Internal
Links

Top

Review Notes:  Karl Mannheim
1893 - 1947
External
Links
 
Syllabus 
Link
 
Resources 
Link
 
Outline on  Review Notes:  Karl Mannheim
 
Link
Overview of Mannheim   
Link
      German Sociology   
Link
      Interpretation   
Link
      Historicism   
Link
      Conservative Thought   
Link
Class Location   
Link
      Generations   
Link
      American Generations   
Link
Ideology   
Link
      Utopia   
Link
      Ideology & Utopia   
Link
The Intelligentsia  
Link
      Reconstruction   
Link
      Diagnosis   

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Karl Mannheim  1893  -  1947
External
Links
Link
-  Biography & Major Works 
 
  Mannheim is responsible for the creation of the field known as the sociology of knowledge 
 
  Mannheim also examined rationality in a manner that picks up on Weber's views but offers a more concise examination 
 
  FOR MANNHEIM, EPISTEMOLOGY:  THE SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE, 
SHOWS THAT KNOWLEDGE IS CREATED IN / BY SOCIAL EXISTENCE 
 
  Mannheim's first area of exploration was of epistemology & the sociology of knowledge   
  Mannheim's developed a comprehensive sociological analysis of the structures of knowledge   
  Mannheim follows Comte & Hegel who believed that in the past people had been dominated by histl processes, but in the future we would gain ascendancy over them   
 
For Mannheim, the sociology of knowledge is the systematic study of knowledge, ideas, or intellectual phenomena in general 
 
 
Mannheim fundamentally agrees w/ Marx on the relationship btwn econ structure & culture, the base & the superstructure   
  See Also:  The Base & the superstructure   
  There is a correlation btwn the econ struc of a society & its legal & political organization, & that even the world of our thought is affected by these relationships   
 
Mannheim examined the relationship among political, legal, phil, religious, & other ideas & their relationship w/ econ & soc changes   
  The ideas that people hold vary w/ changing econ circumstances & they are "somehow connected w/ the social context in which they live"   
 
To Mannheim, knowledge is determined by social existence 
 
 
Mannheim relates the ideas of a group to their position in the social structure 
 
 
Marx related the ideas of social classes to their positions in the social structure while Mannheim focused on social groups in the social structure 
 
  Mannheim's theories structures of knowledge were not embraced by Marxists or the neo Marxists of the Frankfurt School   
  For the Marxists &  neo Marxists a focus on the theories of the sociology of knowledge reduced the examination of class analysis & critiques of capitalism   
 
THE SOCIAL SCIENCES SHOULD ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS   
  Mannheim's second area of exploration was why & how the social sciences should address "the challenging present"   
  Mannheim had an ethical commitment to develop the social sciences as "a specifically modern way of thought which contributes to the rational self orientation of man [sic] in indl society"   
  In his belief in another way of thinking, in the 'new intellectual tools,' Mannheim is laying the foundation for Mills' concept of the sociological imagination   
  Mannheim also developed a comprehensive analysis of the structure of modern society by way of democratic social planning &  education  
  IDEOLOGY IS A GRP'S MENTAL REPRESENTATION OF THEIR HISTL POSITION IN SOCIAL STRUCTURE & CULTURE, IE BY SOCIAL CONTEXT   
 
Mannheim extends Marx's views on social classes, ideology, positions in the social structure to include a variety of different positions in society such as generations 
 
 
Mannheim is also well known for his idea systems of ideology & utopia 
 
 
An ideology is an idea system that seeks to conceal & conserve the present by interpreting it from the point of view of the past 
 
  Mannheim saw ideology as the perhaps deliberate obscuring of facts   
  Mannheim traced the history of the term ideology from what he called a 'particular' view   
 
Those who are advantaged use their power to influence the opinions of others so that, for a time, people tend to believe in values & ideas that support the existing order   
 
From Mannheim's work, an ideology may be defined as a set of  knowledge, values, & beliefs that support, or give legitimacy to the social structure 
 
 
Though Mannheim was by no means a Marxist, his conception of ideology as a culture that supports the social structure is something that sociologists of both the functionalist & conflict perspectives acknowledge   
  Mannheim inquired into the roots of culture   
 
A utopia is a system of ideas that seeks to transcend the present by focusing on the future 
 
 
For Mannheim, conflict btwn ideologies & utopias is an ever present reality in society 
 
  In 'Ideology &  Utopia' he argued that the application of the term ideology ought to be broadened   
  Mannheim's view gave way to a 'total' conception of ideology (most notably in Marx) which argued that a whole social group's thought was formed by its social position (e.g. the proletariat's beliefs were conditioned by their relationship to the means of production)   
  Mannheim developed a general, total conception of ideology, in which it was recognized that everyone's beliefs, including the social scientist's, were a product of the context they were created in   
  He feared this could lead to relativism but proposed the idea of relationism as an antidote   
  To uphold the distinction, Mannheim maintained that the recognition of different perspectives according to differences in time & social location appears arbitrary only to an abstract & disembodied theory of knowledge   

 
Top
 

Karl Mannheim  1893  -  1947

Karl Mannheim (March 27, 1893, Budapest - January 9, 1947, London) was born in Budapest, Hungarian & died in London.  He was a sociologist, who influential in the first half of the 20th century & one of the founding fathers of classical sociology. Mannheim rates as a founder of the sociology of knowledge.

He studied in Budapest, Berlin -- in 1914 he attended lectures by Georg Simmel --, Paris & Heidelberg. During the brief period of the Hungarian Soviet in 1919 he was offered a position by his friend & mentor Georg Lukacs. After the collapse of the government Mannheim moved to Germany. From 1922 to 1925 in Heidelberg he worked under the German sociologist Alfred Weber, brother of the well known sociologist Max Weber. Norbert Elias worked as one of his assistants (from spring 1930 until spring 1933). He immigrated to England in 1933.  He held posts at Heidelberg, Frankfurt, the London School of Economics & the University of London. 

Mannheim's biography, one of intellectual & geographical migration, falls into three main phases: Hungarian (to 1919), German (1919-1933), British (1933-1947). Among important intellectual influences are Georg Lukacs, Georg Simmel, Edmund Husserl, Karl Marx, Alfred & Max Weber, Max Scheler & Wilhelm Dilthey. Through these & others, German historicism, Marxism, phenomenology, sociology & Anglo American pragmatism entered his work.

Top
   
Major Works of Mannheim

([1922-24] 1980) Structures of Thinking. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 
([1925] 1986) Conservatism. A Contribution to the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 
Ideology & Utopia.  1929 
(1936) Ideology & Utopia. London: Routledge. 
(1940) Man & Society in an Age of Reconstruction. London: Routledge. 
([1930] 2001) Sociology as Political Education. New Brunswick, NJ. Transaction 
(1971. 1993) From Karl Mannheim. New Brunswick, NJ. Transaction 


 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Mannheim & German Sociology
External
Links
  MANNHEIM'S SCHOLASTIC ROOTS 
 
  Mannheim's thought has 3 scholastic roots, including: 
 
  a.  German classic phil, esp the Hegelian school 
 
  b.  nonacademic sociological thought, esp Marxism 
 
  c.  the Geistewissenschaften school which held that the social sciences needed their own methodology
 
  Following Hegel & Marx, Mannheim adopted the conception of history as a structured & dynamic process
 
  Mannheim expanded the ideas of Comte, Hegel, & Marx to embrace the idea that while humanity had been blindly dominated by the forces of hist, in the past, w/ knowledge of those processes, & a social will to be free, we could escape these hist processes  
  Facts & events are not isolated phenomena & occurrences but in relation to the dominant social forces & trends & create the whole social situation 
 
  The changing class structure of a society resulted from changes in productive techniques & the division of labor
 
  The ideologies of a given society in a given period bore some determinate relationship to the existing classes & to the objective conflict of interests among them
 
  THE WORLDVIEWS OF THE PHYSICAL & SOCIAL SCIENCES, & THE HUMANITIES
 
  Weltanschauungen, i.e. styles of thought or worldviews, separated the physical & social sciences
 
  For Mannheim, the social sciences required a specific method
 
  The physical sciences are concerned w/ calculable external phenomena
 
  The social sciences are, & must be concerned w/ the motives & values of people & the meanings of their acts
 
  In the physical sciences explanation, as defined as the correlation of external facts, was sufficient  
  In the social sciences explanation, as defined as the correlation of external facts, was insufficient  
  In the social sciences explanation alone is superficial  
  All knowledge, at any rate, knowledge of  things human, was situation bound, that is, tied to a given constellation of socio hist circumstances  
  THE SOCIAL SCIENCES ACHIEVE BOTH EXPLANATION & UNDERSTANDING   
  The social sciences should strive for explanation & understanding, erklarung & verstehen  
  In order to have an understanding of the meaning of a situation, one must have a sympathetic intuition of the actors & the situation  
  Mannheim is interested in meaning because the most important interrelationships & interactions were meaningful & communicative acts   
  Interpretive understanding is applied not only to art, literature, music, etc. but also to everyday speech & acts   
  Mannheim saw that Weber adopted Marx's general view that changes in the minds of people could not be understood w/o relating them to the changes in their concrete existential conditions  
  Mannheim related the changes in mental attitudes to changes in social situations   
  Changes in the human spirit corresponds to changes in the situation  & conversely changes in the situation indicates that people, too, have undergone some change  
  'CULTURE' AT ITS HIGHEST LEVEL EXPRESSES THE MEANING OF A SOCIETY IN A GIVEN EPOCH  
  Geisteswissenschaften:  a cultural element is part of a greater logico meaningful whole  
  Understanding consists in systematically placing an element in its large logico meaningful context  
 
The large Gestalt, i.e. whole, structure, context, form, etc., is what imparts meaning to its component elements
 
 
Every intellectual & cultural field has a structure of its own
 
  Each age develops its own style of though & comparisons btwn these styles are impossible, since each posits a different basic, or, so to speak, relatively absolute sphere  
 
