Internal
Links

Top

  Review Notes on   WO 4: Disruptions, Barriers, & Stress at Work:  Race, Gender, Class
External
Links
  Syllabus 
Link
  Resources 
Link
 
Outline on WO 4: Disruptions, Barriers, & Stress at Work
 
Link
Discrimination  
Link
    Discrimination at the Workplace  
Link
    Evaluation Criteria in the Workplace  
Link
    Gender Bias in the Workplace  
Link
    Gender & Workplace  
Link
    Comparable Worth  
Link
    Sexual Harassment  
Link
    Race under Global Capitalism  
Link
    Race & the Workplace   
Link
    Affirmative Action  
Link
    Affirmative Action Backlash  
Link
Economic Indicators  
Link
    Unemployment  
Link
    Layoffs  
Link
    Unemployment Compensation  
Link
    Legislation on Unemployment  
Link
Toxic Substances, Hazardous Material, & Hazards at Work  
Link
    Safety at Work  
Link
    Environmental Degradation & the Workplace  
Link
Industrial Accidents  
Link
    Silkwood & Kerr-McGee, 1970s  
Link
    Bhopal, 1984  
Link
    Chernobyl, 1986  
Link
     Texas City Refinery Accident  
Link
    Normal Accidents  

 
Internal
Links

Top

Outline on   Social Injustice Based on Social Differentiation,  aka Discrimination
External
Links
  Project:  Examples of social differentiation
Link
  -  Project:  The Individual, Organizational, & Institutional Discrimination
Link
  -  Project:  Video: All In the Family:  Images of Discrimination
Link
  -  Video: All In the Family: Discrimination in Housing & Marriage
Link
  Summary:
Note: This typology applies to racism, gender, nationalism, & all of the social injustices are based on social differentiation
Type of Social Injustice 
based on Social Differentiation
Component of Social Differentiation
1. Stereotypes cognitive
2. Ethnocentrism cognitive
3. Prejudice cognitive
4. Ideological Chauvinism cognitive
5. Bias behavioral
6. Individual Discrimination behavioral
7. Organizational discrimination  behavioral
8. Institutional Discrimination behavioral
9.  Legal Discrimination behavioral
10.  Statistical Discrimination behavioral
 
  Social differentiation is a behavior or a social arrangement (action), & the norms & beliefs that support such (mental state), that has intent or effect of differentiating one cultural group over another   
  Societal differentiation is often thought of, in common usage, as unjust or negative social differentiation (prejudice, discrimination, etc.) that favors one group over another but technically it refers to any type of differentiating people whether that is interpreted as being good or evil  
  Equal or fair social differentiation favors no one, and includes everyone  
blank
The bases of Social Differentiation may be:
Economics Ethnicity Cliques
Religion Nationality Criminal Status
Race Gender Age.....
        that is, any criteria by which people differentiate one another
blank
  There are EIGHT types of social differentiation, which may have either a cognitive & behavioral component, or both  
  1.  Stereotype                          cognitive  
  A stereotype is an exaggerated belief concerning a group of people that assumes that nearly everyone in the group possesses a certain characteristic  
  Stereotyping is the attributing a group's characteristics to an individual  
Link
There is an archaic meaning of stereotype  
  Sociologists see stereotyping as exaggeration & thus not generally accepted as wrong, evil, bad, unfair, etc.  
  Stereotypes function to distinguish one group from another  
  Stereotypes are often used in jokes  
  However, the "art of PC," i.e. good manners, dictates that one must be careful & not cross line from stereotype to prejudice
 
Link
An example of a stereotype is the assumption that an individual has the characteristics of the group
 
  2.  Ethnocentrism                         cognitive  
  Ethnocentrism is a pattern whereby people view their own culture as normal, natural, & superior, & judge other cultures accordingly  
  Within a culturally homogenous group, ethnocentrism performs the function of promoting solidarity, pride & cooperation   
  Within a tolerant, heterogeneous society, ethnocentrism functions to promote solidarity, pride & cooperation, but if the society is not tolerant, ethnocentrism may be overdone & dysfunction & to promote divisiveness, hubris, & conflict  
 
3.  Prejudice                           cognitive
 
  A prejudice is a categorical and unfounded attitude or belief concerning a group or an individual   
  A prejudice is a stronger, more exaggerated form of stereotype that crosses a line, that the target group does not accept  
  The relation between prejudice and discrimination is not always clear in that a person may be prejudiced & never act on it or a person may not be prejudice but act on it, i.e. discriminate  
Link
Examples:  Believing that women are too emotional for work  
 
4.  Ideological chauvinism            cognitive  
  Ideological chauvinism is a "world view" ( integrated set of knowledge, beliefs, values, norms, attitudes ) that one cultural group is inherently superior to another  
 
Chauvinism is the prejudiced belief in the superiority of one's own group  
  Ideological chauvinism is often used as justification for the various types discrimination  
  Ideological chauvinism is often integrated into other ideological systems, especially religious & scientific world views  
  An important function of ideological chauvinism is to justify the exploitation of the minority group, in which case it is often called ideological racism  
Link
Examples:  Hitler's concept of a "master race"  
 
5.  Bias                                   behavioral
 
  Bias is the presenting of one side of an argument  
  Bias is also a technical term in the social sciences denoting questionnaires or media bias   
Link
Examples  
  6.  Individual discrimination             behavioral  
  Individual discrimination is any behavior that intentionally or unintentionally treats people differently or unfairly or favors one person or group on the basis of race, ethnicity, sex or some other characteristic  
  Discrimination refers to what people do:  it is behavioral  
Link
Examples:  racism, sexism  
 
Racism is an attitude, belief, behavior, or social arrangement that has the intent or the ultimate effect of favoring one racial or ethnic group over another
 
  7.  Organizational discrimination             behavioral  
  Organizational discrimination occurs when people are cooperating or conspiring in individual acts of prejudice, discrimination, etc.  
  Conspiracies are considered to be a much more serious type of crime than one person working alone  
  Orgl discrim can occur if one or more people are discrim, & one or more people are not directly involved but are aware of the discrim, & are looking the other way  
 
8.  Institutional discrimination           behavioral
 
 
Institutional discrimination is the behaviors or arrangements in social institutions or any social arrangement that intentionally or unintentionally favors one race, sex, ethnic group, religion, etc. over another
 
 
Institutional discrimination is the widespread practices and arrangements within social institutions that have the intent or effect of favoring one race (usually the majority group) over another (usually the minority group)
 
 
Institutional discrimination is the systematic practices that lead to inequality between groups, i.e. men & women, whites & blacks  
 
The difference between individual & institutional discrimination is that if an individual action is part of a larger, systematic pattern, then it is institutional  
Link
Examples:  Racial steering, aka red lining, is the practice in the real estate industry of showing white customers houses in white neighborhoods while showing black customers houses in black or mixed neighborhoods  
Link
Examples of the difference btwn individual, orgl, & institl discrimination  
 
9.  Legal discrimination                    behavioral
 
  Legal discrimination is the behaviors or arrangements in the laws of political institutions or rules in organizations supported by such laws that intentionally or unintentionally favor one race, sex, ethnic group, religion, etc. over another  
 
Legal discrimination is a very obvious, serious, & widespread form of discrimination that requires legitimacy in form of ideological chauvinism to justify / uphold the law
 
 
Note:  The elimination of legal discrimination does not necessarily eliminate the behavior or the ideology
 
Link
Examples of Legal Discrimination  
 
10.  Statistical discrimination                   behavioral
 
  Statistical discrimination occurs when there is no direct evidence of discrimination, yet a numerical examination demonstrates the persistence of discrimination   
  Statistics themselves are not discriminatory, but they may be used to demonstrate a discriminatory practice  
  Example:  the poverty rate of Whites is one third that of Blacks  
  The concept of statistical discrimination is controversial & it is not accepted by the courts, yet it is widely accepted by social scientists
 
  Employers may choose candidates on the basis of statistically average qualifications of the group, rather than on an individual's qualifications  
  Thus, an employer may choose a White high school grad over a Hispanic grad because of the statistically based belief that the White is better qualified, thus confusing the average w/ the particular situation  
  Statistical discrimination entails prejudice on the part of the employer because of the willingness to attribute a group's average characteristics to every member of that group  
  Because discrimination has been pervasive in the past, as in the case of minorities & women in American, many group characteristics such as education, training, & work histories still, on average, favor the majority group, but it is expected that over generations, as discrimination lessens, the disparity of group characteristics will decrease  
  The reality of the disparity btwn average group characteristics of minority & majority groups makes statistical discrimination particularly hard to eradicate  
  Statistical discrimination is especially likely in situations where employers do not take the trouble to carefully assess applicants' qualifications on a case by case basis  
Link
Examples  
Link
The Table on Roles & Behavioral & Cognitive Social Differentiation shows that all weather liberals are unprejudiced & generally do not discriminate, fair weather liberals are unprejudiced but may discriminate, timid bigots are prejudiced but generally do not discriminate, & all weather bigots are prejudiced & generally discriminate  
  The roles of all weather, fair weather, or timidity in social differentiation often occur in a inconsistent manner among the many types of social differentiation, thus a person may be a fair weather liberal on prejudice, but an all weather bigot on legal discrimination  

 
Top  
Archaic meaning of stereotype

Process of making metal plates for printing by taking a mold of composed type & then taking from this mold a cast ( Plate ) in type metal
To give a fixed or settled meaning to   [ to average out ]
Of an established conventional form or kind:  e.g. a stereotyped smile


 
Top  
Examples of Stereotypes

Sexism
Women drivers
Racism
White men can't jump

 "All Asians are brilliant at math & science." 
Elders are wise
White men can't jump
Whites walk like they are constipated
Whites hate/are prejudiced against blacks

True stereotypes
Rich people do better in school & go farther in school
True, but not of all rich people
Is not a trait of the person, but of their social situation


 
Top  
Examples of prejudice

Beliefs supporting Racial Steering: aka Red-Lining: 
___________ are lazy
Men are pigs


 
Top  
Examples of ideological discrimination

KKK doctrine
Aryan Nation doctrine
Nazism

Patriarchy
Womanist


 
Top  
Examples of Bias

What is your opinion of candidate Smith who has been accused of being an adulterer?


 
Top  
Examples of Individual Discrimination

Racism
Hate crimes
Violence
Robbery
Slurs


 
Top  
Examples of institutional discrimination

Unequal educational opportunities
Police brutality

Racial Steering: aka Red-Lining:  Practice in the real estate industry of showing customers houses in neighborhoods of same race/ethnicity

Unfair hiring, firing, lay-offs, promotions, etc.

IQ tests

Movement of jobs out of inner cities to the white suburbs

Glass Ceiling

Katrina relief:  White sectors of NO had been built on slightly higher ground that Black sections of NO, so when the floods came there was a belief that White areas were salvageable while Black areas were triaged as unsalvageable

Police Protection:  Many cities have a policy that robberies of less than, for example $15,000, will not have a detective assigned to them.  The police do this because they must have some way to allocate the limited policing forces that they have.  The policy of allocating detectives to robberies has the effect that most detective work on cases where Whites are the victims.  Crimes where Blacks are the victims are almost totally ignored.
 


 
Top  
Examples of legal discrimination

Men's control of women
Only white, male, land owning people may vote
Slavery
Jim Crow laws
Segregation in education
Apartheid


 
Top  
Examples of the difference btwn individual, organizational, & institutional discrimination

Individual Discrimination: 
One racist cop may be involved in individual discrimination

Orgl Discrimination: 
But if cop is part of Dept that looks the other way, that is organizational discrimination

The line btwn individual discrimination & organizational discrimination is not clear because one or more people in an org may be discriminating but they are not aware of each other or cooperating

When people are aware of other's cooperation in discrimination, this is orgl discrimination

Institutional Discrimination:

Policies which control where police forces are deployed, such as allocating detectives to high value crimes, is institutional.  But if the same activity was done not because of a policy but because of individual discrim, i.e. the police did not want to investigate low value crimes because of prejudice, this is individual discrim.  And if the same activity was done because of the prejudiced beliefs of a grp of officers, this is orgl discrim.

The differences btwn individual, organizational, & institutional discrimination is important because detection & solutions lie in different areas


 
Top  
Examples of Statistical discrimination

A population is half men & half women, with overall equal qualifications,
no instances of discrimination,
yet the workforce is only 10% women

% of minorities in a workforce, neighborhood, etc. is not proportional to overall population

Looking at overall characteristics & ignoring individual qualities
(employer believes that overall whites are better qualified) 


 
Top  
Table on Roles & Behavioral & Cognitive Social Differentiation
The Table on Roles & Behavioral & Cognitive Social Differentiation shows that All Weather Liberals are unprejudiced & generally do not discriminate, Fair Weather Liberals are unprejudiced but may discriminate, Timid Bigots are prejudiced but generally do not discriminate, & All Weather Bigots are prejudiced & generally discriminate

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Discrimination at Work
External
Links
  -  Project:  The Cultural Division of Labor
Link
  -  Project:  The Individual, Organizational, & Institutional Discrimination
Link
 
Dream of equality
 
 
I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up,
 live out the true meaning of its creed;
 we hold these truths to be self evident,
 that all men are created equal.
  Martin Luther King, August 27, 1963
 
 
CULTURAL DIVISION OF LABOR
 
  The cultural division of labor channels people into certain occupational roles based on cultural identity  
 
That is, men into "men's jobs,"  women into "women's jobs,"   etc.
 
 
The cultural division of labor has existed from the time of hunter gatherer society, through antiquity, the middle ages, & into the industrial era
 
 
Today,  minorities & women are disproportionately concentrated in certain occupational roles that are low paying agricultural, factory, & service jobs
 
  But since the 1960s, sizable middle & upper classes of minorities & women have formed, & continues to grow today  
 
The cultural division of labor is also known as occupational segregation
 
 
Imperialist oppression occurs in the workplace when conquered peoples are relegated to lower level jobs & to slavery
 
  Economic imperialism occurs in the workplace when immigrants concentrated in particular sectors  
 
Examples of economic imperialism in the US include the concentration of SE Asians in the meat packing industry the use of immigrants as strike breakers to break unions
 
 
Today in Germany, Turkish workers are colonized & treated as second class citizens even though Germany has a strong Labor Movement & Labor Party
 
 
DUAL LABOR MKTS
 
 
Most labor mkts have more than one track:
 
 
Many labor mkts have a promotion track, aka the "fast track"
 
 
Many labor mkts have more than one set of jobs ( a tracked division of labor )
 
 
Dual labor mkts are common & those w/ one track for the "insiders" or the "old boy" system are illegal or unjust
 
 
Legal dual labor mkts include:
 
 
- internal & external labor mkts  
 
- affirmative action tracking  
  - career or specialization tracks, which are often based on education or certification  
  - education tracks  
  - part- or full time tracks  
  - permanent or non permanent / tenure or nontenure tracks  
  Non sanctioned labor mkts are those that are not specifically designed, but have evolved over time  
  Non sanctioned labor mkts may or may not be legal  
  An example of non sanctioned labor mkts includes:  
  - gender typed jobs  
  - race typed jobs  
  - age typed jobs  
  - nationality typed jobs  
  Through childhood socialization, we learn gender typed skills & expectations about appropriate work  
  Non sanctioned labor mkts are seen in the careers of teaching, nursing, secretary, waitressing, & laboring, powerline construction, janitoring, doctors, etc.  
  Subjective criteria in job hiring & promotion include intelligence, appearance, self confidence, vigor  
  Role performance is associated w/ maleness in that men are seen as aggressive/sharks while women are bitches  
  The worth of the role performances of men & women is a classic Catch 22, i.e. a social win - lose situation  
 
RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
 
 
Overt discrimination has declined but, it has "evolved" into subtle or low level discrimination, organizational discrimination, & institutional discrimination
 
 
Legal debates over discrimination at work
 
 
Much progress has been made since the turn of the century
 
 
Much progress has been made since Civil Rights Movement which occurred primarily in the 50s & 60s
 
 
Little more progress has been made in last 20 yrs because it is very difficult to prove a case of discrimination
 
 
Individual discrimination is any behavior that intentionally or unintentionally treats people differently or unfairly or favors one person or group on the basis of race, ethnicity, sex or some other characteristic
 
  Subtle discrimination occurs when people discriminate but do so within or at the edges of the law or orgl rules by disguising their prejudice & discrimination in legal criteria of decision making  
  An example of subtle discrimination occurs when a man says he does not support a woman for the job because he does not like women, but says that she is not as professional as the other candidate, thus disguising his prejudice  
 
