Internal
Links

Top

Review Notes: Social Movements
External
Links
Link
Social Movements  
Link
   Examples of Social Mvmts  
Link
   Socio Historical Analysis of Social Movements  
Link
   Social Movement Orgs (SMOs)  
Link
   Interest Groups  
Link
   New Social Movments' (NSMs)  
Link
   Non-Governmental Orgs (NGOs)  
Link
   Similarities btwn Soc Mvmts & Collective Behavior  
Link
   Differences btwn Soc Mvmts & Collective Behavior  
Link
Types of Social Movements  
Link
   1. Transformative Mvmts  
Link
   2. Counter Mvmts  
Link
   3. Redemptive Mvmts  
Link
   4. Reformative Mvmts  
Link
   5. Revolutionary Mvmts  
Link
   6. Alternative Mvmts  
Link
Resistance to Soc Mvmts   
Link
   Ridicule as Resistance to Soc Mvmts  
Link
   Co-Optation as Resistance to Soc Mvmts  
Link
   The TVA & Organizational Co-Optation  
Link
   Social Control as Resistance to Soc Mvmts  
Link
   Formal Social Control as Resistance to Soc Mvmts  
Link
   Violence as Social Control & Resistance to Soc Mvmts  
Link
The Importance of Soc Mvmts  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Social Movements
External
Links
  -  Supplement:  Video:  Social Mvmts
Link
  -  Video:  Living Wage:  The Insider Story:  UVa, 2006        3:07 minutes
Link
  -  Video:  Living Wage:  The Arrests:  UVa, 2006      27 sec
Link
  -  Video:  The US vs. John Lennon          1 hr 36 min
Link
  A Social Movement is a large number of people acting together on behalf of some objective or idea
 
  A Social Movement usually involves use of non institutionalized means such as marches, protests, rallies, boycotts, etc., to support or oppose some social change
 
  A defining characteristic of a Social Movement is that it involves substantial numbers of people for an extended period of time
 
  A social movement is a group of people who organize in an attempt to encourage or resist some kind of social change  
  A social movement is a group of people who have no political power who join together in order to acquire some  
  People in a social mvmt hope to influence their community or their society by joining together  
 
A Social Movement has an agenda that it seeks to promote
 
 
Generally, the agenda of a soc mvmt is contained w/in a larger ideology, which is a  world view (a set of beliefs & values) that it seeks to promote
 
  The success of a social movement depends on its ability to convince participants & general public of the merits of its objectives
 
  A Social Movement has large scale membership, a promotional character, & a sophisticated administrative process whose structure varies as the Social Movement develops
 
  For many social theorists, Social Change & Social Movements are part of a historic, dialectical & mutually reinforcing relationship
 
  Redcliff & Benton demonstrate that there are FOUR broad perspectives to the examination of social mvmts, including:  1.  the Descriptive Approach, 2.  the Historical Approach,  3.  Systematic Classification,  4.  the Comparison of Soc Mvmts & Interest or Pressure Groups  
  1.  The descriptive approach, though not founded on post-modernism, is post modernist in its view that there is no consistent logic that captures all the qualities of soc mvmts  
  Because there is no consistent logic, analysts should rely on general description therefore we must rely on a general description  
  For Yearly there is no categorization that adequately describes Soc Mvmts & we must rely on description & consensus as to what is a SM & what is not  
  Most collective behavior theorist consider soc mvmts to be a type of collective behavior, but others see soc mvmts as a separate, unique form of social behavior
 
  2.  The historical approach to examining soc mvmts attempts to articulate the interest of some developing historical actor  
  Giddens notes that articulating interests may seem easy in retrospect, but is very difficult in practice, & even the most skilled analysts can rarely predict the future beyond a few days or weeks w/ any accuracy  
  See Also:  The History of Soc Mvmts  
  3.  The systematic classification of social mvmts examines the different functions of soc mvmts in society & as well a comparison of the roles or niches that different types of soc mvmts fulfill  
  One important type of systematic classification of social mvmts is done by Giddens in his examination of the institutional dimensions of modernity  
  For Giddens the major institutions of modernity are capitalism, surveillance, militarism, & industrialism  
  For Giddens the power of the major institutions of modernity is being met, reflexively, by soc mvmts  
Link
The Table of the Institutions of Modernity & the Reflexivity of Social Mvmt shows that soc mvmts balance, challenge, temper, etc. the actions of the most powerful structures of modernity  
  See Also:  Giddens  
  4.  The separation of soc mvmts from "pressure grps" is an important distinction that many analysts fail to make  
  For Redcliff & Benton, soc mvmts do cognitive praxis in that they produce innovative knowledge claims while pressure mvmts are a subset of a soc mvmt in that the latter may disseminate the knowledge that  soc mvmts create  
  Praxis the combination of theory & social action  
  Soc mvmts define a new way of thinking, a world view, an ideology  
  However, some soc mvmts seem to have no new ideology, i.e. Moral Majority, & these types of mvmts are considered to be a unique type, often called counter mvmts, which are attempting to re-assert an old ideology  
  Major soc mvmt subjects
Political mvmt (revolution)
Labor mvmt 
Women's mvmt 
Civil rights mvmt 
Envl mvmt 
Peace mvmt
 