The simpler forms of social being can only be understood in terms of the highest, all embracing form 
 
  System, context, complementarity, correlations, etc. are all implied in every concept because there is no such thing as an isolated concept  
  The unity of concepts, of all social being, is demonstrated by the fact that one has a sense of where a given concept properly belongs & it will be obvious once it is transferred to an alien sphere where it can only be applied metaphorically   
  The very process of thinking is a matter of placing a concept in its proper total framework  
  A thing is taken to be explained, comprehended, insofar as we have discovered its place in the currently accepted orders, on a series of levels  
  The concept of a system where everything is interconnected holds for the physical sciences as well as for phil, art, lit, etc.  
  NEW UNDERSTANDING IN THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES DISPLACES THE OLD; 
IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IT SUPPLEMENTS THE OLD
 
  In the physical sciences, once a new system comes along, the old system is discarded as when the Copernican system made the Ptolemaic system obsolete  
  In the social sciences, when a new system comes along, the old system continues to exist along side of it as when Chic Lit came into existence after Gothic Romance  
  Art forms can exist side by side w/o contradicting one another even while expressing different truths  
  Different truth & validity are involved in the arts as compared w/ the sciences  
  Once a work of the humanities achieves aesthetic validity, it acquires a 'timeless glory'  
  While phil is closer to science than art, certain of its old or abandoned solutions or insights have a timeless quality  
  Each cultural endeavor has its own criteria for validity yet all such endeavors are part of a meaningful whole which lends them a mutual affinity & common spirit  
  TRUTH IS AN ATTRIBUTE OF REALITY  
  For Mannheim, truth is an attribute, not so much a discourse, of reality  
  The individual who is in contact w/ the living forces of her age has the truth, or better, is in the truth  
  The concept of being 'in the truth' shows at once Mannheim's Marxism, his historicism, & his pragmatism in that truth is situated in the material conditions that produce it, truth is situated in the cultural worldview of that epoch, & truth is what functions best, i.e. is 'frictionless' in that epoch  
  Mannheim is close to the position that truth is where there is a correspondence of thought & situation  
  Mannheim was interested in the genuineness, rather than in the properly of, the so called truth of a given worldview  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Mannheim on Interpretation
External
Links
  SOCIETY IS FRAGMENTED 
 
  The many cultural creations of humanity constituted a unity
 
  The truth of human unity is obscured by the splitting up of the whole culture into apparently separate & isolated domains
 
  The fragmentation of the concept of culture into religion, art, literature, phil, etc. was a product of the theoretical standpoints from which culture is analyzed 
 
  The div of labor & rationalization of society from which there emerged professional practitioners of religion, art, lit, etc., added to the fragmentation of culture
 
  As the result of the div of labor, professionalization of the humanities, & theoretical abstraction the concrete cultural experiential whole is neglected
 
  The 'whole of culture' can be seen both in an individual work of art, in the oeuvre of the artist, the meaning of the style, to the most comprehensive whole of culture of an epoch
 
  Interpretation requires one to refer to the cultural unity underlying the creations of a society in a given epoch 
 
  WELTANSCHAUUNG IS A HOLISTIC UNDERSTANDING OF A CULTURE  
  Zeitgeist refers to the underlying cultural unity of a society in a given epoch 
 
  Zeitgeist, worldview, global outlook, weltanschauung, culture, the highest levels of the superstructure, etc. all relate to each other
 
  Weltanschauung is an atheoretical entity, an ideal type in the Weberian sense, which refers to the highest, all embracing 'spirit' that permeates all cultural creations ranging from the arts through customs & including even the tempo of living, expressive gestures, & demeanor
 
  OBJECTIVE MEANING   
 
Every cultural product & / or social event reveals 3 levels of meaning:  he objective, the expressive, & the documentary
 
 
Observing the objective meaning of a social interaction is simply to see what happened & what was said 
 
  EXPRESSIVE MEANING   
 
To proceed beyond the objective level, one must grasp the individual intent 
 
 
At the expressive level, to grasp intent, one must grasp the act & context authentically, as the actor intended it 
 
  DOCUMENTARY MEANING   
 
But to truly know a person we must understand how they act not only in one context or situation, but in many contexts or situations
 
 
The documentary or evidential type of meaning provides an expressive level of understanding across many contexts or situations 
 
 
The objective, expressive, & documentary levels of meaning are merely analytical & thus not clearly distinguishable from one another
 
 
When the three methods of objective, expressive, & documentary levels of understanding are combined, one gets an understanding of weltanschauung
 
 
The existence of any one weltanschauung of one society in one epoch can never be positively, empirically demonstrated
 
  Yet one can apply rigorous scientific standards to problems of objective & expressive meaning  
  Given sufficient background, one can describe w/ precision the 'visible' aspects of a work of art & the relevant aspects of an artist's biography which affected his style, choice of subject, materials, themes, etc.   
  SPATIO TEMPORAL LOCATION  
  The documentary level has the special problem of the spatio temporal location of the interpreter  
  Unlike objective observation & the understanding of the expressive, documentary interpretation must be performed anew in each period   
  Any single interpretation is influenced by the location w/in the histl stream from which the interpreter is constructing the spirit of the epoch under examination   
  The act of cognition must not be regarded as the effort of a purely theoretical consciousness because the human consciousness is permeated by non theoretical elements   
  The non theoretical elements in people's consciousness arise both from people's participation in social life & in the streams & tendencies of 'willing' which work themselves out contemporaneously in that life  
  The Hellenic or Shakespearean spirit presents itself in different ways to different generations   
  The problem of the spatio temporal location of the interpreter does not mean that knowledge is relative, rather it means that it is different from histl knowledge   
  Contrary to historians, social scientists grasp the meaning & structure of histl understanding in its specificity rather than reject it because it does not have the positivist truth criteria sanctioned by natural science  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Mannheim on Historicism
External
Links
  HISTORICISM IS A SOCIO HISTL ANALYSIS WRITTEN FROM A PARTICULAR PERSPECTIVE  
  Historicism is the writing of history under the influence of that weltanschauung  
  Historicism is the interpretation of history primarily from the point of view in which the writing of the history is done  
  "We have historicism only when history itself is written from the historistic weltanschauung"  
  Weltanschauung is a comprehensive conception or image of the universe and of humanity's relation to it; a world view   
 
Historicism is an aspect of weltanschauung that emerged in response to definite histl conditions
 
 
It is no accident that concepts such as movement, process, flux, etc. first appeared in a definitive histl period
 
  Under weltanschauung historians view human life, its institutions, customs, art, etc., either developmentally or organically
 
  TWO TYPES OF HISTORICAL ANALYSIS:  VERTICAL (TOPICAL) & HORIZONTAL (TIMELINE)  
  The structure of history, its ordering principle, may be studied via a vertical / topical socio histl analysis, or via the horizontal / timeline socio histl analysis
 
 Link
The Table on Vertical & Horizontal Socio Historical Analyses demonstrates that histl social life may be examined by topic or by an overview of all histl events via vertical & horizontal socio histl analysis, respectively   
  Vertical histl analysis makes any social institution or cultural phenomenon & traces it back sowing how each later form develops continuously, organically from the earlier
 
  If vert histl analysis is extended to all spheres of life, then one obtains a 'bundle of isolated evolutionary lines'
 
  Because w/ vertical socio histl analysis explores each of the lines or spheres are isolated & disconnected w/o any recognizable relationship among them, a horz socio histl analysis is necessary
 
  The horz socio histl analysis is necessary to show how at one temporal stage, the motifs, which have just been observed in isolation, are also organically bound up w/ one another
 
  MANNHEIM, HEGEL, ET AL HOLD THAT 'REASON' IS UNFOLDING IN HISTORY   
  The Hegelian notion of Spirits or Idea as the real subject of hist is useful for the study of the history of the separate motifs, i.e. the manner in which a given topic such as gender or race relations are part of the larger culture in a given society in a given epoch, i.e. weltanschauung, are 
 
  The separate motifs of vertical socio histl analysis must be examined in a horz socio histl analysis because the motifs are conditioned at the successive stage of evolution by the rest of culture & are components & functions of an ultimate basic process which is the real 'subject' undergoing change
 
  For Mannheim, Hegel, Weber, Marx, etc. histl processes are permeated by 'reason' & 'form giving categories' & a higher, all embracing totality that imparts meaning & unity to the apparently separate events
 
  Present day systems & conclusions of phil are based on a reality not yet know to earlier system
 
  The earlier systems are not false but incomplete
 
  One must eschew an out & out rejection of previous systems by attempting to incorporate them in the new systems because old systems contain part of 'the truth'
 
  For Mannheim, there is a greater truth & validity embodied in the thought of a later hist stage  
  ENLIGHTENMENT THINKERS, WRONGLY, HELD THAT REASON WAS STATIC   
  Mannheim believed that the Enlightenment thinkers held an ahistorical conception of Reason & therefore rejected the the later, histl, organic, developmental conception of reason  
  The Enlightenment thinkers failed to see that the most general definitions of Reason vary & undergo a process of alterations of meaning, along w/ every other concept, in the course of hist  
 
The Enlightenment thinkers embraced a static concept of reason & thus closed themselves off from the insights derived from a dynamic organic model
 
 
Our understanding of such concepts as reason, gender, race, the env, work, leisure, etc. all change in relation to the general transformation taking place in the social structure
 
  The changed socio hist situation is the basis for the emergence of a new theoretical superstructure  
  A socio histl analysis rejects the rigid alternative of true & false & seeks instead the 'truth in history itself'  
  THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES STRIVE FOR THE PERSPECTIVE OF OBJECTIVITY; 
THE SOCIAL SCIENCES STRIVE FOR UNDERSTANDING FROM THE POSITION OF A PARADIGM 
 