Organizational discrimination occurs when people are cooperating or conspiring in individual acts of prejudice, discrimination, etc.  
  Conspiracies are considered to be a much more serious type of crime than one person working alone  
  Orgl discrim can occur if one or more people are discrim, & one or more people are not directly involved but are aware of the discrim, & are looking the other way  
  Institutional discrimination is the behaviors or arrangements in social institutions or any social arrangement that intentionally or unintentionally favors one race, sex, ethnic group, religion, etc. over another  
  Institutional discrimination is the widespread practices and arrangements within social institutions that have the intent or effect of favoring one race (usually the majority group) over another (usually the minority group)  
  Institutional discrimination is the systematic practices that lead to inequality between groups, i.e. men & women, whites & blacks  
  The difference between individual & institutional discrimination is that if an individual action is part of a larger, systematic pattern, then it is institutional  
Link
Examples of the difference btwn individual, organizational, & institutional discrimination  
 
Women & minorities have broken barriers in the workplace  
 
But a large movement to equality in the workplace is occurring day by day  
  Each legal case over discrimination at work must be individually argued  
  Criteria for comparability of cases on workplace discrimination can be endlessly debated  
  The demand for proving an intention to discriminate is a strong defense for those that do discriminate  
  Factors affecting the amount of discrimination in the workplace  
  1.  The unemployment rate & the number of lay offs  
  2.  Jobs do not pay proportionally to the amount of wealth they create  
  3.  Jobs pay proportionally to the amount of labor available to do the job  
  4.  The economics of the labor market examines the supply & demand of labor  
  5.  Unions impact the supply of labor & thus increase the power of labor in the mkt  
  6.  The amount of racism / discrimination in society  
  7.  Culture  
  8.  Religion  
  9.  Legality of discrimination  
  10.  The economic & political power of the classes below the ruling or upper class  
  11.  The amount of equality in society  
  The consequences of discrimination at work include  
  a.  Internal Colonization  
  Internal colonization can cause the deterioration of the life style of individuals, & also entire communities & even regions  
     The Appalachian Coal Region  
     The Steel & Auto Regions  
  b.  Unemployment, unemployment compensation, severance pay  
  c.  Welfare  
  e.  Plant closing legislation  
  f.  Underemployment  
  g.  Poverty & related social problems  
  h.  Social conflict / social change  

 
Top  
Examples of the difference btwn individual, organizational, & institutional discrimination

Individual Discrimination: 
One racist cop may be involved in individual discrimination

Orgl Discrimination: 
But if cop is part of Dept that looks the other way, that is organizational discrimination

The line btwn individual discrimination & organizational discrimination is not clear because one or more people in an org may be discriminating but they are not aware of each other or cooperating

When people are aware of other's cooperation in discrimination, this is orgl discrimination

Institutional Discrimination:

Policies which control where police forces are deployed, such as allocating detectives to high value crimes, is institutional.  But if the same activity was done not because of a policy but because of individual discrim, i.e. the police did not want to investigate low value crimes because of prejudice, this is individual discrim.  And if the same activity was done because of the prejudiced beliefs of a grp of officers, this is orgl discrim.

The differences btwn individual, organizational, & institutional discrimination is important because detection & solutions lie in different areas


 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Evaluation Criteria in the Workplace
External
Links
  The evaluation criteria used to evaluate people in the workplace are inherently subjective
 
  Through one of the major features of bureaucracy & rationalization, i.e., the merit system, orgs today are attempting to minimize the subjective components in evaluation criteria 
 
  Both rationalized or objective criteria, & subjective criteria may be used to provide unfair evaluation, i.e. discrimination in orgs
 
  However, given today's legalized society & the existence of organizational watchdogs, subjective criteria in evaluation is the most frequently used method of discrimination in the workplace
 
  See Also:  Discrimination in the Workplace  
  Many workplaces & professionals maintain the necessity of subjective criteria, & it is not currently possible to substitute objective criteria
 
  Subjective screening criteria play an important role in ranking job applicants w/ personal characteristics that differ from those of employers or current employees 
 
  Subjective recommendations by immediate superiors play an important role in decisions related to hiring, promotions, opportunities, firing, demotions, etc. & there are rarely explicit, written standards for such evaluations (Fernandez, 1991)  
  Many criteria leave ample room for evaluators subjective impressions of intelligence, appearance, self confidence, vigor, demeanor, clothing, hair style, etc. 
 
  While these subjective factors are important in all evaluations, they are easily biased by the evaluators' prior stereotyped notions about women, minorities, or any other group
 
  In establishing evaluation criteria, frequently standards arise over time that are shaped to match the characteristics of the majority group 
 
  Because of ethnocentrism people feel more comfortable trusting people w/ who they have much in common, & because the workplace is dominated by white males, the white males in control of the workplace are more likely to decide in favor or white male candidates & against minority & female candidates  
  Decisions made based on subjective criteria, by a close knit group who is culturally similar, w/in a hierarchical system rely on stereotypes of any group, women, minorities, etc. & fail to give proper weight to more objective criteria  
  Subjectively based decision making & evaluation styles are more likely the higher one goes in the authority hierarchy (Braddock & McPartland, 1987)  
  Prior practices of legal & illegal discrimination means that minorities & women have less seniority & thus the use of seniority as an evaluation criteria results in the continuation & magnification of discrimination (Wilson, 1987)  
  Thus the use of objective criteria such as seniority puts minorities & women at an institutional disadvantage for hiring, promotions, the allocation of OJT, etc.  
  In some cases, the courts have mandated the use of separate seniority queues for women & minority workers in allocating promotions & layoffs  
  Professional jobs in previously male dominated fields pose special problems of access to women
 
  The role performance expected in these jobs includes behavioral styles characteristically associated w/ men
 
  See Also:  Gender at Work  
  Employers may choose candidates on the basis of statistically average qualifications of the group, rather than on an individual's qualifications
 
  Thus, an employer may choose a white high school grad over a Hispanic grad because of the belief that the white is better qualified
 
  Statistical discrimination entails no prejudice on the part of the employer, only a willingness to attribute a group's average characteristics to every member of that group 
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Gender Bias in the Workplace
External
Links
  Women face the hurdle that they are steered into occupationally segregated, gender typed jobs (Game & Pringle, 1983)
 
  Occupations involving helping & serving others, such as nursing & waitressing, have been identified w/ the female role because women have historically been responsible for these activities w/in the family (Cockburn, 1983)
 
 Link
The Table on the Percentage of Women in Various Occupations demonstrates that some occupations are characterized by an almost exclusively female labor force
 
  Unfortunately "women's jobs" are often relatively poorly paid & their incumbents are treated as subordinate, a position in keeping w/ the traditionally subordinate role of wives to husbands
 
  In many female typed occupations, qualifications of attractiveness & pleasantness may be more important than acquired skills & competencies
 
  Not only are physical traits fleeting, but they do not form a package of skills necessary for promotion to higher positions
 
  Women compose only a small percentage of the skilled trades
 
  Female professionals face special problems of gender typing
 
  Channeling women into a relatively narrow range of female typed professions:  nursing, teaching, library work, social work, & other helping professions
 
  Because of women being channeled into female typed jobs there is overcrowding in these profession, which leads to lowered wages
 
  The fact that many female professionals marry male professionals & managers also creates the possibility that geographic moves will be made that facilitate the husband's career rather than that of the wife
 
  Such decisions often appear rational to the extent that the husband's job pay more
 
  The result of decisions to professionals to marry & follow the male's career is a cumulative detriment to the wife's career trajectory, which makes future decisions even more likely to be weighted toward the husband's career
 
  Gender differences in job placement are not explained by differing education
 
  Male & female workers both have an average of 12.7 yrs. of education
 
  Men & women have approximately the same rate of college completion, although fewer women have advanced degrees  
  Fewer women than men have advanced degrees  
  Btwn 1970 & 1990, the proportion of masters degrees awarded to women increased from 40.1% to 47.4% & the proportion of professional degrees awarded to women increased from 19.7% to 24.6%  
 
Women now exceed men in two & four year degrees  
Link
Table  on Women's Educational Attainment by % of College Degrees demonstrates that the greater number of advanced degrees going to men, is decreasing as more women gain advanced degrees  
  For full time workers, in 1993, women earned about 70% of what men earned & by 2000 women earned 75% of what men earned  

 
Top  

Table on the Percentage of Women in Various Occupations, 1991
HS0205
Occupation
% Women in Workforce
Pay
Secretaries
99 %
 
Receptionists
97
 
Dental Hygienists
99
 
Childcare Workers
97
 
Carpenters
  1
 
Brick Masons
0.3
 
Electricians
1.5
 
Machinists
3.7
 
Crane Operators
0.4
 
Low Level Assembly Positions
25
 
Federal Employment of Women by Rank:    
Grades 16 - 18
9.1
$ 69 - 78 K
Grades 13 - 15
17
43 - 77
Grades 11 - 12
33
30 - 47
Grades   7 - 10
54
20 - 35
Grades   1 -  6
75
11 - 24
In 2000, the % of women in female gender typed jobs stayed the same except for the changes in Federal Employment as listed below, demonstrating that women are advancing in this sector
Grades 16 - 18
11.1
Salaries now individually set
Grades 13 - 15
19.0
52 - 94
Grades   9 - 12
34.7
30 - 57
Grades   5 -   8
51.4
20 - 36
Grades   1 -   4
72.6
13 - 23
The Table on the Percentage of Women in Various Occupations demonstrates that some occupations are characterized by an almost exclusively female labor force

 
Top
 

Table  on Women's Educational Attainment by % of College Degrees
HS0305
Type of Degree
Percentage of Female Degree Holders
Associate
61
Bachelors
55
Masters
56
MBA
38
Law
44
Medicine
41
Doctoral
40
Table 5.2 Women's Educational Attainment by % of College Degrees demonstrates that the greater number of advanced degrees going to men, is decreasing as more women gain advanced degrees
Diana Furchtgott-Roth & Christine Stolba, 1999, Women's Figures:  An Illustrated Guide to the Economic Progress of Women in America.  Washington, DC:  American Enterprise Institute

 
External
Links

Top

  Outline on  Gender & Work
External
Links
  Project:  Gender & Race Socialization & / or Discrimination in the Workplace
Link
  ProjectVideo:  North Country, Work, Gender
Link
  -  Video:  North Country, Work, Gender
Link
 
-  Supplement:  Nontraditional Occupations for Women
Link
  -  Supplement:  Male Scientist Writes of His Life as a Female
Link
  -  Supplement:  Women Celebrate 20 Years of Smokejumping
Link
  Sex role socialization makes women less likely to complain about job discrimination  
  Professional jobs in previously male dominated fields pose special problems of access to women  
  The role performance expected in previously male dominated jobs includes behavioral styles characteristically associated w/ men  
  Women in many professions face a dilemma in that they can either conform to the expected role behavior of the job & appear unfeminine or they can follow the expected role behavior of their gender in which case they may be acting out of character for their occupational role  
  The dilemma of "the opposite sex" in a gender typed occupation creates a "Catch 22" situation in which "the opposite sex" has limited options for achieving acceptance & recognition (Kanter, 1977)  
  A survey of male lawyers found that half believed women lawyers were "tough & masculine" while the other half believed women lawyers were "weak & feminine" & said that women go to law school to "catch a man" (Deckard, 1979, p. 128)  
  Gender socialization in the workplace is influenced by FIVE factors:
a. Occupational Gender Socialization  ( OGS )
b. Comparable Worth
c. Sexual Discrimination 
d.  Sexual Harassment
e.  Glass Ceiling
 
  a.  Occupational gender socialization is socialized through the socialization processes of modeling & identification  
  Occupational gender socialization is a concept denoting that there are men's jobs, & there are women's jobs
Doctor     Nurse          Manager    Worker
Janitor     Secretary    Lineman    Operator
Firefighters, police, soldiers are more likely to be men
Teachers, daycare workers, elder care workers are more likely to be women
 
  Occupational segregation is a pattern whereby two groups, most often men & women, hold different kinds of jobs  
  Occupational segregation is the stratification ( system of division & differing rewards ) of the occupational system  
  Occupational gender segregation  denotes that our culture recognizes that there are male jobs & there are female jobs  
  Occupational gender segregation is the concentration of men and women into different occupations, even when they have similar levels of skill and training  
  For example, we "know" that janitoring is male & nursing is female   
  Over one half of all working women are employed in clerical and service jobs  
  In fact, nearly half of all working women have been concentrated in just three occupations: secretary, nurse, & teacher  
  Women who entered the world of work found that their experience was different from men, including occupational segregation, pay, promotions, training, etc.  
Link
What message does occupational gender socialization give?   
  b.  Comparable worth denotes that women & men doing the same level of work, should get paid the same  
  Today women earn about 60 - 75 % of what men earn, & there has been little change in the last decade  
  The biggest actual change in status of women, so far, has been the large pay increases that have brought the salaries of women closer to men's  
  See Also:  Comparable Worth  
  c.  Sexual discrimination at work is the treating of people unequally based on their gender w/ respect to raises, promotions, perks, etc.  
  d.  Sexual harassment is a form of sexual discrimination where an employee is 
- forced or asked by another employee or customer to give sexual favors
- exposed to unwelcome behavior w/ sexual content
- hired, promoted, etc. based on explicit or implicit sexual submission
- subjected to sexual content which creates a hostile, intimidating or offensive environment
 
  See Also:  Sexual Harassment  
  e.  Glass ceiling denotes that discrimination increase dramatically at or above the middle management level
 
  The concept of the glass ceiling denotes that the "old boy network" is the most powerful at the top  
  The concept of the glass ceiling is consonant w/ the stratification theorists' position that an "inner group" of elite men are extremely powerful in western, industrial society  
 
In its simplest form, the glass ceiling is the reluctance to place women in positions of authority
 
Link
For the courts to rule that gender discrimination has occurred, the plaintiff must show specific damage; i.e., the courts have not allowed statistical discrimination as proof  
  There are SIX causes of occupational gender segregation   
Link
1.  Competing expectations of women  
  The practice of women leaving the work force to raise small children is becoming less common  
  2.  Women have less access to OJT (On the Job Training) because of competing expectations for family  
  Less OJT makes Women less competitive as workers  
  One of the most difficult problems to overcome in leveling the playing field on the job between men & women is that women have babies & men don't  
  What is the solution to this?   
  3.  Open individual or institutional discrimination includes FOUR major types
     i. Less access to OJT
     ii. Hiring Patterns
    iii. Steering:  Channeling:  "men's" jobs pay better.
     iv. Occupational Segregation
 
  4Cultural lag:  Better pay for men's work is partially a carry over from family wage days  
        See Fordism  
  5.  Men's jobs were more highly unionized creating a pool of male jobs w/ more pay & security
Historically, unions were patriarchal & white
Today unions are very active in women's sectors & non-white sectors of employment
 
  6.   Sex role socialization: Socialization in other social structures 
- reinforces “correct” jobs for men & women
- makes women less likely to complain
 
  In general it has been shown that the more women that work in an occupation, the lower the pay of that occupation  
  Historically, the movement of women into an occupation has lowered pay & status as is the case in secretarying, teaching, & nursing  
  Historically, the movement of women out of an occupation has increased pay & status as is the case w/ factory work  
  The best predictor of whether a family's income will fall below the federal poverty level is the sex of the primary breadwinner  
  The fact that being a woman has become associated with being poor is termed the feminization of poverty  
  Among families with a female householder, the poverty rate in 1986 was over  34%, which is over twice the total poverty rate  
  Working class women are especially hurt by the low wages earned by women  
  Occupational gender segregation explains some of the difference in pay for men & women  
  EIGHT Reasons for the gender pay differential, besides occupational gender segregation, include:  
  i.  the competing expectations of working women  
  ii.  that women seem to have less access than men to OJT that increases their skills  
  iiihiring patterns  
  ivoutright discrimination  
  vcultural lag; i.e., a carry over from the days when it was widely believed that men should be paid more because they were more likely to be supporting a family  
  vi.  the fact that employers do not want to raise pay in occupations that have historically had low pay  
  vii.  the fact that predominantly male occupations are more highly unionized, & therefore pay better, than are predominantly female occupations  
  viii.  that men do not bear children & therefore get more experience, OJT, etc.  
  One of the most difficult problems to overcome in leveling the playing field on the job between men & women is that women bear children, men don't   
  Pregnancy Leave Act of 1993 was passed by the Clinton Administration & it allows females 6 weeks unpaid leave following pregnancy, but allows men no leave  
  Our culture is now establishing norms over gender relations in the workplace, & YOUR generation will develop them more  
  Victims of sexual harassment find it very difficult to report the violation  
  Based on her study of an underground coal mine, Yount, 1991, developed a typology of three strategies that female coal miners used to confront sexual harassment  
  See Also:  Sexual Harassment  
  There are FIVE general strategies to confront sexual harassment in the workplace which include
 
 
a.  Ladies confront sexists as gentlemen w/, for example, “Why sir, what would your mother say?”
 
