Links |
|
Links |
|||
|
Economic Systems | ||||
|
The Economy & the Social Sciences | ||||
|
Economic Concepts | ||||
|
The Premises of Capitalism | ||||
|
Pure Capitalism | ||||
|
Capitalism & Profit Maximization | ||||
|
Market Failures | ||||
|
The Commons | ||||
|
Externalities |
|
|||
|
Public Goods |
|
|||
|
Economics Functions of Government |
|
|||
|
Limits to Neoclassical Economics |
|
|||
|
The Economy & the Environment |
|
|||
|
Economic Development | ||||
|
Factors Affecting Econ Development |
|
|||
|
Lenowisco | ||||
|
Globalization | ||||
|
Tourism & Economic Development | ||||
|
Eco Tourism | ||||
|
Costa Rica: Alternative Tourism | ||||
|
Ecuador: Alternative Tourism |
Links |
|
Links |
|||
- Project: Economic Systems |
|
||||
|
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS ARE SOCIAL STRUCTURES THAT DETERMINE PRODUCTION & DISTRIBUTION |
|
|||
Economic systems are social structures that determine the production & distribution of scarce resources | |||||
Economic systems define the nature of private & public property including who owns capital, or productive capacity |
|
||||
Economic systems have evolved, historically over time & thus parallel general historical development from hunter gatherer society, to empires, to feudalism, to capitalism, to mixed or state capitalism, to socialism, to communism & to as of yet undefined economic systems |
|
||||
See Also: A Socio Historical Overview | |||||
See Also: The Transition of Socialism | |||||
See Also: Outline on Marxist History | |||||
While there is not total agreement among social scientists, the types of economic systems, each which develops or focuses on a unique economic factor, include hunting & gathering, agricultural, conquest, slave agriculture, feudal, mercantile capitalism, pure capitalism, industrial, state capitalism, service, high tech, socialism, command, communism, and others |
|
||||
IN COMMON USAGE THE NATURE OF ECON & POLITICAL SYSTEMS ARE OFTEN CONFUSED | |||||
Many analyses of economic systems mix political systems w/ economic systems & indeed in the past there was no social sciences of politics or economics, rather social scientists examined political economic systems |
|
||||
It is important not to confuse economic systems w/ the authoritarianism, oligoplism, fascism, nazism, representationism, elitism, democracy, etc. of different political systems |
|
||||
Thus it is possible to have a authoritarian capitalist system as was seen in South America, or a democratic socialist system as was seen in the Scandinavian region |
|
||||
There are FIVE fundamental functions that any economic system must
fulfill:
a. An economic system impacts what the society is to produce b. An economic system impacts how much of each of many products to produce c. An economic system impacts how production is to be carried out d. An economic system impacts who is to receive the output e. An economic system impacts how & when to adapt to change |
|
||||
a. AN ECON SYSTEM IMPACTS WHAT THE SOCIETY IS TO PRODUCE |
|
||||
An economic system has an impact on:
- the mix of consumer goods - the mix of capital & consumer goods - the mix of capital goods |
|
||||
b. AN ECON SYSTEM IMPACTS HOW MUCH OF EACH OF MANY PRODUCT TO PRODUCE |
|
||||
An economic system has an impact on:
- the amount of consumer goods of each type - the amount of luxury goods - the amount of art, education, medical care, etc. - the amount of capital goods - what resources are needed to produce goods, since resources themselves are products |
|
||||
c. AN ECON SYSTEM IMPACTS HOW PRODUCTION IS TO BE CARRIED OUT |
|
||||
An economic system has an impact on the organization of:
- of production as private vs. govt - of production as big vs. little - of production w/ regards to labor vs. technology, etc. - the types of labor such as free, slave, indentured, wage, salary, independent, etc. - capital such as individual, partnerships, corporations, etc. |
|
||||
d. AN ECON SYSTEM IMPACTS WHO IS TO RECEIVE THE OUTPUT |
|
||||
An economic system has an impact on the socially acceptable:
- distribution of wealth - level of the income gap - level of poverty - level of wealth |
|
||||
e. AN ECON SYSTEM IMPACTS HOW & WHEN TO ADAPT TO CHANGE |
|
||||
An economic system has an impact on the ability to adapt to:
- internal goals & needs - external pressures |
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
PURE CAPITALISM IS CHARACTERIZED BY THE MKT, PRIV PROP, & NO GOVT INTERVENTION | |||||
A capitalist economy is one in which most of the productive capacity is privately owned & which the distribution of all goods is accomplished through the market system | |||||
Pure capitalism is frequently called laissez faire capitalism because the French word laissez faire means "hands off" connoting that the govt. keeps out of regulating capitalism, thus its pure form |
|
||||
W/in capitalism the system of private ownership as it relates to business, is often called private enterprise |
|
||||
Capital is seen as stored wealth in the form of money, stocks, bonds, etc. as well as the productive capacity including manufacturing & distribution capacity, raw materials, etc. |
|
||||
The US is considered to be the most highly capitalistic nation because it has the highest proportion of privately owned productive capacity, yet the US today is not pure capitalist because the govt. does own some productive capacity |
|
||||
Another important feature of pure capitalism besides lack of govt. or public ownership is a low level of govt. regulation on the market system |
|
||||
In most capitalist systems the market system of supply & demand determines what is produced, who can & cannot buy that production, & who profits from that production |
|
||||
THE CONCEPT OF THE "INVISIBLE HAND" DESCRIBES THE NATURE OF THE SELF REGULATING MKT | |||||
Under pure capitalism, the "invisible hand" of the market is said to guide producers into producing the optimal amount in the most efficient manner |
|
||||
Adam Smith, in his book The Wealth of Nations, 1776, developed our understanding of the invisible hand |
|
||||
The invisible hand works imperfectly but in general, when a supply is insufficient, people will pay more for a product, producing excess profits, which attract more producers, who produce more, driving the price down |
|
||||
CAPITALISM DETERMINES WHAT, HOW MUCH, HOW TO PRODUCE, & WHO GETS IT, & HOW TO CHANGE | |||||
Capitalism & the market fulfill the FIVE fundamental economic functions
An economic system impacts: a. - what the society is to produce b. - how much of each of many products to produce c. - how production is to be carried out d. - who is to receive the output e. - how & when to adapt to change |
|
||||
A capitalist economic system impacts what & how much to produce based on what creates the most profit | |||||
Through the profit motive, capitalism determines what & how much to produce in that private enterprise will only produce what will make a profit, & they will produce at a level where supply starts to satiate the market, driving down the price to the level of minimal profits |
|
||||
Capitalists will produce only what is profitable, thus if something is needed but people cannot afford it, it will not be produced |
|
||||
"Orphan drugs" is a generic concept connoting any product that is needed but which there is no monetary demand |
|
||||
Profit is looked at, generally, in two manners, which may be thought
of as a cost benefit analysis:
- revenues minus cost equals profit - sales minus expenses equals net income |
|
||||
For economists, costs are the total payments made to "homes" including workers, land owners, capital suppliers |