  In the physical sciences the histl & social position of the knowing subject & that person's corresponding value orientations do not penetrate the scientific content   
  The physical sciences attempt to maintain a distance btwn the known & the knower, i.e. they strive for objectivity in the sense of no personal involvement or commitment to any outcome   
  In the social sciences depending on whether one is positivist, hegelian, Marxist, etc. the principles of selection, the direction of the study, & the categories of meaning differ   
  One cannot posit an abstract, impartial knowing subject in the study of society, history, culture, psychology, etc.   
  There is no impartial knowing subject in the social sciences because knowledge is only possible from an ascertainable intellectual location, i.e. a paradigmatic position   
  A paradigmatic position presupposes a subject harboring definite aspirations regarding the future & actively striving to achieve them   
  Only out of an interest in the present & the future does the observation of the past become possible   
  The histl picture changes w/ every epoch because the knower comes from a different paradigmatic position & they have different interest in the present & future   
  SOCIO HISTL ANALYSIS IS NOT RELATIVISTIC, BUT PERSPECTIVAL  
  Yet for Mannheim, historicism veers away from relative because histl knowledge is not relative but perspectival & relational  
  Marx's histl materialism offered one perspective of the rise of capitalism during the late Middle Ages which held that capitalism arose as a result of changes in the mode of production when craft production began to replace the old feudal mode of production  
  Weber later developed his theory of the Protestant work ethic which examined the role of religious & cultural changes on the rise of capitalism  
  Weber grounds his theory of the Protestant work ethic which is a cultural analysis grounded in histl materialism  
  Weber's cultural analysis is not a contradiction of Marx's theory of histl material, rather it complements it  
  Histl materialism & cultural analysis are not mutually right & wrong, rather they are different perspectives of a given reality & our knowledge of that reality became more adequate as a result of the additional perspective added by Weber  
  Perspectivism does not imply relativism rather it led to widening of our concept of truth   
  Perspectivism does not impugn the validity of an insight, it merely draws attn to the fact that the insight is dependent upon & confined w/in a specific socio histl situation  
  Perspectivism shifts the relativity, & does not remove it  
  Every social histl situation is located at a specific pt along a unilinear, ever progressing & never returning temporal continuum: hist  
 
A wider concept of truth saves us from being barred from the exploration of these fields in which both the nature of the object to be known & that of the knowing subject makes only perspectivistic knowledge possible 
 
 
NEW HISTORICISM IS BASED ON POST MODERN THEORIES   
  Post modernism generally denies any conception of rationality or the development of a histl 'spirit' in hist  
  Rather, hist is merely a series of stories w/ open multitudes of interpretations, none of which is more valid than another  
 
New historicism, based on the theories of French philosopher Michel Foucault & American anthropologist Clifford Geertz, emphasizes the histl analysis of literature
 
  New historicism insists that hist, like literature, is not a matter of "hard facts," but of texts that need to be interpreted to be understood   

 
Top
 
Table on Vertical & Horizontal Socio Historical Analyses 
External
Links
VERTICAL SOCIAL HISTORIES  
      A Socio Historical Analysis of Gender Relations  
      A Socio Historical Analysis of Race Relations  
      A Marxist Socio Historical Analysis  
      A Weberian Socio Historical Analysis  
      A Socio Historical Analysis of the Agricultural Revolutions  
             A Socio Historical Analysis of Subsistence Agriculture  
A HORIZONTAL SOCIO HISTORICAL ANALYSIS:   
             Geologic Time 15 bb BC      -    5 mm BC
 
             Pre Human Evolution  5 mm BC     -    1.5 mm BC
 
             Hunter Gatherer Society 1.5 mm BC   -    10 K BC
 
      The Human Time-Line of History blank
 
             The Pre Empire Era 10 K BC   -   3 K BC
 
             The Era of the Early Empires   3 K BC   -   200 BC
 
             The Era of the Roman Empire    200 BC  -   500 AD
 
             The Middle Ages         500   -  1300
 
             The Early Industrial Age       1300  -  1700
 
             The Industrial Age      1700  -  present
 
             The Era of Global Capitalism      1910  -  present
 
             The Post-Industrial Age      1970 -  present
 
The Table on Vertical & Horizontal Socio Historical Analyses demonstrates that histl social life may be examined by topic or by an overview of all histl events via vertical & horizontal socio histl analysis, respectively   

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Mannheim on Conservative Thought
External
Links
  INTRO:  CONSERVATIVE THOUGHT CREATES IDEOLOGY;  THOUGHT CREATES UTOPIAN IDEALS  
  Conservation of the status quo tends to produce 'ideologies' to falsify thought by excessive idealizaiton of the past & overemphasis on the factors making for stability  
  Intentness on change is apt to produce 'utopias,' which overvalue both the future & factors leading to change  
  EXISTENCE INFLUENCES FORMS OF THOUGHT, I.E. IDEOLOGY
 
  Mannheim examines the styles of thought, their relationship to one another, & their place in the larger cultural context, as well as the social basis of a given mvmt of thought, the conservative mvmt
 
  The key to understanding the changes in ideas is found in the changing social background, mainly the fate of the social grps or classes which are the 'carriers' of these styles of thought 
 
  Mannheim uses a Marxian approach as well as utilizing elements derived from Hegel & Weber
 
  Mannheim examines the conservative mvmt to demonstrate the relationship btwn forms of thought & the existence & fate of social grps, e.g. German conservatism after the Fr Rev 
 
 
Mannheim examines the styles & mvmts of thought which are predominantly political, approximating what he later calls ideologies 
 
  All knowledge is situation bound in that it is creatd in a given socio histl context  
  Each age devleops its own style of thought & comparisons btwn  these styles are impossible sicne each postis a different basic sphere  
  Within each age there are conflicting tendencies toward conservation, on the one hand , & toward change on the other  
  Mannheim believes that the study of conservative thought implies that one must study liberal thought & even socialist thought which in each case is developed along class & party lines
 
  CONSERVATIVES IN POST FR REV GER PREFERRED FEUDALISM OVER CAPITALISM 
 
  To understand conservative thought one must begin w/ rationalism, or the phil of the Enlightenment 
 
  The capitalist bourgeoisie accounted for the growth of modern rationalism 
 
  Quantitative rationalism, as it appeared in math, phil, & the nat sciences had its parallel in the growth of the cap econ system 
 
  Commodity production replaced the subsistence econ, exchange value replaced use value, & the formerly qual attitude toward things & people became increasingly quantitative 
 
  As Marx observing, using Carlyle's phrase, it was now the callous 'cash nexus' which related person to person 
 
  The cash nexus ideology came to include all forms of human experience 
 
  Within the capitalist ideology even the other person is experienced abstractly 
 
  What Marx explained as alienation stood in sharp contrast to Gemeinschaft of the Mid Ages in which the social relationships of persons engaged in production appear as their own personal relationships, & not disguised as social relations of things, of products of labor 
 
  Conservatism wa the political & intellectual reaction against the continuing process which was destroying the older world
 
  Conservatism called for a restoration of that world, for a return to the status quo ante 
 
 
CONSERVATISM IS TRADITIONALISM THAT DEVELOPS AN IDEOLOGY 
 
 
The social carriers of the post Fr Rev conservative ideology are those of the social & intellectual strata that remained outside of the capitalistic process of rationalization 
 
  Post Fr Rev conservatives included the peasants, the small bourgeoisie, & the landed aristocracy   
  The conservatives kept the older, pre capitalist relationships & traditions alive  
  The conservatives opposed the phil of the Enlighten, esp the intellectual tendencies that accompanied bourgeois capitalism  
  Romantic Conservatives sought to salvage the older way of life & its values when they set 'community' up against 'society,' family against contract, intuitive certainty against reason, spiritual against material existence  
  Thus it was the conservatives, not the socialists, who were the first opponents & critics of capitalism  
  Conservatism, then like socialism, is a new or modern phenomenon which arose as a conscious reflective reaction against the advance of capitalism  
  Conservatism is different from traditionalism because the latter is the intellectual, political ideological expression of class interests & values in a dynamic histl situation  
  Traditionalism can only become conservatism in a society in which change occurs through the medium of class conflict in a class society  
  The conservatives express their ideology by positively emphasizing all those aspects of life & thought which are antagonistic to the life & thought of bourgeois society  
  THE CONSERVATIVE IDEOLOGY EMBRACES THE QUALITATIVE, PROPERTY & GRPS  
  With conservative ideology:
a.  the qualitative & concrete are opposed to the quantitative & the abstract
b.  landed property, not the individual is the basis of history
c.  organic grps, not 'classes' are regarded as the real units of society & history
 
  In the post Fr Rev era, conservatism looks to the past, liberalism to the present, & socialism to the future  
  The conservative mvmt arose in conscious opposition to capitalist conditions  
  NAT LAW DERIVED FROM THE ENLIGHTENMENT & FOSTERED THE AM, FR & OTHER REVS  
  Post Fr Rev conservatism is a repudiation of natural law philosophy, the mode of thought most characteristic of the bourgeois revolutionary epoch  
  Nat law phil included the concepts of :
a.  the state of nature 
b.  social contract
c.  popular sovereignty
d.  inalienable 'rights of man' 
 
  The principles of nat law phil were that  
  1.  rationalism was a method of solving problems  
  2.  deductive procedures encompassed everything from general principle to particular cases  
  3.  nat law had universal validity for every individual  
  4.  nat law had universal applicability to all histl & social units  
  5.  one views existence atomistically & mechanistically in that collective units, i.e. the state, the law, etc., are constructed out of isolated, individual  factors  
  6.  static thinking & right reason is conceived as a self sufficient, autonomous sphere unaffected by hist  
  CONSERVATIVES' IDEOLOGY WAS 'ROMANTIC' IN THAT IT WAS 
NON RATIONAL, NON UNIVERSAL, ORGANIC, & EVOLUTIONARY 
 
