Internal
Links

Top

Lecture Review Notes 2:
Montesquieu
Hobbes
Rousseau
1689  -  1755
1588  -  1679
1712  -  1778
External
Links
Link
An Overview of Montesquieu       1689  -  1755  
Link
    Montesquieu on the Fall of Rome  
Link
    The Dialectic  
Link
    Montesquieu's Analysis of Various Forms of Government  
Link
    Montesquieu on the Development of the Scientific Method  
Link
An Overview of Hobbes            1588  -  1679  
Link
An Overview of Rousseau          1712  -  1778  
Link
    Discourse on Inquality  
Link
    The Social Contract  
Link
    Emile & Sophy  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 An Overview of   Montesquieu   1689-1755
External
Links
Link
-  Biography   
  -  Project:  Montesquieu & the Enlightenment 
Link
  Monte was one of the 1st to try to formulate the basic uniformities of all human behavior 
 
  Monte was influenced by Vico ( 1668 - 1744 ) who was one of 1st to construct a philosophy of society & history 
 
  Monte is the 1st to be recognized as constructing a philosophy of society & history 
 
  Vico saw regularity, order, & causation in physical & natural worlds   
  While Vico saw phases of development, or cycles, Monte saw progress as did many during the Enlightenment 
 
  Review:  The Enlightenment   
  METHODOLOGY   
  Monte sought laws of social & historical development via the scientific method 
 
  Monte discovered/formulated the scientific method   
  See Also:  The Scientific Method   
  Monte was influential in the development of the concept of the ideal type   
  Monte believed an ideal type should be universal, but must be tailored to fit each specific example   
  Monte advocated the study of social facts   
  Monte was one of the 1st to propose social laws   
  Monte was an important contributor to the concept of the orderliness of nature, which was important to the Enlightenment thinkers 
 
  Monte was influential in the sociology of knowledge, i.e., study of what we consider to be knowledge, as opposed to tradition, faith, common sense, etc.   
  SOCIAL ACTIONS DETERMINE SOCIAL IDEAS   
  Monte developed his analysis around the concept of spirit, but today we might use the terms ideology or culture for spirit 
 
  Like Monte, Weber also uses the term spirit in a similar vein in his Protestantism and the Spirit of Capitalism. (1920)   
  For Monte, & many theorists today, social position determines ideology, which is one's views of society, i.e. one's customs & ideas, world view 
 
  One of the biggest debates in the social sciences, & even among the general population is whether Monte is correct & social position determines ideology (Conflict Theory) or whether ideology determines social position (Functionalism, Post Mod, etc.) 
 
  In practice, either position can be true, depending on the particular psycho socio historical conditions   
  For more on this debate, see ideology, false & class consciousness   
  Monte proposed that general social ideas develop over time along w/, or as a result of the development of society 
 
  The development of general social ideas influencing the development of society is the thesis of Weber in his  Protestantism and the Spirit of Capitalism,. & is also similar to much of Hegel's work 
 
  For Montesquieu, because material life does affect consciousness, ideas, spirit, consciousness, therefore ideas & actions are functionally interdependent 
 
  SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS   
  Monte noted the interdependence of social institutions   
  All instit's in society are interdependent to one another & to the whole of society as seen in the interdependence of 
- education   - justice    - marriage    - family     - politics,      etc. 
 
  Monte’s work on forms of government greatly influenced the writing of constitutions throughout world, including US Constitution   
  Monte applied social theory to the fall of Rome & from this he discovered much of his social theory   
  HUMAN RIGHTS   
  Montesquieu believed that liberty was based on the balance of power   
  Monte supported human freedom & opposed tyranny   
  Monte proposed that liberty is based on separating legislative, executive, & judicial powers   
  Respect for law & liberty could exist side by side   
  A major concern for Monte was relationship of power to freedom   
  People are not free because they have natural rights or because they revolt, they are free because power is distributed & organized so as to prevent, or minimize its abuse   
  Liberty is preserved where interest groups or publics check one another as well, as the govt, & where such checks & balances are integrated into law   
  In the Persian Letters, 1721, Monte looked at French culture from another point of view, Monte traveled to Germany, Austria, Italy & England, & was impressed by English govt  
  Monte ridiculed Parisian life & many French institutions & he also criticized the church & national govts of France   
  Monte, 1689 - 1755, believed, like Locke, 1632-1704, that people are essentially morally neutral, & not filled w/ values at birth, tabula rasa   
  For Locke, & then Monte, we are a tabula rasa at birth & then we are socialized to our society's values   
  For Monte, one's position in the division of labor, one's occupations & professions, determines one's character as well as one's outlook on life   
  We are not born w/ a character, nor are we born w/ instincts, as is believed today   
  -  Human nature   
  -  Locke, 1632 - 1704   
  Monte believes that social differentiation is an important & socially valuable societal quality   
  Societal forms depend on certain conditions:  e.g., the volume of society   
  As population grows, a single person cannot perceive all the changes & factors of society   
  Social differentiation means that an increased population & stratification gives rise to divergent views and objectives   
  Differentials in property yield unequal power   
  As differentials in property develop, a republic must give way to a monarchy   
  If the checks in a society fail, despotism will arise   

 
Top
 

 

Montesquieu   1689-1755
 

Born Charles de Secondat, near Bordeaux, France
Admitted to the French Academy in 1722
Inherited the title Baron de la Brede et de Montesquieu
or Baron Charles-Louis de Secondat de Montesquieu (1689-1755)

Monte was a philosopher & jurist who was educated at Bordeaux & became an advocate, but turned to scientific research & literary work. He settled in Paris in 1726, then spent some years traveling & studying political & social institutions. His best-known work is the comparative study of legal and political issues, The Spirit of Laws (1748), which was a major influence on 18th century European political thought.


