelines to follow & effective critical decision making


 
Top
Examples of Positive & Negative Correlation

Positive Correlation:  both variables change in same direction
Ed level is positively correlated w/ income
Negative Correlation:  a situation where one variable increases & the other decreases
Ed level is negatively correlated w/ poverty rates


 
Top
Example of Constructs

ideal type of bureaucrat
Weber:  rational, power in the office, tenure, salary, entrance exams & appointment from within


 
Top
 
Table on Variable Measurement Types
 
Difference
Rank Order
Equal Space
Zeroed
Examples
Nominal
Yes
     
Deviance Committed
Ordinal
Yes
Yes
   
Hi Lo SES
Interval
Yes
Yes
Yes
 
Temperature
Ratio
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Income
Scale
Yes
 
Yes
 
Race
Gender

 
Top
Example of Validity

IQ   Many people question the validity of IQ tests. 
 


 
Top
Example of Reactivity

Hawthorne effect:  form of reactivity:  people being studied attempt to please the researcher: 
From H Motor Wiring Room:  young women & young male researchers


 
Top
Sampling: the random selection from a general population to establish a Sample Group, which represents the entire population

Sample Group:  a subset of a population that is used to represent the entire population.

The basic way to obtain a representative sample is by a random draw from everyone in the population in question. 

No matter how small your population, you almost always need 50 people in order to have a scientifically valid sample.

1,100 is enough for most major survey firms to survey the US 

Thus if you divide your sample into different groups, you need even more people. 
If you want to compare men & women:  50 of each
If you want to compare lower income, middle income & upper income men and women, how many do you need? 
6 groups:
50 lo income men
50 lo income women
50 mid income men
50 mid income women
50 hi income men
50 hi income women
300 total


 
Top
Example of Content Analysis

Violence & TV:  perform content analysis on top 10 novels  & top 10 TV shows of each decade to determine amount of violence.  Is there a correlation? 


 
Top
Example of Multivariate Analysis

Divorce:  age at marriage; class, ed, race of spouses; income of each; expectations; children; urban/rural; love; sex; length of marriage; etc.


 
Internal
Links
An Overview of  Research Design
External
Links
  Project:  Brain Storming 
Link
 
     SUMMARY:  THERE ARE SEVENTEEN STEPS IN RESEARCH DESIGN 
1.   Select a Topic
2.   Formulate a Thesis Statement...
3.   Choose the Types of Analyses
4.   Research & Write a Literature Review
      & Refine the Thesis
5.   Formulate the Research Objectives & Questions
6.   Conceptualize a topic
7.   Choose Research Method / the Research Instrument
8.   Operationalize concepts / construct the instrument
  9.   Formulate the Data Collection Strategy
10.  Obtain HIC Approval
11.  Perform a Pilot Study
12.  Collect Data
13.  Prepare the Data for processing & analysis
14.  Process & Analyze Data
15.  Interpret & make Inferences about Data
16.  Write the Research Paper
17.  Write Final HIC Report
 
 
1.  SELECTING A TOPIC is the first step in research design where the researcher's task is to pick the broad area of investigation, which will be narrowed down in successive steps   
  The most important step in any research project is to define clearly the problem the researcher wishes to study   
  See:  Webbing & Brainstorming the Topic   
  2.  THE FORMULATION OF THE THESIS narrows the topic so that a type of analysis can be applied to establish research objectives   
  See:  Writing the Thesis   
  See:  Refine the Thesis:  add Types of Analysis   
  Review:  The Types of Analysis   
  3.  THE CHOICE OF THE TYPE OF ANALYSIS (TOA) determines the mode of inquiry (descriptive, correlation, comparison, etc.) which will be used to achieve the research objectives   
  4.   RESEARCHING & WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW allows the researcher to refine the thesis   
  See: Scholastic Sources   
  Evaluation of the Literature Review   
 