|
||||
HI PROFIT RATES ATTRACT INVESTMENT, LO PROFIT RATES REDUCE INVESTMENT | |||||
For economists, normal profits are the "average" profits to entrepreneurs in that any product must have profits to attract producers, but not economic profits |
|
||||
The allocation of resources to production depends on profits | |||||
For economists, economic profits are "above average" profits which will attract more producers & drive up supply which drives down prices, reducing profits to the level of normal profits | |||||
|
A cap econ system impacts how production is to be carried out based on the max of profit & thus there can be little concern for Labor, alienation in the wkplace etc. |
|
|||
The econ function of profits & losses signals that resources should be reallocated | |||||
Losses or below average profits (normal profits) will tell people to get out of the business into a more profitable business | |||||
Above average profits (economic profits) will tell people to get into the business | |||||
|
A cap econ system impacts who is the receive the output based on who has the money to buy goods |
|
|||
A cap econ system impacts how & when to adapt to change by adapting to the profit levels in the production of different goods & services | |||||
When a product falls below normal profits, enterprises start looking for methods to reduce costs to bolster profits or for new, more profitable products to produce | |||||
INVESTMENTS UPGRADES OLD FACILITIES, BUILDS NEW FACILITIES, & MOVES FACILITIES | |||||
Brown field industrialization connotes economic expansion in the same area, in the same general product line by building or rebuilding of a factory or other productive facility in an area that has had such facilities before | |||||
Green field industrialization connotes the new development of a factory or other productive facility in a new area | |||||
Deindustrialization is is the relative decline in industrial production & employment in core regions as a result of the development of information technology & the export of traditional industries to semi peripheral & peripheral nations | |||||
Deindustrialization is economic contraction in one area that is usually accompanied by economic expansion in another area | |||||
A capitalist economic system will pursue profits & adapt through expansion of current facilities, brown field Industrialization, green field industrialization, or deindustrialization | |||||
|
THERE ARE FIVE MAJOR WEAKNESSES OR CRITICISMS OF CAPITALISM: |
|
|||
A. COMPETITION DEVOLVES INTO MONOPOLISTIC SYSTEMS | |||||
Marx noted that capitalist, competitive systems devolve into a monopolistic systems because production becomes ever more concentrated as some producers grow, become more profitable, driving smaller, inefficient producers out of business | |||||
Pac Man Economics | |||||
Based on the nature of capitalism to produce ever bigger firms, Marx predicted the downfall of capitalism | |||||
Marx saw ever bigger firms, driving workers ever harder, w/o regards to humanity | |||||
Brutal monopolies run by robber barons emerges out of pure capitalism in the 1800s & early 1900s | |||||
Marx was correct in that until the development of "trust busting" & the govt regulation of big business which occurred in the early 1900s & heralded the beginning of mixed or state capitalism, pure capitalism demonstrated its monopolistic, exploitative character | |||||
B. CAPITALISM INCREASES INCOME INEQUALITIES | |||||
A capitalist system develops inherent income inequalities because it is a winner take all system | |||||
C. UNDER CAPITALISM, ONLY "WANTS" ARE REGISTERED BY THE MARKET | |||||
In a capitalist system, only "wants" are registered by the market | |||||
For economists, wants are different than needs | |||||
Wants are what consumers can afford | |||||
For economists, needs are half of wants in that to purchase a product one must want the product, i.e. be able to afford it, & one must need or desire the product | |||||
For the economist, orphan drugs are needed, but they are not wanted | |||||
D. THE MARKET IS OPERATES BEST IN THE SHORT TERM | |||||
The market system has no vision & cannot plan ahead because it registers wants & profit in the extreme short term | |||||
E. CAPITALISM HAS MARKET FAILURES | |||||
Market failures are the collapse of demand, resulting in an economic downturn, bust, recession, depression, etc. | |||||
Historically, capitalist systems have had frequent market failures |
Links |
|
Links |
|||
- Video: The Corporation: Segment 5: Sept 11th & the Price of Gold & Oil 2:25 minutes |
|
||||
THE MKT IS EFFICIENT BECAUSE OF THE OPERATION OF THE "INVISIBLE HAND" | |||||
The functioning of capitalism, through the market & the "invisible hand," promotes profit maximization, efficiency, flexibility, etc. |
|
||||
Adam Smith believed that under capitalism, w/ its processes of the invisible hand & the profit motive, everyone would benefit because these social processes reward efficiency w/ higher profits, create jobs, create products, provide a tax base, etc. | |||||
Marx recognized that capitalism was the most efficient system, the most flexible system; even more so than socialism |
|
||||
Marx, however, believed that w/ the transition to socialism that the efficiency developed in mature capitalism would be more than sufficient to provide for all human needs & thus socialism is a compromise btwn humanity & efficiency |
|
||||
EFFICIENCY IN THE MKTS DOES NOT GUARANTEE FAIRNESS IN THE MKTS | |||||
For Marx, what is most efficient is deficient in its humanity |
|
||||
Thus, modern economists agree w/ Marx agree who posits that capitalism depends on a norm of maximization |
|
||||
For modern economists & Marx, economically rational behavior is that which brings the maximum possible return in income, wealth, or profits |
|
||||
Critics of capitalism note that when one person maximizes wealth, it may occur at the expense of another |
|
||||
Maximization of profits results in social inequality |
|
||||
The US has greater economic inequality & more severe poverty than most other industrialized countries all of which are less capitalistic than the US |
|
||||
See Also: Stratification | |||||
PEOPLE HAVE NOT ALWAYS PURSUED UNBRIDLED PROFIT MAX | |||||
Many argue that maximizing wealth, inequality, poverty, etc. is simply human nature |
|
||||
There are TWO arguments that say it is wealth maximization, inequality, poverty, etc. are part of human nature |
|
||||
First, the socio historical examination shows that while wealth maximization, inequality, poverty, etc. have been consistent in the US for the last 100 years, stratification has not been consistent historically in that it has changed depending on the type of socio-economic system from a low during the Hunter Gatherer Era, to a high during the Feudalism of the Middle Ages, to the medium to high level during the Post Industrial Age, i.e. the present |
|
||||
THE PURSUIT OF PROFIT MAX IS CULTURALLY DETERMINED | |||||
Second, Weber demonstrates that stratification is related to, created by the interaction of cultural, religious & social systems as well as economic systems |
|
||||
See Also: Weber | |||||
See Also: Weber on Strat | |||||
The norm of maximization of wealth & income has arisen in socialist countries |
|
||||
The norm of maximization of wealth & income arising in socialist countries is the result of their viewing the higher standard of living in capitalist countries | |||||
In extremely isolated socialist countries such as Albania & North Korea, it does not seem that individualist, maximizing values are prevalent | |||||