The principle of separation of powers, or of checks and balances, which is characteristic of the Constitution of the United States was formulated in such a striking manner by Montesquieu that Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, and James Madison and other founders of the United States were deeply impressed by it, and held it more or less clearly in their minds when they gave the Constitution is shape.

Montesquieu was a high judge in France but he was very critical of the regime which he served. In his youth he had been a member of the "First Floor Club" in Paris, a secret society strongly opposed to absolutism and clerical orthodoxy. He remained faithful to the club's principles but became rather moderate in his judgment on the advantages of other political systems.

His Persian Letters (1721), a thinly veiled satirical criticism of French life, made a great sensation. His Reflections on the Causes of the Greatness and the Decadence of the Romans (1734) is considered one of the most important monuments of modern historical literature. The very spirit of Roman civilization is grasped and brilliantly illustrated by Montesquieu, however much scholars of later times may object to his treatment of details. Montesquieu's major work, The Spirit of Laws (1748), was the result of fourteen years of strenuous study into political history and comparative legislation, of reading sources and observing life by traveling through many countries of Europe, and above all, of a stay in England where he arrived on Lord Chesterfield's yacht.

Montesquieu admired England, though not uncritically. Its institutions, in his opinion, guaranteed and realized the highest possible degree of freedom, and he derived this view from the application of the principle of checks and balances. This view is not shared by modern constitutional historians or jurists, least of all concerning the England of Montesquieu's days. But his work has been of lasting value to the development of methods of analyzing political, social and legal conditions and their connection. Next to John Locke, Montesquieu was the most influential champion of liberalism in the 18th century. Some ideas put forth by Montesquieu have had an influence on Classical Liberalism.

From: Adventures in Philosophy 
http://radicalacademy.com/adiphilpolitics3.htm


 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Montesquieu on the Fall of Rome
External
Links
  -  Project:  Comparing Revolutions 
Link
 
Monte went beyond the examination of the Fall of Roman civilization in that he sought to explain the rise, development, & fall  
 
Monte believed that social & physical factors interacted to cause the Fall of Rome  
 
Monte generalizes & finds that there are cultural & physical cause that affect the rise, maintenance & fall of systems of power & even civilizations  
 
For Monte, physical factors such as climate, soil, etc. are limiting factors affecting a society such as Rome  
 
Monte believed climate had an important influence on temperament & thus on conduct  
 
Social factors were just as important as physical factors in relation to the fall of Rome  
 
Monte saw both the interdependence of institutions & dialectical relationships  
 
Roman institutions are seen as functionally interdependent
 
  Rome was a military society & thus it's social structures of peers, family, govt, econ, etc. were dominated by the military social structure  
 
Roman institutions are seen as dialectical because their final collapse is seen as a consequence of their initial success
 
 
     Review: The Dialectic  
  The Roman Empire expanded until it's borders spanned the continents of Europe, Asia, & Africa, stretching the military to it's limits  
  The prominence of a militaristic society resulted in:  
  -  the lack of development of ag & the econ in general  
  -  civil war  
  -  the ideology of 'live by the sword; die by the sword,' i.e. a dirth of the rule of law & civil dispute resolution  
 
-  'the Games'  
  -  the display of wars' treasure  
  -  monument building  
  -  the glorification of the elite  
  -  the pacification of the non military sectors of society  
 
Tensions w/in Roman society could not be overcome because they were inherent in the military society  
  The antithesis of Roman militaristic society, was it's collapse, & the development of civilization in the late Middle Ages, i.e. the Renaissance Period & later, was the new synthesis  

 
Internal
Links

Top

Outline on the Dialectic
External
Links
  -  Video:  The French Revolution 
Link
  -  Project:  The Dialectics of the French Revolution 
Link
  THE DIALECTIC DENOTES THAT SOCIAL RELATIONS DEVELOP, & CREATE THEIR OWN WEAKNESSES, WHICH ARE THEN RESOLVED THROUGH NEW SOCIAL RELATIONS, WHICH CREATE THEIR OWN WEAKNESSES...   
  Dialectics: 
Stage: 
                Explanation: 
Thesis  Social relations develop, 
Antithesis  which creates its own weaknesses 
Synthesis  which are then resolved through new social relations 
 
Link
Chart on the Dialectic   
  As a synthesis is reached, resolving the old conflicts of the antithesis, the new social relations develop & become a thesis, & the dialectical cycle begins again   
 
The Chart on the Dialectical Tree of Development 

The Chart on the Dialectical Tree shows how each synthesis becomes a thesis, w/ new social relations, which create contradictions in the form of a antithesis, indicating that dialectical relations constantly continue to evolve 

 
  DIALECTICAL DOES NOT MEAN MUTUALLY INTERDEPENDENT  
  Many people, even some social theorists, misuse the term dialectic to mean a mutually, interdependent relationship such as btwn income & education:  one's level of education is impacted by one's income; & one's income is impacted by one's education   
  Some relationships are dialectical, & mutually interdependent   
  Culture & social structure are dialectically related in that one may evolve into the other through the dialectical process; furthermore, culture & social structure affect each other in a mutually independent manner on a day to day basis   
  The history of the dialectic is that it's first known reference is w/ ancient Greek societies   
  The dialectic was first made famous by Hegel, & then more so by Marx, & also by Freud   
  One of the lessons of the dialectic is that stability is impossible & progress is inevitable   
  The dialectic embodies the idea that the old must be destroyed to pave the way for the new   
  The dialectic embodies the idea that progress may appear as other than progress, i.e. destruction   
  Aristotle believed that development, individual & societal, was a natural process that should occur in an unhindered manner where no disturbing influence could intrude  
  HEGEL'S DIALECTIC HELD THAT IT WAS THE DEVELOPMENT, CONFLICT, & RESOLUTION OF IDEAS / IDEOLOGY THAT CHANGED THE WORLD   
Link
Examples  
  The dialectic is one place where Marx is said to have "Turned Hegel on his head"   
  For Hegel, historical ideas dialectically developed & then shaped the world   
  For Marx, material relations in history dialectically developed which then shaped our ideology, culture, law, etc.   
 