  Yount found that Ladies cast their co-workers as gentlemen & socially w/drew  
 
b.  Flirts confront sexists w/ sexuality w/, for example, “I save that for my favorite men, and you haven't qualified... yet.”
 
  Yount found that flirtatiousness encouraged come ons from men & sometimes resulted in more severe harassment if the men perceived that the women were using this strategy to gain preferential treatment  
 
c.  Tomboys confronting sexists w/ balance w/, for example, “I would, but you're better suited for Joe!”
 
  Tomboys emphasized their occupational role & engaged in joking relationships w/ their male co-workers  
  Two more strategies that female worker employ include:  
 
d.  Girls do not confront sexists but ignore it, or withdraw
 
  Girls' role of non confrontation & w/drawl may work if the harassment is not too severe; however, it risks the possibility that passivity may evoke more severe harassment  
 
e.  Today's Woman confronts sexists w/ legal or formal action w/, for example, the statement that, “That's harassment.  I'm filing a complaint.” 
 
  Today's women's, strength & resolve of the direct confrontation of illegal & boorish behavior will cause most harassers to back down  

 
Top  
What message does OGS give? 

Men are more capable, worth more, etc.


 
Top  
The courts & gender discrimination

1970   ATT   $ 52 mm to 3,600 females
1973   US Steel   $ 31 mm to 61,000 females & minorities
1978   GE   $ 29 mm to females
1980   Ford   $ 23 mm to minorities
1996   Texaco agrees to pay  $ 1.5 bb for discrimination


 
Top  
a. Examples of Competing Expectations of Working Women

Women miss more work to care for family
Women have babies:  interrupted career track
Women take principle responsibility for home duties      (see Gender & the Family      Link )
But these are societal assumptions:
Despite competing expectation, the reality is that Women devote more time to work than men


 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on   Comparable Worth
External
Links
  Comparable worth denotes that women & men doing the same level of work, should get paid the same
 
  Today women earn about 60 - 75 % of what men earn, & there has been little change in the last decade
 
Link
The Table on the Comparison of Median Earnings of Year-Round Full-Time Workers, by Sex demonstrates that gender-based pay discrimination is declining but persistent  
  The biggest actual change in status of women, to date, has been the large pay increases that have brought the salaries of women closer to men's
 
  Comparable worth discrimination occurs when companies base their pay on existing market rates for jobs, & such market rates build in discrepancies in pay btwn jobs that have typically been filled by men & those that have typically been fill by women
 
  Pay discrepancies btwn men & women have little to do w/ the skill required in the job, & a lot to do w/ discrimination
 
  While the concept of "comparable worth" is new in its connotation related to equal pay for equal work, the idea of comparing jobs & paying according to skill, education, responsibility, risk, etc. is as old as the human relations era in business, i.e. from the late 1800s on
 
  Job evaluations consist of a formal set of procedures fro hierarchically ordering jobs on the basis of their relative skill, effort, responsibility & working conditions for the purpose of establish relative pay rates (Hartmann, Roos, & Treiman, 1985, p. 5)
 
  Other criteria for job evaluations include education, intelligence required, on-the-job training, verbal aptitude, numerical aptitude, complexity of the task, perceptual skills, dexterity, motor coordination, physical strength, social skills such as speaking persuasively, supervising, instructing, negotiating, & mentoring
 
  About 30% of the difference in pay btwn men & women would be eliminated if rationalized, objective criteria were consistently used in determining pay for men & women
 
  The legal basis of comparable worth is hotly debated
 
  In 1978 Judge Fred Winner ruled against the doctrine of comparable worth in a case brought by public employees in the state of Washington
 
  Judge Winner argued that redressing pay discrimination would result in "restructuring the entire economy of the US... & I am not going to do it..."  (Hartmann, Roos, & Treiman, 1985, p. 12-13)
 
  In 1983, a District Judge overruled Judge Winner & found overwhelming evidence that intentional & pervasive discrimination had caused jobs held mostly by women to be paid an average of 20% less than jobs held by men in Washington public sector employment (Walsh, 1985a)
 
  The settlement in this the Washington Public Employees comparable worth case approached $1 billion
 
Link
The Table on Job Evaluation Points & Gender Difference in Pay demonstrates that there was discrimination in pay against female Washington Public Employees
 
  The criteria used to establish job comparability can be endlessly debated
 
  Employers can contend that they are merely offering the prevailing wage for a particular job placing the responsibility for inequality outside of any particular employer; i.e., if there is pay discrimination, it is in the market & an employer cannot go against the market
 
  Proponents of comparable worth argue that unequal market rates of pay embody past discrimination & that pay discrimination should be determined by discrepancies btwn the value or skill of an occupation, not by disparities btwn a specific employer's pay scale & prevailing market rates (Buchele & Aldrich, 1985)
 
  THE FUTURE OF COMPARABLE WORTH  
  Currently most case law had held that there must be intent to discriminate, weakening any arguments for comparable worth  
  Congress is unlikely to act to address issues of comparable worth especially given the failure ot the ERA  
  Collective bargaining by unions to address comparable worth issue will be unlikely from male dominated unions, but female dominated unions are continuing the legal & legislative battle  
  Local govts. have taken a wait & see approach, but do respond to pressure from voters  

 
Top
 

Table on Comparison of Median Earnings of Year-Round Full-Time Workers, by Sex
HS0305
Year
Median Earnings
for Women
Median Earnings
for Men
Women's Earnings as a % of Men's
1955
$ 2,719
4,252
64 %
1956
2,827
4,466
63
1957
3,008
4,713
64
1958
3,102
4,927
63
1959
3,193
5,209
61
1960
3,293
5,417
61
1961
3,351
5,644
59
1962
3,446
5,974
60
1963
3,561
5,978
60
1964
3,690
6,195
60
1965
3,823
6,375
60
1966
3,973
6,848
58
1967
4,150
7,182
58
1968
4,457
7,664
58
1969
4,977
8,227
60
1970
5,323
8,966
59
1971
5,593
9,399
60
1972
5,903
10,202
58
1973
6,335
11,186
57
1974
6,772
11,835
57
1975
7,504
12,758
59
1976
8,099
13,455
60
1977
8,618
14,626
59
1978
9,350
15,730
59
1979
10,151
17,014
60
1980
11,197
18,612
60
1981
12,001
20,260
59
1982
13,663
21,655
63
1983
14,488
22,506
64
1984
15,422
24,004
64
1985
16,252
24,999
65
1986
16,843
25,897
65
1987
17,504
26,722
66
1988
18,545
27,342
68
1989
19,643
28,605
69
1990
20,586
29,172
71
1991
21,376
30,092
71
1992
22,167
31,012
70
1993
22,276
31,173
70
1994
22,388
31,334
70
1995
22,497
31,496
71
1996
23,710
32,144
74
1997
24,973
33,674
74
Table 5.4   The Comparison of Median Earnings of Year-Round Full-Time Workers, by Sex demonstrates that gender-based pay discrimination is declining but persistent
US Dept. Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1991, Money Income of Households, Families, & Persons in the US, 1990, Washington, DC, US Govt. Printing Office.  Also US Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 2000, Statistical Abstract of the US, 1988.  Washington, DC, US Govt. Printing Office.

 
Top
 

Table on Job Evaluation Points & Gender Difference in Pay
HS0205
 
Average Annual Salary, 1983 - 1984
Job Title
Evaluation Points
Male Dominated
Female Dominated
Warehouse Worker
97
$ 17,030 
 
Delivery Truck Driver
97
19,367
 
Laundry Worker
105
 
$ 12,276 
Telephone Operator
118
 
11,770
Data-Entry Operator
125
 
13,051
Intermediate Clerk Typist
129
 
12,161
Civil Engineering Tech
133
18,796
 
Library Tech
152
 
13,963
Licensed Practical Nurse
173
 
14,069
Auto Mechanic
175
22,236
 
Maintenance Carpenter
197
22,870
 
Secretary
197
 
14,857
Chemist
277
25,625
 
Civil Engineer
287
25,115
 
Senior Computer System Analyst
324
24,019
 
Registered Nurse
349
 
20,954
Librarian
353
 
21,969
Table 5.5   Job Evaluation Points & Gender Difference in Pay demonstrates that there was discrimination in pay against female Washington Public Employees
Helen Remick, 1984.  "Comparable Worth and Wages:  Economic Equity for Women."  Manoa, Hawaii:  Industrial Relations Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Table 3

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on   Sexual Harassment
External
Links
  In a workplace dominated by men, women often face being treated as sexual object, ranging from embarrassing banter & jokes to overt propositions to demands for sexual favors  
  Sexual harassment is a form of sexual discrimination where an employee is 
- forced or asked by another employee or customer to give sexual favors
- exposed to unwelcome behavior w/ sexual content
- hired, promoted, etc. based on explicit or implicit sexual submission
- subjected to sexual content which creates a hostile, intimidating or offensive environment
 
  One of the primary federal agencies responsible for civil rights in the workplace is the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)  
  The EEOC defines sexual harassment as repeated, unwelcome behavior w/ a sexual content when submission to such behavior is explicitly or implicitly a condition for the person's hiring or for other employment decisions, or when such behavior creates a hostile, intimidating, or offensive working environment
 
  In 1982, it was found that 20.7% of women had experienced a severe form of sexual harassment such as physical attack or sexual blackmail
 
  In 1982, 48% of women experienced moderate forms of sexual harassment such as sexual propositions, verbal innuendoes, or social derogation (Gruber & Bjorn, 1982)
 
  Studies conducted in the 1990s find similar results, w/ as many as 20% of women experiencing severe form of sexual harassment & as many as half experiencing moderate forms of sexual harassment (Fletcher, 1999)  
  Example:  a young female file clerk was asked by her supervisor to come to his office where he told her about intimate details of his marriage & asked her what she thought of different sexual positions (Benokraitis & Feagin, 1986)
 
  Example:  Sexual Harassment of Policewomen
 
  Women in low status occupations who are in direct contact w/ men in higher status occupations (such as secretaries & managers) are the most likely targets of sexual harassment
 
  Large scale peer harassment frequently occurs on crews, assembly lines, etc. since these large congregations of workers frequently develop a workplace culture that is only marginally witnessed or understood by supervisors or managers, allowing peer worker practices, including but not limited to sexual harassment, to develop under unsupervised conditions
 
  Women in low status positions are less likely than women in higher status jobs to respond assertively & are more likely to placate the harasser (Gruber & Bjorn, 1986)
 
  A SES analysis shows that women are more likely to experience harassment w/ the characteristics of being:
- low status
- perceived as less powerful
- single
- divorced
- younger
- a minority
 
  Thus, perpetrators of sexual harassment, or any type of negative social differentiation for that matter, usually have more power & SES than the victims  
  Today, perpetrators of negative social differentiation often are lower in power & SES within their class & thus perceive themselves as weak or frustrated, while still being higher in SES than their victims  
  Today, in general, perpetrators are have a lower within class SES but a higher SES btwn classes, as compared to their victims  
  Victims of sexual harassment find it very difficult to report the violation  
  There are shades of gray btwn normal, acceptable warmth & sexual harassment
 
  When does an arm around the should cross the line btwn a show of affection & a come on?
 
  Is it possible for men & women in the same workplace to date?
 
  When does an off color joke go beyond banter to become offensive & discriminatory?
 
  How can men & women communicate to draw these lines in the workplace?
 
  Based on her study of an underground coal mine, Yount, 1991, developed a typology of three strategies that female coal miners used to confront sexual harassment
 
  a.  Ladies confront sexists as gentlemen w/, for example, “Why sir, what would your mother say?”
 
  Yount found that Ladies cast their co-workers as gentlemen & socially w/drew
 
  b.  Flirts confront sexists w/ sexuality w/, for example, “I save that for my favorite men, and you haven't qualified... yet.”  
  Yount found that flirtatiousness encouraged come ons from men & sometimes resulted in more severe harassment if the men perceived that the women were using this strategy to gain preferential treatment  
  c.  Tomboys confront sexists w/ balance w/, for example, “I would, but you're better suited for Joe!”  
  Tomboys emphasized their occupational role & engaged in joking relationships w/ their male co-workers  
  Tomboys experienced a great deal of sexual "razzing" but this was often intended to be friendly & inclusionary  
  Tomboys who resisted being place in traditional females roles, seemed to be the most successful at minimizing harassment while being accepted as capable workers  
  The Flirt & the Lady relied on traditional female role behavior, provoked either active harassment or reduced respect  
  Two more strategies that female worker employ include:  
  d.  Girls do not confront sexists but ignore it, or withdraw  
  Girls' role of non confrontation & w/drawl may work if the harassment is not too severe; however, it risks the possibility that passivity may evoke more severe harassment  
  e.  Today's Woman confronts sexists w/ legal or formal action w/, for example, the statement that, “That's harassment.  I'm filing a complaint.”   
  Todays women's, strength & resolve of the direct confrontation of illegal & boorish behavior will cause most harassers to back down  
  Direct confrontation of the harasser is the most successful if the workplace is supportive of such behavior; however, if the workplace administration is not supportive, confrontation may evoke retaliation  
  Confrontation must also be chosen in light of the difficulties of proving a case of sexual harassment  

 
Internal
Links

Top

Outline on  Race in the Age of Global Capitalism  circa 1910 - present
External
Links
  -  Supplement:  Senate Committee Approves Sweeping Immigration Bill, Kingsport Times, News, March 28, 2006, p 3A
Link
  Summary:  The period of Global Capitalism witnesses the dismantling of American Apartheid, & the beginning of the end of discrimination  
  In the Age of Global Capitalism, there is less physical violence based on racism today than in the past   
  Racist mobs attack Blacks, Asians, etc. for economic reasons, justified by racist ideologies based on  Social Darwinism & religious beliefs  
  Many racial attacks & harassments are coordinated or incited by the KKK & related orgs  
  1908-21  mobs attack blacks in dozens of US cities  
  In 1922, Marcus Garvey gives the Universal Negro Improvement Association Speech in NYC, & this organization becomes the Negro Nationalist Movement  
  From 1937-1945 the Holocaust took place in Europe  
  The economic base of Nazism necessitated the Holocaust, & was justified by the racist ideology of Aryan superiority  
  The US knew about the Holocaust but chose to look the other way because of American Anti Semitism, lack of public political will, & a reluctance to enter WW 2  
  An analysis of the early discrimination in unions shows that early in their development, many American unions, but not all, were discriminatory / racist  
  The UMWA was not discriminatory  
  Unions also discriminated against women & other groups because many early US unions were dominated by a WASP patriarchy  
  The UMWA had accepted many ethnicities & races of miners from its inception  
  Liberal & Radical Union leaders had been assassinated & deported by the govt.  
  Since the late 1800s, lured by industrialists, Blacks traveled North & had been & used as scabs & strikebreakers  
  The Internal Colonialism Theory & the Split Labor Market Theory explain much of the racism that festered in the late 1800s & early 1900s  
  See Also:  The Causes of Racism / Social Differentiation  
  Dr. Ralph Bunche (1903-1971), an African American mediator & UN diplomat, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his role in fostering an armistice btwn warring Arabs & Israelis  
  In 1960, Wilma Rudoph made history when she became the 1st African American woman to win three Olympic gold medals in track & field.  She was known as "the fastest woman in the world"  
  In the 1950s & 60s, the Civil Rights Movement uses non-violent methods in 200 cities to advance its cause  
  In 1957, the Civil Rights Act was passed  
  In 1957, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, w/ ML King as president, was formed  
  In 1963, the Letter from a Birmingham Jail w/ the Birmingham Manifesto heralded King's legacy to African Americans  
  In 1963, WEB Du Bois dies at age 95 in Ghana  
  In 1964, the another Civil Rights Act passed & these two laws are the first comprehensive federal civil rights legislation of the 20th century  
  The Civil Rights Act makes it illegal to discriminate on basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, & established the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC )  
  The Disabilities Act is passed decades later, but even today it is still legal to discriminate on sexual orientation though some institutions have rules against it  
  In 1968,  ML King is assassinated  
  See Also:  Affirmative Action,   1967  
  Executive Order 11375, signed by President Johnson, established Affirmative Action  
  See Also:  Affirmative Action Backlash  
 