It seems that if an individual, class, or even society is isolated from inequality, i.e. does not have to view others w/ more wealth, then people are content w/ their own level | |||||
To paraphrase Merton's findings of crime, commonly called the J Curve or the Expectations Theory, it is not a lack of wealth that motivates people or creates feelings of deprivation & alienation, rather it is the lack of wealth in the midst of wealth that creates need, deprivation, etc. |
Links |
|
Links |
|||
|
Market failures are built in, normal functions of the mkt in which the system produces (1) Externalities or Spillovers, (2) Public or Social Goods, (3) Mkt Instability in the form of Booms or Busts, (4) Unjust Distribution of Resources, (5) the Problem of the Commons, (6) Mkt Assimilation | ||||
(1) An externality, aka a spillover, is a benefits or cost associated w/ the consumption or production of a good or service which is obtained by or inflicted w/out compensation on a party other than the buyer (user) or seller (producer) of the good or service | |||||
There are both spillover benefits & spillover costs | |||||
|
(2) Public or social goods are mkt relationships where there is a failure to allocate any resources whatsoever to the production of certain goods & services whose output is economically justified | ||||
|
(3) Mkt instability is seen in the econ cycle, which is the periodic, repetitive cycle of growth, peak, decline, & trough of econ output | ||||
See Also: Unemployment | |||||
|
(4) Unjust distribution of resources: stratification | ||||
The distribution of resources is not a question economists usually discuss because it is often viewed as normal or functional | |||||
|
(5) The problem of the commons is the mkt failure wherein public, or common land is mis utilized because everyone may benefit from it while no one is responsible for, or pays for, it | ||||
The landlord tenant problem is a special case of the problem of the commons where the common property is owned by one & rented by another, who is induced to mis utilize that & not be responsible for that property | |||||
|
(6) Mkt assimilation, aka pacman econ, is the mkt failure whereby smaller econ enterprises are assimilated, bought up or run out of business by bigger econ enterprises, eventually leading to monopolies |
Links |
|
Links |
|||
THE COMMONS IS PROPERTY THAT IS HELD BY THE PUBLIC | |||||
The commons is any resources held in common by the people | |||||
Today we often, but not always, call the commons public property | |||||
|
The commons is the opposite of private property or land which has a designated national sovereign |
|
|||
The commons includes resources that are not private property or public property, in that the commons includes resources for which no person, nation, etc. has ownership, & yet it has not been designated as public property | |||||
THE NATURE OF PUBLIC PROPERTY HAS CHANGED DRAMATICALLY OVER TIME | |||||
|
Our notion of private property is greatly expanded as compared to that of the middle ages |
|
|||
In the Mid Ages, peasants, i.e. the commoners had private property in the sense of their homes & personal possessions, but in another sense their sovereign, King, actually owned that property | |||||
All material property, & the people belonged to the sovereign, but in another sense it belonged to the Kingdom in that the ruler only had limited rights of bequeathal in that in most cases he could only bequeath to the eldest son | |||||
The term commons originally referred to the common people as distinguished from their rulers or a ruling class | |||||
The commons indicated the body of people not ennobled, as represented in England by the lower house of Parliament House of Commons | |||||
Later the term commons came to denote the food provided at a common table | |||||
The commons as the food provided by ruler represented the expanded obligation of the ruler to the people, & the right of the people to require the ruler to provide particular goods & services to them | |||||
The obligation of the ruler / right of the people finally expanded to include access to land held in common, i.e. the commons | |||||
THE 'TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONS' IS THAT EVERYONE TRIES TO EXPLOIT IT AS MUCH AS THEY CAN | |||||
|
The dilemma of the commons is that if I exploit the env, I benefit but everyone else loses; if I don't exploit, I lose & everyone else wins |
|
|||
Today the public property has relatively clearly defined protections that generally prevent individualistic exploitation | |||||
However, there is still large amts of resources that are not private or public property & therefore are 'the commons of modernity' | |||||
Examples of the commons of modernity include the public property, & the oceans, Antarctica, the Arctic, space, moon, the EM - spectrum, & parts of the env which cannot be made into private property such as the air, some bodies of water, many wild species of flora & fauna, etc. | |||||
The tragedy of the commons is seen in that commons areas are often 1st area threatened by misuse | |||||
Everyone can use the commons, but no one is responsible for it | |||||
It is to an individual's advantage to use the commons as much as possible since it is free | |||||
Others may use the commons up if I don't get it first | |||||
Grazing on public land encourages individuals, including corps, to graze as many cattle as possible w/o concern for the land | |||||
Wood cutting on public land encourages individuals, including corps, to log as much as possible w/o concern for the land | |||||
Agriculture industry grows as much as possible to max profits in the short term, w/o a long term concern for the land | |||||
Note that these relationships do not necessarily change even w/ private property because capitalism has created an ethic of max profits today, w/o concern for the next gen, even if they are your own family | |||||
W/ private land there is a greater chance for responsible use because a limited number of people may use the resource, & one person / grp is responsible | |||||
|
THE COMMONS IS AN 'INDICATOR SPECIES' IN THAT IT'S HEALTH IS REPRESENTATIVE OF ENVL HEALTH IN GENERAL |
|
|||
|
Healthy societies have had healthy commons policies |
|
|||
This develops a sense of cooperation & common responsibility | |||||
Commons areas are often the first to be threatened by misuse | |||||
|
NATIONS ARE GAINING SOVEREIGNTY OVER SOME COMMON AREAS & DESIGNATING OTHER AREAS AS 'COMMONS' |
|
|||
Intl bodies such as UN & EC see envl issues as a way to build their orgs: this is their legit territory | |||||
It is hard for nations to argue against the commons w/o appearing to be self interested | |||||
|
The envl mvmt is a creator of the modern commons |
|
|||
The envl mvmt has a greater vision for alt society than other soc mvmts as seen in it's critique of capitalism, alt value sys, alt soc, common property, etc. | |||||
|
LANDLORD - TENANT PROBLEM IS SIMILAR TO TRAGEDY OF COMMONS IN THAT USERS HAVE INCENTIVES TO EXPLOIT |
|
|||
|
Landlords pay capital investment costs |
|
|||
|
Tenants pay operating costs |
|
|||
|
Both tenants & landlords will tend to forego these costs, i.e. investments & operating costs, unless they have long term reasons not to |
|
|||
Landlords often have the long term interest of the value of bldg is going up | |||||
The tenant may have the long term interest of intending to stay as tenant for a long term | |||||
With the long term nature of the env, landlords do not see the value of, e.g., forest land as increasing after it is logged | |||||
Natural resource harvesters operate as tenants who are not going to stay | |||||
|