Dialectical materialism is the analytic method that all social phenomena are formed as a result of material relationships   
  A reversal of Hegel's dialectical idealism, dialectical materialism holds that everything is material & that human beings create social life solely in response to economic needs   
  Materialism rejects idealistic explanations, such as those examined by Hegel   
  Both Hegel & Marx would agree that development depends on the clash of contradictions & the creation of a new, more advanced synthesis   
  Marx applied dialectical materialism to the economy:   
 
Social phenomena form as a result of material relationships, i.e. economic relationships 
 
  Material, or economic, relationships themselves form dialectically   
  Dialectically, a new form of production w/ new relations of production replaces the old & allows yet a newer form to begin develop which will eventually replace the old   
  In a dialectic relationship, growth, change, & development take place through a naturally occurring struggle of opposites, a process that individuals cannot influence   
 
Marx applied dialectics to history is his development of the concept of historical materialism 
 
  Historical materialism holds that history develops dialectically in that one era develops problems which are resolved by the new era   
  By way of a dialectical process, social, cultural & political phenomena are determined by the mode of production of material things   
  Thus, for Marx, we end up w/ historic epochs based largely on economic relationships   
  In a dialectical relationship, all aspects of society are considered to reflect the economic structure, & classes in society are determined by their relationship to the means of production   

 
Top
Chart on the Dialectic
An argument of logic, which holds that...
...each condition creates or embodies the  Thesis 
Which development it's own weaknesses / seeds of destruction, which are called the  Antithesis 
Until they are resolved by established new conditions, which are called the  Thesis 

 
Top
 
Examples 

Each attempt at control sews the seeds of its own destruction. 

Pollution was an advantage for businesses but people organized against it. 

Assembly line allowed for greater control of workers. 
But working together made people more likely to organize 


 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Montesquieu on Forms of Government
External
Links
  -  Project:  Monte's Forms of Govt & Your Design 
Link
 
Monte believed that there are SIX Forms of Government, including the:
 
 
a. savage
b. barbarous
c. republican            democratic
d. aristocratic           democratic
e. monarchical
f. despotic
 
 
There are direct relationships between political systems & other social & nonsocial conditions
 
 
a. The savage form of govt 
- has a small population
- holds land in common
 
  - has conduct regulated by customs, not laws  
  - usually forms in a society of hunters in small, non sedentary societies, which would be viewed this as a hunter gatherer society in today's classification  
 
b. The barbarous form of govt 
- has a small population
- holds land in common
 
  - has conduct regulated by customs, not laws  
  - is sedentary in that the people reside at one locale & raise cattle & grow crops which would be viewed as an early agricultural society of the pre-empire era  
 
c. The republican form of govt:
- exists when all people have power
- has restrictions on accumulation of wealth & power
 
  - is democratic        Note:  Monte is ignoring the non citizens  
  - is generally a small nation such as seen in the Greek & Italian city states of Athens, Sparta, & early Rome  
  - exists when all citizens are equal, & there is social homogeneity  
  - might become an aristocracy if there is a loss of social equality or an accumulation of wealth & power  
  - has conditions of general solidarity prevailing among the population  
  - has the condition where virtue is the spirit of society  
  In the republican form of govt, virtue is viewed as what might be called "the common good"  or "rational"  
 
d. The aristocratic form of govt 
- has on a few people w/ power
- has virtue as the spirit of society
 
  - is generally seen in medium sized nations  
  - is democratic, but an even narrower demo than the Republic  
  In the aristocratic  form of govt, virtue is viewed as what might be called "the common good"  or "rational" as determined by the few people w/ power  
 
e. The monarchical form of govt
- is generally seen in large nations
 
  - is more likely to have the emergence of social classes  
  - is more likely to have a complex division of labor  
  - has the maximum level of political freedom as compared to other forms of  govt  
  - has a system of checks & limits to the power based on classes of  the monarch & other citizens   
  Under the system of checks & limits to power, individuals & groups now disregard the general welfare in favor of personal & class interests.  
  The system of checks & limits to power anticipate the utilitarian doctrine which holds that what is good for the individual  is good for society  
  Utilitarianism holds that many small good acts add up to the benefit for society  
  - has honor as the spirit of society  
  Thus the "common good" is replaced by "individualism" as seen in the famous quote 'What is good for Ford is good for the nation'  
  Examples of monarchical forms of govt existed in the early Greek, Latin, & German states  
 
f. The despotic form of govt 
- is generally seen in large nations
- has power primarily in the tyrant. 
- has fear as the spirit of society
 
  - is likely to form when checks & balances  fail  
  - is likely to form when one group or person becomes so powerful that they can rule the society  
  Examples of despotic forms of govt existed in the early Oriental nations of China, Japan. & others  
  The Contingency Theory of Society  
 
Monte developed the roots of "contingency theory of society"
 
  For Monte, the contingency theory of society holds that no single govt is universally appropriate for all societies & different kinds of govt were appropriate for people who live in different parts of the world  
 
In support of the contingency theory of society, Monte found
 
  - free govt. exists more frequently in nations in the northern hemisphere while despotism exists more frequently in the nations in the southern hemisphere  
 
- that the contingencies of each society make a different form of govt appropriate
 