  The conservatives attacked nat law & replaced reason & the deductive method w/ history, life, the nation & the irrationality of reality  
  The conservatives repudiated the claim of universal validity & posited instead the historically unique character of each society  
  For the mechanical conception of political & social instits, conservatives embraced the organic conception whereby political instits could not be mechanically transposed from nation to nation  
  While the nat law liberals held that society was atomistic, mechanical, the conservatives insisted that society was an organic unified whole  
  Conservatives attacked the doctrine of static reason because the norms of reason are in a process of continual histl development  
  CONSERVATISM IN GER WAS IDEALISTIC NOT MATERIALISTIC IN THAT IT WAS THEORETICAL & NOT ACTIVIST  
  Marx observed that Germany experienced the Fr Rev on the phil plane while in Fr the conservatives related to actual revolutionary events  
  What was being fought out was accompanied by a political & ideological conflict  
  In Germany, the struggle was of a purely intellectual character  
  In Germany, because of a lack of a mid class, conservatism was pushed to a logical extreme  
  The UK & Fr developed a liberal party & ideology which mediated btwn the existing political extremes, but Ger had no mediating mid class  
  For Mannheim, all phil is nothing but an elaboration of a kind of action  
  To understand a phil, one has to understand the nature of the action which lies at the bottom of it  
  An 'action' is specific to each particular grp which penetrates social reality, & takes on its most tangible form in politics  
  The political struggle expresses the aims & purposes which are unconsciously but coherently at work in all the conscious & half conscious interpretations of the world characteristic of the grp  
  GER ECON BACKWARDNESS LIMITED THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MID CLASS, & THUS CAPITALIST IDEOLOGY   
  Mannheim explains the specific form of German conservatism on the basis of Ger econ backwardness  
  Capitalist development in Ger lagged behind the West & Marx estimated that Ger econ development in 1843 was like that of Fr in 1789  
  Because of its econ non development, Ger lacked any real bourgeoisie or proletariat & this was still evident, as Engels noted, in Ger's failure to have a rev   
  The Ger mid class had such a wide variety of interests that it could not carry out concerted political action  
  The mid class' response to the Fr Rev in Ger was purely ideological  
  In Ger, the only strata capable of pol action were the nobility & the bureaucracy  
  In Fr, the bourgeoisie mobilized their 3rd & 4th estates (peasants & intellectuals?) against the Church, the monarchy, & the nobility  
  In Ger, the lack of public pressure weakened the ties of the nobility & the bureaucracy so that capitalist reforms empowered a romantic, feudal, ideological reaction  
  The econ, e.g. class structure of Ger led to the situation where the bureaucracy employed rationality as an ideological weapon against the nobility, while the nobility sought to preserve its feudal privileges & the organic, corporative structure of medieval society  
  The outcome of the struggle of the Ger bureaucracy & nobility was a Romantic historicist ideology which was so influential that even its opponents never freed themselves from it   

 
Internal
Links

Top

  Outline on   Class Location
External
Links
 
Analysis of class location examines how & why people, analysts, politicians & the people themselves view themselves & others as belonging to a particular class
 
 
For Kerbo, there are  SIX variables that describe a particular class location including realism, nominalism, subjectivism, objectivism, continuity of ranking, & discontinuous ranking
 
  1.  REALIST:  CLASS LOCATION BASED ON WHO ONE ASSOCIATES WITH   
 
The realist analysis of class location is based primarily on who one associates with
 
 
The realist analysis holds that an analysis of associations can identify clear class boundaries, though many dispute this
 
  Most people do associate w/ people of the same class, status, etc., however a certain percentage of people do have associates of a different ranking, & a certain amount of people will say / believe they have friends of a different ranking  
  An example of the realist position is that most people marry w/in their rank & w/in rank marriages have a greater chance of success  
 
The realist analysis is primarily a subjective form of identification
 
  2.  NOMINALIST:  INDEPENDENT CRITERIA ON CLASS  
 
The nominalist analysis of class location is based primarily on objective criteria based on independently constructed criteria
 
 
The most important class determinants of the nominalist analysis of class location are the common characteristics of people such as Weber's life chances, membership in prep schools, inclusion on the social register, etc.
 
  3.  SUBJECTIVE:  SELF IDENTIFICATION OF CLASS   
 
The subjective analysis of class location is based primarily on self identification or whether a class identity has meaning for the individuals themselves  
  When people are asked to self identify which class they are in, most people place themselves in the middle or working class  
  4.  OBJECTIVE:  ACCEPTED CRITERIA ON CLASS   
  The objective analysis of class location is based primarily on definition of class emphasizes observable, widely available factors such as wealth, income, status as measured by a well known survey, etc.   
  The obj analysis of class location is based on rewards from society as objectively determined by education, status, power, whether or not a person recognizes it  
  The objective analysis of class location is used by social analysts from Marx to Wright  
  5.  CONTINUOUS CLASS RANKING:  SCALES OF SUBCLASSES   
  The continuous class ranking analysis of class location ranks subclasses on a scale based on several objective, weighted factors which are used to create a range of class membership  
  6.  DISCONTINUOUS CLASS RANKING:  SCALES OF SUBCLASSES W/ CLEAR BREAKS   
  The discontinuous class ranking analysis of class location ranks subclasses in a discontinuous system when there are clear breaks, recognizing that a continuous class ranking may be possible when there are no clear breaks  
  Kerbo believes there are THREE dimensions of class location:  occupational structure, bureaucratic authority divisions, & property structure
( Not to be confused w/ the 3 dimensions of stratification systems:  class, status, & power or the 6 variables that describe a particular class location  )
 
  A.  OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURE IS ONE'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE MARKET  
  i.  primarily based on skill  
  ii.  & thus reward & skill are not directly correlated  
  iii.  & one's contribution to society is not primary factor in determining pay, etc.  
  iv.  where dominant groups shape the occupational reward structure  
       Economy:  MOP:  ROF & FOP  
  Marx's analysis of class & consciousness holds that they are influenced by the base of society; i.e. the larger economic system  
  B.  BUREAUCRATIC AUTHORITY DIVISIONS STRATIFY PEOPLE ON CONTROL OF RESOURCES & PEOPLE   
  Bureaucratic authority divisions are organizations (e.g. Weber & Dahrendorf's imperatively coordinated associations (ICAs) ) each have their own unique power structure, w/ many similarities which stratify people on control of resources & control of other people  
  C. PROPERTY STRUCTURE WAS A CLEAR INDICATOR OF CLASS IN THE PAST, BUT IS NOT TODAY   
  For most of the industrialized world, as recently as 200 yrs. ago, property ownership was a clear indicator of class position  
  In the past, aristocrats owned nearly all the property while the proletariat owned almost nothing  
  Today the concept of property is much more complicated & is not a clear indicator of class location  
  Property structure includes real property & paper property such as stocks, bonds, trusts  
  For Kerbo, the property structure method of class location is problematic because many in middle class own stock & so "own" the means of production (MOP), but have no control over the MOP  
  In practice middle class stock holders own the MOP, but they do not control the MOP  
  On the other hand, farmers & small business people are middle or lower class & own relatively large swatches of property  
  The top 10 % of the US population own over 88 % of all stocks, bonds, & trusts & thus 90 % of the population own less that 12 %  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Mannheim on Generations
External
Links
  THE ANALYSIS OF GENERATIONS IS DERIVED FROM THE ANALYSIS OF CLASS   
  In exploring generations, Mannheim generalized Marx's concept of class & formulated a sociological conception of a generation 
 
  A generation is not a group, but a category 
 
  A grp cannot exist w/o its members having knowledge of each other & it ceases to exist as a mental & spiritual unit when physical proximity is destroyed 
 
  General is a social category where the members share a class position 
 
  Class position is not the common location people hold in the econ & power structure 
 
  A class is not a concrete group like a community 
 
  Class position is an object fact whether a person knows their class position or not 
 
  Class consciousness does not necessarily accompany a class position although class can give rise to consciousness 
 
  Generations is similar to class in that a number of people have a similar location in the social structure & culture of a society 
 
  For a generation, the similar location is based on the biological rhythms of humanity while w/ class, the similar location is based on a common relationship to the means of production 
 
  SPATIO TEMPORAL EXPERIENCE IS DIFFERENT FOR EACH GEN  
  Social location of class & generations refers to the limitation imposed by that spatio temporal experience 
 
  People are exposed to a specific range of potential & actual experiences & excluded from others 
 
  Just as the experiential, intellectual, & emotional data differ for each class, they also differ for each gen
 
  Stratification also affects gens as seen in the fact that the Baby Boomers as a gen are not as well off as the WW2 gen, & if current trends continue, Gen X will not be as well off as the Baby Boomers 
 
  Even the 'mental climate' or ideology varies according to class & gen as seen in the different consciousness of the theologizing cleric, a knight, or a monk, in the Mid Ages   
  CHARACTERISTICS OF A GEN:  EMERGENCE, DISAPPEARANCE, LIMITED, TRANSMISSION, CONTINUOUS TRANS  
  The characteristics of a gen are that:   
  a.  new participants in the culture are always emerging   
  b.  former participants in culture are continually disappearing   
 
c.  members of any one gen can participate only in a temporally limited section of the histl process 
 
  d.  gens continually transmit their accumulated cultural heritage   
  e.  the transition from gen to gen is a continuous process   
  GENS HAVE SUBJECTIVE, I.E. POTENTIAL, & OBJECTIVE, I.E. ACTUAL CHARACTERISTICS   
  The subjective aspects of a gen, or class, are that because members share a socio histl location, that location contains potentialities which may materialize or be suppressed  
  What a person does is objective, what they might have done is subjective; & so it is w/ a gen, what they might have done, their potential, is subjective  
  The objective form of a gen comes about only as a result of their actual activities  
  Whether peasants & urban youth become a gen depends on whether they participate in a common destiny of some socio histl unit  
  A gen is an actuality only when a concrete bond is created by exposure to the social & intellectual symptoms of a process of dynamic destabilization, i.e. a common historic event   
  A grp of people of the same age has the potential of becoming a gen because of the potential of being sucked into the vortex of social change   
  GEN UNITS ARE SUB GRPS OF GENS W/ COMMON EXPERIENCES   
  Even w/in the same gen, separate units which emerge in response to a historical stimulus experience by all   
  The generational unit represents a more concrete bond than the typical gen  
  The genl unit is not necessarily a grp since members may not come into contact w/ each other  
  Members of a genl unit respond similarly to the situations in which they participate & share an affinity for certain ideas & ways of viewing their world  
  Within any gen there exists a number of differentiated & antagonistic gen units  
  Thus a soc analysis explores the mutual relationship of class, ideology, & gen  