5.  THE FORMULATION OF RESEARCH OBJECTIVES ( ROs ) from the types of analysis ( TOA ) is accomplished by utilizing the TOAs to formulate research questions, or hypotheses  
  6.  THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE TOPIC is the process whereby specification & refinement of abstract concepts used in the research is accomplished  
  Common Factors & Concepts  
  Ideal Types  
  Units of Analysis  
 
7.  THE CHOICE OF METHODOLOGY / OF THE RESEARCH INSTRUMENT is where the researcher chooses the data collection tool, such as a survey, experiment, etc. to achieve the research objectives  
  8.  OPERATIONALIZATION is the development of specific research procedures (operations) such as survey questions, experimental protocol, interview schedules, observation protocol, etc., that result in empirical observation representing those concepts in real world  
  9.  THE FORMULATION OF THE DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY determines the procedures by which the research instrument will be applied to suitable research participants; e.g. what are the procedures used for giving out a survey   
  Consent & Confidentiality in Research  
  Moral, Ethical & Privacy Issues in Social Research  
  Sampling issues should be contemplated throughout the research design process, but must be finalized during operationalization of the research instrument   
  10.  OBTAINING THE HIC's APPROVAL ensures legal & ethical research responsibilities are met  
  11.  THE PERFORMANCE OF A PILOT STUDY allows the researcher a trial run for the study so that any problems, omissions or other anomalies can be addressed  
  12.  DATA COLLECTION utilizing efficient, effective & ethical methodological practices as delineated in the data collection strategy  
  13.  THE PREPARATION OF DATA for processing & analysis is determined by the type of data collected by the research instruments in that data preparation is quite different for surveys & content analysis, etc.  
  14PROCESSING & ANALYZING DATA is determined by the type of data collected by the research instruments in that data preparation is quite different for surveys & content analysis, etc.  
  15.  THE INTERPRETATION & MAKING INFERENCES ABOUT DATA allows the researcher to draw conclusions & state opinions about the findings of the research  
  16.  WRITING THE RESEARCH PAPER is where the researcher organizes all the steps of the research to make it available to the targeted audience  
  17.  WRITING THE HIC FINAL REPORT is where the researcher makes the findings of the research available to the HIC, demonstrating that legal & ethical responsibilities have been upheld  

 

 
Internal
Links

Top

Outline on the Scientific Method
External
Links
  SUMMARY:  There are SEVEN steps in the Scientific Method
1.  Observe      2.  Classify      3.  Apply Logic 4.  Hypothesize
5.  Research     6.  Record & Analyze Findings       7.  Record Findings
 
  There are SEVEN steps in the Scientific Method  
  The Scientific Method is put into operation through the steps of the Research Design Process  
Link
1.  Observation (a.k.a. empiricism) employs the five senses: seeing, hearing, touching, smelling, & tasting  
  Hume found that the senses are subject to illusions, errors, or prejudices  
  Because of problems w/ the senses, the scientific method makes further demands on the researcher  
  Observations must be subject to confirmation and verification  
  Confirmed & verified observations lead to "factual information" where the facts are socially created  
Link
2.  Classification establishes relationships among facts:   
  Facts & classifications alone are sometimes viewed as "knowledge"  
  But this knowledge, classifications, must be seen as culturally based (i.e. biased)  
  In the mid 1800s, there was an explosion of modern classification  
  3.  Applying logic infers a relationship among facts or objects of classification  
  The relationship inferred by application of logic becomes a hypothesis, if it is to be tested  
  But there are other ways of knowing than by deductive logic, including emotion, tradition, religion, feminist, post-modern  
  And logic tells us nothing of values; but other ways of knowing do deal w/ values  
  Science & logic tacitly support existing social relations, cultural & moral identities  
  We live in a culture where tradition, religion, emotions, etc. have less influence than science, logic, etc.  
  Scientism is the habit of thought or procedure of scientists that embodies a particular set of values, norms, structures & institutions  
  Choosing the Types of Analyses to be utilized in the Research Project reflects the application of logic  
Link
4. Hypothesize: If the hypothesis is true, then such & such should follow 
 