In 1983 President Reagan signed the bill that established January 20 as a federal holiday in honor of ML King
 
 
It took many years for Congress to decide to celebrate ML King Day, but a few states had declared a state holiday
 
  Unions & race today:  
  In 1960, the AFL CIO supports civil rights, & begins integration in unions  
  Nearly all unions have successfully integrated today  
  Blacks & Hispanics in America are more likely to be union members than whites  
 
The glass ceilings still exist in some unions as a result of institutional discrimination
 
 
Significant Impacts of race in modern era include that in:
 
  - the 1960s there were race riots in US cities  
  - 1968 when MLK is assassinated, over 100 communities erupt in violence  
  - 1973 US Steel pays $31 mm to women & minorities for past discrimination  
  - 1973 the first interracial kiss occurs on national TV on Star Trek btwn Cpt Kirk & Lt Orrura (but the kiss is the result of  both being under the control of an 'alien force')  
  - 1980 in Miami, when the police beat a black business man to death for a traffic violation, riots occurs in Miami & other cities resulting in 18 deaths & $200 mm in property damage  
  - Ford pays $ 21 mm to minorities for workplace discrimination  
  - 1988 Jesse Jackson finished 2nd in the Democratic Primary despite the fact that many people would not vote for him solely because of race  
  - Armenians & Azerbaijanis engage in ethnic warfare  
  - 1989 Miami cops shoot a black boy resulting in waves of riots & police attacks  
  - 1992 the Rodney King beating & subsequent trial, acquittal, riots, federal trial & convictions of officers occur  
  - 1994 the OJ Simpson trial takes place dividing the nation & creating an unheard of national conversation on race & justice  
  - 1995 Church burnings become so frequent that they gain national attention  
  - 1996 Texaco agrees to pay $1.5 b for discrimination primarily against blacks who aspire to own Texaco franchises  
  - the CIA crack scandal blows over  
  - 1991-93 an ethnic war in Yugoslavia btwn Serbs, Croats & Slovenians who are Muslim & Christian threatens to envelop all of Southern Europe culminating  in a successful UN peacekeeping action  
  - 1999 NYC cops shoot an off duty black cop  
  - 2005 youth  riots which are ethnically based erupt in France as a result of the frustration of the underclass  
 
"Race & ethnic" conflicts around the world are often based on 'economic' conflicts as seen in:
 
 
-  S. Africa where Dutch Whites opposed Mandella's ANC & Budulazies Inkaataa Freedom Party & the issues were both land reform & civil rights
 
  -  Northern Ireland where Irish Catholics are oppressed by British Protestants which & the issues were political econ control of  N Ireland  
  -  Israel where Jews, Palestinians, other Arabs, & Christians all oppose each other over land & political econ control w/in that land  
 
In the US, there is less physical violence based on racism today than in the past, though there is more institutional racism
 
  The next period, the Post Industrial Age, witnesses the major form of discrimination being institutional discrimination  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Race & the Workplace
External
Links
  Decisions about promotions are often made informally, behind closed doors by an executive group composed mostly by white men
 
  Subjective decisions & evaluations are the method through which all types of discrimination enter into the workplace today, especially institutional discrimination, which is the most common type today
 
  See Also:  Evaluation Criteria in the Workplace  
  See Also:  Discrimination  
  Overt expressions of racism have declined in the US & developed world in the 1980s & 90s but more subtle everyday expressions of racism are still common
 
  Many people & groups make efforts to marginalize minorities & women, to identify them as the carriers of social problems, & to reject complaints about prejudice & discrimination as invalid (Essed, 1991)
 
  Equal treatment for minorities & women often comes only when those w/in an org work actively to demand such changes (Baron, Mittman, & Newman, 1991)
 
  Kanter, 1977, notes that women & minority workers are highly visible representatives of their group when then enter new occupations
 
  Tokenism is the policy of making only a superficial effort or symbolic gesture toward the accomplishment of a goal such as racial or gender integration  
  Tokenism occurs when there are only a few workers who are different because of race, gender, religion or any other identifiable cultural trait
 
  Tokenism puts a worker under a spotlight & the pressure to overachieve
 
  Tokenism need not be a bad experience as everyone has encountered a situation where they, for some reason, felt out of place or outnumbered, & yet were welcomed & accepted  
  W/ tokenism, there is often open hostility from majority workers who feel their position threatened by the incursion of "lower-status" workers (South, et al, 1983) 
 
  While women & minorities have continued to make progress in that more sectors of society are becoming integrated, discrimination is less open & hostile, these changes & income changes have been slow
 
Link
The Table on Medium Family Income by Race, 1964 to 1997, indicates that during the last 40 yrs. Blacks have earned btwn 50 & 60 % of what Whites earned
 
  Farley, 1984, found that from 1959 to 1982 White income grew 1.1% & Black income grew by 1.3% but because Whites had more income initially, White income grew by $4,200 & Black income grew by $2,600 thus increasing the absolute income gap
 
  Hispanic families earn about 60% as much as White families
 

 
Top
 

Table on  Medium Family Income by Race, 1964 to 1997
HS0205
Year
Blacks
Whites
Black Income
as a % of 
White Income
1964
$ 4,646 
$ 8,557 
    50 %
1965
4,849
9,047
50
1966
5,624
9,722
58
1967
6,083
10,274
59
1968
6,688
11,151
60
1969
7,485
12,220
61
1970
7,834
12,772
61
1971
8,035
13,316
60
1972
8,564
14,410
59
1973
9,070
15,715
58
1974
9,989
16,730
60
1975
10,954
17,803
62
1976
11,531
19,386
59
1977
11,932
20,887
57
1978
13,574
22,918
58
1979
14,529
25,581
57
1980
15,814
27,330
58
1981
16,552
29,343
56
1982
16,900
29,720
57
1983
16,610
29. 474
56
1984
16,884
30,294
56
1985
17,734
30,799
58
1986
18,247
31,935
57
1987
18,098
32,274
56
1988
19,329
33,915
57
1989
20,209
35,975
56
1990
21,423
36,915
58
1991
21,548
37,783
57
1992
21,103
38,670
55
1993
21,542
39,300
55
1994
24,698
40,844
60
1995
25,970
42,646
61
1996
26,552
44,756
59
1997
28,602
46,754
61
Table on Income by Race, 1964 to 1997, indicates that during the last 40 yrs. Blacks have earned btwn 50 & 61 % of what Whites earned
Blue indicates the lowest % of Black/White Income
Red indicates the highest % of Black/White Income
US Dept. of Commerce, Census, 2000; Statistical Abstract of the US, 1999, Washington, DC; US Govt Printing Office

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Affirmative Action
External
Links
  Executive Order 11375, signed by President Johnson, established Affirmative Action in 1967
 
  The various executive orders calling for affirmative action are an attempt to compensate for past discrimination through hiring quotas, preferential consideration, or active recruitment of women or minority workers  
  The aim of Affirmative Action is to prevent institutional discrimination:  It is believed that non-white & females are sufficiently qualified but are less qualified than typical white males who have access to the best preparatory schools
 
  EO 11375 mandated the Federal Office of Contract Compliance to issue govt purchasing contracts only to orgs that are making efforts to remedy the effects of past discrimination
 
  EO 11375 affected much more than govt orgs because many orgs sell at least some of their products to the fed govt, & therefore they had to comply w/ Affirmative Action rules or loose all govt contracts
 
  Defense contractors, utilities, computer & electronic manufacturers, & many other businesses have been forced to develop affirmative action plans
 
  Affirmative Action plans give preference to minorities or women if the purpose of the plan is to erase "a manifest imbalance in traditionally segregated job categories"
 
  Affirmative Action plans can be instituted voluntarily by an employer or jointly by an employer & a union
 
  Affirmative Action plans can be brought about as as result of a discrimination lawsuit
 
  The majority of Affirmative Action plans are adopted by large firms w/ a white collar labor force
 
  Such plans have the potential to redistribute some desirable jobs to previously excluded female & minority workers
 
  Many plans are extremely modest & call for only minimal adjustments as necessitated by law
 
  Most small firms lack Affirmative Action plans & thus minorities & women continue to face significant limits in these sectors
 
  A study of the Sex Discrimination Act of 1975 in Britain found that its main effect was to eliminate overt discrimination in recruiting, especially in job advertisements
 
  The study also found that there was little change in the allocation of training & promotions
 
  Over half the orgs surveyed in the study had acted to minimize their compliance
 
  Thus in Britain, Affirmative Action did not eliminate discrimination, & minorities & females are not equally represented at any level in the workforce; furthermore, they are over represented at the lower levels, & under-represented at the middle levels, & extremely under-represented at the upper levels of employment
 
  Never the less, Affirmative Action has had positive consequences for some female & minority workers & has helped break down sexual & racial hiring barriers
 
  Affirmative Action legislation has encouraged the creation of decentralized state, county, municipal & org Affirmative Action plans  
  Many firms have focused on placing minorities & women in highly visible positions to implement affirmative action  
  The wages of Black college grads have risen faster than those of White college grads, but are still behind  
  The wages of Black high school grads have fallen even further behind White high school grads  
  Thus, Affirmative Action has helped created a Black middle class, but has done little to help the large Black underclass, & has barely broken "the glass ceiling" of upper level jobs  
  Inequality in wages by race has been exasperated by the concentration of Blacks & Hispanics in regions & urban areas w/ high unemployment  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the  Affirmative Action Backlash
External
Links
  As a matter of fact, social movements usually generate an opposition social movement
 
  At the beginning of a social movement, the status quo forces attempt to stem the institutionalization of the new social relationships  
  If the new social movement can prevail, it becomes an accepted feature of society, & the status quo opposition must contend w/ defeat  
  As the social movement becomes institutionalized & accepted in society, it may either become complacent & weak, it may over reach its original goals & therefore lose supporters, it may be so successful that it is no longer needed, or it may be so successful that it re energizes its opposition  
  Because of the social tendency to create counter movements, it was inevitable that at some point a white backlash would occur against Affirmative Action & Civil Rights
 
  Supporters of affirmative action claim that it is so successful that it re energized its opposition while opponents of affirmative action claim that it has overstepped its bounds & it is no longer needed, thus re energizing its opposition
 
  Affirmative action has sparked resistance from Whites & men who believe they are being deprived of opportunities because of increased opportunities for minorities & women  
  30 years of affirmative action has not eradicated the inequalities resulting from 300 yr.. of legal restrictions on Blacks in America & thousands of years of gender based inequality  
  The increasing economic stress in the developed world has made all people less sympathetic to the problems of minorities & women  
  It is well known that all forms of discrimination increase during economic, political, etc. hard times  
  See Also:  The Causes of Discrimination  
  A backlash against civil rights has come in the form of an attack on affirmative action, Title IX, & support for school vouchers  
  In the 1980s, the Berkeley Medical School is sued over Affirmative Action on the premise that it is admitting under qualified minorities in lieu of more qualified Whites  
  A White male lost the Berkeley Medical School case, but his cause energized affirmative action opponents  
  In the 1990s, affirmative action opposition coalesced & Clinton attempted to balance the opposition & the supporters w/ the policy of  "Mend it, don't end it"  
  While some maintain that affirmative action was essentially ended under Clinton, other believe it was kept alive; regardless, affirmative action is much less practiced today  
  In 2002, the Supreme Court rules that the University of Michigan may not use affirmative action admittance procedures but can seek to maintain a diverse student body, in essence offering a split decision  
  Affirmative action supporters makes FOUR points
 
  a.  The "playing field" is not level
New cases of race discrimination in workplace are reported everyday
Minorities face discrimination in education which translates into discrimination at work
 
  b.  Affirmative action is fair because hiring is an inexact science & it's difficult to choose the "most qualified" person
 
  Affirmative action supporters make the point that hiring is an inexact science & it's difficult to choose the "most qualified" person & it is in these cases where quotas can be used  
  c.  Affirmative action does work as evidenced by the fact that we are gaining a non-white middle class & that women's wages are increasing as a percentage of men's wages
 
  d.  Affirmative action is possibly the weakest form of restitution
In the US, because whites have benefited from centuries of racism & men have benefited from centuries patriarchy, there is a debt owed
 
  Affirmative action is applied only to orgs doing govt contracts & thus has little effect on smaller firms
 
  Under affirmative action rules, orgs w/ govt contracts must develop plans to rectify "manifest imbalances" in race or gender inequities in the workplace
 
  Affirmative action can be voluntary or court ordered & quotas were possible but infrequent, & they are not legal today
 
  Overall the effect of affirmative action has been minimal because orgs minimized their compliance
 
  Affirmative action & other factors have created a Black middle class, but affirmative action has not had a great effect overall  
  Affirmative Action Opposition made THREE points
 
  a.  For the opponents of affirmative action because the playing field is now equal, affirmative action is no longer needed
 
  b.  For the opponents of affirmative action, affirmative action is unfair to Blacks & Whites because it allows the hiring of under qualified people & does not allow the hiring of most qualified person
 
  c.  For the opponents of affirmative action, affirmative action does not work because it does not serve to help minorities
 
  The opposition to affirmative action can be seen in the beliefs of some sub cultures of the White population that every employed Black they encounter owes his or her job to federal pressure rather than to personal qualification & efforts (Jencks, 1985)
 
  The fate of civil rights in general & affirmative action in particular depends to a significant extent on the political climate in the next decade
Link

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Economic Indicators
External
Links
 
Federal Reserve Bank of NY:  Economic Indicators Calendar   http://www.ny.frb.org/research/national_economy/nationalecon_cal.html 
Link
  AN ECON INDICATOR (OR BUSINESS INDICATOR) IS A STATISTIC WHICH MEASURES SOME ACTIVITY IN THE ECON   
  Econ indicators allow analysis of econ performance & predictions of future performance   
  One application of econ indicators is the study of business cycles   
  Econ indicators include various indices, earnings reports, & economic summaries   
  The leading business cycle dating committee in the US is the National Bureau of Econ Research (private)   
  The Bureau of Labor Statistics is the principal fact finding agency for the US govt in the field of labor econ & statistics   
  Other producers of econ indicators include the US Census Bureau & US Bureau of Economic Analysis  
  ECON INDICATORS ARE INTERPRETED TO PREDICT THE BUSINESS CYCLE (LEADING INDICATORS), OR ARE EXPECTED TO CHANGE AFTER THE ECON CHANGES (LAGGING INDICATORS), OR MEASURE CURRENT ACTIVITY (COINCIDENT INDICATORS)   
  Leading indicators are indicators that usually change before the econ as a whole changes   
  Econ indictors are useful as short term predictors of the econ   
  Stock mkt returns are a leading indicator: the stock mkt usually begins to decline before the econ as a whole declines & usually begins to improve before the general econ begins to recover from a slump   
  Lagging indicators are indicators that usually change after the econ as a whole does   
  Typically the lag is a few quarters of a year   
  The unemployment rate is a lagging indicator: employment tends to increase two or three quarters after an upturn in the general econ   
  Coincident indicators are those which change at approximately the same time as the whole econ, thereby providing info about the current state of the econ   
  Personal income, GDP, industrial production & retail sales are coincident indicators   
  A coincident index may be used to identify, after the fact, the dates of peaks & troughs in the business cycle   
  ECON INDICATORS MAY INDICATE IF THE ECON IS GROWING OR CONTRACTING  
  Pro cyclic indicators move in the same direction as the general econ: they increase when the econ is doing well; decrease when it is doing badly   
  Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is a pro cyclic indicator   
  Counter cyclic indicators move in the opposite direction to the general econ   
  The unemployment rate is counter cyclic: it rises when the economy is decreasing   
  Acyclic indicators are those with little or no correlation to the business cycle: they may rise or fall when the general economy is doing well, and may rise or fall when it is not doing well   
  SOME ECON MEASURES ARE RELEVANT TO EVERYDAY PEOPLE INCLUDING INFLATION, THE ECON CYCLE, LAYOFFS, THE DEBT, UNEMPLOYMENT, ETC., WHILE OTHERS ARE MORE IMP TO CORPS SUCH AS INTEREST RATES, PRODUCTIVITY, ETC.   
 