 
Internal
Links

Top

  Outline on   American Generations
External
Links
  -  Project:  The Boomers & Gen X 
Link
  A GENERATION IS A GROUP OF PEOPLE CATEGORIZED AROUND TIME & / OR A HISTL EVENT   
  A generation is the whole body of individuals who are born around the same general period of time   
  Generations include those past, the last, declining, the present, rising, & the next generations   
  A generation is commonly accepted to last 30 yrs  
  30 yrs is the average difference of age btwn 1 generation of a family & the next  
  Adults in a gen usually dominate other gens for the 30 yrs they are in their peak career period, i.e. from about 30 to 60 yrs. of age   
 
There are many ways to categorize the American Generations
 
  AMERICAN GENERATIONS   
 
The Revolutionary War Generation
 
  The Early Westward Expansion Generation
 
  The Civil War Generation/ the Late Westward Expansion Generation  
  The Gay 90's Generation  
  The Depression Era Generation  
  The Greatest Generation  
  The Baby Boomers  
  Gen X  
  EACH GENERATION HAS A UNIQUE LIFESTYLE & WORLDVIEW  
  Generations always overlap, usually 3 or 4 gens at a time as seen in the simultaneous existence of Gen X, Boomers, the Greatest Gen, & the Depression Era Gen  
  Despite the fact that gens co-exist they frequently have different lifestyles & worldviews  
  While gens share some experiences, frequently what divides one gen from another is a central histl experience as seen in those who experienced WW 2 & those who experienced the Vietnam War  
  Central histl experiences as well as general, everyday experiences come to define a gen & create its worldview  

 
Internal
Links

Top

Outline on  Ideology
External
Links
  AN IDEOLOGY IS A WAY OF THINKING, A WORLDVIEW  
  An ideology is a  particular system of ideas, a characteristic way of thinking of a people, a group, or a person especially on social & political topics   
  An ideology is a system of thought based on related assumptions, beliefs, & explanations of social movements or policies   
  Ideologies are mental systems of beliefs about reality   
  An ideology may be understood as a "world view  
  Ideology & culture are very similar in meaning.  The definition for ideology asserts that the knowledge, beliefs, & values shared by a society give legitimacy to the social structure   
  An ideology is a system of ideas that is pre conscious that often embodies a rationalization of motivations   
  IDEOLOGIES COMBINE ALL FACETS OF SOCIAL EXISTENCE  
  An ideology's content may be economic, political, philosophical, or religious   
  Some ideologies, such as communism & socialism, refer to econ & political systems   
  Other ideologies are capitalism, democracy, fascism, feminism, Protestantism, racism, Roman Catholicism, totalitarianism, & more   
  Ideologies do not rely equally on factual info in supporting their beliefs   
  People who accept an entire thought system usually reject all other systems concerned w/ the same content   
  To such people, only conclusions based on their ideology seem logical & correct   
  people strongly committed to an ideology have difficulty understanding & communicating w/ supporters of a conflicting ideology   
  Conflicting ideologies held by various nations, social classes, or religious groups have led to the world's greatest & most dangerous controversies   
  For example, World War 2 was largely a struggle btwn democratic & totalitarian nations   
  IDEOLOGIES HAVE SOCIAL POSITIONS, I.E. EXIST IN A HISTL CONTEXT  
  Ideologies have a "social position" in that they often support or justify a party, class, or group   
  Ideology & contextual knowledge:  Because we all have an ideology, & our own personal historical context true knowledge is impossible   
  Epistemology is the sociology of knowledge or how knowledge is socially created   
  Conflict theorists, Marxists, etc. believe that, narrowly speaking, consciousness, or broadly speaking, ideology, is shaped by the interaction of material ( working ) conditions & the dominant culture in which one finds oneself   
  A major focus of conflict theory is the examination of ideology which is a world view, including  knowledge, opinions, etc.   
  For conflict theorists, our ideology is that part of our culture of which we are generally, but not specifically aware   
  Ideology is important to conflict theorists because they seek an end to class domination, & to achieve that end, people must first understand that they are exploited, & desire to end that exploitation   
 
Social scientists know that their is an interaction of ideology & social position, but they do not agree on how that interaction operates 
i
 
The materialists believe that one's social position determines ideology 
 
 
The idealists believe that one's ideology determines social position 
 
  The conflict theorist / Marxist view is that social position determines one's view of society, i.e., one's world view or ideology 
 
  Montesquieu first developed the concept of the "contextualization" of knowledge as seen in many contemporary theories of ideology   
  MARX:  CLASS DETERMINES CONSCIOUSNESS  
  Marx developed an analysis which held that class determines consciousness through a process that follows FOUR steps   
  a.  labor determines class   
  b.  labor & class determine consciousness   
  c.  what you do, determines how you think   
  d.  you are what you do   
  Marx developed an analysis which held that through the creative process of our labor, we develop an ideology which embodies the adage that "you are what you do"   
  CLASS CONSCIOUSNESS IS AN UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR OWN BEST INTEREST  
  Class consciousness occurs when a group of people w/ a common self interest correctly perceive that interest & develop beliefs, values, & norms consistent w/ advancing that interest   
  Class consciousness occurs when subordinate groups do not accept ideology of the dominant group, but accept ideology relevant to their own interests   
  THE DOMINANT CLASS' IDEOLOGY USUALLY DOMINANTS   
  The ideology of the dominant group or class is often the most prominent ideology   
  People accept the ideology of the dominant groups in society & so accept their values & do not pursue their own self interest   
  Much of social analysis concerns 
a.  the nature of the dominant group's ideology 
b.  why people accept the dominant group's ideology 
c.  how the dominant group's ideology is disseminated 
 
  STRUGGLES OCCUR OVER IDEOLOGY & MATERIAL RESOURCES  
  For many social theorists, culture, ideology, etc. cause conflict   
  For many social theorists, cultural belief systems, ideology, ethnicity & religion, can cause a lot of conflict   
  Ideological struggle has gone by various names such as: 
a.  the culture wars
b.  the struggle for the hearts & minds 
c.  religious wars 
 
  When analyzing these ideological struggles, one must also examine material / economic struggles   
Link
Examples of ideological & material struggles   

 
Top
 
Examples of ideological & material struggles 
Israeli - Arab conflict:  religion & land 
Black - White conflict:  some amorphous ideology of race/culture & equal opportunity rights 
Catholics & Protestants in No Ireland:  religion & land & equal opportunity rights 
PW

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on   Utopia
External
Links
 
A UTOPIA IS A PERFECT WORLD CREATED ON EARTH 
 
  Utopia is the name commonly given to an imaginary land where everything is supposed to be perfect 
 
  The name utopia comes from the Greek words meaning no place 
 
  The name refers particularly to a society w/ ideal econ & social conditions 
 
  People often apply the word utopian to plans of reform that they consider impractical & visionary 
 
  THOMAS MORE BASES UTOPIA ON A PERFECT GOVT 
 
  The word utopia was used as the title of a famous book by Saint Thomas More 
 
  Utopia was first published in Latin in 1516 & was translated into English in 1551 
 
  The book gives More's views on the ideal govt 
 
  But, like most writings on utopias, the book also criticizes social & economic conditions of More's times 
 
  OTHER NARRATIVES OF UTOPIA EXAMINE SOCIAL PERFECTIONS & IMPERFECTIONS 
 
  Several other books have presented an imaginary ideal state of society 
 
 
One of the first books describing a utopia was Plato's Republic (375 BC) 
 
  More recent utopias are described in Samuel Butler's Erewhon (1872), & Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward (1888)   
  Several novels have explored imperfect world's, i.e. dystopias   
  Examples of dystopias include 1984, Animal Farm, etc.   
  FOR SOCIAL SCIENTISTS UTOPIA IS CREATED THROUGH HUMAN PLANNING / EFFORTS   
 
Mannheim believed that both Marxism & Christianity were utopian doctrines, meaning that he thought they were non pragmatic & not functional for society   
  However, Mannheim believed that components of each were rational & functional, visa vie his conception of the 'New Christianity' which he observed was emerging in the West in the post WW 2 epoch   
  The West is so concerned w/ its natural needs, the rejection of both Marxism & Christianity is due to an opposite construction, to their subordination of nature to history   
  People, according to both Marxism & Christianity, live not in nature but in history   
  Mannheim awarded Marxism the honor of being the last utopian worldview of Western culture before the socio genetic analysis of sociology & psychoanalysis together closed off the future of illusions   

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Mannheim on Ideology & Utopia
External
Links
  INTRO: CONSERVATIVES & LIBERALS CREATE FLAWED WORLDVIEWS OF IDEOLOGIES & UTOPIAN IDEAS, RESPECTIVELY  
  Btwn ideology, the false worldview produced by conservatives, & utopia, the false worldview produced by liberals, there is at leas the possibility of completely realistic though that functions w/o friction w/in the given frameworks of life  
 
EXISTENCE DETERMINES THOUGHT
 
  Mannheim believes that it is the conditions of people's social existence which tends to determine their social consciousness
 
  People act w/ & against one another in diversely organized grps, & while doing so they think w/ & against one another 
 
  Depending on the position people occupy in the social structure & their consciousness of that position, they join grps & strive to either change or preserve the conditions of their existence
 
  Like Marx, Mannheim protests the separation of thought from action
 
  The unity of theory & action must be recognized & restored so we gain a fuller consciousness of the consequences of our acts 
 
  For Marx, theory was to guide people in changing the world
 
  For Mannheim, theory was to provide scientific guidance for action directed toward social changer, what what he called planning for freedom 
 
  The ultimate determination of truth is found in the investigation of the object or situation in that in the pragmatic sense, does it work 
 
  ANALYSIS OF THE EXISTENCE BASED ORIGINS OF THOUGHT DOES NOT REVEAL THE TRUTH OF A THOUGHT  
  Relating people's ideas to the location they occupy in the soc structure is not to address their truth & validity 
 
  Mannheim's theories can explain to us the nature & origin of ideas but not whether they are true or false
 
  In the modern era w/ the great social mobility & communication of the capitalist era, a decisive change did take place 
 
  Forms of thought & experience, which had earlier developed independently, enter into one & the same consciousness impelling the mind to discover the irreconciability of the conflicting conceptions of the world
 
  The greater  mobility, communication, & conflict which accompanied capitalist development brought democratization
 
  Democratization gave the thinking of the lower strata a greater public significance  
  Pragmatism is an attempt to formalize the thinking of the lower strata  
  A new grp today is the 'free intelligentsia who are recruited from constantly varying social strata & life situations & their mode of thought is no longer subject to regulation by a caste like org  
  THE 3 APPROACHES TO UNDERSTANDING KNOWLEDGE & TRUTH ARE: 
EPISTEMOLOGY, PSYCHOLOGY, & SOCIOLOGY
 
  There are three approaches to understanding knowledge & truth:  the epistemological, the psychological, & the sociological   
 
Epistemological theories of knowledge are part of the philosophic debates btwn the idealists & the materialist, the realists & the nominalists, the empiricists & the rationalists, etc.
 