  A Hypothesis is an "if, then statement"  
  A Hypothesis takes the form that: 'If "C" or the Cause occurs, then "E" or the Effect should follow'  
  The hypothesis is a concise statement of the problem to be researched  
 
In research, the answers you get depend on the questions you ask
Some questions are never asked. 
Who controls the questions asked? 
See Interest Based Knowledge
 
  5. Research:  In actually conducting the research, some variation of the Research Instruments is used  
  Research Instruments include Surveys, Interviews, Statistical Analysis, Analyze Existing Data, Observation, Experiments, etc.   
  6. Record & analyze findings is the process by which the Researcher documents observations, numerical data, etc.  
  7. Report findings is where scientific findings are usually reported in journals, books, govt publications, conferences, etc.  
  See Also:  
  -  Qualities of the Scientific Method  
  -  The History of the Development of the Scientific Method  
  -  Criticism of science:  Weber on values & science  
  -  Hoaxes:
Link
  -  Montesquieu on the Scientific Method  

 
Top
1. Observe
Examples:  Egyptians studied motions of heavenly bodies to predict seasons, flooding of Nile & when to plant & harvest
1830:  Darwin observed species & developed theory of evolution

 
Top
2. Classification
e.g. Periodic Table, Phylums;  types of society (ancient, agriculture, industry, service)

 
Top
4. Hypothesize
If a build-up of CO2 causes warming in greenhouses, then a build-up of CO2 in the Earth's atm should cause warming
Social isolation causes suicide

 
Internal
Links

Top

Outline on the Qualities of the Scientific Method
External
Links
  There are THREE Qualities of the Scientific Method which are utilized by the natural & the social sciences  
  a. Organized Skepticism:  All scientific claims must be supported by proof (research) which has been reviewed by the scientific community and replicated by others  
  Organized skepticism attempts to mitigate the effect of values in research by making the research process visible to all  
  b.  Share Findings:  There is an obligation to share both findings & methods so that others can review & replicate the experiment  
  The sharing of findings is done to prevent mistakes & hoaxes  
  One of the fundamental differences btwn common sense & science is that scientific knowledge is shared & replicated ( tested by others ) while common sense is merely our own personal experience w/ little or no methodology, replication, etc.  
  c.  Minimized Values:  Science tries to minimize values in research
For most of the public AND many scientists (social & natural), there is the assumption that science is neutral, i.e. value free
 
  Max Weber originated idea of value free science, but even he knew it was impossible to accomplish  
  See Also:   
  - The Scientific Method  
  - The History of the Development of the Scientific Method  
  - Criticism of science:  Weber on values & science  
  - Hoaxes:
   - The Piltdown man
   - Cold Fusion
Link

 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on    David Hume    1711  -  1776
External
Links
Link
-  Biography & Major Works  
  Introduction:  Hume was a Scottish philosopher who influenced the modern philosophical schools of skepticism & empiricism  
  Summary:  Hume distrusted philosophical speculation & believed that knowledge came from experience
All experiences existed only in the mind as individual units of experience
Whatever we experience is only the contents of our own consciousness
Hume believed a world existed outside of consciousness, but this could not be proven
 
  Hume's Challenge of Skepticism was the simple question:  How do we "know" anything?
 
  Hume and the skeptical philosophers said it is impossible to prove anything  
  Hume distrusted  philosophical speculation  and believed knowledge came from  the senses  
  For Hume, the senses were not infallible, & therefore faith must be in god  
  For Hume, understanding came from experience, which is a combination of sensory knowledge & shared understandings
 
  The nature of shared understandings formed a 'proto scientific method' which Hume developed   
  Hume undermined the mechanistic view of Locke, et al, by attacking causality 
 
  For Hume, Causality is simply an idea, or a customary way of thinking 
 
  Today, Post modernists agree w/ Hume & the Skeptical Philosophers that causality is simply a customary way of thinking
 
  For Hume who was a "skeptical philosopher," because B follows A, one assumes that A causes B   or   B is the effect of A
 
  Hume's point is that any causal relationship is really open to question because we don't see the cause, only one even & then another that we call cause & effect
 
  Hume believed experience existed only in the mind as individual units of experience  
  From Hume's work, THREE Principles of Causality can be developed
 
  a.  In a causal relationship, time order must be preserved in that event  A must always precede event B in time, i.e. does the cause precede the effect?
 
