Internal
Links

Top

  Review Notes on   WO 3:  Meaningful Work & Job Satisfaction
External
Links
  Syllabus
Link
  Resources
Link
 
Outline on WO 3:  Meaningful Work & Job Satisfaction
 
Link
Determinants of Job Satisfaction  
Link
Alienation & Anomie  
Link
     The Components of Alienation  
Link
    Contemporary Definitions of Alienation  
Link
    Alienation at Work  
Link
Maslow  
Link
McGregor  
Link
Herzberg  
Link
Argyris  
Link
Ideology  

 
Internal
Links

Top

  Outline on  Job Satisfaction
External
Links
  -  Project:  Job Satisfaction
Link
Link
Outline on the FOUR Factors & their sub factors which determine Job Satisfaction
1.  Job tasks 
2.  Characteristics of organization 
3.  Individual differences
4.  Individual expectations
 
 
Satisfaction means gratification, pleasure, contentment  
 
Alienation as defined by Marx, is the separation or isolation of workers from the products of their labor
 
  A contemporary definition is that alienation is the feelings or the experience of emotional distance, isolation, powerlessness, & loss of control  
 
Most Americans are satisfied on the job  
  75 % of workers report "I am satisfied" or more and 40 % of workers would continue in their same line of work  
  Workers usually don't have a choice as to whether to change jobs, and their current position is "acceptable," therefore they register as being satisfied  
 
Intrinsic satisfaction includes the rewards realized on the job such as freedom, co-workers  
  Extrinsic satisfaction includes the rewards realized off the job such as pay, benefits, & security  
  Workers now seem to desire both intrinsic & extrinsic satisfaction on the job  
 
1. Job tasks  
  Job tasks, which are determined by the organization & structure of the economy, are one of the major factors that determine job satisfaction  
 
1.1  Technology on the job impacts job satisfaction  
  Technology does not dictate the organization of work  
  Technology has been able to "clean-up" some jobs, but it has polluted others  
  Many managers & social scientists wrongly believe that technology dictates the organization of work  
  And it is true that once investments have been made, technology does dictate an organization of work, but technology can be designed & installed to increase or decrease worker control, satisfaction, etc.  
  Many social theorists believe that technology could bring an end to alienated labor  
  Technology can deskill or increase the skill required, routinize, or provide variety on the job  
  In  Alienation and Freedom, 1964, Robert Blauner linked four dimensions of subjective alienation, i.e., powerlessness, meaninglessness, isolation, & self estrangement, to different types of work found in modern industry & claimed that production techniques were the major determinant of alienation  
  Blauner thought automation would increase job satisfaction & so abolish alienation  
Link
The Diagram of Blauner's Inverted U Curve of Technology & Alienation  shows that some production technologies are more alienating than others  
 
1.2  Organization of the industry impacts job satisfaction  
  Many qualities, such as the organization of the industry, are beyond the control of any firm or even any industry such as autos, computers, medicine, etc.  
  However, all factors of organization & technology are not beyond the control of any firm or the industry & thus most firms have wide latitude to shape such factors to increase worker satisfaction  
  There are SIX factors of the organization of the industry / economy that affect job satisfaction, including  
  i.  the stage of development of the industry; i.e., is the industry  new, in the growth stage, old, or in decline   
  ii.  the state of the competition; i.e., low competition yielding big profits, or  high competition yielding low profits  
  The range of competition may run from pure competition to high concentration to oligopoly to monopoly  
  iii.  the technology used  
  iv.  the level of innovation  
  v.  the type of labor; i.e. skilled. unskilled, professional, technical, etc.  
  vi.  others  
  1.3  The production of meaningful products impacts job satisfaction because there is an intrinsic reward in producing something of value  
 
a. Mass production & self production  
 
Is there similar satisfaction in producing for mass production ( work ) or for yourself (hobby / play / "work")?  
 
Jolly Green Giant green beans & your own garden beans?  
 
b.  Good & Bad Products  
 
Is there any absolute difference between producing "good & bad" products?
 
  - Essential products        ( food, homes, clothes, medicine )
- Medical products         ( medicine, medical care, medical technology )
- Helping products          ( education, social services, recreation )
- Destructive products    ( guns, military industrial complex )
- Exploitative products   ( porn movies, alcohol, tobacco )
- Frivolous products       ( fads [ pet rocks, lava lamps ] fashions )
- Luxurious products       ( diamonds, zillion $ anything:  homes, stereos )
 
  c.  High & Low Paid Jobs:  One's level of pay affects job satisfaction  
  Is there any absolute difference in high & low paid jobs?  
  Are low paid jobs inherently unsatisfying?  
  In low paid jobs, satisfaction is affected by pay in that for adults, i.e., neither teens nor seniors, a minimum "living wage" is usually necessary, but other factors are equally important such as autonomy, respect, challenge, advancement, etc.  
  - Fast food      &      medicine?
- Janitor          &      lawyer?
- Laborer        &      engineer?
- Blue collar    &     white collar?
 
  2.  Characteristics of organization ( autonomy, responsibility, etc. )  
  2.1  Self Direction  
  Job autonomy is the extent to which the worker controls their own work and relations w/ others on the job  
  Job complexity allows greater self direction, more of an intellectual challenge on the job  
  Diversity of job tasks allows more flexibility and variety on the job  
  One may consider self direction factors on a range of job organization from the assembly line to pod production to autonomous work; from data entry to clerical work  
  2.2  Belongingness  
  One aspect of belongingness is that workers prefer interaction, friendship, & compatriots on the job  
  Safety & health are common concerns on the job that relate to belongingness since people cannot feel that they belong unless they feel safe  
  Belongingness was determined by Maslow to be a fundamental human need, & belongingness may be realized at a rewarding workplace  
  2.3   Pay  
  Most workers felt their income was adequate for their necessities  
  21 % of workers felt their income was inadequate for their necessities  
  55 % of workers felt they had inadequate fringe benefits  
  Minimum wage of $5.15 times 40 hrs. times 50 weeks = $10,900  
  Minimum wage of $10 times 40 hrs. times 50 weeks = $20,000  
  Studies have shown that pay above the level of the middle income often results in less job & life satisfaction; i.e. those w/ lower incomes have less stress & a higher quality of life  
  2.4  Size  
  Workers prefer small organizations  
  500 workers & mgt is considered to be an optimal size or organization giving the economies of scale in the workplace & the need for human interaction  
  2.5  Promotions  
  There are always less promotions available than desired by the workers  
  Increased status & responsibility in low & middle range jobs makes promotions less necessary  
  Eliminating supervision & administration, & flattening the hierarchy also increases job satisfaction in lieu of promotions  
  2.6 Unions  
  Less than 15 % of US workers belong to unions  
  The higher wages won by unions pull up regional wages  
  The grievance system has created due process at nearly all workplaces, unionized or not  
  Unionization allow some worker influence in company policy development  
  In general, workers are more satisfied in a unionized workplace  
Link
Table  on the Types of Workplaces  
  The Table on the Types of Workplaces indicates that there are many types of organizational structures varying along a dimension running from authoritarian to democratic  
 