Stagflation recession & inflation;  only hist instance: late 60s & 70s 
 
 
An economic cycle is the period movement of the economy btwn growth & decline as measured by changes in economic factors such as growth, unemployment, inflation, etc.   
 
Layoffs are the temporary elimination of jobs, creating unemployment   
 
Downsizing, as contrasted to layoffs is the permanent elimination of jobs:  80s word 
 
 
Deindustrialization is the closing of industrial jobs: shipped them away:  lost 38 mm jobs by 1982   
 
National Debt  
 
2003:  6.5 T 
 
 
$70,000 per family 
 
 
2000  Surplus of 281 bb 
 
 
2003  Deficit of 347 bb 
 
  EACH MONTH THERE ARE MANY ECON INDICATORS MEASURED & MADE PUBLIC BY A NUMBER OF PRIVATE, PUBLIC, & QUASI PUBLIC ORGS   
  Some econ indicators are measured & made public only once a month or once a quarter, while others are measured & made public each week   
  Below is a partial list of the many econ indicators measured & made public each month, appearing in the approximate order in which they appear, beginning w/ personal income & ending w/ GDP  
  Personal Income  
  Personal Spending  
  Construction Spending  
  Home Sales  
  Crude Inventories measures the amount of inventories on hand in retail & wholesale sellers   
  Initial Claims includes first time claims for unemployment   
  Continuing Claims includes only continuing claims for unemployment   
  Productivity  
  Unit Labor Costs  
  Factory Orders measures the amt of orders factors have received in the last month   
  Non farm payroll  
  Unemployment rate  
  Average Workweek measures the average amt of hours worked in the last week   
  Hourly Earnings  
  Consumer Credit  
  Trade Balance is the amount of imports the nation receives less the amount of exports, & is usually a negative number because we have imported more than exported for a number of years   
  Treasury Budget  
  Fed's Beige Book is an overview of the econ put together by the Fed Reserve Bank   
  Retail Sale  
  Export Prices ex - oil  
  Import Prices ex - oil  
  Business Inventorie  
  CPI (Consumer Price Index) is, essentially, the inflation level at the consumer level   
  Core CPI (Consumer Price Index) is, the CPI excluding certain volatile components such as energy   
  Capacity Utilization measures how much of our nations productive capacity (e.g. factories, construction corps, etc.) is being used   
  Industrial Production  
  Building Permits  
  Housing Starts  
  PPI (Producer Price Index) is, essentially, the inflation level at the wholesale or producer level   
  Core PPI Producer Price Index) is, essentially, the inflation level at the wholesale or producer level excluding certain volatile components such as energy   
  Leading Indicators  
  Existing Home Sales  
  Consumer Confidence is a survey which attempts to determine how optimistic consumers are, esp. as it relates to their willingness to spend   
  FHFA Home Price Index  
  New Home Sales  
  FOMC Rate Decision is the Fed Reserve Banks decision on interest rates   
  Durable Goods Orders measures the amt of durable goods such as refrigerators, washing machines, etc. ordered from factories   
  GDP (Gross Domestic Product) is a measure of the total (gross) amt of production in the nation   

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Unemployment
External
Links
  -  Project: Video: Risky Business:  Family Crisis:  Unemployment 
Link
  -  Video: Risky Business:  Family Crisis:  Unemployment     9:25 & 13:31 
Link
  BEING OUT OF WORK IS NOT THE SAME AS BEING UNEMPLOYED BECAUSE THE LATTER IS AN OFFICIAL GOVTL DEFINITION   
  Unemployment is defined as the percentage of the labor force officially determined to be w/o work, & looking for work in a given month 
 
  The labor force is defined as anyone who is 16 or older who is not institutionalized   
  In general, the labor force makes up about half of the total population 
 
  -  Resource:  Worker & Labor Force as Units of Analysis for more on the definition of the labor force 
Link
  In order to be considered in the unemployed category by the govt., people must be in the labor force & are   
  a.  employed neither part time nor full time for pay or trade   
  b.  actively seeking work during the four weeks preceding the govt. survey of the labor force   
  c.  currently available to take work   
  d.  not out of work longer than 6 mos.   
 
Specifically, many groups of people are not considered to be part of the workforce, including students, those employed part time, prisoners, those considered to be incompetent (children, the mentally ill, etc.), the retired, the chronically unemployed, etc. because these people are not considered to be part of the labor force 
 
  The unemployment rate (UR) is the number of unemployed people divided by the number of people in the labor force, multiplied by 100, to give a percentage   
  UR = (unemployed/labor force) X 100   
  A rise in the UR often indicates that the business cycle is about to enter a downturn; conversely, a decline often indicates economic improvement   
  The UR is higher in economically depressed areas & lower in prosperous areas, so URs indicate local labor market conditions   
  FRICTIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT IS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE OF PEOPLE BTWN JOBS   
 
Frictional unemployment is considered to be the unemployment that results from unavoidable delays btwn jobs takes time to find a new job   
 
Economists estimate that frictional unemployment is estimated,  to be 3% though some estimates are lower   
 
Frictional unemployment could be reduced by programs to match job openings more quickly w/ qualified candidates   
  During WW 2, unemployment fell to 1.6%, which is considered by some to be a more realistic minimum level of frictional unemployment   
  STRUCTURAL UNEMPLOYMENT IS LONG TERM OR BUILT IN UNEMPLOYMENT   
  Structural unemployment is the chronic gap btwn the number of jobs in the economy & the number of people seeking work   
  Structural unemployment results from economic shifts or the chronic shortage of jobs   
  During good times, a boom, a growth phase, structural unemployment makes of the biggest share of unemployment   
  In 2003 - 2004, a new & unique economic phenomenon, the "jobless recovery," manifested high economic growth rates (over 8%) but continuing high rates of unemployment, over 6%  
  Economists hope that the jobless recovery will be a short lived economic phenomenon, & not a new, higher level of structural unemployment   
  CYCLICAL UNEMPLOYMENT IS THAT WHICH IS AFFECTED BY ECON BOOMS & BUSTS   
  Cyclical unemployment is the component of unemployment that results from economic downturns  
  In a recession, depression or any economic downturn, cyclical unemployment makes up the biggest share of unemployment  
  Cyclical unemployment results from economic downturns  
  In his conception of the Sociological Imagination, C. W. Mills notes that unemployment is a public issue, but in most cases people individualize it, making it appear as a personal trouble  
  Unemployment is often a public issue, not a personal trouble  
  For Mills, the most important distinction btwn a public issue & a personal trouble is that the former requires a social solution, i.e. one person cannot resolve the issue, while w/ a personal trouble, the resolution lies solely w/ the individual  
  Different classes, occupations, races, genders, groups are affected differently by unemployment  
  UNEMPLOYMENT RATES HAVE BEEN 'POLITICAL FOOTBALLS' WHEN THEY WERE MANIPULATED TO MAKE A POLITICIAN LOOK GOOD   
  The Reagan administration increased allowable frictional unemployment, thus making unemployment appear lower  
 
President Reagan shortened the time one can be out of work & still be considered to looking from 1 yr. to 6 mos. 
 
 
Anyone who does not find a job in 6 mos. is considered to be chronically unemployed & is not considered to be part of the workforce
 
  As useful as labor force statistics are, the definitions used by the govt. are troublesome to many observers  
  Labor force participation, unemployment, etc. all include only those who produce goods or services for sale in the market  
  Labor statistics exclude many people who perform useful services outside the market economy, notably, homemakers & volunteers  
  When a homemaker reduces home work & takes a job, the person who is hired to help out around the home is counted in the labor force  
  DISCOURAGED WORKER IS THE OFFICIAL DESIGNATION FOR ONE WHO IS OUT OF WORK, BUT NOT CONSIDERED TO BE UNEMPLOYED   
  Discouraged workers are those persons in the labor force who are not counted as unemployed because they have been unemployed for such a length of time, as determined by the govt., that they are no longer considered available for work  
  Hodson & Sullivan point out that some workers stop looking for work because they believe no work is available  
  In December of 2003, only 1,000 new jobs were created in the economy, & it is estimated that 150,000 new jobs must be created each month just to keep up w/ labor force growth, but over 200,000 unemployed workers were moved from the official rolls of the unemployed to the category of discouraged workers & thus unemployment fell from 5.9% to 5.7%  
  Discouraged workers are officially removed from the labor force & are categorized as not in the labor force (NILF)  
  The BLS estimates that there were 600,000 discouraged workers in January of 1994  
  The BLS estimates that there were 200,000 discouraged workers in September of 2000  
  By excluding discouraged workers from the labor force, the official unemployment rate is too low in that it under represents the number of people who are out of work & would like a job  
  Those receiving unemployment insurance benefits are not used to estimate the unemployment rate because not every worker receives unemployment insurance benefits  
  See Also:  Unemployment Compensation  
  THE US ECON ALWAYS RESULTS IN UNEMPLOYMENT, CREATING JOB INSECURITY & A WKFORCE THAT IS UNABLE TO MAKE DEMANDS ON MGT BECAUSE THEY HAVE LITTLE ECON SECURITY   
Link
The Table on a Summary of Historical Unemployment Rates shows that the US has accepted ever higher rates of unemployment as normal  
 
During the 1940s, 50s, & early 60s unemployment was low, usually below 5%
 
  During the late 60s & 70s the US experienced "stagflation" denoting that the economy experienced stagnation, i.e. high unemployment sometimes above 10%, & simultaneous inflation
 
  In the recession of the early 1980s, unemployment reached over 10%
 
  One reason unemployment rose in the 70s & 80s is that the baby boomers reached working age & more women left home making & entered the workforce  
  Other reasons that unemployment rose in the 70s & 80s is that deindustrialization began, the Vietnam War was winding down, the oil crisis, shifts in the timber & farm industries, etc.  
  Women entered the workforce because under emerging gender norms, they were now allowed to, & because it became necessary for most families to have two incomes in order to maintain their standard of living  
  In the recession of the early 90s, unemployment reached over 8%
 
  From 1993 to 2000, the nation experienced its longest single period of growth, w/ unemployment falling to 4% by 2000
 
  In 2000, only 4% of poor people were unemployed, which was the lowest in many years
 
  The nation has been in a minor recession since late 2000 until 2004 w/ unemployment reaching nearly 6%
 
  WHILE MANY FEEL THE POOR ABUSE THE WELFARE SYSTEM, THE ECON CREATES A CLASS OF WKING POOR WHO CANNOT MAINTAIN A SUSTAINABLE LIFESTYLE & THUS FALL OUT OF WK INTO WELFARE   
Link
An Analysis of the Pie Chart on the Work Status of Poor People in 2000 demonstrates over 50% of the poor did work or attend school, but only some of those would legally be considered unemployed  
  In 2003, the unemployment rate in the US is over 5%
 
  In 2003, there are signs of a recovery in that economic growth is increasing, but the unemployment rate is not falling, resulting in the phenomenon of a "jobless recovery"
 
  Unemployment is a major hardship for all classes except the upper class & the corporate class in that all of the middle class, & below, experience lay offs or downsizing
 
 
When experiencing job loss, the middle classes experience a fall in their standard of living, being forced to live off of savings, or the sale of family assets such as the car or home
 
 
When experiencing job loss, the lower classes experience poverty, having few assets to sell
 
 
Most economists believe that increasing unemployment lowers inflation, thus there is a trade off btwn unemployment & inflation
 
  THE GOVT HAS A LOT BUT NOT TOTAL CONTROL OF UNEMPLOYMENT RATES, & CHOOSES TO KEEP RATES AT RELATIVELY HIGH LEVELS   
 
Unemployment hurts primarily the middle & lower classes, while inflation hurts primarily the upper classes  
  Many social theorists believe that the economy is designed to limit inflation at the expense of high unemployment  
  Unemployment rates are deliberately regulated by the govt by TWO major processes, including monetary policy & fiscal policy  
  Monetary policy is set by the Federal Reserve Bank who determines the interest rates & amount of $ in the economy  
  See Also:  The Federal Reserve Bank      http://www.federalreserve.gov/otherfrb.htm
Link
  Traditional economics sees an unsolvable conflict btwn interest rates, inflation & unemployment  
  Interest rates & unemployment vary inversely:  improvement in one, degrades the other  
  While high interest rates, inflation & unemployment do have all classes, they impact different classes differently  
  Unemployment does more harm to lower classes than it does to the upper classes  
  The Fed is commonly know at "the inflation fighter"  
  Fiscal Policy is set by the President & the Congress who determine the amount of govt spending  
  Foreign trade policy addresses imports, exports, tariffs, deindustrialization, but not unemployment  
  Some trade policies, such as NAFTA, provide for limited retraining if one can demonstrate that their job was lost due to NAFTA  
  THE CONTINUOUS HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT RATES HAVE BEEN CALLS ED INDUSTRIAL RESERVE ARMY, DENOTING THE ECON INSECURITY & SUBMISSIVENESS IT FOSTERS IN SOCIETY   
  Marx's concept of the industrial reserve army denotes that people in occupational structure can be laid off to protect profits, & rehired in booms  
  An industrial reserve army is an army of the unemployed which functions to keep wages low  
  The US has no domestic industrial policy, which is a set of policies & regulations that coordinate monetary policy, fiscal policy, business regulations, industrial development, worker training, worker retraining, etc.  
  In relation to unemployment, many social scientists believe that the published/official rates of unemployment is influenced by the public policy process, & is usually lower than the actual rate  
  For example, in 1988 there were 6.7 mm people actively seeking work but unable to find it resulting in an official unemployment rate of 5.5%  
  In 1988, the workforce of 121.8 mm also had 5.4 mm people who desired work, and were available to start work immediately, but were not actively looking for work because they were in school, ill or disabled, were keeping house, or were convinced they could not get a job  
  Adding in all the categories of the unemployed, which govt. economists exclude, results in a 10.5% unemployment rate in 1988  
  Statistics on categories of people who are unemployed but not listed as such may be found in the US Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)  
  UNEMPLOYMENT AFFECTS THE MIDDLE & LOWER CLASSES THE MOST   
 Link
The Table on Occupational Differences in Unemployment shows that unemployment is distributed unequally across occupational groups  
  Unemployment is unequally distributed across social groups  
  The unemployment rate for blacks & Hispanics is about twice that for whites  
  Youth unemployment among 16 - 19 yr. olds is two to three times as high as the overall rate  
  Unemployment among minority youths reached 30% to 40% in the early 1990s  
Link
The Table on the Changes in US Unemployment Rates demonstrates that unemployment is a chronic problem in the US & that different groups experience different rates of unemployment   
Link
The Table on Unemployment in Europe shows that unemployment is a chronic problem in many industrialized nations  

 
 
Top
 
Table on a Summary of Historical Unemployment Rates
HS 0205
 
  1950s   3 % Post war consumer boom  
  1960s   3 to 6.8 % Johnson's War on Poverty
VN War begins
 
  1970s   5 to 8.5%  unusual situation of "stagflation" VN War ends  
  1980s   almost reached 10 % Reagan recession
Tax cuts
Deficit spending
Military build-up
 
  1990s   drops from 10 to historic low:  4 % Welfare reform
Limited defense spending
 
  2000s   begins w/ historic low:  4 % Is the info econ immune to recession?  
  2003   reaches a high of 6.2% Term "Jobless Recovery" is coined  

 
Top
 

Table on Occupational Differences in Unemployment
HS 0205
Year
1992
1998
Overall US Unemployment Rate
7.4 %
4.5 % 
Professionals & Managers
3.1
1.8
Clerical Workers
5.7
3.7
Craft Workers
8.8
4.2
Service Workers
8.1
6.7
Machine Operators & Laborers
11.0
6.7
Construction Laborers
22.9
14.2
The Table on Occupational Differences in Unemployment shows that Unemployment is distributed unequally across occupational groups
Census, 1993e