  In social or natural experiments, it can be very difficult to determine time order  
  The complexities of time ordering in causality can be seen in the relationship btwn low income as a cause of juvenile delinquency where juvenile delinquency can also be seen to cause low income  
  What is needed to show time order?  
  Could juvenile delinquency come before low income & cause low income?  
  b.  In a causal relationship, a correlation must be evident as event A must be correlated to event B; that is, the variables change together in a predictable way
 
  For Hume, the Principle of Causality of Correlation indicates that the variables change together in a predictable way  
  When the independent variable changes, the dependent variable also has a tendency to change, there is a correlation  
  Correlation is often aka covariation or a statistical relationship  
  Scientists report findings such as, "Isolation is correlated w/ suicide," and not "Isolation causes suicide"  
  For scientists to find results, whenever event A occurs, we must see event B follow a certain percentage of the time  
  The percentage of times event B follows event A is called the reliability coefficient  
 
c.  In a causal relationship, Alternative Explanations must be eliminated, that is other possible causes that may cause both events A & B must be eliminated
 
  To establish a causal relationship, the researcher must eliminate any alternative explanations  
  In establishing causality, eliminating alternative relationships is the most difficult to establish, & we can never know for sure that we have done so
 
  Researchers can test for other explanations, but frequently this cannot be done because they are not aware of other relationship or because the situation is simply too complicated to be sorted out  
  A Spurious relationship occurs when the observed effect is caused by a 3rd variable, i.e. another explanation  
  A Control Variable is used to test for alternative explanations  
  Example:  What caused delinquency?
What is the control variable in pop density & delinquency?
What is the Independent Variable?
What is the Dependent Variable?
What relationship was spurious?
 
  Hume demonstrates that there can be no certainty in establishing a cause & effect relationship through research  
  Hume's dissection of the scientific process of showing cause & effect demonstrates that we never know anything for certain, because:  
  a.  Correlation shows that we only see two things occur together, we do not actually see cause & effect.  We may see effect w/o cause  
  b.  Time order is valid only until we see a counter case, that is, we see cause precede effect  
  c.  We can never be certain that we have eliminated other causes, i.e. alternative explanations  
  d.  Because of illusions, we cannot trust the senses  
  For Hume, then, science was not a panacea or solution for all human challenges & problems...  
  ...& thus he remained very religious  

 
  See Also:  
  The Enlightenment      1642  -  1789  
  Rousseau         1712  -  1778   
       The Discourse on Inequality  
       The Social Contract   
       Emile & Sophy   
  Locke        1632 - 1704  
  Hume         1711 - 1776  
  Kant          1724 - 1804  
         Critique of Pure Reason,   1781   
         Critique of Practical Reason,   1788  
         The Elements & Judgments  
  Burke        1729 - 1797  
  Hegel         1770 - 1831  
         Hegel's Dialectic  
         Hegel's Influence on other Thinkers  
         Hegel's Major Works  
  Bonald      1754  -  1850  
  Maistre     1754  -  1821  
  The Conservative Reaction to the Enlightenment  

 
Top
 

David Hume
1711  -  1776
b Edinburgh, Scottish
Spent most of his life writing
Occasional diplomat to France

Top
   
Major Works

A Treatise of Human Nature       1739, 1740
Essays Concerning Human Understanding     1748
An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals   1751
History of Great Britain     1754,  1756
History of England     1759, 1762