  Epistemology questioned whether sensory experience as explored by Locke is the basis of knowledge & truth  
  Epistemology questioned whether fundamental features of reality such as time, space, causality, etc. as described by Kant mediates the experiential basis of knowledge & truth  
  Mannheim sided w/ Kant except that the qualities that impact our knowledge & truth are not fundamental universals, but rather social products that emerge as a result of our class, ideological, generational experiences  
  The psychological approach emphasizes that biographical data are important for understanding why we think what we think  
  But the psych approaches limitations are that it can never fully explain why a person thinks what they think  
  To understand thought, one must examine biography, social structure, & history in a sociological analysis  
  The merit of sociology is that it sets alongside the individual genesis of meaning the genesis from the context of grp life  
  IDEOLOGY IS THE WORLDVIEW OF OPPRESSIONS   
  The conditions of existence & the conflict of interests btwn oppressors & oppressed engender antithetical mvmts of thought  
  For Mannheim the thought forms of the oppressors is ideology  
  UTOPIA IS THE WORLDVIEW OF THE OPPRESSED   
  For Mannheim the thought forms of the oppressed is utopia  
  Early Christian though was utopian in that it expressed the resentment of the oppressed  
  The resentment of the Christians was sublimated into a mere psychic rebellion   
  IDEOLOGY & UTOPIA ARE SITUATIONALLY DETERMINED   
  Both ideological thought & utopian thought are thus situationally determined in the sense that  
  a.  each reflects  the different conditions of existence of rulers & ruled  
  b.  oppressors & oppressed  
  c.  upper & lower strata  
  d.  each reflects the interests of its carriers  
  PARTICULAR IDEOLOGY IS ONE PERSON'S WORLDVIEW   
  Ideology has particular & total aspects  
  Particular ideology refers to the conscious disguises of the real nature of the situation, the true recognition of which would not be in accord w/ one's interests  
  The distortions of the particular ideology range from conscious lies to half conscious & unwitting disguises; from calculated attempts to dupe others to self deception  
  Particular ideology, i.e. psychological ideology deals w/ an individual & unmasks him / her by discovering the true personal interests he / she hides or denies   
  TOTAL IDEOLOGY IS THE WORLDVIEW OF A CLASS  
  Total ideology refers to the total world view of a class or epoch which are the ideas & categories of thought which are bound p w/ the existential conditions of that class or epoch  
  Total ideology questions the opponents worldview & attempts to understand these concepts as an outgrowth of the collective life of which they partake  
  Examples of total ideology are conservatism, bourgeois liberal ideology, etc.   
  When people express these ideas, it is not as a matter of deceit or interests, but an expression of the outlook of a whole grp whose existential circumstances they share  
  SPECIAL SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS DISCOVERS THE ORIGINS OF ONE'S OPPONENTS WORLDVIEW   
  Total ideology requires special & general sociological analyses  
  Special soc analysis discovers the situational determination of its opponents' ideas while remaining unaware that its own thought is also influenced by the social situation  
  GENERAL SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS DISCOVERS THE ORIGINS OF ONE'S OPPONENTS & ONE'S OWN WORLDVIEWS  
  General soc analysis when one examines both the opponents, & their own pts of view to analysis  
  Gen soc analysis investigates all pts of view in a non evaluative manner w/ judgments suspended   
  The soc analyst strives to understand other pts of view not from the absolute location of their own position, but simply in relation to their own position  
  The question of which social standpoint offers the best chance for reaching an optimum of truth still remains but the social basis of an ideas & its validity are two separate questions & soc analysis focuses on the social basis not the truth of though systems  
  All pts of view, including one's own, are partial & one sided so one must consider many contending view pts which are also related to their respective social situations  
  Through the consideration of multiple pts of view the one sidedness of ones' own pt of view is counteracted & conflicting intellectual positions may come to supplement one another  
  The gen soc analysis allows one to employ a variety of perspectives  
  MANNHEIM BELIEVES THAT PERSPECTIVES / IDEOLOGIES CAN ALL SUPPLEMENT EACH OTHER   
  Weber believed that Marx's perspective was useful for understanding histl change & his own perspective supplemented it  
  With Weber & Marx, one partial truth supplemented another   
  Gen soc analysis should be based on facts  
  However objective an analysis may be, there is always a subjective evaluation inherent in it, but one stratum of society was more capable than any other of becoming conscious of its evaluations, & that was the intelligentsia  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Mannheim on the Intelligentsia
External
Links
  THE INTELLIGENTSIA IS AN AGGREGATE OF INTELLECTUALS THAT HAS THE CAPACITY TO EMBRACE MULTIPLE VIEW PTS
 
  The intelligentsia is the intellectual aggregate w/in a society, where aggregate implies the isolation or non unity of the grp, as compared to the unity of a class   
  The more common meaning of intelligentsia is the class or body of persons representing, or professing to represent, the superior intelligence or enlightened opinions of the country or public or political questions   
  The intelligentsia in general uses is a grp of persons professing or affecting special enlightenment in views or principle   
  Only the comparatively uncommitted intelligentsia is likely to approach nearer the truth   
  From its special & particularly favorable vantage pt, it could, & should, elaborate a 'total perspective' which would synthesize the conflicting contemporary world views & thereby neutralize, & to some extent overcome their one sidedness  
  The dynamic synthesis of the intelligentsia's vantage pt of multiple / total perspective is the nearest possible approximation to a truly realistic attitude, w/in the limitations imposed in a given epoch   
 
The intelligentsia is a classless aggregation which became a satellite of one or another of the existing classes & parties 
 
  The intelligentsia is not a class because they: 
a.  have no common interests 
b.  cannot form a separate party 
c.  are incapable of common & concerted action 
d.  do not have a common relationship to the means of production, e.g. profs, scientists, writers, etc. 
 
  The intelligentsia are ideologues of this or that class but never speak for themselves 
 
  The intelligentsia was btwn, but not above, the classes 
 
  Intellectuals are not a superior stratum nor does their peculiar social position assure any grater validity for their perspectives 
 
  Their position does enable them to do something others cannot do which is ability to view the problems of the day in several perspectives 
 
  THE INTELLIGENTSIA IS USUALLY PARTISAN   
  From case to case, the intellectual may act as a partisan & align her or himself w/ a class 
 
  For Mannheim, the intelligentsia has the the potential to adopt a variety of perspectives, but that does not mean they will 
 
  The intelligentsia are no better able to overcome their own class interests than other gps 
 
  Thus intelligentsia are 'relatively unattached' in that they may or may not be unattached from their or other grps interests 
 
  Intelligentsia do not react as uniformly to a situation as, for example, workers do 
 
  Certain types of intellectuals have a maximum opportunity to test & employ the socially available vistas & to experience their inconsistencies 
 
 
THE INTELLIGENTSIA IS NOT A CLASS & IS NOT ORGANICALLY ATTACHED TO ANY CLASS 
 
  When Mannheim describes the intelligentsia as 'relatively unattached' he is emphasizing the fact that after the Mid Ages, the intelligentsia became increasingly emancipated from the upper class & yet were unaligned w/ the lower classes   
  Salons & coffee houses were the first institutions where intellectuals were discernibly free & detached   
  Salons enabled people of different social backgrounds, views, stations, & allegiances to mingle, & entry to the salon required social acceptability & was in that sense restricted   
  The coffee houses were open to all & thus became the first centers of opinion in a partially democratized society   
  Membership & participation were not now determined by rank & family but by intellectual interests & shared opinions   
 
In the modern era, some intellectuals are able to escape a relationship of dependence on local habitat, institution, class, & party 
 
  The detachment of the intelligentsia is not absolute in that some writers, some scholars, some scientists 'enjoy' a relatively uncommitted position   
  The non committal intelligentsia has positive & negative aspects in that while the intellectual has a potentially wider view, & is potentially less blinded by particular interests & commitments, he lack the restraints & experience of real life   
  The intelligentsia is more inclined to generate ideas w/o testing them in practice   
  The intelligentsia loses touch w/ reality & forgets that a main purpose of thought is the orientation of action   
  BUREAUCRATIZATION / RATIONALIZATION POSES THREATS TO THE INTELLIGENTSIA   
  Bureaucratization of all aspects of social life, as delineated by Weber, applied not only to wkrs, but also to scientists & scholars   
  For Mannheim, the dangers of bureaucratization / rationalization include that:   
  a.  the intelligentsia is being separated from the means of production   
  b.  the intelligentsia is subject to specialization which narrows the compass of thought & activity, discourages the will to dissent & innovate   
  c.  more research, thinking, & scholarship is now carried out in the contest of large orgs, private & governmental   
  Other features of the bureaucratization of the intelligentsia include the:   
  a.  commercialization of research   
  b.  elimination of the security of freedom of intellectual exploration via the elimination of tenure   
  c.  development of intellectual property rights which are used to make ideas the property of corps   
  d.  consolidation of the publishing industry   
  The bureaucratic / rationalistic control of the intelligentsia is creating what Mannheim called intellectual desiccation   
  THE ROLE OF THE INTELLIGENTSIA IS POWERLESS YET INFLUENTIAL   
  The intelligentsia retains its role of diagnostic, constructive, & critical thinking   
  The intelligentsia's role does not follow naturally from its social position   
  It is only by a conscious & deliberate commitment that the intellectual can prevent her affiliation w/ parties & orgs from resulting in self abnegation   
 