3.  Individual Differences, & how they are treated, are a major factor affecting job satisfaction
 
  3.1  Gender relations on the job impact job satisfaction  
  Men & women have about equal job satisfaction, but they have different expectations for that satisfaction  
  Women compare themselves to other women on the job  
  Occupation job segregation reinforces blind comparisons  
  Women want complexity, interesting work, congenial co-workers  
  Men want authority, advancement, freedom  
  Sexual discrimination is treating people unequally based on their sex  
  Sexual harassment is giving unwanted sexual favors, or demanding sexual favors  
  Both sexual discrimination & sexual harassment are major sources of alienation for women in the workplace today  
  3.2  Race relations on the job impact job satisfaction  
  Race relations create the largest satisfaction gap of any known social factor  
  Minorities, like women, are often stuck in lower level jobs  
  Minorities are more vocal about their dissatisfaction than women  
  While women largely compare themselves only to other women, Blacks, Hispanics, Whites, et al do compare themselves to other racial & ethnic groups on the job  
  There is a widespread belief in equality on the job, though there are pockets of prejudice  
  On the job discrimination & harassment both still exist & are major sources of alienation  
  3.3  Stage of development / personality:  A person's stage of development or personality has an impact on their job satisfaction  
  Business leaders & social theorists firmly believe that one should match their job w/ their own needs  
  3.4  Age  has an impact on one's job satisfaction since jobs & where one is at on the career ladder are often stratified by age  
  Younger workers have higher expectations & are less satisfied than older workers  
  Older workers may become dissatisfied if they feel:
-  they have reached an unsatisfactory job
-  they have reached a dead end job
-  younger workers are passing them by
-  younger workers are being more highly rewarded
 
  Younger workers may become dissatisfied if they feel that the workplace is overstaffed w/ older workers who prevent them from moving up  
  3.5  Tenure, or length of service, impacts job satisfaction  
  New workers who believe in the importance of the work   
  Experienced workers who have autonomy on the job are more likely to be satisfied  
  3.6 Handicapped workers are likely to be satisfied if they believe they are achieving / contributing appropriately  
  Many people need special equipment, or arrangements at work, such as a big computer screen, short walking distances, etc.   
  4. Expectations, & how they are treated, are a major factor affecting job satisfaction  
 
4.1  Job commitment impacts job satisfaction
 
 
Willingness to retain long term membership on the job indicates job satisfaction
 
 
Workers today seem to have lower commitment
 
 
Companies today also have lower commitment to workers
 
 
4.2  On the job ideologies impact job satisfaction
 
 
Working class ideology generally fosters solidarity against the more powerful
 
 
In contrast to a solidarity oriented view of the working class, white collar & bureaucratic workers are more likely to have an instrumental orientation & an individualistic view
 
 
A wide range of ideologies may impact job satisfaction ranging from conservative, to moderate, to liberal  
 
4.3  Expectations about any of the factors above impact job satisfaction
 
 
Expectations are one of greatest factors affecting job satisfaction
 
 
Expectations are affected by one's social biography including one's unique socialization to culture & social structure
 
 
Culture:  KBVN
 
 
Social Structure:  1. peers 2. family 3. religion 4. econ 5. govt 6. mil 7. charity 8. ed 9. media 10. leisure 
 
 
Culture & social structure interact on & off the job to construct relations & expectations on class, gender, race, education, etc.
 
 
4.4  Generational expectations on the job impacts job satisfaction
 
 
Generational expectations are one of greatest factors in job satisfaction
 
  Generational expectations are affected by one's social biography including one's unique socialization to culture & social structure, which are relatively unique to each generation  
  Compare your generations work ethic & expectations of rewards to another, such as
   Gen X
   Baby Boomers
   WW2 Generation
   Depression Era Generation
 
  Behavioral responses to work vary widely  
  The range of behavioral responses run from those who love work & will do anything for it to those who hate work & will do anything to avoid it  
  Enthusiasm may be measured by one's willingness to work w/o pay, do lousy work, etc.  
  Enthusiasm may be a quality of self actualizing work  
  Passive resistance is often manifested by restricted output  
  Passive resisters often focus on nonproductive aspects of work such as the interactions w/ peers  
  Passive resisters often live destructive lives on & off the job  
  Most of us live somewhere in btwn enthusiasts & passive resisters, and as Thoreau said, 'lives of quiet desperation'  
  Turnover is an excellent measure of job satisfaction  
  In the US, 15 % of workforce changes jobs each year  
  The level of resistance & sabotage is an excellent measure of job satisfaction  
  Resistance & sabotage allow workers to vent frustration  
  Work slow downs allow workers to vent frustration  
  Theft  
  Theft is expected at some jobs & allows workers to vent frustration, & to receive greater rewards  
  Job satisfaction & socialism  
  Early after the USSR Revolution in 1917, the Soviet Union had high job satisfaction  
  Stalinism destroyed this the job satisfaction of the workers  
  Alienation did not end in USSR, or other communist countries  
  Work had greater equality, but used western organizing principles  
  Job Satisfaction can increase w/ informed policies & structures at work  

 
Top
 
Outline on the FOUR Factors which determine Job Satisfaction & their sub factors 
Satisfaction & Alienation are determined by
    1. Job tasks (determined by organization & structure of the economy)
    2. Characteristics of organization (autonomy, responsibility, etc.)
    3. Individual differences
    4. Individual expectations