 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Weber on Values in Science
External
Links
  Max Weber originated idea of value free science, but even he knew it was impossible to accomplish  
  Weber held that science cannot decide value issues
 
  For Weber, the clarity of issues is all that science can offer us
 
  Science can provide us w/ means but not ends
 
  Science can never show the way to true values
 
  A conflict of values is inevitable
 
  Values can never be arranged through science, or otherwise, into one universal scale
 
  Weber demonstrated that it is difficult not to use Science to determine values because science offers insight:
 
  - into the nature of human actions  
  - into the meaning of certain goals
 
  - into the means of attaining goals
 
  - into the costs & consequences for those goals & goals not pursued
 
  Weber was one of the first people to maintain that the sciences should try to minimize values in research
 
  For most of the public AND many scientists (social & natural), there is assumption that science is neutral, i.e. value free
 
  But we must realize that value free science is a noble, but relatively unattainable goal
 
  Science often assumes a particular set of values
 
  Values are personal judgments or preferences about what is considered good or bad, or about what is liked or disliked
 
  Values & theory overlap because many of our value judgments are unproven "personal theories" however, this should not lead us to the belief that scientific theories can prove values
 
  Values, unlike scientific theory, can never be proven
 
  If we have a question of values, that should be resolved by the political process, the religious process, etc.
 
  Questions of science can be resolved, questions of values cannot  
  It is difficult to separate values & science on many issues
  - abortion
  - death penalty
  - pollution
  - unemployment policy....
 
  What are the questions of values & science here or in other issues?   
  A value loaded statement is one that purports to be neutral but has value statements  
Link
Examples of loaded statements  
  How do values enter into research?  
  Weber proposed value free science, though he understood that this is an impossible goal, it is something to be striven for  
  Today science has established a mantle of objectivity which holds "science is value free"  
  Values enter the scientific process through FIVE Avenues  
  a.  Values enter the scientific process through the sponsor of the research who inevitably has some interest in the outcome of the research   
  The influence of the sponsor can be minimized by asking 'Who are is the researcher working for?  What are the interests of the sponsor?'  
  b. Values enter the scientific process through the perspective or paradigm the researcher is researching from  
  For researchers, the bias inherent in a paradigm is difficult to account for because they often have difficulty conceptualizing factors that lie outside their paradigm  
  The influence of perspectives or paradigms can be seen in that different fields of science work w/in different theoretical frameworks, & are based on a set of different theories or models   
  Sociology has the paradigms of functionalism, conflict theory, & symbolic interactionism  
  Astronomy has the paradigms of the collapsing universe, the expanding universe, & the rapidly expanding universe  
  c. Values enter the scientific process through hypothesis formulation, the question is the researcher exploring, the statement of  the problem  
  Values enter in hypothesis formulation because 'the answer you get depends on the question you ask'  
  Values may be minimized in research by exploring a variety of questions & hypotheses & by using a variety of research methods, since each method asks the research question in a different manner  
 
d. Values enter the scientific process through the processes of generalization & interpretation
 
  Among various researchers, there is often strong disagreement over the interpretation of the same data  
 
e. Values enter the scientific process through bad science in the form of hoaxes & faulty research
 
  In research today, there is a very small amount of hoaxes or faked science  
  In research today, there is a very small amount of faulty or erroneous science  
 
The Scientific Method attempts to mitigate effect of values by making research process visible to all through the principle of organized skepticism
 
  Methods & Conclusions  
  Values usually do not enter the research process in the application or methods of the study, but each type of methods has its own bias  
  Values are legitimately relegated to the conclusion of a research project where they are identified as such  
  See:  Epistemology & the Antidotes to Bias  
  a. Antidote:  Question Knowledge; Have no blind faith in science;  Keep on Questioning   "Question Authority"  
  b. Antidote: Ask, "Who benefits from a given bit of knowledge?"  
  c. Antidote:  Ask  "Who controls or creates a given bit of knowledge?"  