Intellectuals are powerless & yet they play an influential role in the preservation of freedom & the reconstruction of society 
 
  The intelligentsia has no power in that they have little direct authority over the major levers of power in society; in that they generally are not politicians or govt agents & so have no state power, & they are not in the UC & so have no power in the econ sector of society   
  The intelligentsia has influence well beyond it  because of their education & the scientific authority which expertise conveys on them   
  The major holders of power in society, eg the UC, politicians, & govt agents typically recruit a particular intellectual or their 'think tank'  to support their positions & in this way, the power & influence of these parties & the chosen intellectual is magnified   
  Some intellectuals are so far outside the norm that no one from the UC, politicians, & govt agents will embrace or utilize their pt of view   
  Some of these radical intellectuals have, never the less, through the strength & persistence of  their intellectual power & arguments, managed to have significant influence on the world   
  Examples of main stream intellectuals include Daniel Patrick Moynihan (who was also a Senator)   
  Examples of radical intellectuals include Noam Chompsky   

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Mannheim on Reconstruction
External
Links
  MODERNIZATION MADE IT INCREASING POSSIBLE FOR A SMALL GRP TO CONTROL SOCIETY 
 
  Mannheim wrote btwn the decades of the Russian Rev (1917) & the rise & fall of Nazism 1947
 
  Following Weber, Mannheim believed that even in democratic nations, the growing bureaucratization of crucial sectors of society was an inexorable process
 
  Bureaucratization undermined democracy because it separated the people from the means of power & brought about the dominance of small minorities under capitalism as well as communism 
 
  In the 1700s & the early 1800s, democracy was based on the military power of the people
 
  In the 1900s the growing scale & concentration of military tech made it possible for large numbers of people to be intimidated, terrorized, & killed by efficient, large scale means of destruction under the control of dominant minorities
 
  The military significance of small arms, barricades, & population size diminished by the power of the people declined accordingly
 
  VISA VIE WEBER, BUREAUCRACY ALLOWS FOR A CONCENTRATION OF POWER 
 
  Bureaucracies strive for functional rationality & suppress all forms of substantial rationality 
 
 
Functional, aka formal rationality requires of the subordination of one's mind & self to a thing or mechanical process 
 
  Formal rat is the use of  organizational structures (usually bureaucracy) which constrain people to act in a rational manner in their choice of means to ends   
  Substantive rationality requires that people strive to master a situation & adapt it to their conscious ends 
 
  Substantive rationality is the dominance of norms & values in the rational choice of means to ends 
 
 
See Also:  Rationality   
 
The main trend in modern indl society is bureaucratization, or increasing formal rationalization 
 
  PEOPLE ARE LOSING POWER TO BUREAUCRACY & RATIONALIZATION   
  Bureaucratization, & formal rationalization does not raise the capacity of Everyperson for independent judgment, & is in fact paralyzing & destroying it   
  The average individual has little or no understanding of her condition, & in effect has turned over to small dominant grps the responsibility for making decisions   
  Bureaucratization, rationalization, dominance by a ruling minority increased the distance btwn the elite & the masses, & increased the 'appeal to the leader' which has become so widespread   
  With a reduced capacity for independent thinking, & accustomed to following blindly, the average person is reduced to a state of 'terrified helplessness' & impotence when the system collapses   
  Given little capacity for independent thinking & blind followership create widespread eruptions of irrational behavior whenever their is a disruption of the social system such as an econ recession or a major storm   
 
For Mannheim, people are inherently neither rational nor irrational & which type of conduct will prevail depends on the situational context 
 
  Uncontrolled outbursts & psychic regression were more likely to occur in the mass indl society than in small grps  
  Formal rat of human behavior in indl society brings a series of repressions & renunciations of impulsive satisfaction which remain repressed so long as the system works smoothly   
  With any breakdown of society, the repress impulses assert themselves as wild & powerful irrational outbursts which yield people nothing but which are successfully harnessed by the leaders  
  THE SOLUTION TO DISEMPOWERMENT IS SOCIAL PLANNING   
  The solution to the disempowerment of people via bureaucratization & rationalization which lead to irrational impulses when the system has problems, & when such impulses are harnessed by the dominant grp is social, esp econ, planning   
  The laissez faire liberal must recognize that their classic doctrine is flawed in that it is the planlessness of contemporary society that is the cause of econ crises & the breakdown of the social order  
  Mannheim advocates planning, not in the formal sense which tends toward totalitarianism, but in the democratic planning sense  
  Liberals must be made to understand that planning need not take the totalitarian form  
  For Mannheim, Marxists must recognized that class conflict, revolution, & working class power are not the preconditions for a new society   
  Mannheim recognizes that we have progressed so far as to be able to plan society & even plan people themselves, but this means society also must plan those who are to do the planning   
  The problem of who plans or controls the planners is one of the most difficult problems of modern society   
  Mannheim reluctantly admits that responsible elites need to be involved in controlling the planners   
  The responsible elites should plan for the whole society & then bear responsibility for it   
  The masses always take the form which the creative minority controlling societies choose to give them  
  An elitist conception of democracy is characteristic of all of Mannheim's work on planning   
  SOCIETY MUST LEARN FROM TOTALITARIANISM ABOUT HOW TO MAINTAIN DEMOCRATIC IDEALS   
  The hi degree of bureaucratization of the crucial sectors of society is here to stay  
  The concentration of power is an irreversible process, though decentralization here & there may be possible  
  Periodic econ crises & other crises such as war, terrorist attacks, major storms, etc. all have weakened the liberal political order   
  The working class & its leaders are divided among themselves & seem incapable of stopping fascism  
  The unemployed restless masses have come under the sway of dictators who threaten to envelop the whole world in a devastating war  
  The only choice is to learn what one can from the totalitarian states, namely, planning & other social techniques, & to apply them as democratically as possible tow the maintenance of order  
  Planned persuasion should be used, not for stirring up strife, but for encouraging behavior on which all our hopes  of peace, cooperation, & understanding  
  Mannheim advocates the use of persuasion techniques w/ caution because a small  minority, w/ so much power over all others is dangerous, but there is no alternative  
  INTELLIGENTSIA ARE INDEPENDENT & THEREFORE ARE A SOURCE OF TRUTH & ALLEGIANCE TO DEMOCRATIC IDEALS   
  Since intellectual have no power, the only option is for them to become ideological spokespeople for one or another grp  
  The role of the 'relatively unattached intellectual' was to impart scientific sociological knowledge to the various elites so that they might govern wisely & benevolently  
  The intellectuals would become an integral part of the planning authority  
  Mannheim's approach to social change is reminiscent to that of St Simon which is positivistic, technocratic, paternalistic, & elitist   
  The planning authority should decide on empirical grounds what influence to use in a given situation, basing judgments of the scientific study of society, coupled w/ sociological experiments  
  CRITIQUE:  MANNHEIM HAS WEAK DEMOCRATIC PROPOSALS   
  For Zeitlin, Mannheim's proposal for the intelligentsia aiding the elite to rule in a humane manner has sinister implications  
  Mannheim is naively technocratic  
  It is naive to believe that planning is simply a matter of applying scientific knowledge  
  Social change require little more than intelligent social engineering  
  Somehow, science & the good will of the elites would be sufficient to bring about a higher organic solidarity & Mannheim relies on Durkheim's thesis for the theoretical support  
  A new consensus must emerge planned by the scientific & power elites & the sole reason social techniques is to influence human behavior as society thinks fit  
  Nowhere does Mannheim make provisions for a genuinely democratic decision making process by which the members of society may determine their own fate  
  SOCIETY IS MOVING FORWARD & BACKWARD W/ REGARD TO DEMOCRACY  
  Since Mannheim's time, soc mvmts, NGOs, etc. have arisen which have imparted more power to the people  
  Given the 'Reagan Revolution' & defederalization, i.e. an increase in state power & the decrease in fed regulatory agencies, there has been less econ planning  
  The mid class has never embraced any econ planning that would benefit them because the upper class has convinced them that the best econ is unregulated, i.e. a laissez fair econ, while the govt's participation in planning for the elites remains out of the picture  
  The elites still embrace econ planning, when it is in their own interest as seen in 2008 when the Fed Res Bank offers profit guarantees to JP Morgan in its buyout of Bear Sterns   

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Mannheim on a Diagnosis of Our Time
External
Links
  -  Project:  The Third Way 
Link
 
THERE IS A NEW, NON UTOPIAN PATH FOR SOCIETY TO ADVANCE 
 
  Because conservatives have a distorted worldview as embodied in ideology, & because liberals have a distorted worldview as embodied in utopian ideas, Mannheim forges a third way where realistic thought functions w/o friction w/in the contemporary context  
  The third way is set neither on pushing forward nor on holding back the development of society  
  There is a strong tendency toward the polarization of society into hostile camps & only the comparatively uncommitted intelligentsia is likely to approach nearer the truth  
  HISTL EVENTS HAVE THEIR 'MOMENT' & THIS IS THE MOMENT FOR A NEW SOCIETY TO EMERGE   
 
Mannheim held that just as the revolutionary waits for his hour, the reformer whose concern it is to remold society by peaceful means must seize his passing chance
 