   1. Job tasks (determined by organization & structure of the economy)
        1.1  Technology on the job
        1.2  Organization of the industry
        1.3  Meaningful products
   2. Characteristics of organization (autonomy, responsibility, etc.)
        2.1  Self direction
        2.2  Belongingness
        2.3  Pay
        2.4  Size
        2.5  Promotions
        2.6  Unions
        2.7  Types of workplaces
   3. Individual differences
        3.1  Gender
        3.2  Race
        3.3  Stage of development / personality
        3.4  Age
        3.5  Tenure
   4. Individual expectations
        4.1  Commitment
        4.2  Ideology 
        4.3  Expectations about any of the factors above
        4.3  Gen expectations

 
Top
 
The Diagram of Blauner's  Inverted U-Curve of Technology & Alienation shows that some production technologies are more alienating than others

                     |  Machine                  *         Assembly
                     |  Tending              *        *     Line
                     |                        *                *
                     |                  *                            *
                     |               *                                    *
Level of        | Craft   *                                          *       Continuous
Alienation     |         *                                                  *    Process
                     |     *                                                           *
                     |  *                                                                    *
                     |*________________________________________*_
                      Printing      Textiles         Autos        Chemicals


 
Top
 
Table  on the Types of Workplaces
Sole proprietorship owner, admin / mgr., workers
Partnership partners, non partners, workers
Corporation major stockholders, minor stockholders, up mgt., mid mgt., workers
ESOPs equal stockholders, up mgt., mid mgt., (all workers)
Cooperatives coop members, non-members
Democratic Org's workers / voters, mgrs. / candidates
The Table on the Types of Workplaces indicates that there are many types of organizational structures varying along a dimension running from authoritarian to democratic

 
Internal
Links

Top

  Outline on the  Definition of Alienation & Anomie
External
Links
  ALIENATION IS THE RESULT OF BEING SEPARATED FROM THE PREDOMINANT CULTURE  
  Many theorist have contemplated the meaning of alienation  
  Hegel            1770  -  1831  
  Feuerbach     1804  -  1872  
  Marx             1818  - 1883  
  Blauner         contemporary  
  Alienation is a state of being, a relationship ( mental & physical manifestations ) characterized by the separation or isolation from existing culture ( knowledge, beliefs, values, norms held in common ) caused by an estrangement from idealistic and/ or materialistic factors  
  While both Hegel & Feuerbach discussed the nature of alienation, Marx built upon these to develop his own dialectical- material view of alienation  
  Alienation, as defined by Marx, is the separation or isolation of workers from the products of their labor Contemporary definition:  feelings or the experience of emotional distance, isolation, powerlessness, loss of control  
  ANOMIE IS THE RESULT OF A WEAKENED OR ABSENTCULTURE / MORALITY  
  For Durkheim, anomie is weakened or absent common morality; a condition of normlessness in society  
  Durkheim developed his concept of anomie to explain the condition in modern society where the old culture or common morality, break down, but have not yet been replaced by its modern form, in the form of organic solidarity as manifested in a societal div of labor  
  Anomie is a state of being, a relationship, with mental & physical manifestations, characterized by the lack of a controlling culture ( knowledge, beliefs, values, norms held in common ) caused by the destruction, ineffectiveness or rejection of culture  
  Anomie is the lack or weakness of the usual social or ethical standards in an individual or group  
Link
Examples of alienation include: 'I am alienated if there is a strong culture, but I cannot become part of that culture' or 'I am anomic if culture has basically disintegrated or is ineffective'  
  Durkheim, taking the term from the Greek anomia which means lawlessness, argued that anomie could result from rapid social change  
  FOR MERTON, ALIENATION IS THE RESULT OF NOT BEING ABLE TO ACHIEVE THE NORMAL LIFE GOALS OF A SOCIETY   
  Some US sociologists, in particular Robert K. Merton (1910- ), have maintained that anomie can lead to deviance  
  For Merton, when an individual or group is prevented from achieving widely accepted goals, law-breaking may result  
  Both alienation & anomie exhibit any number of psychological & political manifestations
  - depression                                  - thievery
  - anger                                          - violence
  - revolutionary political ideals    - deviance
 
  While the concept anomie is similar to Marx's concept of alienation, there are significant differences btwn the two including the fact that anomie is a condition of a lack of, or a vacuum of common culture, while alienation is a condition where a person or group is separated from an existing common culture  
  For Hegel, alienation was only a phenomenon of mind caused by an estrangement from the dominating ideas of the time  
  FOR MARX, ALIENATION IS A COMMON CONDITION IN CAPITALIST SOCIETIES BECAUSE PEOPLE, RATHER THAN BEING ABLE TO MANIFEST THEIR CREATIVITY THROUGH WORK AS THEY SHOULD, ARE EXPLOITED AT WORK   
  For Marx, alienation is a condition in which a person's own powers appear to be controlled by independent forces or entities     [ Marx & his contemporaries were called the young, or left Hegelians ]  
  Marx believed that people find their humanity through labor, not religion, not sex, not anything else  
  Marx believed that the failure to realize our human nature results in alienation  
  We are what we do  
  Our labor becomes objectified in our products  
  Craftsperson, or the primitive hunter gatherer produces, controls the products & either consumes it, or sells it themselves  
       See Also:  Species Being  
  In the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, Marx writes Human Estrangement is rooted in the social structure which denies people their essential human nature   

 
Top
 
Examples
Hippie is alienated because they cannot fit in or become part of middle class America
For the street urchin there is no dreams of middle class America
For him there is no such culture in existence-- he is anomic
He embraces a gang counter culture
PW

 
Internal
Links

Top

  Outline on the Components of Alienation
External
Links
  -  Project:  The Components & Experiences of Alienation 
Link
  -  Project:  Alienation, Examples, Increasing? 
Link
  Marx believed we are alienated under capitalism for FOUR reasons because of any of FOUR estrangements [separations] from
1.  Products 
2.  Labor
3.  Oneself
4.  Others
5. ( the Earth / nature )
i.e., all those things that make us human
 
