Internal
Links

Top

Review Notes on  CT 18: Weber's Methodology
External
Links
 
Syllabus
Link
  Course Schedule & Review Notes List
Link
  Review Questions for CT 18: Weber's Methodology
Link
 
Resources
Link
 
Outline on  CT 18: Weber's Methodology
 
Link
Weber on Values in Science
Link

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Weber on Values in Science
External
Links
  Max Weber originated idea of value free science, but even he knew it was impossible to accomplish  
  Weber held that science cannot decide value issues
 
  For Weber, the clarity of issues is all that science can offer us
 
  Science can provide us w/ means but not ends
 
  Science can never show the way to true values
 
  A conflict of values is inevitable
 
  Values can never be arranged through science, or otherwise, into one universal scale
 
  Weber demonstrated that it is difficult not to use Science to determine values because science offers insight:
 
  - into the nature of human actions  
  - into the meaning of certain goals
 
  - into the means of attaining goals
 
  - into the costs & consequences for those goals & goals not pursued
 
  Weber was one of the first people to maintain that the sciences should try to minimize values in research
 
  For most of the public AND many scientists (social & natural), there is assumption that science is neutral, i.e. value free
 
  But we must realize that value free science is a noble, but relatively unattainable goal
 
  Science often assumes a particular set of values
 
  Values are personal judgments or preferences about what is considered good or bad, or about what is liked or disliked
 
  Values & theory overlap because many of our value judgments are unproven "personal theories" however, this should not lead us to the belief that scientific theories can prove values
 
  Values, unlike scientific theory, can never be proven
 
  If we have a question of values, that should be resolved by the political process, the religious process, etc.
 
  Questions of science can be resolved, questions of values cannot  
  It is difficult to separate values & science on many issues
  - abortion
  - death penalty
  - pollution
  - unemployment policy....
 
  What are the questions of values & science here or in other issues?   
  A value loaded statement is one that purports to be neutral but has value statements  
Link
Examples of loaded statements  
  How do values enter into research?  
  Weber proposed value free science, though he understood that this is an impossible goal, it is something to be striven for  
  Today science has established a mantle of objectivity which holds "science is value free"  
  Values enter the scientific process through FIVE Avenues  
  a.  Values enter the scientific process through the sponsor of the research who inevitably has some interest in the outcome of the research   
  The influence of the sponsor can be minimized by asking 'Who are is the researcher working for?  What are the interests of the sponsor?'  
  b. Values enter the scientific process through the perspective or paradigm the researcher is researching from  
  For researchers, the bias inherent in a paradigm is difficult to account for because they often have difficulty conceptualizing factors that lie outside their paradigm  
  The influence of perspectives or paradigms can be seen in that different fields of science work w/in different theoretical frameworks, & are based on a set of different theories or models   
  Sociology has the paradigms of functionalism, conflict theory, & symbolic interactionism  
  Astronomy has the paradigms of the collapsing universe, the expanding universe, & the rapidly expanding universe  
  c. Values enter the scientific process through hypothesis formulation, the question is the researcher exploring, the statement of  the problem  
  Values enter in hypothesis formulation because 'the answer you get depends on the question you ask'  
  Values may be minimized in research by exploring a variety of questions & hypotheses & by using a variety of research methods, since each method asks the research question in a different manner  
 
d. Values enter the scientific process through the processes of generalization & interpretation
 
  Among various researchers, there is often strong disagreement over the interpretation of the same data  
 
e. Values enter the scientific process through bad science in the form of hoaxes & faulty research
 
  In research today, there is a very small amount of hoaxes or faked science  
  In research today, there is a very small amount of faulty or erroneous science  
 
The Scientific Method attempts to mitigate effect of values by making research process visible to all through the principle of organized skepticism
 
  Methods & Conclusions  
  Values usually do not enter the research process in the application or methods of the study, but each type of methods has its own bias  
  Values are legitimately relegated to the conclusion of a research project where they are identified as such  
  See:  Epistemology & the Antidotes to Bias  
  a. Antidote:  Question Knowledge; Have no blind faith in science;  Keep on Questioning   "Question Authority"  
  b. Antidote: Ask, "Who benefits from a given bit of knowledge?"  
  c. Antidote:  Ask  "Who controls or creates a given bit of knowledge?"  

 
Top  
Examples of Loaded Statements: 
"Conflict is bad because it usually leads to violence,
    & rarely changes anything anyway."

"We should decrease welfare payments 
    because too many people are lazy 
    & are skimming off of working people 
    when they could have jobs."

Neutral:  "Conflict leads to violence.  Conflict rarely changes things."

"We should decrease welfare payments 
    because given welfare recipients skill levels, 
    & the number & type of available jobs, 
    15% could have jobs.

It is impossible to be value free.

The End
 
Top