  - that there are + & - features of each form of govt  
 
Monte saw his task as to determine what features of a society fit a particular form of govt
 
 
Monte anticipates several branches of sociology:
 
 
What held one type of society together was different from what held another type together
 
  In relation to Monte's contingency theory of society position that societies are held together by different social forces,  
 
- Durkheim found mechanical solidarity holds traditional societies together & organic solidarity holds modern societies together
 
 
- Weber found that charismatic, traditional & rational societies all have different social forces operating
 
 
- Marx found that ancient, feudal, capitalist, socialist, communist societies went through historical, dialectical processes which transformed the social forces predominating in each 
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

Outline on  Montesquieu on the Development of the Scientific Method:
The Contextualization of Knowledge
External
Links
  Monte on the contextualization of knowledge:  
  Monte was one of first to explore the branch of theory called epistemology or the sociology of knowledge  
  As a consequence of his work in Persian Letters, Monte understood that all knowledge is contextual, i.e., we, as individuals, & each society understands its major ideas in relation to its values, morals, history, economic system, etc.  
  The coneption of the contextualization of knowledge leads to conclusion that there is no absolute knowledge available to people  
  The conception of no absolute knowledge is consonant with Monte's view on political systems that each pol sys is contingent on the various factors of society, i.e., the social institutions  
  For Monte, all features of society are interrelated as seen in the contextualization of knowledge, the contingency of pol systems, & so on  
  Monte on the origins of the scientific method:
 
  Monte noted that during the Enlightenment period, modern scientific methods were developed  
  W/o classification, science & the understanding of reality is impossible, so, the 1st thing that must be done is description, classification, typefication  
  Aristotle only classified:
- political states
- morality
- religion
- economics
- families
 
  For Monte, each of the social sciences areas seemed so variable that no one thought they could be classified  
  Monte notes that the physical & life ciences also require classification, interpretation, & explanation  
  Scientific methods are grounded in the tenets of the Enlightenment, particularly the tenet that scientific methods presuppose order & rationality  
  Because we each have a particular context, limited experience, vision, understanding, etc., errors are unavoidable  
  Monte developed TWO features that took the scientific method from its medieval limitations to its modern form, including:
- the study of social facts
- the  interpretation of social facts to determine laws that govern humanity
 
  Monte's scientific method is described in his  The Spirit of the Laws, 1748  

 
Internal
Links

Top

An Overview of 
 Thomas Hobbes
      1588  -  1679
External
Links
Link
-  Biography  
  -  Video:  Hunter Gatherer Society 
Link
  Galileo's work on physics influenced Hobbes
 
  During Hobbes' times, Galileo's work on the new physics was just being worked out  
  From Galileo's work, Hobbes concluded that only matter exists & that everything that happens can be predicted in accordance w/ exact, scientific laws which was a foundation for materialism & the clockworks model
 
  Many believed that Hobbes' view denied the existence of both God & a free human soul, but Hobbes denied this
 
blank
The English Civil War had a great influence on Hobbes
 
  Because of the bloody & treacherous English Civil War, Hobbes concluded people were selfish & are moved chiefly by desire for power & fear of others  
  Hobbes, views that people were selfish power seekers shocked his contemporaries, just as they continue to shock today  
blank
Hobbes’ influence has been great, & continues to this day
 
  Hobbes denied that people are naturally social beings  
  People's most basic motives are selfish considerations  
blank
For Hobbes, power is the means to obtain some future apparent good
 
  Hobbes' view of power as a means to obtain some good is a more social view of power than in the past when it referred primarily to as coercion, but an even more social view of power is power as the ability to get people to do as you wish  
  All people have a natural & restless desire for power  
  We cannot guarantee our present power, w/o acquiring more  
blank
Hobbes believed that the natural condition of people, i.e. in pre-historical society, was one of equality
 
  Rousseau agrees that the natural / pre-social, condition of humanity is of equality
 
  Hobbes said that in pre-hist society it is equality that creates war because when all people are equal, or when they see another is weaker, they each try to gain an advantage 
 
  Hobbes surmised that the weakest has strength & cunning enough to kill the strongest
 
  When one person or party is stronger, they rule & peace is attained
 
  Rousseau disagrees w/ Hobbes' view that equality creates conflict
 
  For Rousseau, it is not equality that creates war, but rather organized govt  
  For Hobbes, the dream of equality creates war
 
  Equality in capacity gives rise to the hope of equality in ends  
  We fight to gain what we feel is rightfully ours creating a war of every person against every other  
  In the condition of equality, "Life becomes a war of all against all."
 
  Hobbes believed that pre-hist people lived in a continual fear & danger of violent death & thus he believed that 'life is solitary, poore, nasty, brutish, & short'  
  In the state of nature, force & fraud prevail & there is no right or wrong, justice, cruelty, etc.
 
  Fear of war makes society possible
 
  The social contract is based on fear  
  When we do not fear the other, we revert to war  
  The fear of falling into a (total) state of war is what leads to a modicum of reason & to form a social contract  
  For Hobbes the social contract is that people submit to force rather than fight, & in this submission they gain a sovereign
 
  People give up their natural liberty & submit to an authority who in turn protects them  
  It is the terror of the sovereign that holds the war of all against all in check  
  A contract w/o the sword, is but words, & of no strength to secure a person at all  
  Hobbes was unpopular during his lifetime  
  As is the case today, people were shocked at Hobbes' violent view of basic human nature  
  Rulers of time banned his work because he posited a nat reason for the structure of society which replaced the god/king given rationale for the structure of society  
  It is “that great Leviathan, 
or rather (to speake more reverently)...
that Mortall God, 
to which we owe under the Immortall God, 
our peace & defence.” 
 