  In the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 Marx writes that human estrangement is rooted in the social structure which denies people their essential human nature   
Link
1.  ALIENATION IS CAUSED BECAUSE OF OUR SEPARATION FROM PRODUCTS, THE THINGS WE PRODUCE   
  What each worker produces is appropriated by others & no person who made it has control over it  
  In the past, during many societies from tribal society to feudalism, people consumed, traded, gave away everything they produced  
  Today, the product is gone before we complete it  
  For a laborer, labor becomes objectified in commodities over which they have no control  
  An example of product related alienation is birthing for hire, or creating a child against your will  
 
In the sense that under capitalism, labor becomes objectified, the more one produces, the more morally poor the laborer becomes 
 
  2.  THE SEPARATION OR LOSS OF CONTROL OF THE ACT OF PRODUCTION CAUSES ALIENATION   
  Under capitalism, nearly everyone experiences a separation from the means of production  
  Work can be an act of creativity, but has become merely an means to an end, rather than an end in itself  
  When we are estranged from the act of production, work becomes a means to an end rather than an end in itself  
  No intrinsic satisfaction in the act of production causes alienation  
  Work becomes a commodity that is sold to someone else, & its only value is in its salability  
  In the past, all products were hand produced & each product was individualized, such as in crafts work
 
  Under capitalism, nearly everyone experiences a separation from the means of production  
  Alienation begins w/ the separation of people from their means of production & subsistence: e.g., such as that in England w/ the Enclosure Movement  
  People are separated from their land & so left w/ becoming vagabonds, & eventually w/ nothing to sell but their labor, becoming "wage slaves"  
  In modern factories, workers no longer own tools or any production facilities  
  Animals produce for immediate consumption, instinctively while people make activity the object of their will which is how we can attain greater degrees of freedom  
  Production as the object of our will & the ensuing freedom is reversed w/ capitalist, alienated labor in that people's essential being, productivity, becomes a mere means to an end  
  3.  ALIENATION IS THE SEPARATION FROM ONESELF, OUR VERY HUMAN ESSENCE, OUR SPECIES BEING, OUR HUMAN NATURE   
  Review:  Species Being  
  Alienation from oneself, the denial of one's Species Being, results in the objectification of the self  
  The worker feels outside themself because the worker has no control over the process of production or its results  
 
The alienated worker therefore feels outside of their work, & his work feels outside of themself
 
  Work is like any other human activity in that when it is abstracted or separated from other human functions, it becomes animalistic  
  Because alienation from the separation from products & separation of the act of productions, alienation deprives people of their productive activity, those specifically human qualities which distinguish us from the activity of animals, & people come to feel like an animal, harnessed to the plow  
  Marx said, "Certainly eating, drinking, procreating, etc., are also genuinely human functions.  But in the abstraction which separates them from the sphere of all other human activity and turns them into sole and ultimate ends, they are animal."  
  In the past, as people labored/created, they  discovered/created themself, but today most workers do not hope to discover or create themself at work & instead they often try to do that, unsuccessfully, after work  
  Our species being is that we express our humanity through our laboring essence, our creativity  
  The process of labor is a process of objectification  
 
We make objects which embody our hopes, dreams, our creativity, our essence, & yet these things stand separate from us
 
  Objectification only becomes alienation under certain historical circumstances such as capitalism  
 
Under capitalism, owners appropriate products produced by another, & one works only for profit & not for personal reward
 
 
Under capitalism, one has no identity in relation to what one produces
 
  Because one cannot express oneself in ones product or creativity, one attempts to do so in other ways & one seeks objects to express oneself  
 
With alienation, one becomes those objects which we purchase to express ourself
 
  The worker feels outside themself because the worker has no control over the process of production or its results  
 
Because the worker cannot express themself in their work, & they turn to commercialism to express themself, the worker therefore feels outside of their work, & their work feels outside of themself
 
  Work is like any other human activity:  when it is abstracted or separated from other human functions, it becomes animalistic  
  Marx said, "He is at home when he is not working, and when he is working he is not at home....  It is therefore not the satisfaction of a need; it is merely a means to satisfy needs external to it."  
  4.  ALIENATION IS CAUSED BY THE SEPARATION FROM OTHER PEOPLE  
  The bourgeoisie & proletariat remain estranged from each other because the relationship is based on conflicting interests & fundamentally different conditions of life  
  The ideology of capitalism alienates all,  including the capitalists themselves because of self denial  
  The proletariat is separated from the proletariat because under capitalism, the organization of the forces & relations of production make workers compete against each other  
  In the owner worker relationship is the first alienation between worker & owner  
  Under capitalism, social relationships turn into market relationships which causes separation from other people & thus alienation  
 
People are judged by their position in the market, rather than by their human qualities
 
  People objectify others not as individuals but by "How can you help me?"  
  In the past, to trade or give away a product or even small scale, personal sales were very personal relationships  
  Today, with mass marketing there are no personal relationship in selling or buying  
  Under capitalism & alienation, people become interchangeable cogs in the commerce machine  
  While people are united by common life experiences, people are also divided by very different life experiences  
  The ideology of capitalism alienates all, including the capitalists themselves because of self denial  
 
For Zeitlin, self denial, the denial of life & of all human needs, is capitalism's cardinal effect
 
 
The less you consume, the more capital you have; the less you are, the more you have
 