  Mannheim believe that post WW2 England had the chance & the mission to develop a new pattern of society
 
  The concentration of power & the growing scale of organization were an undeniable tendency in all spheres of society including the econ, political, military, the media, & communications
 
  SOCIAL TECHNIQUES ARE METHODS TO GUIDE, DEVELOP, EDUCATE, LEAD, CONTROL, ETC., THE PEOPLE   
  Mannheim refereed to 'social techniques' to describe the various political & social techniques of social control that had developed since WW1
 
  The new means of social control now allowed small grps in key positions of power to control large masses of people
 
  A few people strategically placed could make decisions affecting the lives & fate of the vast majority
 
  Social techniques had acquired a fundamental importance, perhaps even more fundamental to society than the econ structure or the social strat of a given order
 
  Social techniques can hamper or remodel the working of the econ system, destroy social classes & set others in their place
 
  LAISSEZ FAIRE SOCIETY WAS APT TO EVOLVE TO TOTALITARIANISM 
 
  After he immigrated to the UK in 1933, Mannheim argues that a completely unregulated society, such as he thought liberalism had created in Germany & the rest of the West, was apt to produce its own opposite, totalitarian dictatorship  
  To secure the values of democracy, it was necessary to avoid the weaknesses of both totalitarianism & liberalism, the first & second ways  
  As a viable synthesis, Mannheim advocated "planning for freedom," which he called the third way   
  The third way proposed a social system which would insure econ stability by regulating the more objective aspects of life, such as production, but at the same time grant freedom to people's subjective strivings, for example, in matters of taste, thereby releasing cultural creativity  
  In relation to regulating the more objective aspects of life, Mannheim became interested in education as the prime means of radical democratization  
  SOCIETY CANNOT RETURN TO THE PAST, OR ACCEPT TOTALITARIANISM, & THUS PLANNING FOR FREEDOM IS THE WAY   
  Society cannot go back to the decentralized, small scale social org of the past
 
  The concentration of power accompanying modern developments fostered oligarchy & even dictatorship, but these are not necessary outcomes
 
  The periodic breakdowns of the econ system & the resulting social upheavals make it evident that social life in modern mass society requires planning
 
  The partial planning in effect in the formal rationalization of many areas of social life is clearly not what is require
 
  Planning must be democratic & guided by substantial rationality Mannheim tried to persuade the public that laissez faire policy was now a useless & even dangerous doctrine & that planning need not be totalitarian  
  SOCIAL CONTROL TECHNIQUES CAN BE USED TO FOSTER TOTALITARIANISM OR FREEDOM   
  The third way, using social control techniques for the benevolent mgt of society, is compatible w/ democracy & freedom  
  Mannheim's third way is a mixture of Keynesian & social democratic measures  
  Mannheim is hoping that the elites will recognize their wisdom & act upon them  
  It was clearer than ever that when 'left alone,' the econ system generated greater inequalities in wealth & income, or in 'life chances' than ever before  
 
Not only was the laissez faire econ sys unjust, it lead to social tension, conflict, revolutionary upheavals, & dictatorship
 
  Social justice as well as class cooperation & social peace could be achieved by a conscious & deliberate diminution of differences in wealth & opportunity  
  The wealthy & advantaged have to be enlightened enough to make some sacrifices  
  If the elites embrace the third way, they may be able to hold onto a reasonable amt of their wealth  
  If the elites do not embrace the third way, they may lose it all  
  JUSTICE CAN BE ACHIEVED THROUGH THE USE OF EXISTING TECHNIQUES   
  The move to justice has the advantage that it can be achieved by the existing means of reform, through taxation, control of investment, public works, & the radical extension of social services  
  The third way does not call for revolutionary interference, which would lead at once to dictatorship   
  With such means, & the active cooperation of the liberal & conservative intelligentsia, & the Church could be enlisted  
  The third way requires the militant & systematic inclusion of basic values of Western society of social justice, freedom, neighborly love, mutual help, decency, respect of the individual, etc.  
  THE THIRD WAY REQUIRES BUY IN FROM ALL CLASSES   
  The third way requires more than just the assent of the elites, it also required the support of the working class & its leaders   
  Mannheim shared the illusion of his time that wartime class cooperation would continue after the war, but this proved not to be true   
  The Great Depression & WW2 had encouraged a strong sense of cooperation & fear of totalitarianism & Mannheim hoped both of these would grow during the period of reconstruction   
  Mannheim observed that revolutionary upheavals are more likely to result in dictatorships than in a good society & therefore social critics should be reformists, not revolutionaries   
  The chances of revs & fascism are slight as soon as a united party has coordinated all the key positions  is capable of preventing any organized resistance   
  EDUCATION FOR FREEDOM IS REQUIRED, FORMALLY & INFORMALLY, ON ALL LEVELS OF SOCIETY   
  Mannheim's proposal for peaceful social changer require general goodwill, class cooperation, & the rational mobilization of resources guided by the knowledge of the soc sciences  
  Soc science knowledge is an aid to those who govern, but it can also aid the governed  
  Ed in general, but esp in the science of society can help the governed check the arbitrariness of the leaders  
  The leaders need to understand that the uneducated & uniformed masses are a greater danger to the maintenance of order than classes w/ a conscious orientation & reasonable expectation  
  Ed for democratic planning is essential at all age levels, but esp for the young  
  The totalitarian states of Russia, German, Italy, Japan demonstrated that the point of the ed of the youth is that their great energy can be guided toward constructive goals  
  A nationwide youth mvmt could be organized w/ a common worldview that would cut across class lines  
  Mannheim called for a new type of awareness, not the partial class awareness that furthers class conflict, but a total awareness in which one considers general interests as much as one considers one's special interests  
  The new consensus would not preclude class conflict; rather it would lend it a democratic & peaceful form  
  Democracy is essentially a method of social change, the institutionalization of the belief that adjustment to changing reality & the reconciliation of diverse interests can be brought about by conciliatory means, w/ the help of discussion, bargaining, integral consensus  
  Class struggle preserves democracy  
  To make democracy safe is not to exclusion of social struggle, but that it should be fought out by methods of reform  
  The wkrs should realize by now that a society w/o a governing class is an unrealizable fantasy   
  The goal should be the improvement of the econ, social, political, & educational opportunities for people to train themselves for leadership, & improvement of the method of the selection of the best in the various fields  
  SOCIETY CAN MEASURE WHETHER SOCIAL CONTROL TECHNIQUES ARE SUCCEEDING   
  There are 3 criteria by which one could judge whether a society was succeeding in the implementation of his proposals:   
  a.  social control, discipline, & repression are steadily reduced to an absolute minimum   
  b.  controls & prohibitions are democratically decided upon & are above all 'humane'
 
  c.  institutions are designed to help the individual make his way but also to come to the rescue of those who have failed 
 
 
THE THIRD WAY, I.E. REFORM, LIES BTWN THE STATUS QUO & REVOLUTION   
  Mannheim's third way lies btwn the extremes of the same old routines & those who demand fundamental social changes  
  In relation to the status quo, planning counteracts the dangers of mass society, i.e. social unrest  
  The elites must embrace their sense of justice & realize that their long term interests can only be achieved by freeing the masses & involving them, democratically, in the planning of society  
  The socialists must embrace the fact that revolution may have been appropriate under the conditions of the 1800s, but in the 1900s, w/ the power of social controls, rev only leads to totalitarianism & therefore reform not rev is the way forward   
  The withering away of the state is occurs as the absolutist regimes of feudalism & early cap in the 1800s were giving way to democratic regimes   
  The econ collapses, revolutions, & the wars of the 1900s demonstrates that such collapses were followed by a strengthening of the state, not a withering   
  The social control techniques available to the elites are so efficient & powerful as to render rev against any totalitarian power nearly hopeless  
  No estbed totalitarian regime, can be broken from wi/in; it takes an external war to unseat it  
  THE SUCCESS / EXPANSION OF THE MID CLASS IS THE BASE OF SOCIAL PLANNING   
  In the UK, the main social base of  planning would be the large middle class  
 
The mid class w/ democratic institutions & traditions makes it more likely that planning is acceptable to the majority, excluding the reactionaries / conservatives who want to return to the past & the radicals / revolutionaries who want a new, socialist regime
 
  THE THIRD WAY REQUIRES INTL PEACE   
  Increasing social justice by means of democratic social planning required intl peace   
  People of Mannheim's era looked forward to the defeat of fascism & the transformation of the wartime coalitions into a lasting peacetime alliance, but as hist has shown, this optimistic vision was not to be   
  Mannheim & others were searching for, hoped for what William James called a moral substitute for war   
  The horrors of the War did launch the UN, but it to proved to be a weak substitute for the dreams the post War social critics had  
 
INTL PEACE CAN BE ACHIEVED THROUGH A BALANCE OF POWER 
 
 
Since the third way is unthinkable under conditions of intl tension & war, peace must be a priority 
 
  Mannheim supported the idea in intl relations of the balance of power btwn the US & the SU  
  Mannheim recognized that small nations could become pawns in the great power struggle  
  The super powers have a special responsibility to transform imperialist intl relations into a peaceful order  
  MANNHEIM BELIEVED THE EMERGENT MODERN CHRISTIANITY WAS PROVIDING A POSITIVE VALUE SYSTEM   
  Mannheim's new society was St Simonian in that it is hierarchical, organic & guided by scientific indl elites  
  Because even the best planners & the most substantial, or justice oriented rationality cannot avoid econ decisions that affect some grps & classes more favorably that other, organic unity requires something more  
  Just as St Simon proposed a New Christianity, Mannheim now proposed a New Social Phil based upon Christian values  
  Modernized Christianity holds hope for a new mechanism for the integration of society's value system, which had become splintered & self contradictory  
  Basic ethical principles which were altruistic & self sacrificing had to be established  
  In every planned society there will be a body somehow similar to clergy whose task it will be to watch that certain basic standards are established & maintained  

The End
 
Top