Landlords will not pay for good insulation unless property is increasing in value, & it benefits tenants so they can raise rents |
|
|||
SOLUTIONS TO THE COMMONS, LANDLORD - TENANT PROBLEMS INCLUDE PRIVATIZATION & REGULATION | |||||
The classic economists' solution to the commons landlord - tenant problem is to privatize everything | |||||
Modern economists advocate privatizing all resources, even those that are indivisible such as air, water, etc., via a stock mkt, share system | |||||
The classic liberals' solution to the commons landlord - tenant problem is public stewardship, i.e. govt ownership, mgt, & regulation of public property | |||||
Modern liberals advocate quasi public ownership by, for example, the Nature Conservancy, the people & the town of Boulder, CO, etc. |
|
|
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
LIBERALS HOLD THAT OUR CURRENT ECON SYSTEM MUST BE REGULATED BY GOVT & SOC MVMTS | |||||
While even advocates of capitalism recognize it's problems, liberals advocate stronger remedies than conservatives prefer | |||||
|
The nine premises of capitalism describe how neoclassical economists believe the econ should operate | ||||
The nine premises of capitalism include:
|
|||||
|
The five fundamental functions of an econ sys are answered in a particular way by the neoclassical sys, & another way by the critics of neoclassical sys | ||||
|
The five fundamental functions of any econ include determining:
|
|
|||
|
Under neoclassical econ, the operation of the mkt sys should fulfill the five fundamental econ functions |
|
|||
|
Liberal criticisms to the capitalist mkt sys include:
a. that the competitive system develops into a monopolistic system b. inherent income inequalities c. market failures d. that only “wants” are registered by the mkt e. that the mkt system is present 'oriented' |
|
|||
The liberal criticisms of capitalism hold that strong remedies of regulation, taxation, oversight, & supplemental production of goods & services are needed to correct its ills | |||||
Radicals advocate even stronger solutions than liberals, opting for socialism or other forms of society | |||||
|
A. COMPETITIVE MKTS DEVELOP INTO MONOPOLIES BECAUSE OF 'PAC MAN' ECONOMICS & MAX OF PROFITS |
|
|||
|
See Also: Monopoly Capitalism |
|
|||
|
Historically, competition decreases as the size of businesses grow |
|
|||
|
Because of competition, the strong businesses survive & grow, while & weak businesses eventually go out of business or are bought out |
|
|||
|
As the process of econ 'survival of the fittest' continues, large business & monopolies grow |
|
|||
The process of monopolization & big business has been forestalled to a certain extent because of the modification of pure capitalism into state capitalism, where the govt limits & regulates monopolies | |||||
See Also: State Capitalism | |||||
The pursuit of the maximization of profits exacerbates monopolization because as firms pursue extraordinary profits, as opposed to normal profits, they have a greater ability to buy out or defeat the competition | |||||
See Also: Capitalism & the Maximization of Profits | |||||
|
B. INCOME INEQUALITY IS HIGH IN CAPITALIST SYSTEMS |
|
|||
See Also: Stratification | |||||
See Also: Income Inequality in the US | |||||
|
Income inequality is high in capitalist systems; it was highest under pure capitalism, but has moderated somewhat under state, aka mixed capitalism |
|
|||
|
Under capitalism, it is a winner take all system & losers are left w/ unemployment or a failed business w/ little safety net |
|
|||
|
Capitalism has developed some methods to level out income inequality, but inequality still remains hi |
|
|||
|
Income inequality worsens other social problems because it weakens the mid classes |
|
|||
Most soc problems are addressed by the mid classes only because they have some disposable income & free time to address them | |||||
The lower classes do not generally address soc probs because while they care, they have no disposable income & little free time to address them | |||||
The upper classes do not generally address soc probs because while they have disposable income & free time, they do not care to address them | |||||
|
C. MKT FAILURES CAUSE DISRUPTIONS IN THE ECON |
|
|||
|
See Also: Mkt Failures |
|
|||
|
The mkts themselves have little or no ability to affect any aspect of production or society that is not monetarized |
|
|||
|
Mkt failures must be addressed by a govt, & govt's must deal w/ the pitfalls of democracy which make them slow to act & inefficient |
|
|||
See Also: Pitfalls of Democracy | |||||
Under state capitalism, i.e. today, some corps have developed mission statements of 'social responsibility' | |||||
While the strategy of corp soc responsibility has great potential, for most corps today it is implemented as a charity policy where a % of profit is given to charity | |||||
For the strategy of corp soc responsibility to be paradigm changing, corps need to internalize the strat of soc respon & implement it in their daily ops so that they are accting for extremities, spillover costs, lack of needed public goods, etc. | |||||
|
D. THE MKT ONLY REGISTERS 'WANTS' |
|
|||
Wants are different than needs in that wants are what a person can afford while needs are what a person requires | |||||
Under capitalism, needs are half of wants, & money is the other half | |||||
Because the mkt only registers wants which can be monetarily represented, non monetarized wants, social, wants, etc. go unanswered, creating social problems, strife, radicalization, & crises | |||||
Govts, charities, soc mvmts, NGOs, etc. all function, at least in part to make the system recognize individual & social needs | |||||
An example of govt registering needs is the provision for healthcare for some of the poor & elderly who cannot afford it | |||||
Govtl provision for healthcare is a public good, i.e. good for even those who already pay for healthcare because of the transferable nature of disease | |||||
An example of a soc mvmt registering needs is the provision for clean water for VA mussels as advocated for by the Sierra Club | |||||
Soc mvmts' provision for VA mussels is a public good to the extent that people care about nature, & benefit from a living species either directly or aesthetically | |||||
E. THE MKT SYSTEM IS ONLY ORIENTED TO THE PRESENT | |||||
The mkt system cannot plan ahead | |||||
The mkt system lives in the extreme shortterm | |||||
Theories of pure cap hold that shortterm planning is sufficient in that a series of decisions over time is superior to a longterm decision | |||||
Critics of capitalism, some investors themselves, for example, decry the stock mkts' emphasis on quarterly profits | |||||
But because peoples' lives, the welfare of a society, the welfare of an env, community property, etc. are all longterm goals, pure cap has difficulty addressing both their needs & wants | |||||
Because govt also has structural factors that make it difficult for it to address longterm issues, issues such as social security, the national debt, global warming, economic planning, etc. are seemingly intractable problems | |||||
The intractibleness of some social, econ, & envl problems is largely a function of the shortsightedness of the mkt & the govt, & soc mvmts are not much better | |||||
Soc mvmt have only been powerful, some argue, for a few decades, yet some are beginning to develop longterm strategic plans | |||||
Some corps, notably Japanese, then European, have also begun to develop longterm strats that by necessity must acct for social factors, externalities, needs, govtl goals, etc. |
|
Links |
|
Links |
||