  Marx believes that the proletariat is separated from the proletariat  
  Review Forces & Relations of Production   
  Under capitalism, the organization of the forces & relations of production make workers compete against each other at an extreme & unsustainable level  
  Marx believes that production is an act of people in social cooperation, among other conditions  
  Under capitalism, cooperation is secondary to competition & worker is pitted against worker in a winner take all struggle  
  Unions & other professional organizations can overcome destructive competition only to an limited extent  
  5.  ALIENATION IS CAUSED BY A SEPARATION FROM THE EARTH & NATURE  
  Marx & most other social scientists failed to considered the separation from the Earth   
  However some social scientists & many environmentalists, conservationists, preservationists, & others have seen humankind's separation from, objectification of, exploitation of, & ignorance/lack of awareness of the Earth & nature causes various types of harm & incompleteness to the self, society, & the Earth & nature  
  See Also:  The Environment & Alienation  
CAPITAL IS A SOURCE OF ALIENATION BECAUSE IT REDUCES ALL THINGS TO THE ULTIMATE COMMODITY, DEVOID OF HUMANITYMONEY  
  "Capital" itself is a source of alienation  
  Capital is money & wealth, used in trade, manufacturing, or any business  
  Through capitalism, people are reduced to the level of commodities & they become just one more factor in means of production   
  Money itself is not wealth as the story of Midas demonstrates  
  People, business, personal material objects, & the economic system of capitalism are all dominated by the requirements of profitability, rather than by their own human needs  
Link
Alienation appears as an impersonal force  
  An impersonal force is a structural force which seems to be independent of any person, but is the result of a social relationship  
  The impersonality of capitalism & alienation is the reification of individual to individual, personal relationships  
  See Also:  Reification  
  Marx noted that the pursuit of profit & capital accumulation seems to take on a life of its own, disguising the human origins of capital & exploitation of "man by man (sic)  
  The improvement of wages does cannot eliminate alienation because it does not address the separation from the products, the act of production, others, & oneself  
  For  Marx, the improvement of wages would only be better wages for the slave because the alienated conditions would still exist  
  Modern workplace developments have shown that alienation can be mitigated by such workplace innovations such as autonomy, innovation, democratic mgt, employee ownership, job enlargement, shop floor control, etc.  

 
Top  
Examples of Layers  of Alienation

Production not yet commodified
An example of product related alienation:
Birthing for hire, or creating a child against your will
“The worker puts his life into the object; 
  but now his life no longer belongs to him but to the object.” 
Each act of production has some of the qualities of birthing
We produce babies in an unalienated manner 
where "the product" is considered part of us

Alienation occurs when a person no longer recognizes him or herself in their product
“It is no longer his own and stands opposed to him as an autonomous power.”

Medicine
Early on, Doctors took a vow of poverty
The patient was 1st.  To serve was the most important
Drs. soon became more professional
Then, like all professionals, they did as much pro bono work at came along
Then some started limiting pro bono work
Now, some Drs. do little or no pro bono work & are in UMC or rich

Cooking
Do McD's cooks have any love of cooking or the product?

Watchmaker in shop
Watchmaker in factory

PW

 
Top  
Examples of Alienation as an Impersonal Force

Fall/Winter 1998:  Boeing lays off 26,000  'just in time for Xmas'
Exxon Mobil lay off 6,000 in largest merger in history
Other corps downsize as Asian flu hits
This is all "Nothing personal, just business."

Doctors:     Personal or Impersonal relationship is best?

PW

 
Internal
Links

Top

  Outline on  Contemporary Analyses of Alienation
External
Links
  -  Project:  Video:  Office Alienation 
Link
  -  Video:  Office Space 
Link
  FOR MARX ALIENATION IS SEPARATION FROM CREATIVE LABOR; FOR DURKHEIM ANOMIE IS THE ABSENCE OF A DOMINANT CULTURE; FOR WEBER THERE IS POWERLESSNESS IN SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS  
  Durkheim developed the concept of anomie which describes a weakened or absent common morality; a condition of normlessness in society   
  Weber examined the powerlessness in face of the solidity of social institutions, but did not use any specific concept to describe it   
  The modern view of alienation, in the 50s & 60s, emphasized the subjective or psychological facet of alienation at the cost of the social structural aspect, and thus ignored Marx's sociology of capitalism   
  For contemporary social theorists, alienation is a personal experience created by social forces  
  Sociologists are not saying the personal feelings of alienation are inauthentic; they are valid in that alienation is lived as the personal experiences one has when one is alienated  
  Most of society, many social theorists as well as the people in the street, want to attribute these personal experience of alienation to personal causes  
  SEEMAN DELINEATED FOUR PERSONAL EXPERIENCES OF ALIENATION INCLUDING POWERLESSNESS, MEANINGLESSNESS, ISOLATION, & SELF ESTRANGEMENT  
  1.  Powerlessness is the feeling that one cannot influence their social surroundings  
  2.  Meaninglessness is the feeling that illegitimate means are required to achieve valued goals  
  3.  Isolation is the feeling of being estranged or separated from society's norms and values  
  4.  Self estrangement is the inability to find activities that are psychologically rewarding  
  ENVIRONMENTALISTS BELIEVE THAT ALIENATION IS CAUSED BY SEPARATION FROM OUR ENVIRONMENT  
  An aspect of alienation is that today we produce w/o regard to continuity, as if production were a single act  
  In the past there was less alienation because we produced in a manner that did not destroy the Earth  
  Our experience w/ the Earth is similar to the relationship or experience that we have w/ others & even w/ ourself; the Earth is part of us; we are part of it  

 
Internal
Links

Top

  Outline on  Alienation at Work
External
Links
  In 1953, Mills said that work has no intrinsic meaning, directly contradicting Marx, et al, who held that work was a central feature of realizing one's humanity  
  For Mills, Marx et al had inherited their view of work from the previous age of the old middle class & the industrial artisan  
  In the 1980s, Habermas, in qualified agreement w/ the Marxists, said that work is part of attaining our individual humanity but an equally vital part of attaining our individual humanity is the social activity of communicative action:, which holds that  
  1.  We are social / herd animals who need interaction  
  2.  We need free interaction w/ others  
  3.  We need to express ourselves / communicate in all forms, verbal & nonverbal, talk, music, acting, etc.  
  See Also:  Habermas  
  Regardless of whether one agrees w/ Marx, Mills, or Habermas, it is clear today that the nature of one's job can result in job satisfaction or job alienation, and these experiences always impact other spheres of life such as the family, recreation, etc.  
  The outcomes of alienation at work include the segmentation of life in which we work to earn money; after work we try to establish & preserve our humanity  
  “Each day men and women sell little pieces of themselves in order to try to buy them back each night and weekend with the coin of ‘fun.’”
                                                                                          C. Wright Mills
 