 
Top  
Examples of Loaded Statements: 
"Conflict is bad because it usually leads to violence,
    & rarely changes anything anyway."

"We should decrease welfare payments 
    because too many people are lazy 
    & are skimming off of working people 
    when they could have jobs."

Neutral:  "Conflict leads to violence.  Conflict rarely changes things."

"We should decrease welfare payments 
    because given welfare recipients skill levels, 
    & the number & type of available jobs, 
    15% could have jobs.

It is impossible to be value free.


 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Gender & Research
External
Links
  HISTORICALLY, RESEARCH WAS DONE BY MEN, FOR MEN & NOW WOMEN ARE ADDING USEFUL METHODOLOGIES, E.G. VALIDATING MULTI PERSPECTIVAL KNOWLEDGE, & MORE   
  Research & nearly all aspects of life are affected by gender, the personal traits & social positions that members of a society attach to being female, male, & transgender in five ways
 
  Gynocentricity is the tendency to approach an issue from the male perspective  
 
Androcentricity is the tendency to approach an issue from the male perspective
 
  Neither gynocentricity nor androcentricity would be considered good, bad, accurate, inaccurate, etc., to a social scientist  
  The point in recognizing gynocentricity & androcentricity is to recognize that they are different  
  If either gynocentricity or androcentricity has any weakness it is in the fact that androcentricity has dominated & gynocentricity has been marginalized  
 
Over generalizing is the using of data drawn from studying only one sex to support conclusions about human behavior in general
 
  Gender blindness, or not considering the variable of gender at all, results in only partial understanding of a phenomenon
 
  Double standards result in one set of findings for one gender & another set for the other gender, as well as respecting the work of different genders differently
 
  All research can experience reactivity wherein the subjects react in unpredictable ways to the research methods or the researcher while gender reactivity is the interference created when a subject reacts to the sex of the researcher
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on an  Intro to Ethics & Research
External
Links
  SINCE THE INCEPTION OF ETHICAL REGS IN RESEARCH, THERE HAVE BEEN FEW VIOLATIONS, OR DANGERS TO SUBJECTS   
  The American Sociological Association (ASA), the professional organization of US sociologists, has estbed formal guidelines for conducting research
 
  Every social science & natural science now has ethical reviews of all research w/ a greater level of review on research w/ human subjects
 
  In their research, sociologists must strive to: 
 
  -  be technically competent & fair minded in their work
 
  -  ensure the safety of subjects taking part in a research project
 
  -  include in their published findings any sources of financial support
 
  -  observe the global dimensions to research ethics
 
  Most universities, colleges, research instits & other orgs which do research also have their own human research boards
 
  The Human Investigation Committee (HIC) at UVaWise is an example of one ethical board that reviews social & natural science research
 
  In the recent past there was inadequate ethical oversight of research as seen in:
 
  -  the Tuskegee Experiments
 
  -  the Zimbardo Experiments
 
  -  human radiation experiments  
  -  unethical electroshock, lobotomy, & chemical experiments & more  
  Research ethical review boards balance the benefit of the research to society w/ the cost or risk to the subjects
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the  Hawthorne Effect & Placebos 
External
Links
 
Summary:  The Hawthorne Studies began in 1924 at the Hawthorne Works of the West Electric Co. near Cicero, IL, & were conducted under auspices the National Research Council under the lead researcher, Elton Mayo.  The objectives were to examine the effect of illumination on output.  After 2.5 yrs. & many experiments, researchers could see no effect because output in both control & experimental groups had increased because the effect of being studied impacted the research subjects.  But ultimately the research found that wkrs are socially motivated as well as economically motivated, & that it is the wkrs control the pace of the wk 
 
  THE HAWTHORNE EFFECT OCCURS WHEN WKRS REACT TO BEING STUDIED BY PLEASING THE RESEARCHER, & THAT WKRS CONTROL THE PACE OF WORK, & AS CONCERNED W/ SOCIAL AS WELL AS ECON INCENTIVES   
 