  Hobbes' Leviathan is a metaphor for the “monster” of government  
  War is natural & peace is social  

 
Top
 

Thomas Hobbes

1588  -  1679

Born in Westport (now part of Malmesbury), England
Ed at Oxford
Served as secretary to Sir Francis Bacon
Tutor to William Cavendish
    who became Earl of Devonshire
H traveled widely w/ Cavendish, exposed to
    European philosophers & scientists
During the English Civil War, 
H fled to the continent
He tutored the Prince of Wales, later Charles II
Returned to England while Oliver Cromwell was still in power
Yet, H was still able to make peace w/ Charles II 
    when he became king in 1660

Top
 
Important Works of   Thomas Hobbes   1588 - 1679

Hobbes' most famous work: 

The Leviathan:  The Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth, Ecclesiastical and Civil Society (1651)  written during the English Civil War


 
Internal
Links

Top

An Overview of
Jean Jacques Rousseau
1712  -  1778
External
Links
  -  Project:    Hobbes Debates Rousseau
Link
  Summary:
The heuristic device of natural people allowed R to understand culture. 
One of the 1st to systematically address inequality
He saw classes in society as having a big influence
Inequality lead to strife & war
He saw the possibility of change
 
  Rousseau was French, & the most imp philosopher of the Age of Reason
 
  R's work was perhaps most important for the Fr Revolution of 1789, even though those revolutionaries ignored many parts of his work  
  Rousseau believed that it was inequality that caused conflict, as opposed Hobbes who believed equality caused conflict
 
  Rousseau was one of the first to systematically address inequality, ultimately finding that inequality lead to strife & war  
  In his analysis of inequality, R saw that classes in society have a big influence in all spheres of life  
  R's analysis was unique because he saw the possibility of change as opposed to the traditional view that humanity was in a permanent state of being  
  While it is widely understood today that inequality leads to strife & war, in the 1700s, inequality was considered not only natural but good
 
  As is still the case today w/ many people, "Gettin' above yer upbringin'" was not only wrong, but against the social order & would lead to chaos & anarchy & was therefore against god's will, i.e. was immoral  
  Rousseau asked: 
What experiments are need to discover the natural person & natural society?
How can we create the positive characteristics of the natural society this w/in society today? 
 
  Rousseau believed we could discover the characteristics of the natural person & the natural society through FIVE  methods, including the:
 
  a.  observation of animals  
  b.  study of primitive people, recognizing that they have acquired some social attributes  
  c.  use logic or thought experiments to remove all social attributes, such as language  
  By stripping away social qualities, we also strip away our biases & ideology, so it is more possible to arrive at truth  
  d.  examination of feral children??  
  e.  compilation of common characteristics of various natural people & societies??  
  For Rousseau, there are two realms:  the natural & social
 
  Currently there is a big gap between the natural & social realms, but this could be reconciled  
  To reconcile the natural & social realms, we must understand the dual nature of people, or each person, in that we each embody the natural person & the social person
 
  Rousseau's state of nature is a hypothetical construct by which people are stripped of social & cultural aspects
 
  This heuristic device of natural people allowed Rousseau to understand culture  
  The “natural person”  is divested of what she/he has acquired in society:  living in isolation
 
  The natural person does not have cruel & warlike tendencies because these are characteristics acquired in society
 
  People should need only what is found in immediate physical env
 
  Natural people have only sensations;  no knowledge / language
 
  Rousseau accepted Condillac’s view that knowledge, as we understand it, is impossible without language
 
  Therefore a person in nature has neither language nor knowledge
 
  Rousseau thought the basic human needs were only food, a mate, rest, shelter, clothing
 
  R believed that humanity had no natural war-like tendencies, rather these tendencies were created by inequality in society  
  Surprisingly, R did not postulate any need for knowledge or language  
  For R, the natural person cannot conceive of the future
 
  Harmony is achieved between our internal nature & external nature through the satisfaction of all needs  
  In the state of nature, conditions for discord are wholly lacking  
  Therefore, the relation among humans is not a state of war, the natural relation among humans is a state of peace  
 
For R, people, by their very nature, are good & it is society that causes corruption & vice  
  In a state of nature, the individual is characterized by healthy self love  
  Our natural self love is accompanied by a natural compassion  
  In society, natural self love becomes corrupted into a venal pride  
  Venal pride seeks only the good opinion o others & in so doing, causes the individual to lose touch w/ his or her true nature  
  For R, the loss of one's true nature ends in a loss of freedom  
  Rousseau::  Hobbes, Freud, Marx, Feuerbach  
  Rousseau believed that Hobbes had given his “natural people” social qualities  
  Freud agrees w/ R in that there is an irremediable antagonism between our natural & social nature  
blank
Marx also had theories about the natural state of society:  species being, which are complementary to Rousseau's position  
  Marx & Rousseau agree that inequality causes strife & war  
blank
Feuerbach agrees w/ R that the best social system is that which allows people to realize their full potential  
  Rousseau influenced both philosophy & literature  
  R foreshadowed the Romantic movement (mid- 1700s to mid 1800) by his valuation of feeling in contrast to the Age of Reason's emphasis on rationality  
  R valued feeling at least as much as reason  
  R's utilization of feeling & reason can be seen in his living life based as much on impulse & spontaneity as self discipline  
  He popularized descriptions of nature  
  Confessions popularized intimate autobiographies  
  Education was primarily discussed in his work Confessions  
  The Romantic Movement began w/ Rousseau & Hume, was later developed by Kant  
  While R was an Enlightenment thinker, he was considered unconventional in his methods his "romantic" version of "natural people"  
  R did not organize society around abstract principles, rather he relied on the development of the:
- inner moral will
- conscience
- convictions
 