  Studs Terkel, in Working ( 1972 ) and in other publications ethnographically catalogues many experiences of alienation at work  
  Le Masters in Blue Collar Aristocrats ( 1975 ) shows that skilled, blue collar workers who work under condition like those of independent artisans are more satisfied & have higher positive feelings & identity  
  But the skilled, blue collar jobs Le Masters describes in Blue Collar Aristocrats are the exception and are difficult to find  
  There is a positive relationship between alienation & position in the stratification system as seen in the fact that higher positions have less alienation because they offer more control, freedom, expression  
  Jencks et al, 1972, show that job satisfaction is positively related to occupational status, income, education & occupational category  
  Kalleberg & Griffin demonstrate that 
a.  occupational skill level shows a weak relation w/ job fulfillment
b.  ownership shows a strong relation w/ job fulfillment
c.  authority shows a strong relation w/ job fulfillment
 
  Kohn found that occupational self direction was most strongly correlated to alienation as seen in the fact that employers, managers and workers are in a hierarchy of fulfillment  
  Japanese workers generally are less alienated than American workers because Japanese management techniques are designed to give workers more control  
  But there are many exceptions to greater Japanese wkplace control & lower alienation & mgt style can reduce alienation to some degree, but it is only one of many factors  
  Workers in Japanese corporations in America are less likely to vote for unions in part because of their satisfaction, but also because Japanese firms are known to be very anti union  
  The effects of alienation or satisfaction at work carries into other aspects of life including
a.  family relations
b.  overall self esteem
c.  mental health
d.  one's general outlook on life
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on an Intro to   Abraham Maslow  1908 - 1970
External
Links
Link
-  Biography & Major Works  
  Maslow is considered "Father of Humanistic Psychology"  
  Humanistic Psychology developed as an alternative to behaviorism & psychoanalytical psychology  
  Maslow stressed the necessity of studying well-adjusted people instead of only disturbed ones  
  Maslow believed people are controlled by their own values & choices, & neither by the environment nor by unconscious drives  
  Maslow holds that we have EIGHT Needs which are satisfied as we develop through Stages which pose opportunities & obstacles to satisfy them  
  The EIGHT Maslovian needs include
a.  Physiological Needs
b.  Safety Needs
c.  Belongingness & Love Needs
d.  Esteem Needs
e.  Need to Know & Understand
f.  Aesthetic Needs
g.  Self-Actualization
h.  Transcendence
 
Link
Chart on Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs  
  The Chart on Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs demonstrates, as Freud believed, that the lower needs are the foundation upon which other needs are fulfilled, but unlike Freud, higher needs are primarily social in nature  
  Psychologists debate over whether each stage in the Hierarchy must be absolutely fulfilled before the next stage of development can occur, or whether a person can skip one stage, or accomplish them in another order
 
  Job Satisfaction was originally linked only to the Physiological Needs such as the need to provide income, but after the Hawthorne Studies & the development of the Human Relations School of workplace studies, researchers recognized that workers respond to the higher, social needs  
 
Today, many needs related to the workplace, the family, etc. are directly related to the Maslovian Hierarchy  
  Though it is not clear whether Maslow ever read Marx, the parallels btwn their works are significant  
  Maslow's Need of Self-Actualization is similar to Marx's conception of the fundamental human need to create in that we cannot be wholly human unless we realize ourselves through a creative life-project  
  Maslow believes that if the development of our needs is blocked, we cannot become fully human  
  Marx believes that if we cannot realize our species-being, we cannot become fully human  

 
Top
 


Abraham Harold Maslow
1908 - 1970
b. NYC
Top
 

Major Works of Maslow
Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper. 
Maslow, A.  (1962)   Toward a Psychology of Being.

 
Top
 

Chart on Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
 
 

The Chart on Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs demonstrates, as Freud believed, that the lower needs are the foundation upon which other needs are fulfilled, but unlike Freud, higher needs are primarily social in nature

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Douglas McGregor
External
Links
Link
-  Biography & Major Works  
  Summary
Theory X 
     1.  workers dislike work
     2.  workers will avoid work
     3.  workers need to be forced/coerced to work
Theory Z
     1.  workers like work
     2.  workers seek/need work
     3.  workers are inherently rewarded by work
 
  McGregor advocated that orgs go 'Out w/ the old Human Relations School & in w/ the new Human Relations School'  
  McGregor held that most orgs functioned according to Human Relations developed prior to industrialization & orgs today needed a new set of Human Relations  
  McGregor called the old school of Human Relations Theory X  
  A Principle of Theory X is that:  
  - the individual dislikes work and seek to avoid it  
  - because individuals dislike work, they must be forced into work  
  - the average person prefers to be directed, avoid responsibility & has no ambition  
  - the average person wants security above all  
  McGregor called the new school of Human Relations Theory Y  
  A Principle of Theory Y is that:  
  - people do not dislike work  
  - work is as natural [as needed] as is play or rest  
  - control is not the only method to achieve org goals  
  - the best rewards are those which assist person in personal development  
  For McGregor, while it may have been true that Theory X worked well in its historical period, today Theory Y is a necessity for increasing job satisfaction  

 
Top
 

McGregor
19  -  19

Top
   
Major Works of McGregor

Much of the thinking in the human relations school is contained in The Human Side of Enterprise, Douglas McGregor, 1960. 


 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Friderich Herzberg
External
Links
Link
-  Biography & Major Works  
  -  Project:  Maintainers & Motivators
Link
  For Herzberg, job satisfaction is a function of TWO factors which he calls hygiene or maintenance factors, & motivators  
  Herzberg noted that the causes of job satisfaction were different than the causes of job dissatisfaction  
  In 1959 Herzberg proposed the two factor theory of human motivation in the workplace which holds that people are influenced by two factors:  
  a.  Satisfaction and psychological growth are a result of motivation factors.  
  b.  Dissatisfaction is a result of a lack of hygiene factors  
  Hygiene factors, aka maintenance factors, aka dissatisfiers, are those factors that function to preserve satisfaction, but will not create satisfaction unless motivators are present, and whose absence causes dissatisfaction  
  Maintenance factors include salary, job security, working conditions, the quality of interpersonal relations, company policies, the quality of supervision, and status  
  Motivators are the primary cause of satisfaction  
  Motivators are the factors intrinsic to a job relating directly to the nature of the work done  
  Motivators are different for different people  
  Motivators include achievement, recognition, responsibility, advancement, the possibility of growth, & the work itself  
 Link
The Chart on Herzberg's Motivation / Hygiene Factors shows that job dissatisfiers include company policies, administration, supervision, working conditions, interpersonal relations, status, job security, & salary  
 Link
The Chart on Herzberg's Motivation / Hygiene Factors shows that job satisfiers include achievement, recognition, advancement, the work itself, responsibility, personal growth  
 Link
The Chart on Herzberg's Two Factor Theory depicts that hygiene factors are a necessary precondition for motivation factors to be effecting in creating a strong workforce  
 Link
The Chart on Factors Affecting Job Attributes demonstrates that all factors have components of hygiene & motivation, but most factors can be attributed to one or the other.  Only growth affects hygiene & motivation equally  