ECON DEVELOPMENT IS THE GROWTH OF THE ECON & USUALLY INCLUDES A GROWTH IN THE NUMBER OF JOBS, WAGES, GENERAL PROSPERITY, & THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURES THAT MAKE IT POSSIBLE | ||||
Economic development is the transformation of the nature & composition of the economy & usually implies increases in prosperity |
|
|||
|
Ec dev is the process whereby simple, low income national economies are transformed into modern industrial economies | |||
ECON GROWTH IMPLIES THAT QUAL ECON GROWTH ACCOMPANIES ECON DEV AS IN PEOPLE MOVING UP IN THE CLASS STRUCTURE | ||||
Economic growth is not the same as economic development since the former implies quantitative growth only while the latter implies quantitative growth, but more importantly qualitative growth |
|
|||
Ec growth implies qualitative growth, a movement up the hierarchy of economic types of agriculture econ, extractive econ, industrial econ, high tech econ, & service econ | ||||
For many social activist the term econ dev is nearly synonymous w/ exploitation in that ec dev allows corps to move into an area & avoid many of the rules & reg of the indilzed nations including labor laws, envl laws, safety laws, etc. | ||||
ECON DEV IMPACTS ARE BOTH POSITIVE & NEGATIVE; FROM ED & WEALTH TO URBAN SPRAWL & ENVL DEGRADATION | ||||
For social critics, ec dev retains all or most of the negative impacts that the indlized nations experienced in their own indl rev | ||||
All participants in the ec dev debate are concerned w/ making the ec dev process less exploitative & more friendly to corps, labor, the env, etc. | ||||
At present there is no clear distinction in the language to differentiate btwn "good" & "bad" ec dev, i.e. there are no labels for different types of ec dev other than to state it is green ec dev, or labor friendly ec dev, etc. | ||||
The issue of econ dev is important because through govt policies & the policies of econ dev agencies, many other issues & policies are impacted | ||||
Econ dev pol impacts envl pol, military pol, trade pol, human rights pol, etc. | ||||
Econ dev pol often impacts the very tone the debate around other issues & thus is often defining what is important on issues, the nature of scientific studies done, & the very ground rules for what is "knowledge" & what is not by setting the parameters of the discussion | ||||
|
A SOCIO HIST ANALYSIS OF ECON DEV INCLUDES COLONIALISM, THEN NEO COLONIALISM, THEN NEO LIBERALISM, & NATION BUILDING | |||
The history of economic development is that in the early 1900s, European colonialism ended |
|
|||
Ec dev was not recognized as a social process until after WW II | ||||
Former colonies & other countries had low living standards compared to the developed countries | ||||
The colonies came to be known as developing countries | ||||
As the concept of econ development emerges, the concepts of developing & undeveloped countries emerges |
|
|||
MEASURING ECON DEV IS PRIMARILY DONE VIA GDP, WHICH INCLUDES THE VALUES OF A NATION'S EXPORTS | ||||
Economists usually rank countries as developed, developing or undeveloped based on per capital income criterion |
|
|||
Another intl econ ranking system, which parallels the developed, developing, undeveloped system, labels nations as core, semi peripheral, & peripheral | ||||
There are several problems w/ using the developed, developing, undeveloped system to measure ec dev including currency comparisons & quality of life issues |
|
|||
The current measure of ec dev may result in the classification of oil rich nations w/ hi per capita income as dev, when in fact other than the oil ind, they are undeveloped | ||||
|
The current measure of ec dev does not effectively acct for currency exchange rates & variations in the cost of living: comparing dollars to denars & cost of living |
|
||
The current measure of ec dev does not take into acct quality of life factors such as food, shelter, health, retirement, etc. | ||||
|
GDP, GNP, PPP HELP US UNDERSTAND DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF ECONOMIES | |||
GDP, GNP, PPP are THREE methods of measuring income | ||||
Gross domestic product ( GDP ) is the amount of income that a given nation creates both nationally & internationally | ||||
GDP is the most frequently used measure of income | ||||
Gross national product ( GNP ) is the amount of income that is produced in each nation, thus the international production in another nation is not counted | ||||
GNP was the measure on income used until globalization became so widespread that GDP became a clearer measure | ||||
Purchasing power parity ( PPP ) is a measure that equalizes the measure of income based on the purchasing power of income for necessities | ||||
Using PPP as a measure of income means that, for example, that $55 K provides a mid class living in the US while $45 K provides a mid class living in Australia | ||||
PPP is considered to be the clearest measure of income across nations | ||||
|
Other means of measuring development include:
|
|||
Examples of comparing economic development | ||||
|
The gap between rich & poor is over $20,000 and growing
Core: PPP GDP: $ 15,000 to $ 20,000 per yr. Periphery: PPP GDP: $ 750 to $ 7,000 |
|||
India per capita income est at $270 in
1985
Brazil est at $1,640, Italy est at $6,520 |
||||
An analysis of the ec dev of Italy, i.e. Italy's living standard, is raises the question of whether 24 times greater than India's, or just how they relate to one another | ||||
The living standard gap btwn Italy & India could be biased, i.e. it could be too hi or too lo | ||||
An analysis of the comparative ec dev of Italy & India leaves no doubt that the Italian living standard is significantly higher than that of Brazil, which in turn was higher than India's by a wide margin | ||||
ECON DEV CONCEPTS DEMONSTRATE THE GROWTH OF DIFFERENT SECTORS OF THE ECON & THE FACT THAT ECONS MUST HAVE PARTICULAR CAPACITY LIKE ED IN PLACE BEFORE OTHER ASPECTS CAN MANIFEST | ||||
There are FOUR types of economic activities: Primary Activities, Secondary Activities, Tertiary Activities, Quaternary Activities | ||||
Geographical path dependence analyzes the relationship btwn the present activities & the past activities of that place | ||||
There are always different pathways to development according to the circumstances of the variations in factors involved | ||||
What is the Geographic Path Dependence of the coalfields? | ||||
FIVE CHANGES IN SOCIAL STRUCTURE IN EC DEV INCLUDE THE BASE, EC SYS, TECH, CONDITIONS, INFRASTRUCTURE | ||||
Economic Development causes changes in FIVE a society's social structure including the | ||||
a. structure of a region's economic type of base: ag, raw material extraction, industrial, info/ high tech, services | ||||
b. form of economic organization (e.g., barter, pure capitalism, state capitalism, socialism) | ||||
c. availability & use of tech | ||||
d. basic living conditions | ||||
e. physical framework or infrastructure | ||||
UNEVEN DEVELOPMENT IS WHERE AN ECON STRAYS FROM ECON PATH DEVELOPMENT | ||||
Uneven development is a problem that has plagued nations & their economies: e.g., a nation must have the infrastructure of roads, power, etc. to support an industrial base | ||||
GENDER & DEVELOPMENT: IN PERIPHERAL NATIONS, WOMEN EXCEL AT STARTING SMALL BUSINESSES WHILE PATRIARCHAL MEN DO NOT | ||||
An analysis of gender & development demonstrates that in no country are women better off than men | ||||
In the core women have 85 to 95 % of the wealth of men | ||||
In the periphery, women have less than 5 % of the wealth of men | ||||
Developers have found that women invest in new sectors of the econ, whereas men are more likely to invest in tradl areas | ||||