 
Top
 
Table on the Changes in US Unemployment Rates
HS 0205
Year
All Civilian Workers
Whites
Blacks
Hispanics
Unemployed over 17 Weeks
1948
3.8 %
3.5 %
--
--
0.5 %
1949
5.9
5.6
--
--
1.1
1950
5.3
4.9
--
--
1.3
1951
3.3
3.1
--
--
.5
1952
3.0
2.8
--
--
.4
1953
2.9
2.7
--
--
.3
1954
5.5
5.0
--
--
1.3
1955
4.4
3.9
--
--
1.1
1956
4.1
3.6
--
--
.8
1957
4.3
3.8
--
--
.8
1958
6.8
6.1
--
--
2.1
1959
5.5
4.8
--
--
1.5
1960
5.5
5.0
--
--
1.4
1961
6.7
6.0
--
--
2.2
1962
5.5
4.9
--
--
1.6
1963
5.7
5.0
--
--
1.5
1964
5.2
4.6
--
--
1.3
1965
4.5
4.1
--
--
1.0
1966
3.8
3.4
--
--
.7
1967
3.8
3.4
--
--
.6
1968
3.6
3.2
--
--
.5
1969
3.5
3.1
--
--
.5
1970
4.9
4.5
--
--
.8
1971
5.9
5.4
--
--
1.4
1972
5.6
5.1
10.4 %
--
1.3
1973
4.9
4.3
9.4
7.5 %
.9
1974
5.6
5.0
10.5
8.1
1.0
1975
8.5
7.8
14.8
12.2
2.7
1976
7.7
7.0
14.0
11.5
2.5
1977
7.1
6.2
14.0
10.1
2.0
1978
6.1
5.2
12.8
9.1
1.4
1979
5.8
5.1
12.3
8.3
1.2
1980
7.1
6.3
14.3
10.1
1.7
1981
7.6
6.7
15.6
10.4
2.1
1982
9.7
8.6
18.9
13.8
3.2
1983
9.6
8.4
19.5
13.7
3.8
1984
7.5
6.5
15.9
10.7
2.4
1985
7.2
6.2
15.1
10.5
2.0
1986
7.0
6.0
14.5
10.6
1.9
1987
6.2
5.3
13.0
8.8
1.7
1988
5.5
4.7
11.7
8.2
1.3
1989
5.3
4.5
11.4
8.0
1.1
1990
5.5
4.7
11.3
8.0
1.2
1991
6.7
6.0
12.4
9.9
1.9
1992
7.5
6.7
13.9
11.1
2.6
1993
6.9
6.2
12.8
10.2
--
1994
6.1
5.5
11.3
9.0
--
1995
5.6
4.9
10.4
9.3
--
1996
5.4
4.7
10.5
8.9
--
1997
4.9
4.2
10.0
7.7
--
1998
4.5
3.9
8.9
7.2
--
The Table Changes in US Unemployment Rates demonstrates that unemployment is a chronic problem in the US & that different groups experience different rates of unemployment
US Dept. Labor, BLS, 1989b, Handbook of Labor Statistics.  Washington, DC:  US GPO, p. 64.  Also, Census, 1993e, Statistical Abstract of the US, 1993.  Washington, DC:  US GPO, p. 413

 
Top
 

Table on Unemployment in Europe
HS 0205
Year
1992
1998
Overall US Unemployment Rate
    7.4 %
     4.5 %
Italy
6.9
12.3
UK
8.8
 
Netherlands
7.0
 
Norway
2.8
 
Sweden
2.6
 
France  
11.8
Germany  
7.5
The Table on Unemployment in Europe shows that unemployment is a chronic problem in many industrialized nations
Census, 1993e

 
Top  
An Analysis of the Pie Chart on the Work Status of Poor People in 2000 demonstrates 
      about 50% of the poor did work, but only some of those would legally be considered unemployed
Far0506

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on Layoffs
External
Links
  Layoffs are the temporary elimination of jobs, creating unemployment
 
  Layoffs occur for many reasons, including quitting a job, being fired, becoming disabled, being laid off, & moving to be w/ a spouse or loved one
 
  Layoffs are a particularly important cause of unemployment because they affect so many people at one time & in one place
 
  Older workers have an especially difficult time finding new employment
 
  Beginning in the 1980s & continuing through the 2000s, layoffs became more common as bankruptcies increased among small firms & as large firms moved both w/in the US, as well as overseas
 
  With the rising numbers of layoffs in the post Reagan era, plants are closed in high wage areas & reopened in low wage areas (Sullivan, Warren & Westbrook, 2000)
 
  Bluestone & Harrison, 1982, found that, "Together, runaways, shutdowns, & permanent physical cutbacks short of complete closure may have cost the country as many as 38 mm jobs"
 
  Layoff are more typically short for workers in skilled occupations in large firms that operate in key industries
 
  Layoffs are longer for workers in less skilled jobs in smaller, peripheral firms (Shervish, 1981)
 
  The term indefinite layoffs is often a euphemism for permanent termination, & beginning in the late 1990s the term downsizing came into use to signify permanent termination, i.e. firing
 
  THE SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF LAYOFFS
 
  Layoffs & unemployment are one of the most direct routes to poverty  
  See Also:  Poverty  
  The loss of income & fringe benefits, especially heath insurance result in the loss of life style, including the potential loss of home, delayed educational plans, reduced medical care, & reductions in food & recreation budgets
 
  Workers often feel helpless & worthless in the face of lengthy unemployment
 
  Layoffs & unemployment often have severe negative health consequences
 
  Bluestone & Harrison, 1982, p. 65, estimate that a 1% increase in the unemployment rate over six years would result in 37,000 deaths including 920 suicides & 650 homicides, 4000 mental hospital admissions, & 3,300 prison admissions
 
  67 % of unemployed women in Britain felt increased loneliness & 34% reported a decline in mental health (Martin & Wallace, 1984)
 
  Careers, marriages & families are all affected by the unemployment rate  
  Higher unemployment produces family violence, family breakups, & divorce  
  Community services such as education, parks, recreation, police, street repair all deteriorate w/ high unemployment  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Unemployment Compensation 
External
Links
  The most important assistance that unemployed workers receive is from the family (Standing, 1981)
 
  Workers may also be eligible for unemployment compensation, usually from a state govt., but there are also a variety of other programs available 
 
  78 % of workers w/o jobs are covered by unemployment insurance, but far less than that usually have receive it
 
  Unemployment payments usually expire after 26 weeks, but Congress has sometimes lengthened them to 52 weeks because of a severe recession, or some other special circumstance
 
  While unemployment laws vary from state to state, farm workers, personal services workers, part-time workers, workers who have not been employed long, workers who quit voluntarily, & workers who were fired are generally not eligible for unemployment
 
  Thus, at any given time about one of four unemployed workers receives unemployment 
 
  Some union contracts also provide supplemental unemployment
 
  If workers are permanently laid off, they may also receive severance pay which is a lump sum payment to help tide the person over until they find new work
 
 
Workers on unemployment may also be eligible to receive welfare if he, she, or their family are completely destitute
 
 
In some states unemployment insurance is funded by taxes on firms and workers, and in some states it is funded only by taxes on firms
 
 
The amount of unemployment benefits a worker receives depends on his or her pay & length of service in their previous job
 
  In 1991, the number of people receiving unemployment benefits amount to about 40 % of the number of the unemployed people (BLS, 1992e)  
  In 1997, the number of people receiving unemployment benefits amount to about 35 % of the number of the unemployed people (US Census, 1999:  Table 626)  
  Some types of work such as agricultural labor are not covered by unemployment insurance  
  People who start their first job are generally not eligible for unemployment because they generally do not have enough time in the labor force  
  People who are discouraged workers & re-enter the work force by getting a job are not eligible for unemployment insurance because they generally do not have enough time in the labor force  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Legislation on Unemployment
External
Links
  The Humphrey Hawkins Bill was passed in the 1960s requiring the US govt to establish policies to minimize unemployment
 
  A few states have passed plant closing legislation which have a variety of provisions
 
  Some of the provisions of plant closing legislation include advance warning of closure, advance warning of layoffs of more than 250 people, compensating workers, & compensating communities
 
  Firms often exploit loop holes in plant closing legislation by laying off workers in groups of less than 250 people, until there is no one left, & then argue that closing costs are very low for a plant w/ a few or no workers
 
  NAFTA & some other trade agreements now provide compensation to workers & communities if they can demonstrate that they were laid off or otherwise harmed by international trade
 
  Workers & communities harmed by international trade must be certified as such by various US govt. agencies such as the Dept. of Labor
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on   Toxic Substances, Hazardous Materials & Hazards
External
Links
  TOXIC SUBSTANCES & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS  
  One reason that occupational diseases have come to play such a significant role in the total injury & illness picture is that over 5,000 new chemicals are introduced into the workplace each year
 
  There are advisory standards for only about 410 of the innumerable chemicals, & OSHA regulations for even less
 
  In the past, people used the expression, "Mad as a Hatter" because the mercury used in early industrial hat making resulted in brain injury & madness, & even though people did not understand the cause of the disease, they understood that it was concentrated in the hat making industry
 
  Most chemicals, like the mineral asbestos, enter the body through the lungs, but some chemicals such as benzenes can be absorbed through the skin
 
  Heavy metals such as lead, mercury, & arsenic, enter the body primarily through the mouth
 
  Chemicals can harm a person in a variety of ways including effects on unborn children, & therefore women of child bearing age, or pregnant women have been barred from working w/ certain chemicals
 
 Link
Table on Cancer-Causing Chemicals in the Workplace
 
  The Table on Cancer Causing Chemical in the Workplace shows that there are many hazardous materials in the workplace putting millions of workers at a significantly higher risk for cancer & related diseases  
  Asbestos was recognized as hazardous by insurance companies in 1918, but was not officially recognized as a carcinogen until 1970
 
  Asbestos was, and to a limited extent still is used as insulation & fire resistant material  
  In just 10 cities, the EPA estimated that 733,000 public & private buildings contained asbestos   
  It is estimated that over 100,000 workers have died as a result of inhaling asbestos insulation fibers  
  HAZARDS IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY WORKPLACE  
  In California is is estimated that workers suffer from job related illness at more than four times the rate of other manufacturing workers because of hazardous material in the workplace  
  Electronics workers are routinely exposed to arsenic & arsine gas & other hazards in the workplace  
  Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) occurs when a person is exposed to many chemicals, & thereby becomes over-sensitized to everyday levels of normal chemicals, causing allergy-like symptoms  
  MCS is also thought to be at least partly responsible for mass psychogenic illness  
  Workers sometimes simultaneously experience fainting, exhaustion, & other symptoms of distress as a result of exposure to toxic substances, MCS, etc.  
  Stress, pressure, heat, long hours, etc. are important contributing factors in the outbreak & spread of such phenomena as MCS & its symptoms  
  While some social scientists view mass illness as "hysteria," others look at the compound effects of the many chemicals in factories  
  Electronics firms spend less than 1% of revenues on safety & health programs, in contrast to 2.5% to 3% spent by rims in other industries  
 
VDTs
 
  Problems w/ VDT use include eyestrain, chronic muscle fatigue, & radiation exposure leading to disturbed sleep, headaches, dizziness, indigestion, high blood pressure, heart disease, ulcers, & nervous disorders
 
  Workers often experience pain in tendons, joints, & muscles  
  Until the late 1980s, a 31 % miscarriage rate for women working w/ VDT's was twice the national average  
  SICK BUILDINGS  
  The EPA estimates that one-sixth of commercial buildings in the US pose health hazards due to indoor air pollution  
  Because of modern, energy-efficient, nearly airtight buildings, dust, vapors, chemicals, molds, bacteria, & so on stay in buildings instead of dispersing  
  Lack of ventilation is considered to be the primary cause of the concentration of indoor air pollution  
 
People experience high rates of asthma, reduced lung capacity, acute & chronic allergies, & cancer
 
  According to the World Health Organization, "there's probably more damage to human health from indoor air pollution than from out-door pollution"  
 
In the 1980s, the EPA's own new office was a sick building
 
 
-  Supplement:  EPA ban: USA Today:  EPA bans pesticide as harmful to kids 
Link
 
Perrow developed the concept of Normal Accidents to connote the increase & persistence of catastrophic industrial accidents, which because of their frequency, people come view as "normal;" i.e. an expected price to pay for the modern way of life
 
 
Normal Accidents are major accidents are inevitable in the modern age because of complicated tech & org structure of production systems
 
 
Normal Accidents include the occurrence of hazardous materials on the job, as well as the accidents that inevitably occur w/ said hazardous materials
 
 
See Also:  Normal Accidents  
 
See Also:  Industrial Accidents  
 
Examples of workplace related Normal Accidents: 
 
 
Love Canal:   Hooker Chemical Co. buried dioxin in the 1950s
     Housing developments built over it in the 70s
     Who's responsible? 
 
 
Bhopal, India:    Union Carbide:   3,000 dead; 300,000 injured, 1984
 
  Silkwood:    1970s:    Kerr-McGee plutonium processing  
  Chernobyl, Soviet Union:  1986  
  Three Mile Island  
  The public has come to accept these events as normal  
  Right-To-Know Legislation  
  OSHA's policies mandate that chemicals are safe until proven dangerous & it often takes yrs. to prove that a material is hazardous  
  Until the 1980s, workers in the US had no Right-to-Know the names of the chemicals, materials, radiation, etc. that they were working w/  
  For example Johns-Manville Asbestos Co. recommended that workers suffering from asbestosis "should not be told of his condition so that he can live & work in peace & the company can benefit by his many years of experience"  
  Some states & cities passed Right-To-Know Legislation, & in the mid 1980s, the US govt also passed it  
  Right-To-Know Legislation dictates that chemicals, radiation, & hazardous materials be clearly labeled & that info be made available on their health hazards  
  While Right-To-Know Legislation is a great advance, the unknown or untested hazards of many chemicals means that while workers may know what they are being exposed to, they have little knowledge of its effect  

 
Top
 
Table on Cancer Causing Chemicals in the Workplace
HS0205
Chemicals
Target Organs
Chronic Health Effects
Workers at Risk
Excess Risk Ratio for Cancer
Number of Workers Exposed Annually
Latency 
Period for Cancer (Years)
Asbestos Lungs, gastrointestinal tract Abestosis, anorexia, weight loss Miners, millers, textile, insulation, shipyards
1.5 - 2 X
4,122,000
4 - 40
Benzene Bone marrow (leukemia) Central nervous system & gastrointestinal effects, book abnormalities (anemia, leukopenia) Explosives, benzene, & rubber-cement workers, distillers, dye users, printers, shoemakers
2 - 3 X
3,900,000
6 - 14
Chromium Nasal cavity & sinuses, lung, larynx Dermatitis, skin ulceration, nasa system ulceration, bronchitis, pneumonia, inflammation of the larynx & liver Producers, processors, & users of Cr-acetylene, aniline workers, bleachers, glass, pottery, & linoleum workers, battery makers
3 - 4 X
1,675,000
5 - 15
Arsenic Skin, lung, liver, lymphatic system Gastrointestinal disturbances, hyperpigmentaiton, peripheral neuropathy, hemolytic anemia, dermatitis, bronchitis, nasal system ulceration Miners, smelters, insecticide makers, & sprayers, chemical workers, oil refiners, vintners
3 - 8 X
1,500,000
10 +
Nickel Nasal cavity & sinuses, lung Dermatitis Nickel smelters, mixers, & roasters, electrolysis workers
5 - 10 X (lung)
100 X (nasal sinuses)
1,425,000
3 - 30
The Table on Cancer Causing Chemical in the Workplace shows that there are many hazardous materials in the workplace putting millions of workers at a significantly higher risk for cancer & related diseases

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Safety at Work
External
Links
  -  Project:  Video:  Office Space & Stress
Link
  -  Video:  Office Space
Link
 
INJURIES AT WORK
 
  A total of 4.3 million nonfatal injuries and illnesses were reported in private industry workplaces during 2004, down from 4.4 million in 2003  
  In 2004 injuries occurred at a rate of 4.8 cases per 100 equivalent full time workers, according to the Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), U.S. Department of Labor  
  The 2004 rate of 4.8 injuries per 100 equivalent full time was a decline from the rate of 5.0 cases per 100 wkrs reported by BLS for 2003 & resulted from a 2.5 percent decrease in the number of cases reported combined w/ a 1.6 percent increase in the number of hours worked  
  U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics
Link
Link
Table  on Workplace Fatalities & Injuries  
  The Table on Workplace Fatalities & Injuries shows that both rates are declining & that about 6,000 wkrs are killed on the job each yr & about 4% of wkrs are injured on the job each yr  
Link
Table on Workplace Injuries by Event  
  The Table on Workplace Injuries by Event shows that main causes of wkplaces injuries are travel related, assaults, falls, contact by objects/equipment, & exposure to substances  
  BLS Report on Wkplace Fatalities, 2004
Link
  BLS Report on Wkplace Fatalities, 2003
Link
  BLS Report on Wkplace Fatalities, 1992 - 2002
Link
 
In 1990, 88 of 1,000 workers are disabled every year in the US
 
 
Lost work days increased from 109 lost work days per 1,000 workers in 1972 to 699 lost work days per 1,000 workers in 1989
 
 
The figures on workplace injuries are lower than real rates because workers are encouraged not to report their injuries & to do light duty
 
  Many firms require an injured worker to come to work & then assign them light duty to disguise the injury & lower the rate of reported injuries & therefore the cost of insurance & the possibility of govt regulation  
  In terms of safety, there is a differential level of risk across the various industries; i.e., some industries are safer than others  
  Safety & health risks are not distributed equally across all industries  
  Injuries range from a high of 189 cases per 1,000 workers per year in lumber & wood products to 20 cases in finance, insurance & real estate  
  Many occupational diseases have a delayed onset, have multiple contributing causes, & may manifest themselves in only a small percentage of those exposed  
  For example, exposure to carcinogenic chemicals may not lead to the development of cancer for twenty years or longer  
  Given the long period of time it takes some cancers to manifest, it may be difficult to separate the effects of on the job exposure from later health problems or from the effects of smoking or diet  
  Some estimates indicate that as many as nine out of ten occupational diseases go unreported  
 
US mines are among the most dangerous w/ over 200 workers killed per year
 
 
In the 1980s, President Reagan cut the Occupational Safety & Health Administration ( OSHA ) by 25% effectively reducing government intervention & regulation
 
 
In 1988, there were 10,700 work related deaths w/ 70,000 permanently disabled
 
 
The rate of workplace death & injury in the US is at least four times higher than any other industrialized country
 
 
Reducing our workplace deaths & injuries would save about 7,500 lives & about 53,000 injuries
 
 
Chronic stress injuries are becoming more common
 
 
Chronic stress injuries are caused by improper equipment, postures, repetition, sound, etc.
 