 
Top
 

Friderich Herzberg

Herzberg (1923 - 2000) was an noted industrial psychologist who was an influential name in business mgt.  Attended City College of NY, but left part way through his studies to enlist in the army. As a patrol sergeant, he was a 1st hand witness of the Dachau concentration camp. He believed that this experience, as well as the talks he had w/ other Germans living in the area was what triggered his interest in motivation. Herzberg graduated from City College in 1946 & moved to the U of Pittsburgh to undertake post-graduate studies in science & public health. He gained his PhD in electro shock therapy w/ a dissertation entitled "Prognostic variables for electroshock therapy". He started his research on the workplace while teaching as a professor of psychology at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland & later moved to the U of Utah where he held the position of professor of mgt in the college of business. (Feder 2000) (Widipedia)

Top
   
Major Works of Herzberg

Herzberg, Friederick.  "One More Time, How Do You Motivate Employee?" Harvard Business Review.  1968.  pp. 52-62


 
Top
 
Chart on

The Chart on Herzberg's Motivation / Hygiene Factors shows that job dissatisfiers include company policies, administration, supervision, working conditions, interpersonal relations, supervision, status, job security, & salary

The Chart on Herzberg's Motivation / Hygiene Factors shows that job satisfiers include achievement, recognition, advancement, the work itself, responsibility, personal growth

Top
 
Chart on

The Chart on Herzberg's Two Factor Theory depicts that hygiene factors are a necessary precondition for motivation factors to be effecting in creating a strong workforce

Top
 
Chart on

The Chart on Factors Affecting Job Attributes demonstrates that all factors have components of hygiene & motivation, but most factors can be attributed to one or the other.  Only growth affects hygiene & motivation equally


 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Chris Argyris
External
Links
Link
-  Biography & Major Works
 
  Argyris believes that satisfaction is contingent on the development of human inquiry
 
  For Argyris, a climate of openness, of exploration is fundamental for full personal development  
  Workers develop on the job from passivity to activity from dependence to independence  
  Argyris examined human personality development & its relation to the place of employment  
  An infant is dependent on others or need fulfillment, & reactive in behavior, whereas adults are ideally independent, autonomous, and proactive in behavior  
  Formal orgs, as they grow assume pyramidal structures in which info is centralized, work divided, & jobs specialized  
  Mgt. requires order giving, evaluation of performance, rewards & punishment, & efforts to ensure conformity, & the perpetuation of membership  
  As the org becomes larger & more formal, it prefers employees whose behavior is more consistent w/ infant characteristics of dependence, passivity, & reactivity  
  There is a conflict btwn the goals & capabilities of the healthy, striving adult & the needs of the org, since consistent behavior patterns are required at some levels of the org & humans' behavior is typically both consistent & inconsistent depending on needs & circumstances  
  The lower an employee in the org hierarchy, the less control he or she has over working conditions, & the less likely it is that he or she will be able to fully employ his or her abilities  
  The more directive the leadership, the more dependent the employee becomes; & it is likely that the frustration-reducing responses by the worker will increase  
  Some workers will fight the org for more control, some will join a union, some will leave psychologically by becoming apathetic & indifferent, & some will downgrade the importance of the job & substitute higher pay as a reward for meaningless work  
  Argyris' model is valid cross culturally, at different org levels, & within different types of orgs  
  For Argyris, "Formal structures, alas, are unintentionally designed to discourage the autonomous & involved worker"  
  Argyris' solutions for the infantizing org include job enrichment, job redesign, & the better integration of the individual into the org, moving the locus of control from the org to the individual, & reducing authoritarianism & dogmatism  
 
The locus of control is the extent to which individuals believe that events are, or are not, under their control  
 
A person w/ a high locus of control believes that he or she can influence the org  
  Internal & external locus's of control  refer to whether one is controlled by one's self or by factors external to one's self  
  If one believes one has an internal locus of control, then one believes that one has control in one's own environment such as the workplace or the family  
  If one believes one has an external locus of control, then one believes that one has no control in one's own environment such as the workplace or the family & instead one is controlled by factors outside of one's self or one's influence  
  Some people believe they have no control in the workplace & so they do not participate, but are very active in community affairs  
  Some people believe they have no control over world events, politics, etc. & so they do not participate, but are very active in the workplace  
  An individual's own personality characteristics impact their internal or external locus of control may affect their behavior & satisfaction in the workplace  
  Argyris developed the concepts of theories in use & expoused theories  
  Theories in use represent the prevailing theories of action of an individual or org  
  Espoused theories represent the theories which an individual or org believe are in practice  
  In a healthy org, , i.e. an org w/ high satisfaction & low alienation, the theories-in-use are the same as or similar to the espoused theories  
  Argyris develops methods for individuals & orgs to determine the nature of their theories-in-use & their espoused theories  
  Argyris' concept of action science adovcates for an approach to research that focuses on generating knowledge that is useful in solving practical problems  
  Other key concepts developed by Argyris include: the ladder of inference, double loop learning, theory of action / espoused theory v. theory in use, high advocacy / high inquiry dialogue  

 
Top
 

Chris Argyris
1923  - 
Chris Argyris (born July 16, 1923) in Newark, New Jersey, a Professor Emeritus at Harvard Business School.