Women must go to new sectors to gain an econ foothold | ||||
REGIONAL PATTERNS IN DEVELOPMENT DEMONSTRATE REGIONAL EC DEV SYNERGY | ||||
Regional patterns in development are a form of uneven development | ||||
Regional patterns in development are explained by the unique interaction of factors affecting development & scarce resources, history of neglect, aka the history of exploitation, lack of investment, concentration of low skilled people, etc. | ||||
Explain how each of these has occurred in the Appalachians | ||||
In reality, many pathways exist to development | ||||
The same factors that effect econ development itself, also effect which pathway is followed | ||||
Regions are interdependent & Econ Development is based on geographic, physical & social factors | ||||
THE STANDARD PATHWAY TO DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES HG, AG, EXTRACTION, IND, INFO / HI TECH, SERVICE | ||||
The 'standard pathway to development' typically includes the SIX phases
of:
|
||||
Most core countries followed the standard pathway to it's end | ||||
Most semi peripheral countries are struggling in extraction or industry econ systems | ||||
Most peripheral countries are struggling in H-G, agricultural, & extraction type of econ systems | ||||
We cannot yet foresee what the next type of economy will be for the core countries | ||||
We now understand that the pathway to development for semi peripheral & peripheral countries will not be the same path taken by the core countries | ||||
Thus economists, social scientists, politician, business people, etc. are all attempting to discover the best pathway for each type of nation to take |
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
Lenowisco: Lee Norton Wise County |
|
||||
Lenowisco is a local development coalition covering Lee County, the city of Norton & Wise County |
|
||||
ARC signifies the Appalachian Regional Commission |
|
||||
ARC was established by President Kennedy in 1965 to promote economic development of the Appalachian region |
|
||||
ARC & Lenowisco had FOUR original goals, including
a. to increase road building b. establishing 200 growth centers c. building infrastructure d. the creation economic incentives: tax breaks |
|
||||
The TWO major critiques of Lenowisco are that
a. the growth centers are too small & too numerous b. they built a good highway system but the secondary roads are weak |
|
||||
Neither Lenowisco nor ARC are formally coordinated w/ efforts to develop tourism or eco tourism |
|
||||
No environmental analysis is done by these econ dev bodies other than that required by the EPA such as EISs |
|
||||
Econ dev & concern for the env are not integrated at the policy level in the Appalachian region, nor in most regions |
|
Links |
|
Links |
|
- Project: Globalization & the Standardization of Culture |
|
||
- Project: Work in the Global Economy |
|
||
|
GLOBALIZATION IS THE INTERCONNECTEDNESS OF DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE WORLD THROUGH ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL, POLITICAL, CULTURAL, ETC. CONVERGENCE & CHANGE |
|
|
|
Globalization is a trend whereby production, competition, & economic exchange increasingly occur on a worldwide scale |
|
|
|
Given the impact of globalization, there is almost no remote place on Earth |
|
|
|
The effects of globalization include the growth of multinational corps., an increase in international trade, the creation & mystification of global content, the internationalization of capital markets, the creation of nascent world govt. & global regulatory agencies, the homogenization of culture, creating a global western culture, and the polarization of culture, creating a clash of cultures aka, cultural wars |
|
|
|
See Also: The Effects of Globalization | ||
Globalization has been going on since international trade began | |||
Wallerstein's world systems theory views world capitalism as beginning in the middle ages as the Europeans began their "Age of Exploration" & such nations as Italy, Spain & Portugal became world powers based on international trade & colonization | |||
The trend of international trade & globalization is in a period of unprecedented acceleration | |||
Researchers Chase Dunn, Kawano, & Brewer (2000) found that world trade, in relation to domestic production, grew rapidly over a 160 yr. period during the 1800s & 1900s | |||
Researchers Chase Dunn, Kawano, & Brewer found that the long term trend of globalization, there are three distinct surges of globalization: | |||
- about 1845 to 1880 | |||
- about 1900 to 1925 | |||
- about 1970 to present | |||
|
Economics & culture are perhaps the strongest globalizing forces
How? |
|
|
|
The global economy is specializing through locational flexibility |
|
|
|
The global economy is specializing in some countries or regions
through:
- extracting raw materials - processing raw materials - manufacturing the raw materials into parts - assembling parts - consuming finished good |
|
|
|
- Examples of globalized production include the Plastic Hoover vacuum & the Ford "World Car" |
|
|
|
There are over 800 mm people who are tied directly to global mkt in the US, Europe, & Japan |
|
|
|
The core nations have totally globalized economies & many other peripheral & semi peripheral countries are partially globalized | ||
|
Global culture(s) are rising & falling
Strong cultures are infectious Which culture is the most well known word in the world? |
|
|
|
Global forces are so powerful, they are affecting the global physical env |
|
|
|
THERE ARE FIVE FEATURES OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC & CULTURAL SYSTEMS INCLUDING: COMPLEMENTARITY, INTL DIV OF LABOR, ECON OF SCALE, TRANSFERABILITY, DIFFUSION |
|
|
The features of global econ & cultural systems include | |||
|
1. complementarity, which occurs when demand in one place is complemented by supply in another |
|
|
|
2. the international division of labor, which is the specialization of labor by country |
|
|
|
3. economies of scale, which are efficiencies created by world scale operations |
|
|
|
4. transferability, which is the ability to move capital, skills, technology, or products creates deindustrialization in the core & economic development in the periphery |
|
|
|
5. spatial diffusion, which is expansion, relocation, hierarchical: the way things spread through space over time |
|
|
FACTORS AFFECTING GLOBALIZATION INCLUDE TECH SYS, CONSUMER MKTS, DIV OF LABOR, & FINANCE | |||
|
There are FOUR factors affecting globalization & local economic development, including the international |
|
|
|
1. technical systems, which today are almost all international in scope |
|
|
2. consumer markets, which today are characterized by global patterns of consumption as seen in people around the world who enjoy McDonalds, Coke, etc. |
|
||
|
As late as the 70s only a few peripheral nations were open to intl trade & only 33 % of the wkrs in centrally planned econs: SU, China, etc. |
|
|
As late as the 70s in the core countries only 33 % of the wkrs were not in the world sys because of trade barriers, etc. | |||
|
In the 00s, only 10% of the entire world's wkrs are outside of the global econ |
|
|
|
3. division of labor, which today results in complex & simple products being constructed w/ parts from several nations, assembled in another nation, & sold in another | ||
|
4. finance, which operates 24 hrs a day following the business day in Am, Japan, Asia, & Europe | ||
|
Americanization is a powerful quality of globalization | ||
GLOBALIZATION THEORIES INCLUDE SUSTAINABLE DEV TH, MODERNIZATION TH, DEPENDENCY TH, & WORLD SYS TH | |||