 
Top
 


Theorist Jean-Jacques Rousseau
1712  -  1778
Early Life 
Born in Geneva, in what is now Switz 
His family was Fr, Protestant with a 200 yr heritage 
R's mother died in child birth: raised by a quarrelsome father 
Father was a watchmaker 
R received little formal ed 
1722:  father fled Geneva as a result of a fight 
R's uncle then raised him 
1728, 15 years old, R ran away & became a wanderer, failing at many jobs. 
Was attracted to music & could not decide on music or lit 
Converted to Catholicism
Top
 

Mid life
R settled down w/ older woman, Madame de Warens
Autobiography:  Confessions, describes his happiness
But he left in 1740  (28 years old)
1741:  entered Paris.  Tried to make it in music: developed a new style of notation
Started to associate with the Philosophes
They sponsored him as sec to Fr Ambassador in Venice
1749:  (37 years old) turning point in his life: 
Entered a contest sponsored by the Fr Academy: 
Was revival of activity in sciences & arts contributing to moral purification?
R realized he opposed existing order & decided to work for change. 
R submits his essay & won prize & fame he so long desired
Top
 

Later Life
When R converted to Catholicism, he lost his citizenship
Converted back to Protestantism & regained citizenship
1757:  quarreled with Fr philosophes
He was feeling personally attacked

R wrote beautiful essays, poetry, plays, music, on botany
R went mad late in life.


 
Internal
Links

Top

An Outline on
 The Discourse on the Origins of Inequality (1775)
 
by Jean Jacques Rousseau     1712  -  1778 
External
Links
  -  Project:  Hobbes Debates Rousseau 
Link
  -  Project:  Rousseau on the Origin of Society 
Link
  Summary 
Discourse on the Origins of Inequality, 1755 
In the natural state, people are isolated & indifferent to each other 
R agrees with Hobbes 
The natural person, aka the noble individual, is egoistic, solitary & even brutish 
The natural / pre social, condition of humanity is of equality 
 
 
For Rousseau, war arises from unmet needs in society 
 
  Needs are unmet in the natural world, but this does not lead to war   
  For R, war is a social institution; people learn to make war   
  Do individual people fight in natural society? 
 
  The Natural Man; the Natural Woman; the Noble Savage   
  The heuristic device of natural people allowed Rousseau to understand culture   
 
For R, natural people
 
  - are withdrawn & tend to live separately   
  - are happy to live alone   
  - possess a natural sympathy towards others   
  - experienced no inequality yet because it did not yet exist   
  - experience vanity, envy, love, loyalty, etc.   
  Even w/o language, people can place themselves in the place of another   
  Yet sympathy is not the basis of society   
  R characterizes the natural person as the noble individual, & some called them the noble savage, because while their scientific & technical skills may be crude compared to modern society, & while their moral code may appear alien, primitive or savage, people adhered rigorously to societal norms & thus were noble   
  A society characterized by noble individuals means that there is little deviance in that people are tightly integrated into the the mainstream culture of that society   
 
For R, SIX events created the origin of society, including 
 
  a. the increase of the population   
  b. the increase of cares & concerns of everyday people   
  c. barren years   
  d. difficult conditions   
  e. people banding together to form the 1st families & then banding families together to form societies   
  f.  people learning to speak a common language   
 
At the origin of society, there still was no material inequality even though the feelings of vanity, envy, love, loyalty, etc. were all present 
 
  R prefers societies that existed just btwn the origin of society & traditional society to the natural state   
 
The anthropological evidence shows that R had many aspects about pre historical society correct, & some aspects wrong 
 
 
The anthropological evidence about natural society is that: 
 
  -  people lived in tribes, of about 50 to 300 people   
  -  there was great harmony w/in tribes, relative to today 
 
  -  there was a high level of equality as compared to today or in other known forms of society in the past   
  -  while there was a high level of equality, this does not mean society was 'perfect' because there may have been some limited gender differences in that men & women had different roles which are difficult to judge on equality, yet both men & women could achieve the highest status available in the tribe   
  -  there was little theft, murder, rape, adultery, except the socially acceptable level, varying greatly among tribes 
 
  -  there was very limited war btwn tribes for territory, food, women, but not for conquest or slaves   
  -  life was not solitary, but it was “poore, nasty, brutish, & short.”   
  -  war btwn tribes was normal, but rare because there was very low population, & there was little of a material nature to gain   
  -  w/in most tribes, harmonious social relations prevail in that there was little murder, rape, robbery, etc., except for changes of leadership   
  -  govt arose as a result of extended family units from w/in a tribe & from treaties of tribes   
Link
Was R right about natural society? 
 
 
R believed that econ development created society & inequality in that  cultivation, domestication, & the division of labor created all kinds of social inequality 
 
  Some people began to prosper more than others & passed on this accumulated wealth to their children   
  For R, as a result of econ dev, strata & classes emerge & society becomes divided against itself   
 
Private property & society caused inequality 
R saw society & private property as causes of inequality & oppression 
Once people live together in society, they become evil 
Society corrupts the noble individual by bringing out her/his inclination toward aggression & selfishness 
Some poor acquiesce & submit to tyranny while some people plunder the poor & the rich 
 
 
Like Locke, R thought govt arose 
- to protect property, 
- to protect the rich 
 
Link
Was Rousseau right about the origin of inequality? 
 