Arygris grew up in Irvington, New Jersey and during the Second World War he joined the Signal Corps in the U.S. Army eventually becoming a Second Lieutenant (Elkjaer 2000). He went to university at Clark, where he came into contact with Kurt Lewin (Lewin had begun the Research Center for Group Dynamics at M.I.T.). He graduated with a degree in Psychology (1947). He went on to gain an MA in Psychology and Economics from Kansas University (1949), and a Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior from Cornell University (he was supervised by William F. Whyte) in 1951. In a distinguished career Chris Argyris has been a faculty member at Yale University (1951-1971) where he served as the Beach Professor of Administrative Science and Chairperson of the department; and the James Bryant Conant Professor of Education and Organizational Behavior at Harvard University (1971- ). Argyris is currently a director of the Monitor Company in Cambridge, Massachusetts. (Infed)

Received an Honorary Doctor of Laws degree from the University of Toronto at the convocation ceremony (MBA & BComm) on June 13, 2006 (Wikipedia)

Chris Argyris was born in Newark, New Jersey on July 16, 1923 

Top
   
Major Works of Argyris

Argyris, Chris and Donald A. Schon.  Theory in Practice:  Increasing Professional Effectiveness.  1974.  Jossey-Bass Publ.  San Francisco.

Argyris, C., Putnam, R. and Smith, D. M. (1985) Action Science: Concepts, Methods and Skills for Research and Intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. ISBN 0875896650

Argyris is ommonly known for seminal work in the area of Learning Organizations which was later developed in the best selling The Fifth Discipline by Peter M. Senge. The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook is now a well-regarded resource for tools to implement and implant learning systems


 
Internal
Links

Top

Outline on  Ideology
External
Links
  AN IDEOLOGY IS A WAY OF THINKING, A WORLDVIEW  
  An ideology is a  particular system of ideas a characteristic way of thinking of a people, a group or a person especially on social & political topics   
  An ideology is a system of thought based on related assumptions, beliefs, & explanations of social movements or policies  
  Ideologies are mental systems of beliefs about reality   
  An ideology may be understood as a "world view  
  Ideology & culture are very similar in meaning.  The definition for ideology asserts that the knowledge, beliefs, & values shared by a society give legitimacy to the social structure   
  An ideology is a system of ideas that is pre conscious that often embodies a rationalization of motivations   
  IDEOLOGIES COMBINE ALL FACETS OF SOCIAL EXISTENCE  
  An ideology's content may be economic, political, philosophical, or religious   
  Some ideologies, such as communism & socialism, refer to econ & political systems   
  Other ideologies are capitalism, democracy, fascism, feminism, Protestantism, racism, Roman Catholicism, totalitarianism, & more  
  Ideologies do not rely equally on factual info in supporting their beliefs  
  People who accept an entire thought system usually reject all other systems concerned w/ the same content  
  To such people, only conclusions based on their ideology seem logical & correct   
  people strongly committed to an ideology have difficulty understanding & communicating w/ supporters of a conflicting ideology   
  Conflicting ideologies held by various nations, social classes, or religious groups have led to the world's greatest & most dangerous controversies.   
  For example, World War 2 was largely a struggle btwn democratic & totalitarian nations  
  IDEOLOGIES HAVE SOCIAL POSITIONS, I.E. EXIST IN A HISTL CONTEXT  
  Ideologies have a "social position" in that they often support or justify a part class or group   
  Ideology & contextual knowledge:  Because we all have an ideology, & our own personal historical context true knowledge is impossible   
  Epistemology is the sociology of knowledge or how knowledge is socially created  
  Conflict theorists, Marxists, etc. believe that, narrowly speaking, consciousness, or broadly speaking, ideology, is shaped by the interaction of material ( working ) conditions & the dominant culture in which one finds oneself   
  A major focus of conflict theory is the examination of ideology which is a world view, including  knowledge, opinions, etc.   
  For conflict theorists, our ideology is that part of our culture of which we are generally, but not specifically aware   
  Ideology is important to conflict theorists because they seek an end to class domination, & to achieve that end, people must first understand that they are exploited, & desire to end that exploitation   
 
Social scientists know that their is an interaction of ideology & social position, but they do not agree on how that interaction operates 
i
 
The materialists believe that one's social position determines ideology 
 
 
The idealists believe that one's ideology determines social position 
 
  The conflict theorist / Marxist view is that social position determines one's view of society, i.e., one's world view or ideology 
 
  Montesquieu first developed the concept of the "contextualization" of knowledge as seen in many contemporary theories of ideology   
  MARX:  CLASS DETERMINES CONSCIOUSNESS  
  Marx developed an analysis which held that class determines consciousness through a process that follows FOUR steps   
  a.  labor determines class   
  b.  labor & class determine consciousness   
  c.  what you do, determines how you think   
  d.  you are what you do   
  Marx developed an analysis which held that through the creative process of our labor, we develop an ideology which embodies the adage that "you are what you do"   
  CLASS CONSCIOUSNESS IS AN UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR OWN BEST INTEREST  
  Class consciousness occurs when a group of people w/ a common self interest correctly perceive that interest & develop beliefs, values, & norms consistent w/ advancing that interest   
  Class consciousness occurs when subordinate groups do not accept ideology of the dominant group, but accept ideology relevant to their own interests   
  THE DOMINANT CLASS' IDEOLOGY USUALLY DOMINANTS   
  The ideology of the dominant group or class is often the most prominent ideology   
  People accept the ideology of the dominant groups in society & so accept their values & do not pursue their own self interest   
  Much of social analysis concerns 
a.  the nature of the dominant group's ideology 
b.  why people accept the dominant group's ideology 
c.  how the dominant group's ideology is disseminated 
 
  STRUGGLES OCCUR OVER IDEOLOGY & MATERIAL RESOURCES  
  For many social theorists, culture, ideology, etc. cause conflict   
  For many social theorists, cultural belief systems, ideology, ethnicity & religion, can cause a lot of conflict   
  Ideological struggle has gone by various names such as: 
a.  the culture wars 
b.  the struggle for the hearts & minds 
c.  religious wars 
 
  When analyzing these ideological struggles, one must also examine material / economic struggles   
Link
Examples of ideological & material struggles   

 
Top
 
Examples of ideological & material struggles
Israeli - Arab conflict:  religion & land
Black - White conflict:  some amorphous ideology of race/culture & equal opportunity rights
Catholics & Protestants in No Ireland:  religion & land & equal opportunity rights
PW

The End
 
Top