 
Occupational diseases have multiple contributing causes
 
 
The long term development of an occupational disease makes it difficult to determine it's cause
 
 
Occupational diseases can be caused by hazardous materials or by chronic stress injuries
 
  Noise is a common source of injury on the job & can also increase stress  
  Vibration, prolonged exposure to heat or cold, low level radiation, & other hazards can cause problems when a worker is exposed to them over a long period of time  
  Often it is difficult to tell what the long term effect of job hazards will be, & they may vary widely from worker to worker  
  Workers in the 3rd World frequently labor under even more hazardous conditions than in the developed world  
 
STRESS
 
 
Time pressure & job changes are the primary causes of job stress
 
  1 to 2% of the working population experience serious job related mental disorders such as depression  
 
Ritzer calls the American "drive system," hyperrationalized in that, on the job, there is no wasted time, no leisure, & thus people must always be on task
 
 
Stress costs $75 to 90 bb per year in the form of such phenomenon as alcoholism, absenteeism, etc.
 
  An example of stress can be seen in the 24,000 calls a phone operator may handle in a day  
 
The body does not adapt well to shift work
 
Link
The Table on the Sources of Office Stress demonstrates that there are many preventable causes of office stress
 
 
NORMAL ACCIDENTS
 
 
Major accidents are inevitable in the modern age because of complicated tech & org structure of production systems
 
 
We accept this as normal
 
 
DISABILITY
 
 
The disabled have twice the normal unemployment rate
 
 
In the US, there are millions of handicapped people, about 14 mm, but this is not all from work injury
 
 
40% of the handicapped are employable
 
 
Americans w/ Disabilities Act  ADA
 
 
While the ADA is powerful legislation, it does not have the same strength as civil rights legislation
 
 
HEALTHCARE
 
 
60% workers have a group health plan
 
 
40% workers have retirement/disability
 
 
Only 34% of service workers have a group health plan
 
 
Only 22% of service workers have retirement/disability
 
  Many safety & health problems could be reduced or eliminated by more effective regulation of industrial chemicals & processes  
  The Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) was created in 1970 & is responsible for regulation of safety & health in the workplace  
  OSHA     http://www.osha.gov/
Link
  Currently OSHA allows any chemical to be used in the workplace until it is proven to be too dangerous  
  It may take years or decades to demonstrate the danger of a chemical, radiation, or other hazardous material  
  Evidence of hazards is routinely challenged by the companies that use the chemicals  

 
Top
 
Table  on Workplace Fatalities & Injuries
Year
Fatalities
(public & private)
Injuries
per 100 wkrs
(private)
Total Injuries
(private)
( in millions)
1992
6,217
8.9
6.8
1993
6,331
8.5
6.7
1994
6.632
8.4
6.8
1995
6,275
8.1
6.6
1996
6,202
7.4
6.2
1997
6,238
7.1
6.1
1998
6,055
6.7
5.9
1999
6,054
6.3
5.7
2000
5,920
6.1
5.7
2001
5,915
5.7
5.2
2002
5,534
5.0
5.3
2003
5,575
5.0
4.4
2004
5,764
4.8
4.3
The Table on Workplace Fatalities & Injuries shows that both rates are declining & that about 6,000 wkrs are killed on the job each yr & about 4% of wkrs are injured on the job each yr
Source:  U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/data/

 
Top
 
Table  on Workplace Injuries by Event
The Table on Workplace Injuries by Event shows that main causes of wkplaces injuries are travel related, assaults, falls, contact by objects/equipment, & exposure to substances
Source:  U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/data/

 
Top
 
Table on Sources of Office Stress
HS3205
Lack of promotions or raises
51.7 %
Low Pay
49.0
Monotonous, repetitive work
40.0
No input into decision making
35.1
Heavy workload or overtime
31.5
Supervisor problems
30.6
Unclear job descriptions
30.2
Unsupportive boss
28.1
Inability or reluctance to express frustration or anger
22.8
Production quotas
22.4
Difficulty juggling home & family responsibilities
12.8
Inadequate breaks
12.6
Sexual harassment
5.6
Table 5.8   Sources of Office Stress demonstrates that there are many preventable causes of office stress
Source:  Joel Makower, 1981, Office Hazards.  Washington, DC, Tilden Press, p. 125.

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on Environmental Degradation & the Workplace
External
Links
  -  Project:  Environmental Degradation & the Workplace
Link
  Dangerous practices in the workplace affect the health of the workers, the health of people outside the workplace, as well as the environment 
 
  As seen in examining the effects of toxic substances on workers & the general population, it can take years or even decades to determine the effects of hazardous practices, pollution, etc. from the workplace on the environment
 
  ACID RAIN  
  Acid Rain has the potential to devastate the remaining forested area & its wildlife in the Northeastern US, Eastern Canada, Europe, & other areas
 
  Acid rain is precipitation polluted by sulfuric acid which forms when water vapor in the air reacts w/ pollutants containing sulfur, such as smoke from power plants that use fossil fuel, especially coal
 
  Because of its absorption of pollution, rain has a slightly elevated acidic level which overtime can slightly acidify lakes & land
 
  Even a small increase in the acidity of bodies of water or land can have devastating effects on the eco-system
 
  Lake Superior was threatened by acid rain & other forms of industrial pollution
 
  Many bodies of water in the industrial mid-west & northeast have had warnings issued on them against the consumption of fish
 
  AIR POLLUTION  
  Air Pollution results in many people suffering chronic irritation in the form of asthma, allergies, etc. w/ Denver, Phoenix, & LA being among the worst US cities
 
  Since the Passage of the Clean Air Act & related laws in 1963, 1967, 1970, 1977, 1990, & significant revision of rules in 2002, most observers agree that air quality has improved & acid rain has declined in the developed world, but air related problems continue to be a problem on a global scale  
  During the administration of Bush, Jr., (2000-2004), air pollution rules that were to go into effect to reduce the micro-components of air pollution were delayed  
  See Also:  Environmental Laws  
  See Also:  Solutions for Air Pollution  
  PESTICIDES  
  Agricultural workers living near & working in fields are routinely exposed to pesticides
 
  Health problems for agricultural workers result from both proper improper application of pesticides, herbicides, & fertilizers
 
  Each year the Texas Dept. of Ag receives almost 800 health complaints arising from pesticide use, & California is even worse
 
  The treatment of farm workers & the misuse of pesticides is even worse in Mexico, central America, & other developing, agricultural nations
 
  These chemical continue to find their way into the food chain of the developed world; for example, fruits & vegetables in the US have detectable levels of DDT & other illegal chemicals
 
 
LOVE CANAL & HAZARDOUS WASTE  
 
In the early 1980s, a town called Love Canal discovered that many residents were built on top of a toxic waste dump  
  The Hooker Chemical Company had buried containers of toxic waste there decades earlier, when it was legal to do so  
  Health problems at Love Canal included deafness, respiratory difficulties, convulsions, cancer, stunted growth in children, & unusually high rates of pregnancy problems & birth defects  
  Today, large sections of the town are abandoned & boarded up  
  COAL MINING  
  THE TIMBER INDUSTRY, FOREST TRANSITIONS, WATER POLLUTION, & WILDFIRE  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Industrial / Workplace Accidents
External
Links
  -  Project:  Analysis of Workplace Accidents
Link
 
Well known industrial / workplace accidents include: 
 
 
Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire in New York City on March 25, 1911  
  The Triangle Factory fire was a major industrial disaster in the U.S., causing the death of more than 147 garment workers, mostly women & girls working there, who either died in the fire or jumped to their deaths  
  The fire & the tireless organizing of the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, (ILGWU) led to legislation requiring improved factory safety standards and   
  The fire helped spur the growth of the ILGWU which fought for better working conditions for sweatshop workers in that industry  
  Texas City Disaster, Texas occurred on April 16, 1947 at 9:15 AM when an explosion aboard a docked ship named the Grandcamp, & subsequent fires & explosions, is referred to as the deadliest industrial disaster in America  
  A minimum of 578 people lost their lives & another 3,500 were injured as the blast shattered windows from as far away as 25 miles  
  Huge boulders of steel flew into the sky to rain down more than a mile from ground zero  
  The origin of the explosion was fire in the cargo on board the ship which detonated 3,200 tons of ammonium nitrate fertilize  
  The fire was thought to have been ignited by a discarded cigarette  
  Although this industrial disaster was one of the largest involving ammonium nitrate many others have been reported, including a recent one in N Korea  
 
The Silkwood & Kerr McGee plutonium contamination controversy occurred in November, 1974.  
  Karen Silkwood experienced high plutonium contamination while working at Kerr McGee's nuclear processing plant in TX  
  Silkwood made allegations to  the AEC about poor operating practices at the plant & died under mysterious circumstances  
 
The Three Mile Island nuclear core meltdown occurred on March 28, 1979 in  Dauphin County, PA  
 
The Bhopal toxic gas release occurred on Dec 2, 1984 killing 3,000 people immediately, while 15,000 have died since, w/ more dying everyday from long term complications  
 
The Space Shuttle Challenger exploded during launch on January 28, 1986 killing all seven astronauts  
 
The Chernobyl nuclear core meltdown occurred on April 26, 1986 in the Ukraine killing scores of workers immediately & resulting in an increase in long term cancer deaths  
  The oil tanker the Exxon Valdez went aground on March 24, 1989 resulting in a catastrophic oil spill in AK  
 
The Kader Toy Factory fire occurred on May 10, 1993 when a fire started in a poorly built factory in Thailand.   
  Exit doors were locked and the stairwell soon collapsed. 188 workers were killed, mostly young women  
 
The South Canyon fire occurred on Storm King Mountain near Glenwood Springs, CO on July 6, 1994 killing 14 elite wildland firefighters including smokejumpers, hotshots, helitak & others  
 
The Space Shuttle Columbia exploded during landing on On February 1, 2003 killing all seven astronauts  
  BP Texas City Refinery Accident  occurred on March 23, 2005 when an explosion occurred at a petroleum refinery in Texas City, Texas, that belonged to BP  
  It is the 3rd largest refinery in the US & one of the largest in the world, processing 433,000 barrels of crude oil per day & accounting for 3% of that nation's gasoline supply  
  Over 100 were injured, and 15 were confirmed dead, including employees of the Fluor Corp as well as BP  
  BP has since accepted that its employees contributed to the accident.   
  Level indicators failed, leading to overfilling of a heater, & light hydrocarbons concentrated at ground level throughout the area  
  An unidentified ignition source, probably a running vehicle, set off the explosion  
 
Charles Perrow, 1984, is an organizational sociologist who believes that major, industrial accidents are endemic to modern society & are the nearly inevitable result of the complicated technological & organizational structure of modern production systems & there fore we can expect increasing numbers of them in the future
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Silkwood & Kerr McGee
External
Links
  -  Video:  Silkwood
Link
  -  Project:  Video:  Silkwood
Link
 
-  Supplement:  Supreme Court: Kerr McGee v. Silkwood
Link
 
The Kerr McGee (KM) plant processed nuclear fuel & Karen Silkwood & other workers had experienced plutonium contamination
 
  Silkwood (February 19, 1946 - November 13, 1974) was an Am labor union activist & chem tech at the KM plant near Crescent, OK  
  After being hired at KM, Silkwood joined the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union (OCAM) local & took part in a strike at the plant  
  Silkwood discovered violations of safety & health regulations, including exposure of workers to contamination, faulty respiratory equipment, improper storage of samples, a lack of shower facilities, preventing proper decontamination, poor training, & more  
  In the summer of 1974, Silkwood testified to the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) about health & safety issues at the KM plant  
  On November 5, 1974, Silkwood had 40 times the limit for plutonium contamination so she was decontaminated & sent home  
  On November 6, 1974, Silkwood had more contamination, was more aggressively decontaminated & sent home  
  On November 6, 1974, Silkwood had such a high level of plutonium contamination that she was exhaling it, & it was found that she had contaminated her home & friends  
  Silkwood claimed she had been deliberately contaminated while KM responded that she had contaminated herself  
  Silkwood had assembled a stack of documentation for her claims & decided to go public w/ the evidence so she made contact with a New York Times journalist prepared to print the story  
 
On Nov 13, 1974  Silkwood died near the KM plant near Gore, OK, in an automobile wreck while traveling to bring documents on the contamination to a lawyer handling her case against the company
 
  The OK State Police investigated determined that she had methaqualone in her blood stream & she had fallen asleep & drove off the road while others maintain that there is evidence she braced for impact & that her car had been struck from behind  
 
There have continued to be radiation leaks at the KM plant posing a hazard to workers & residents
 
 
Silkwood's father sued KM & a jury found KM guilty of contaminating Silkwood, awarding her estate over $10 mm  
  An appeal revised Silkwood's victory, eliminating the punitive damages, awarding her only $5 K, but still finding KM guilty of unsafe practices  
  The Supreme Ct found in Silkwood's favor & reinstated the $10 mm penalty  
  Silkwood finally settled for $1.38 mm & KM admitted no fault  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Bhopal
External
Links
  -  Supplement:  Video:  Bhopal Express
Link
 
INTRODUCTION

On Dec. 2, 1984 a cloud of toxic methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas escaped from a pesticide plant owned by the Union Carbide Corp (UC) in Bhopal, India

According to Hodsun & Sullivan, over 3,000 people were killed & over 300,000 were injured w/ blindness, lung injury, etc.