Reactivity is the tendency of people being studied by social scientists to react to the researcher or to the fact that they are being studied
 
 
The Hawthorne Effect (HE) is a form of reactivity 
 
  In the Hawthorne Studies, the wkrs being studied in the General Electric Hawthorne Plant Motor Wiring Room attempted to please the researchers because they always attempted to please / appease authority figures on the job   
  Many researchers believe the research was affected by patriarchy & gender issues in that all the wkrs were women & all the researchers were men   
 
The concept of the Hawthorne Effect, which was developed during the Hawthorne Studies, holds that added social attention to workers will increase their productivity 
 
 
People in some parts of the Hawthorne Studies found that the people being studied attempt to please the researcher 
 
 
THE PLACEBO EFFECT (PE) IS A FORM OF REACTIVITY WHEREBY PEOPLE REACT AS A RESULT OF BEING STUDIED, WHEN IN FACT NOTHING HAS CHANGED 
 
 
A placebo is a false or phony treatment designed to differentiate btwn changes due to real treatment & "imagined" treatment 
 
 
A placebo is a thing or treatment given by researchers that can provide remedy because subjects believe that their condition is being treated 
 
 
The PE is widely known in medical studies because even groups who receive sugar pills instead of medicine often show improvement 
 
 
The HE & the PE are very similar except the HE is often, at some level, consciously chosen whereas the PE is never consciously chosen 
 
  THE HAWTHORNE STUDIES AT FIRST FOUND NOTHING & THEN DISCOVERED THE PLACEBO / REACTIVITY OF THE WKRS, THAT THE WKRS CONTROLLED THE PACE OF THE WK, & THAT WKRS ARE SUBJECT TO SOCIAL & ECON FACTORS IN THE WKPLACE   
  At the GE Hawthorne plant, Elton Mayo & team of young male researchers studied effect of change in light level at the Hawthorne motor wire winding plant where the wkrs were mostly young women   
  At first the researchers were confused because productivity increased whenever any change occurred at wkplace, but they eventually discovered that the wkrs controlled the pace of the work & were motivated by social factors & not only econ factors as the classic mgt theory of the era held   
  Because of Mayo's research, the concept of the 'economic person' was replaced by the 'social person' in that people seek more from wk than money   
  One of the most important findings was that the pace of work was set by the wkrs   
  Mayo & other researchers came to the realization that pace is informally set by wkrs via social relations of production; mgt efforts are secondary, wkrs resist   
  Wkrs have labels such as rate buster, shrimp, slave, speed king, brown noser which they give to sanction wkrs who work too fast   
  Wkrs have labels such as slug, ghost, gold-bricker, slacker which they give to sanction wkrs who work too slow   
 
During the Hawthorne Studies the HE was serendipitously discovered through dogged research 
 
 
The Hawthorne Studies lasted several years & applied different treatments in different settings 
 
 
One of the dynamics of the study was that the Motor Wiring Room was mostly staffed by young women while the researchers were all young "college men" 
 
  THE HAWTHORNE STUDIES WENT THROUGH 4 PHASES WHERE THEY FOUND:  1. INCONSISTENCIES, 2. THE PLACEBO / REACTIVITY EFFECT, 3. PACE SET BY THE WKRS, 4. WKRS WERE SUBJECT TO SOCIAL AS WELL AS ECON CONTROL   
 
The focus of the study was an examination of the effect of illumination on the workplace; i.e., what was the optimal level of lighting for factory work 
 
 
The findings of the Hawthorne Studies were found serendipitously through the FOUR phases of the study over several years
 
 
DURING PHASE 1, THE RESEARCHERS NOTED SOME INCONSISTENT DATA
 
  The Hawthorne studies began in 1924 at Hawthorne Works of the West Electric Co near Cicero, IL  
  The original objectives were to examine effect of illumination on output  
  After 2.5 yrs & many experiments, could see no effect because output in both the control & the exp grps had increased!   
  PHASE 2 WAS A REVISITATION OF THE RESEARCH & THUS THE PLACEBO EFFECT / REACTIVITY OF THE WKRS WAS FOUND   
 