 
Rousseau believes that the origins of war are in society 
 
  War is not a conflict of individuals in a state of nature, war is always a a social phenomenon   
 
For R, Hobbes is wrong to assume that people made society & submitted to a Leviathan to escape war in the natural state 
 
  We make war as members of organized society; one society against another   
 
For R, we become a citizen first & a warrior second 
 
 
Class & civil conflict is the result of social inequalities 
 
  The state arises to control war   
  In Hobbes’ view, the state is established for mutual security & protection   
  R & Hobbes agree that the state controls & limits war but they disagree in that:   
  R believes the state make war in the midst of a peaceful population   
  Hobbes believes that the state has limited war to suppress the was of "all against all"   
  Social Change   
  On the topic of social change, R was an Enlightenment style optimist: 
 
  He believed that through the social sciences, society / life could be improved, i.e. social change was possible   
  He was one of the first to systematically address inequality   
  He saw classes in society as having a big influence & this inequality lead to strife & war   
  He saw the possibility of change if we could reduce inequality   

 
Top
 
Was Rousseau right about Natural Society? 
No
We were not isolated 
We had language 
Yes
We were relatively more peaceful & harmonious compared to modern society 
There was a high level of equality 

 
Top
 

Was Rousseau right about the origin of inequality? 
Yes, as far as we can tell 
But we have no society w/o 
the accumulation of wealth, 
private prop 
inheritance 

Rousseau also seems to be correct on the Origin of the State: 
True democratic societies did not arise until Rousseau's time 
Before that nearly all govts were dictatorial 

So we cannot be positive 
& no one has organized a society w/o these features 


 
 
Top
 
Was Rousseau right about Natural Society?
No
We were not isolated
We had language
Yes
We were relatively more peaceful & harmonious compared to modern society
There was a high level of equality

 
Top
 

Was Rousseau right about the origin of inequality?
Yes, as far as we can tell
But we have no society w/o 
the accumulation of wealth,
private prop
inheritance

Rousseau also seems to be correct on the Origin of the State:
True democratic societies did not arise until Rousseau's time
Before that nearly all govts were dictatorial

So we cannot be positive
& no one has organized a society w/o these features


 
Top
 
Events leading to the origin of society

In the Discourse on Inequality, for Rousseau, many events created the origin of society, including
- the increase of the population
- the increase of cares & concerns of everyday people
- barren years
- difficult conditions
- people banding together to form the 1st families & then banding families together to form societies
- people learning to speak a common language


 
Internal
Links

Top

An Outline on the  Social Contract 
by Jean Jacques Rousseau   1712  -  1778
External
Links
  For Rousseau, the ideal state has a balance btwn human needs & available resources
 
  Rousseau believes that people are perfectible, but only w/in a society
 
  The unity of society is a function of mutual need, coercion, & least often, reason
 
  Durkheim says that society is held together by organic solidarity which is a form of mutual need structured in the division of  labor  
  In a society of unequals, people's varieties of needs are asymmetrical  
  Freedom & happiness are dependent on understanding the social laws of nature
 
  Because of our limited perspectives & insufficient knowledge, we err  
  We act contrary to our nature by establishing a social order that violates natural laws  
  Rousseau's objective is to find the social order most in sync w/ natural laws
 
  The present social contract is based on the tacit agreement that:  'You need me because I am rich & you are poor.  I will permit you to serve me under the conditions that I give you.  What little you still have, I will take for the trouble of leading / protecting you'
 
  This contract is coercive & today we also understand that contracts btwn unequals are a special class of contract which requires that to be fair, the weak deserve special protections  
  If authority is to have moral value, one must freely submit to the general will
 
  Social unity must be founded on liberty which is an active submission to the general will  
  Today people are not united by reason in liberty  
  Today people are divided by inequality & held together by force thus creating a system which is contrary to our nature  
  The unnatural inequalities such as inheritance soon acquire stability & legitimacy  
  If in natural society a state of equality is possible, then modern society in a state of equality is possible
 
  For R, there no inherent conflict btwn natural existence & society & furthermore, the grandeur of society far outweighs its evils  
  Rousseau did not propose going back to a state of nature, but rather develop a society where all were protected by state
 
  Rousseau's concept of a social contract is fundamental to social & political theory
 
  A social contract is made up of unstated reciprocal obligations btwn people & govt  
  The social contract is where one gains an equivalent right for every right given up  
  Hobbes, Locke, & Grotius viewed society as a contract which established the state by subjugation of its members
 
  Rousseau proposes freedom & equality:  even popular sovereignty
 
  Rousseau advocated a govt controlled by the people
 
  Many wrongly interpreted Rousseau as advocating subordination of individuals to the general will  
  Individuals must not subordinate themselves, but assent only to obligations that each believes to be valid & necessary  
 
A just society replaces the individual's natural freedom of will w/ the general will
 
 
A society based on the general will is based on a social contract by which each person alienates all of his or her natural rights to create a corporate person, the sovereign, who is the repository of the general will
 
 
The person never looses freedom, but rediscovers it in the general will
 
 
The general will acts always for the good of society as a whole
 
  INEQUALITY  
  Rousseau believes that some inequality is normal
 
  Rousseau was not a total equalitarian & he believed that inequity in property ownership is unavoidable  
  The inequity of property ownership only became a problem when it endangered the moral equality of the citizens, that is, if one class becomes instruments for another  
  For R, the solution to a level of property inequality which endangered  the moral equality of the citizens was to place limits on inheritance of wealth  
  Limiting inheritance of wealth has periodically been a popular,  modern political idea & thus in the US there has always been some inheritance tax on multimillionaires  
  Today, w/ the rise of the Reagan Republicans, there has been a reduction in inheritance taxes & serious talk about eliminating it  
  Govt, for Rousseau, functions to protect rights
 
  Citizens loose some rights & gain the assurance of protection by society against powerful individuals & groups  
  Each citizen is a member of a society of equals under the law  
  There is a difference between subjugation of an individual & subjection to a community  
  Compromises are needed in the social contract & they are accomplished through representative democracy
 