Sustainable development theory examines how nations can encourage economic growth in a way that will benefit those nations & their people & not just multinational corporations in a manner that can be sustained over the long run w/o further damage of the environment | |||
Sustainable development theory asks who really benefits when international corps build plants or extract natural resources in developing countries | |||
Modernization theory examines how both the corporations & those who live in developing countries benefit because of the jobs & new markets that are created by the investment of multinational corps. | |||
Dependency theory argues that corporations take wealth out of the developing countries & gain control of resources that could otherwise have been developed & benefited from by the people living in the countries | |||
World systems theory holds that all of history may be understood as a conflict btwn three sets of nations, the core, the semi periphery, & the periphery, all of whom may form strategic alliances to further their own interests |
Links |
|
Links |
|||
- Project: A SWOT Analysis of Tourism |
|
||||
THE SCOPE OF TOURISM | |||||
By 2000, tourism was the largest single item in world trade | |||||
1 in 15 wkrs, or 150 mm, worldwide, wk in tourism | |||||
The primary occupation in tourism are in the areas of:
|
|
||||
Only 10% of Am have passports |
|
||||
Most tourism is done in people's home country | |||||
In 1970 there were 147 mm tour trips abroad |
|
||||
In 1995 there were 650 mm tour trips abroad | |||||
In 2010 there are est to be 1 bb tour trips abroad | |||||
Intl tourism is increasing in breath & so now 1/8 of all tourists go to peripheral nations in Africa, Asia, & Lat Am |
|
||||
INVESTMENT IN TOURISM |
|
||||
Tourism requires only a lo cost infrastructure because there are no heavy plants & little hi tech equip |
|
||||
The cost of creating 1 job in tourism is < 20% that of mfr job & < 2% of the cost of a hi tech job |
|
||||
EFFECTS OF TOURISM |
|
||||
The effects of tourism are not always strong at the local level |
|
||||
The concentration of tourists in 20 affluent countries yields 70% of tourists |
|
||||
Transnat corps own many tourism assets such as hotels, tour ships, resorts, golf courses, amusement parks, tour agencies, ski areas, etc. | |||||
Because transnat corps own so many tourism assets, profits often return to core countries & do not go to the countries where the tourism occurs | |||||
Typically, only 40% of the cost of a tourist's trip is reaped by the local region in which the tourism takes place |
|
||||
If a tourist trip involves a foreign owned hotel, the port of the trip
reaped by the local region falls to only 25%
Who gets the $$ & why? |
|||||
TOURISM INCREASES ECONOMIC INSTABILITY | |||||
Tourism often fosters econ vulnerability in the region or nation in which it occurs |
|
||||
All industries have some level of risk / volatility tourism, like all hi end aspects of consumption depends on style & fashion & thus is especially vulnerable |
|
||||
Thus a tourist region may lose it's popularity & experience an econ downturn | |||||
Some tourist destinations are sought because of their remoteness & "natural" undev quals & thus are econlly successful | |||||
Thus thru their own success, tourist areas become congested & thus less popular & experience an econ downturn | |||||
Example Mediterranean beaches were abandoned by the NW Euro
mid class tourists, who go to more distant, exotic locales
creating a 70% \/ in tourism on the Med beaches |
|||||
Various exogenous factors can affect tourism such as warm weather at a ski resort, a change in currency exchange rates, & political unrest in Ireland, the Mid-East, Africa, Lat Am etc. | |||||
LOCAL BENEFITS OF TOURISM | |||||
Local tourism provides income to:
|
|||||
Local benefits of tourism include that it:
|
|||||
LOCAL DISADVANTAGES OF TOURISM | |||||
Local disadvantages of tourism include that it can:
|
|||||
An example of the threat of tourism can be seen in the Caribbean where sewage poisoned mangrove trees & polluted the coast, boats & divers damaged coral reefs | |||||
An example of the threat of tourism can be seen in the Alps where 40,000 ski runs attracts tourists in numbers 10 time greater than the local pop | |||||
Local disadvantages of tourism include that it can:
|
|||||
ALTERNATIVE TOURISM | |||||
On an alternative vacation, there is an emphasis on self determination, authenticity, social harmony, preservation of env, small scale dev, use of local techniques, materials, architecture styles, etc. | |||||
To be successful, alternative tourism must be aimed @ tourists who
are both
- wealthy & - envlly conscious |
|||||
Alternative tourism is not a large mkt, but it is growing | |||||
See Also: | |||||
|
- Costa Rica: Alternative Tourism | ||||
|
- Ecuador: Alternative Tourism |
Links |
|
Links |
|||
ECOTOURISM IS CHARACTERIZED BY ITS ABILITY TO PRESERVE OR EVEN IMPROVE THE REGIONAL ENV & SUSTAIN OR IMPROVE THE LIVES OF REGIONAL PEOPLE |
|
||||
Tourism is a significant factor in envl destruction |
|
||||
Tourism today consists of large hotels, using large amts of energy, of cruise ships, planes, & automobiles propelled by fossil fuels |
|
||||
The alternative to mainstream tourism is green, or 'eco' tourism |
|
||||
Ecotourism, as defined by ecotourism.org is: 'responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the env & improves the well being of local people' |
|
||||
There are various types of ecotourism & it is becoming more popular as the 21st C continues moving forward |
|
||||
TOURISM IS AS OLD AS HUMANITY BUT ECOTOURISM, AS A MAINSTREAM ALTERNATIVE, HAS ONLY DEVELOPED SINCE THE 80s |
|
||||
Ecotourism has a very short history, starting w/ the beginning of strong environmental efforts in the 1980s |
|
||||
Before this, society had very little concern for protecting, or sustaining the env |
|
||||
However, w/ the rise of env ed, ecotourism became a more popular alternative |
|
||||
While ecotourism was introduced in the 1980s & 1990s, it has been the ed & the env mvmt efforts of the 21st C that have allowed ecotourism to gain its current popularity |
|
||||
Ecotourism really has its roots in African safari trips, & legal poaching |
|
||||
Once it was discovered that this tourism based poaching was destroying the animal populations, it was mostly stopped; which was a great victory for the env mvmt w/ such notable exceptions as rhino, tiger, & elephant hunting |
|
||||
Though the 'green mvmt' has several pieces all collecting to create one big envl picture, ecotourism & 'green' tourism have become some of the more popular forms of commercial envlism |
|
||||
Throughout the 21st C, ecotourism has gained significant popularity as the env mvmt picks up support in political & social circles | |||||
More & more, people are demanding ecotourism opportunities, & expect a green, or sustainable places for them to stay while engaging in their tourism | |||||
THE STRENGTHS OF ECO TOURISM INCLUDE:
A. SUPPORT FOR JOBS & DEV IN THE LOCAL COMMUNITY B. AWARENESS OF LOCAL ISSUES C. ECO FRIENDLY POLICIES WHICH 'GREEN TOURISTS' DEMAND D. A SMALLER ECO 'FOOTPRINT' |
|||||
Ecotourism is building popularity & support; however, there are both strengths & weaknesses in environmental tourism | |||||
Strengths |
|
||||
Tourism has several strengths on its own | |||||
A. Like tourism, ecotourism can support the local econ by providing jobs in the industry | |||||
Tourism jobs can include positions in hotels, travel agencies, recreational businesses, even small businesses that cater to tourists primarily, such as souvenir shops | |||||