During Phase 2, the researchers found that productivity increased regardless of whether illumination was increased or decreased
 
  Productivity increased regardless of environmental changes in wkplace   
  To determine the cause of these changes in output, the researchers isolated small grps of wkrs for close observation   
 
The observers, college males in lab coats, observed isolated small groups of workers, who were mostly young women 
 
 
The women were told to ignore the researchers & work at their regular pace 
 
 
The women & the men interacted 
 
 
The researchers wondered if other factors were intervening, so they introduced hot lunches, rest periods, days off, Saturdays work, longer hrs., shorter hrs., high fatigue, etc. 
 
 
When the researchers introduced & controlled various other factors in the workplace, output rose & stayed high! 
 
 
There was no easily identified relationship btwn productivity & changes in the work environment 
 
 
The impact on productivity seemed to lie more w/ social factors than w/ anything else 
 
 
It was through intensive interviews that Roethlisberger discovered that the women were deliberately increasing productivity because of the intense observation, & the nature of the observers, that they were experiencing 
 
 
The Hawthorne Studies revealed that the workers were reacting to being observed & that at some level, this reaction was conscious or deliberate 
 
  Ultimately as a result of revisiting the research which originally showed inconsistent data, Mayo found that the wkrs were reacting to being studied; they were doing whatever it took to please the researchers, thus revealing the concept of reactivity / the placebo effect in social research   
 
In the later phases of the Hawthorne Studies, it was found that workers develop norms & organizational culture which impact, among other things, work pace 
 
  PHASE 3 FOUND THAT OUTPUT WAS DETERMINED BY THE GRP, OR EVEN AN INDIVIDUAL OR INDIVIDUALS W/IN THE GRP  
  Roethlisberger & Mayo conducted 20,000 interviews where they found that people tended to give standard, stereotyped answers to direct questions   
  Because of what he thought were standard answers, Roethlisberger utilized a non direct approach w/ fewer in depth interviews & observation   
  Through in depth interviews & observation, the researchers found that wkrs ( not mgrs ) controlled pace of wk   
  Wkrs at the GE plant controlled output because they: 
a.  feared wking themselves out of a job 
b.  feared mgt might raise standards & then they wouldn't be able to achieve the goal set by mgt 
c.  could protect low rate / slow wkrs 
d.  realized mgt accepted the current rate 
 
  Mayo & Roethlisberger also found that the wkrs treated different mgrs differently   
  The wkrs had more respect for top mgrs & particular mid & lower level mgrs whom they thought were fair or good / effective   
  Mayo & Roethlisberger also found  that cliques or subgrps formed in the wkplace including 'games men' & 'job traders' as well as the 'leaders' who informally regulated the wkplace   
  PHASE 4 FOUND THAT WKRS WERE SUBJECT TO SOCIAL FACTORS / INCENTIVES  
  The predominant mgt paradigm at that time held that wkrs were motivated solely by econ factors   
  Roethlisberger & Dickson found that wkrs responded, & created & controlled a variety of non econ or social factors which had as much as or greater effect than the econ factors   
  Social factors that impacted wkrs were the codes of conduct created by the wkrs   
  One of the wkrs codes of conduct was a prohibition against rate busters who turn out too much work   
  Rate busters today might be called everything from brown noser to the more benevolent 'mgt material'   
  One of the wkrs codes of conduct was a prohibition against chislers who turn out too little work   
  Chislers today might be called everything from slug to ghost   
  One of the wkrs codes of conduct was a prohibition against squealers; e.g. those who tell a superior anything that will hurt another wkr or grp  
  One of the wkrs codes of conduct was a prohibition against stand-off-ish-ness;  no one, not even an inspector, should maintain soc distance or act officious   

The End
 
Top