  It is nearly impossible to have democracy, other than in a small community  
  We need representatives & the delegation of powers  
  Govt is a threat to freedom & yet is indispensable  
  R believed that aristocracy may be the best form of govt  
  For R, the aristocratic form of govt is a compromise between democracy & monarchy  
  The aristocratic form of govt is composed of a minority based on age & experience  
  See Also:  Montesquieu on the Forms of Govt  
  For free society to succeed, Rousseau believed the nation must be the right age  
  For R, if the society is too old, it is likely to be inflexible, while if the society is too young, it is likely to be undisciplined  
  For free society to succeed, Rousseau believed the nation must be the right size  
  For R, if the society is too large, it is likely to lack homogeneity, while if the society is too small, it may not be able to maintain itself  
  Rousseau favors a small society based on model of ancient city state or Geneva Republic  
  A society may be dependent on a charismatic figure to unite it  
  For Rousseau, the best society has THREE qualities, including
- a simple, agricultural society in which desires could be limited, 
- the control of sexual & egotistical drives, 
- & energies directed toward community life
 
  Many social institutions are necessary for participatory democracy  
  Any form of govt could be legitimate if people gave their consent willingly  
  All forms of govt would decline & could be restrained only through control of moral standards & the elimination of special interest groups  
  Rousseau wrote, The New Heloise in 1761, as both a romantic novel & a criticism of the false codes of morality  
  For R, while society corrupts human nature, it also represents the possibility of its perfection in morality  
  Human interaction requires the transformation of natural freedom into moral freedom  
  The trans from nat freedom to moral freedom is based on reason & provides the foundation for a theory of political right  

 
Internal
Links

Top

An Outline on   Perfectibility Through Education: Emile & Sophy
by Jean Jacques Rousseau    1712  -  1778
External
Links
  Project:  Emile & Sophy:  Raising Our Young
Link
  In relation to Emile & Sophy, Rousseau asks, 'Should education be different for men & women?  Why?'
 
  While education was important for Rousseau, it was not emphasized in any of his works except Confessions  
  Many of R's opinions on the ed of men & women are sexist & wrong, therefore the task is to determine to what extent men & women should be educated differently, i.e. engage in educational gender segregation,, & to what extent ed gender seg is sexist  
  R believes that the natural differences btwn the sexes requires that they be educated differently & separately
 
  Mary Wollstonecraft opposed R's view of educational gender segregation & supported co-education  
  For R, since a child's earliest education is most important, it is undoubtedly women's work  
  God would have had men breast feed, if child rearing & education were for them  
  Instead of developing natural gifts, children & adults are to be subject to control, constraint, & compulsion  
  Rousseau believes that we are imprisoned by institutions
 
  In addition to class based inequality, another origin of  institution of control is the refusal of mothers to fulfill 1st duty to nurse their own children, entrusting them to nannies who swaddle
 
  Upper class women ceased performing the main duties of motherhood  
  Child can learn from & will be better educated by a sensible though ignorant father than by the cleverest stranger
 
  FIRST PHASE OF BOYS' ED  
  Emile's education consists of a daily bath, fresh air, heat & cold, loose clothes to encourage his ability to learn to distinguish btwn pain from things or individuals
 
  SECOND PHASE OF BOYS' ED
 
  People should be educated through a process of gaining wisdom through experience & striving for liberty  
  Children need to learns two types of dependence, including the dependence on:
things, which is the work of nature
people, which is the work of society
 
  Dependence on things does no injury to liberty, etc.  
  Today many environmentalists & social critics would argue that peoples' dependence on things has become pathological for individuals as well as our society as a whole because materialism requires so many resources & because material objects now have the ability to isolate people from others  
  Dependence on people results in vices, e.g., master & slave relationships  
  The words 'command & obey' will not be in the child's vocabulary
 
  The only lesson for a child in the second stage is to never hurt anybody 
 
  Other lessons for a young child includes rigorous exercise, & exposure to that which he fears
 
  The taste for meat is unnatural  
  THIRD ED PHASE:  PUBERTY
 
  The child is ready to transform sensations into ideas  
  In all education, stay within immediate env: learn geography about local conditions.
 
  All work is judged in terms of benefit for humanity: 
 
  Emile learns to respect shoemaker more than jeweler
He learns about interdependence of humans
 
  Emile must learn work appropriate for his age & sex: 
 
  R believes that no man ever wanted effeminate indoor work: e.g., tailoring  
  R believes that repetitive, unskilled work is not appropriate  
  The first seeds of humanity must be sown in adolescent male's heart, otherwise he might become addicted to women & debauchery
 
  Emile understands pain because has experienced pain & striving
 
  Emile learns to put no trust in good health  
  The rich's ills are largely of their own making  
  The poor's come from external hardships that fate has imposed. Emile sees that all people have intelligence, rich & poor alike  
  Now he is ready to learn religion  
  SOPHY'S ED  
  For R, man is master, but is dependent on women  
  Woman has power of stimulating man's passions in excess of Man's power of satisfying them & is thus dependent on her good will & compelled to please her  
  Woman is reminded of her sex & her special functions by her biological makeup. 
        [ Men aren't?]
 
  The inequality in life is not of Man's doing  
  Men & Women are co-dependent  
  If men & women are different, their education must be different  
  R's segregated gender ed mvmt is still alive today, though the vast majority of people in the West are co educated  
  Woman is to be Man's helpmate, not handmaid  
  The training of body comes before the training of mind  
  Women should be taught nurturing & women's work  
  They don't like things that appeal to men, such as reading  
  Women should be kept busy at sexually appropriate tasks & taught restraint  
  While Women have less of a capacity for abstract thinking, they are a good judge of men  
  Women should dress simply but elegantly  
  In both sexes, Rousseau sees those who think & those who do not & this difference is caused by education  

The End
 
Top