There are even areas that are sustained almost completely by the money that tourism funnels into their econ, such as exotic islands in the Bahamas or Dollywood in TN | |||||
B/c of the increase in funds fueling the local econ, areas with high tourism also tend to develop faster | |||||
B. Tourism in an area, also means more people, mostly those w/ disposable income becoming more aware of issues in those areas | |||||
As more people are exposed to an econ depressed area, there is a higher likelihood that there will be donated support to the area | |||||
Green tourism has its own advantages, beyond just those of tourism | |||||
C. Tourists involved in ecotourism provide pressure for the local govts in those destination areas to promote more eco friendly policies | |||||
In promoting eco friendly policies, these areas may be pushed toward a cleaner env, even if it is only in order to appease visitors | |||||
D. Eco friendly policies help to lower the 'footprint' left by tourism overall | |||||
Tourism as a whole leaves a large 'footprint' where it is popular unless policies are developed to limit that impact | |||||
THE WEAKNESSES OF ECO TOURISM INCLUDE:
A. DIFFICULT ADJUSTMENTS FOR NATIVE / LOCAL PEOPLE B. 'GREEN WASHED' OR FAKE ECO FRIENDLY ENTERPRISES C. ELUSIVE PROFITABILITY RESULTING IN DETRIMENTAL PRACTICES FOR ENV & PEOPLE D. COMPETITIVE PRESSURE FROM OTHER TYPES OF TOURISM: 'ADVENTURE TOURISM' & TRADITIONAL LUXURIOUS TOURISM E. ECO TOURISM DESTINATIONS ARE NOT NATURALLY AVAILABLE IN ALL REGIONS |
|||||
Any time there is significant development in order to accommodate a large amt of visitors to an area, one can expect to see a significant negative impact to the surrounding area | |||||
A. Even if development is done with an env friendly goal in mind, it is often difficult to adjust for the larger amt of non native peoples visiting & engaging the local env | |||||
Sometimes due to mismgt of the local env in order to appeal to all tourists, what may seem like an env friendly area, may actually be a sorely depleted area w/ regards to natural resources & health | |||||
B. A lack of regulation contributes to many businesses, tours, & tourism establishments labeling themselves as 'eco friendly' | |||||
These businesses are taking advantage of the growing popularity of ecotourism by attempting to imitate what the travelers are looking for | |||||
Profitability is one of the main aims of the tourism industry | |||||
C. Despite the rising popularity of ecotourism; it is difficult for many ecotourism to maintain profitability | |||||
There are three major types of barriers to successful ecotourism: attitudinal, operational, & financial | |||||
In order for ecotourism to be successful, attitudes must be in order | |||||
D. Adventure tourism & 'traditional tourism' w/ its focus on high levels of comfor & consumption but competitive pressure on eco tourism | |||||
It is mostly those who are seeking adventure who end up participating in ecotourism | |||||
Not all tourists seek adventure | |||||
Besides adventure, it is often those with high levels of disposable income & significant feelings of obligation to the environment that seek ecotourism | |||||
Even with the rising popularity of ecotourism, it pales in comparison to the popularity of traditional tourism which is motivated by those seeking a simple get away in a new env | |||||
Many tourists feel that their comfort is more important than protecting the env that they are visiting | |||||
|
E. Eco tourism opportunities in the env are not available in all locals, or if they are present, they make need significant development to become attractive to eco tourists |
|
|||
In SW Va, the eco attractiveness of the mtns, valleys, streams, & local flora & fauna are not widely recognized across the nation & therefore the VA Tourism Board is expanding advertsing on the local eco treasures | |||||
There are operational barriers to tourism & ecotourism | |||||
A lack of easily accessible 'green' alternative suppliers, products, & info designed specifically for those in the tourism industry make 'going green' more difficult than it needs to be | |||||
Financial barriers include, not just sustaining an env friendly tourism business, but also switching to more env friendly policies can be fiscally challenging | |||||
ADVERTSING & THE DEV OF ECO TOURISM DESTINATIONS WILL HELP ADVANCE THE POPULARITY & ECO EFFECTIVENESS OF ECO TOURISM | |||||
Advertisement done by tourism companies needs to focus on attracting those travelers who are already env friendly | |||||
These visitors will treat their env w/ greater respect, thus automatically lowering the footprint involved w/ tourism | |||||
Rather than spending the money attempting to attract all tourists, this more targeted form of advertisement will help to lower the cost of ecotourism, while increasing the profitability & ease of transition into an env friendly outlook on tourism | |||||
The appeal of ecotourism needs to be developed in the tourism industry as a whole | |||||
Making ecotourism seem fun, exciting, or wild will attract more of the adventure grp of tourists | |||||
If ecotourism is advertised as sleek, or minimalist, it will attract more of the trend followers | |||||
There needs to be significantly greater regulation regarding what may be labeled eco friendly | |||||
Regs related to false advertising will stop the abuse of the label by local businesses, ie green washing, cheating their way through the green tourism trend | |||||
TOURISM & ECO TOURISM ARE GROWING INDUSTRIES & BOTH CAN BE DEVELOPED IN ECO FRIENDLY MANNERS | |||||
If current trends continue; the popularity of ecotourism will continue to rise | |||||
W/o reg, however, the meaning of 'ecotourism,' the true level to which it is 'green' will begin to decline in positive correlation to the rise in popularity | |||||
However, if regulation is implemented successfully, ecotourism can stand as a viable, if not fruitful alternative to modern tourism |
Links |
|
Links |
|||
ALTERNATIVE TOURISM IS AN IMPORTANT & RAPIDLY GROWING INDUSTRY |
|
||||
Alternative tourism is one of the major industries in Costa Rica |
|
||||
One quarter of the land is in biosphere protection & wildlife preserves |
|
||||
The large amounts of protected biosphere attracts tourists |
|
||||
The 800,000 annual tourists' generated income exceeds the income from banana exports |
|
||||
THERE ARE MANY 'OFFSHORE BENEFITS' AVAILABLE TO AMERICANS |
|
||||
Retirees from No America flock to Costa Rica because of the climate, alternative tourism, strong health system, low taxes, & inexpensive living conditions |
|
||||
Costa Rica is developing a public health system |
|
||||
There are no taxes on pensions, dividends or trust funds |
|
||||
50,000 Canadians & 120,000 US citizens partake in some form of offshore benefits |
|
||||
|
Links |
|
Links |
|||
ECUADORIAN ALTERNATIVE TOURISM IS STRONG DUE TO NATURAL LANDSCAPES
& A DIVERSITY OF LIFE WHICH ENTHRALLED DARWIN |
|
||||
While being relatively small, Ecuador has 6 natl parks, 7 nat reserves, & 20 private protected areas |
|
||||
Ecuador has some of the oldest rain forest in the world |
|
||||
Ecuador has many active volcanos |
|
||||
Native Amazonian tribes still survive in the rain forest |
|
||||
The plant & animal wildlife in the Galapagos Islands is world renowned & attracted Darwin & many other naturalists to the area |
|
||||
The native Andean culture continues to thrive |
|
||||
Ecuador has taken many steps to preserve the legacy of Spanish colonialism |
|
||||
Two thirds of tourism is run by the private sector while the govt & ensures sustainable dev thru env awareness |
|
||||
|
|
The End
|