According to the BBC, at least 15,000 have died from related illnesses since the original release while Greenpeace cites 20,000 total deaths as its conservative estimate

 
 
In 1985, the same gas escaped from a UC plant in Institute, West Virginia
 
 
Fewer injuries resulted from the release of MIC in WV because of a better warning procedures & a lower population density
 
 
Bhopal is frequently cited as the world's worst industrial disaster
 
 
A holding tank with 43 ton of stored  methyl isocyanate (MIC), which is a chemical used in making pesticides, overheated & released a toxic heavier than air MIC gas mixture, which rolled along the ground through the surrounding streets
 
 
As the gas spread, the transportation system in the city collapsed & many people were trampled trying to escape
 
 
The immediate cause of the accident was faulty maintenance which resulted in water to leak into the MIC tank causing an explosion & the leak of the deadly gas
 
 
One indirect cause of the accident was the location of the plant itself
 
 
Local authorities had tried & failed to persuade UC to build the plant away from densely populated areas
 
 
UC said their refusal to move the plant was based on the expense such a move would incur
 
  In the early 1980s the factory at Bhopal began losing money because of a decrease in the demand for pesticides  
 
UC had produced their pesticide, Sevin, w/o the known to be dangerous MIC, but started using it because it was cheaper
 
 
The losses caused UC to implement cost cutting measures which affected the interrelated areas of workers, working conditions, equipment, safety regulations, & the use of the cheaper MIC raw material
 
  UC had ignored it's own internal reports of the dangers of the plant location, the use of MIC, & the deficiencies in safety procedures  
 
Like the Silkwood case, the corp maintains that the cause of the accident was sabotage
 
  Today, it is estimated that one person dies per day as a result of the toxic gas release  
  There is much controversy over UC's settlement w/ victims & survivors  
  UC agreed to pay $470 mm (the original lawsuit was for $3 billion) which equals $23,500 per person for the conservative estimate of 20,000 dead or injured  
  Upon announcing this settlement, shares of UC rose $2 per share or 7% in value which was greater than the amount of the settlement  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Chernobyl
External
Links
 
INTRODUCTION

In 1986 there was an explosion, fire & massive release of radiation at the nuclear reactor at Chernobyl in the former Soviet Union (SU)

Scores of workers were killed & hundreds of workers were injured

The release of radiation injured unknown thousands & drifted as far away as Europe & N Am

 
  The Chernobyl nuclear power plant is located near Pripyat, Ukraine, at the time part of the Soviet Union (SU)  
 
In the early morning of April 26, 1986 the Chernobyl nuclear power plant exploded, contaminating the immediate surrounding geographic area
 
  CAUSES  
  The plant was to undergo routine maintenance & thus the turbine of reactor 4 was shut down  
  It was decided to test the plants safety system during this maintenance by seeing if the momentum in the turbine could power the electrical safety systems  
  The maintenance & tests were postponed until the evening & therefore they were performed by a skeleton crew who had not done the tests before  
  As they shut down the reactor, it shut down faster than expected due to faulty control equipment  
  Because this would negate the ability to due the safety test, the control rods were pulled out further than was recommended to increase the power output of the reactor, putting the reactor in a unstable, dangerous condition, unknown to the operators  
  To continue the test & the shutdown, the cooling water was slowed down causing the reactor to heat up  
  The next step was to reinsert the control rods, but by this time the reactor was so hot that it melted them, making it impossible to insert them  
  The reactor then proceeded to "run away", overheating the water, blowing the top off the containment vessel, allowing oxygen in, allowing the graphite rods to catch fire  
  There are two theories of the cause of the explosion & nuclear meltdown:  the faulty operators theory & the faulty design theory, but it is probable that both had some impact  
  The fact that operators were never told of the design flaws demonstrates how weaknesses in a system often compound each other  
  A cause after the fact which added to the disaster was the Soviet denial & cover up causing them to delay notifying nearby citizens & neighboring nations of the nuclear fall out escaping from the plant  
  AFTERMATH  
  Estimates of the dead & dying vary widely w/ the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and World Health Organization (WHO), attributing 56 direct deaths resulting from 47 workers killed in the explosion & immediate containment activity, & nine children w/ thyroid cancer  
  As many as 9,000 people among the approximately 6.6 mm most highly exposed, may die from some form of cancer  
  A plume of radioactive fallout drifted over parts of the western SU, Eastern and W Europe, Scandinavia, the UK, Ireland, & eastern N America.  
  Large areas of Ukraine, Belarus, & Russia were badly contaminated, resulting in the evacuation & resettlement of over 336,000 people  
  About 60% of the radioactive fallout landed in Belarus  
  In the aftermath of Chernobyl locals were denied access to land that was not affected because the analysts’ models lumped all the land into a few categories  
  The locals new better; they knew where the land was irradiated & where it was not  
  LONG TERM EFFECTS  
  The long term effects of Chernobyl radioactive fall out are surprising, not clear, & difficult to determine  
  300 k people have been relocated & there is an 18 mile zone that remains uninhabited  
  Some plants animals are obviously affected, while others seem surprisingly unaffected  
  The increase in cancer rates in a number of nations seems to be attributable to radioactive fall out, but direct causation is difficult to prove  
  The reactor itself has been sealed in a haphazard manner, & water continues to leak in & radioactivity continues to leak out  
  Further costly repairs will be needed to contain the nuclear reactor  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the  BP Texas City Refinery Accident
External
Links
 
-  Supplement:  BP Texas City Fatal Accident Investigation Report.  Dec. 9, 2005
Link
 
INTRODUCTION

On March 23, 2005 there was an explosion at the British Petroleum (BP) refinery in Texas City, TX resulting in 15 deaths & 170 injuries

During the startup of some of the equipment an explosion & fire occurred when a flammable liquid leaked from a ventilation stack, creating a vapor cloud that eventually came in contact w/ an ignition source, probably a running vehicle

 

 
 
The accident was caused by both faulty procedures & my poorly designed equipment
 
 
Workers overfilled a vessel, which then became overheated
 
 
The overheating caused a flammable liquid to overflow from a vent stack, which puddled on the ground, creating a vapor cloud
 
 
The flammable vapor cloud eventually came in contact w/ an ignition source, probably a running vehicle, & exploded
 
 
BP refineries have more deaths than any other in the US, w/ a level that is 10 times those of Exxon Mobil
 
 
On May 3, 005 a man was found dead inside a refinery vessel he had been pressure washing at  BP's Cherry Point Refinery, north of Seattle, WA
 
 
Weeks before the accidents at Cherry Point & Texas City, BP's dismal record landed it on an internal federal watch list of companies "indifferent" to their legal obligations to protect employee safety because of a fatal explosion in Texas City in September 2004 that killed two pipefitters & injured a third
 
 
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) accused BP of a "willful" violation of its rules, leading to the accident
 
 
OSHA inspectors were to conduct follow up inspections at BP's Texas City refinery & also look for & target potential systemic problems at BP plants in other states
 
 
But before OSHA could inspect, the Texas City refinery again exploded on March 23 killing 15 contractors & injuring more than 170 others
 
 
BP officials have focused so much on individual worker safety that they missed problems w/ overall system safety, said Glenn Erwin, a former Texas City refinery employee who monitors refinery safety nationwide for the Paper Allied Industries & Energy Workers International Union
 
 
"They spend all their time saying 'Don't strain your back, don't get dirt in your eye,' " he said.
 
 
Safety statistics improve because more workers are avoiding minor injuries, but lurking problems, such as the outmoded ventilator stack (known as a vent stack) that spewed liquid & gas before igniting, have been neglected
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the  Normalization of Accidents  by Charles Perrow
External
Links
  -  Project:  Analysis of Workplace Accidents
Link
 
Charles Perrow, 1984, is an organizational sociologist who believes that major, industrial accidents are endemic to modern society & are the nearly inevitable result of the complicated technological & organizational structure of modern production systems & there fore we can expect increasing numbers of them in the future  
 
Perrow is interested in conducting risk assessment from a social perspective
 
 
Most risk assessment is done on physical systems
 
 
The common sense understanding of causes of accidents as compared to the social understanding of the causes of accidents makes it difficult to learn from major accidents because
 
 
a)  they are one of a kind freak accidents, & common sense bases most of its logic on patterns
 
 
b)  we do not note that presumed causes are present in systems w/o accidents, so the true causes remain unknown  
 
System failures are inevitable in complexly interactive & tightly coupled systems
 
 
Nevertheless, catastrophes will be rare because they require a large number of specific conditions to occur together
 
 
The common sense, tongue in cheek philosophy of Murphy's Law holds that if something can go wrong, it will
 
 
The concept of normal accidents denies Murphy's Law in that everything that can go wrong in a risky system, does not go wrong; on the contrary, every now & then the craziest coincidences & unexpected interactions occur & something we counted on fails
 
 
Accidents are inevitable & happen all the time while serious accidents are inevitable but infrequent, & catastrophes are inevitable but extremely rare
 
  Catastrophes are rare because they also require just the right combination of conditions to kill hundreds at one blow  
  Risky Systems have structural features that affect safety independent of inevitable normal accidents including the amount of:
- hazardous material
- human engineering to change context of operators
- experience w/ scale
- experience w/ critical phase operations/transitions
- organizational control over members
- organizational density of the system's environment
 
  Only some of the variables of risky systems are controllable
 
  Some variables of risky systems are generic to all systems & are not likely to change, while others are unique, & others are able to be influenced
 
  No matter how safe, how much training, how many safety devices, planning, redundancies, buffers, alarms, bells, whistles, the unexpected interaction of two or more failures defeats all this
 
Link
The Chart on TWO Critical Variables for Understanding Accidents demonstrates that there are TWO critical variables for understanding accidents in organization  
  a.  System consistency, which may be either linear or complex, describes the independence or interdependence of the modes of operation w/in a system  
  b.  System coupling, which may be either loose or tight, describes the connectivity of subsystems w/in systems  
Link
The Chart on a Summary of Terms for Critical Accidents  
  The Chart on a Summary of Terms for Critical Accidents indicates that system consistency & coupling describe facets of orgs which are necessary for understanding accidents  
   Linear system consistency describes systems that have few parts, components, or nodes that operate in a mutually interdependent manner as characterized by a simple division of labor  
  Complex system Consistency describes systems that have many parts, components, or nodes that operate in a limited mutually interdependent manner, but also may operate in an independent manner characteristic of separate orgs  
  Loose system coupling describes systems wherein the parts, components, nodes interact primarily w/ other parts that are either upstream or downstream  
  Tight system coupling describes systems wherein the parts, components, nodes interact w/ other parts through feedback loops & therefore the components are neither upstream nor downstream from other components  
Link
The Chart on the Interaction or Coupling of Organizations  
  The Chart on the Interaction of Consistency & Coupling can be used to categorize orgs & their propensity to particular types of accidents  
 
For Perrow, there are FOUR types of System Failure, including:
a.  Independent failure 
b.  Common mode failure 
c.  Proximity failure 
d.  Cascade failure
 
 
a.  Independent failures occur when the cause of failure is unrelated to other events or accidents  
  An Independent Failure may be something from outside the system  
  Examples:   car drives through front door
Earthquake at nuclear plant
Tornado at chemical plant
 
  Orgs attempt to plan for all independent failures, but often the severity or nature of the event overwhelms the plans  
  b.  Common mode failures occur when a system common to or in widespread use in the org fails  
  Common mode failures are a frequent source of failure  
  Examples:  Phone system going down limits human & alarm communication
Cooling system failure damages many areas & makes it hot for operators
Computer system failure
 
  c.  Proximity failures occur when failure in one immediate area causes failure in other components in that area  
  Examples:  A wire shorts out in one system & shorts wires in another system
Chernobyl, TMI:  Explosion disables control systems & limits manual access
 
  d.  Cascade failures occur when unexpected interactions of multiple failures which lead to other failures  
  See Also:  Example:  Three Mile Island  
  A Union Carbide plant in West Virginia was declared safe after inspection occasioned by the Bhopal accident & then a similar accident occurred in West Virginia & inspectors declared that the accident was "....waiting to happen."  
  See Also:  Bhopal  
  Thousands of plants are as unsafe as Bhopal, yet the accident happened here because a variety of conditions, some of them small failures, came together in just the right way  
  At Bhopal:
- no alarms were set off to warn the population  (Denial)
- plant officials denied the toxicity of the gas  (Denial)
- the staff fled in the opposite direction  (Denial)
- the staff made no attempt to reduce the damage  (Denial)
- the weather conditions brought the cloud over the most populated area   (Independent Failure)
- it was night & the pop was home, asleep   (Independent Failure)
 
  The physical causes of the Columbia Space Shuttle disaster were different than the physical causes of the Challenger Space Shuttle disaster, & yet the social, organizational causes were found to be the same  
  See Also:  Challenger Space Shuttle disaster  
  See Also:  Columbia Space Shuttle disaster  
  The characteristics of systems affect the error rate & thus the accident rate & thus the catastrophe rate  
  Some characteristics of systems that affect the organizational rate of growth, the frequency of critical phase experiences, information sharing, organizational density, & others  
  Less than half the systems characteristics which affect the error rate can be changed because most of them are endemic to the system  
  Accident investigations are misleading because we treat a biased sample (systems w/ accidents) as representative of accident precursors  
  Elites who make decisions about the risks control the system in such a manner that they are able to impose those risks upon us  
  Rates of accidents will not change  
  Systems rarely fail catastrophically & are characterized & declared to be unique, unrepeatable events  
  The number of risky systems in place appears to be increasing  
  At some point, the frequency of catastrophes will follow the bell curve in that though a systems failure is rare, given enough chances, it will occur  
  COSTS OF CATASTROPHES  
  Bhopal was a small cost for Union Carbide  
  Local rate payers & national taxpayers are paying for Three Mile Island & no executive suffered  
  Exxon's $100 mm fine for the Valdez accident is trivial  
  The $2 bb cleanup & remaining $1.1 bb are not large for Exxon & are tax deductible, thus subsidized by the public  
  SOME RISKY SYSTEMS SHOULD BE ABANDONED  
  Perrow "would argue that some of our risky systems should be abandoned;  the agonizing death of two million in Kiev, which was possible with simply a wind shift, is simply not worthy the advantages of nuclear power as it is presently generated."  
  Some of the risky systems that should be abandoned include nuclear arms, plutonium fuel, Star Wars, water transport of toxic & explosive materials, cost of nuke waste should be increased, Alternative to LNG, regulate KNA applications  
  Some risky system are to valuable to abandon including chemical plants, air transport, space shuttles, space stations, nuclear aircraft carriers,   
  The cost of abandoning some risky systems is too high, & the catastrophic potential is not at the maximum level, & leaders could increase the safety level  

 
Top
 

Chart on TWO Critical Variables for Understanding Accidents
Perrow
a. System Consistency linear or complex the independence or interdependence of the modes of operation w/in a system
b System Coupling loose or tight the connectivity of subsystems w/in systems

 
Top
 

Chart on a Summary of Terms for Critical Accidents
Perrow
System Consistency:  the independence or interdependence of the modes of operation w/in a system
Linear System Consistency describes systems that have few parts, components, or nodes that operate in a mutually interdependent manner as characterized by a simple Division of Labor
Complex System Consistency describes systems that have many parts, components, or nodes that operate in a limited mutually interdependent manner, but also may operate in an independent manner characteristic of separate orgs
Spatial segregation
Dedicated connections
Segregated subsystems
Easy substitutions
Few feedback loops
Single purpose, segmented controls
Direct info
Extensive understanding
Spatial Proximity
Common-mode connections
Interconnected subsystems
Limited substitutions
Feedback loops
Multiple & interacting controls
Indirect info
Limited Understanding
System Coupling:  the connectivity of subsystems w/in systems
Loose System Coupling describes systems wherein the parts, components, nodes interact primarily w/ other parts that are either upstream or downstream
Tight System Coupling describes systems wherein the parts, components, nodes interact w/ other parts through feedback loops & therefore the components are neither upstream nor downstream from other components
Processing delays possible
Order of sequences can be changed
Alternative methods are available
Slack in resources possible
Buffers and redundancies fortuitously available
Subsystems are fortuitously available
Delays in processing not possible
Invariant sequences
Only one method to achieve goal
Little slack possible in supplies, equip, personnel
Buffer & redundancies are designed in, deliberate
Subsystems of supplies, equipment, personnel limited & designed-in
The Chart on a Summary of Terms for Critical Accidents indicates that System Consistency & Coupling describe facets of Organizations which are necessary for understanding accidents

 
Top
 
Chart on the Interaction of Consistency & Coupling in Organizations
Perrow
Linear System Consistency 
Complex System Consistency
Loose System Coupling
Linearly Interacting & Loosely Coupled Orgs
Single goal agencies
Most manufacturing
Trade schools
Assembly lines
Junior colleges
Complexly Interacting & Loosely Coupled Orgs
Universities
Multi-Goal Agencies
R & D Firms
Mining
Military adventures
Linear Interaction
Complex Interaction
Tight System Coupling
Linearly Interacting & Tightly Coupled Orgs
Airways
Railroads
Marine transportation
Continuous Processing Plants
Power grid
Dams
Complexly Interacting & Tightly Coupled Orgs
Military Early Warning Systems
Space Missions
Chemical Plants
Nuclear Weapons Accident
Aircraft
DNA
Nuclear Plants
The Chart on the Interaction of Consistency & Coupling can be used to categorize orgs & their propensity to particular types of accidents

The End
 
Top