 
Top
 
The Table of the Institutions of Modernity & the Reflexivity of Social Mvmts
PW
External
Links
Institution of Modernity
Reflexive Social Movement
 
Capital accumulation Labor mvmt  
Surveillance Democracy/free speech mvmt  
Military power Peace mvmt  
Industrialism Ecology mvmt  
The Table of the Institutions of Modernity & the Reflexivity of Social Mvmt shows that soc mvmts balance, challenge, temper, etc. the actions of the most powerful structures of modernity  

 
 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Examples of Social Movements
   
External
Links
 
Name of Movement
Approximate
Time Span
Classic or NSM
 
  The Crusades
1000 - 1300
Classic
 
  The American Revolution
late 1700s
Classic
 
  The Abolitionist Movement
pre Civil War
Classic
 
  The Anti Abolitionist Movement
pre Civil War
Classic
 
  The Labor Movement
circa mid ages ...
Classic
 
  The Prohibition Movement
late 1800s ... 
NSM
 
  The Suffrage Movement
1600s ... 1920
Classic
 
  The Civil Rights Movement
1400s ... 
Classic
 
  The Women's Movement
1600s ... 
Classic
 
  The Pro Life Movement
1800s ...
NSM
 
  The Pro Choice Movement
1800s ...
NSM
 
  The Environmental Movement
1960s ...
NSM
 
  Tiananmen Square
1989
NSM
 
  The Peace Movement of the 1960s
1960s - 80s
NSM
 
  The Peace Movement of the 1980s
1980s
NSM
 
  The Gun Rights / Second Amendment Movement 
1940s
NSM
 
  The End Famine Movement
1950s ...
NSM
 
  MADD
1980s ...
NSM
 
  The Animal Rights Movement
1930s ...
NSM
 
  The Anti Globalization Movement
1990s ...
NSM
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the  Socio Historical Analysis of Soc Mvmts
External
Links
  For many social theorists, social change & social mvmts are part of a historic, dialectical & mutually reinforcing relationship  
  The dialectical & mutually reinforcing relationship btwn social change & social movements is seen in the demographic change of 
-  the Baby Boom
-  the relationship btwn it & the post WW2 growth of higher ed, 
-  both of which spawned student activism around Civil Rights, Vietnam, the Womens' Mvmt, & the Env Mvmt
 
 
Alain Touraine (1977, 1981) developed an analysis of historicity in soc mvmts examining why there are so many more mvmts in the modern world than there were in earlier times
 
  In the pre modern era, i.e. before the industrial revolution, soc mvmts as we know them were rare  
  There were few soc mvmts because:
authoritarian regimes brutally oppressed any dissent
-  there were generally only two classes, & the lower class had virtually no power or resources; 
-  communications & transportation were difficult making it difficult to consolidate people, their resources & power; & 
-  any significant trend toward a soc mvmt was usurped & developed through political systems, i.e. the Crusades
 
  What are now known as the core nations transitioned from traditional societal forms to modern industrialized forms; from agricultural feudal economic systems to industrial econ systems; & from authoritarian kingdoms to democracies  
  Modernization, industrialization, secularization, & democratization have all allowed such social forces as soc mvmts, dissent, & individual & group deviance to flourish  
 
In the modern era, individuals & grps know that social activism can be used to achieve social goals & reshape society
 
 
Nations that have not experienced modernization, industrialization, secularization, & democratization are more likely to oppress soc mvmts, dissent, & individual & group deviance
 
 
Social mvmts are more common in core nations than in peripheral & semi peripheral nations
 
 
Social mvmts are more common in democratic societies than authoritarian nations
 
 
In core nations, interest groups become more common & far more diverse, & social control weaker, which makes it easier for people to organize against conditions or ideas they oppose
 
 
Democracy allows interest groups to flourish & become more diverse whereas authoritarian regimes view social movements as a threat & use techniques such as surveillance & imprisonment to immobilize them
 
 
Modernization, including industrialization, makes the authoritarian practices of surveillance, imprisonment, harassment, assassination, deportation, etc. more difficult to carry out because people have resources to fight such tactics
 
  The former Soviet Union's authoritarian regime kept many social forces under it's control  
  When the Soviet Union collapsed in the 1990s, Eastern European & Central Asian nations & regions underwent rapid social change  
  In general, Eastern European nations have become more democratic unleashing a wide variety of ethnic, religious, & nationalist mvmts  
  In general, Central Asian nations have become less authoritarian than the former Soviet Union & have developed theocracies  
  Historically the major social mvmts which developed in the US include the Labor mvmt, the Civil Rights mvmt, the the Anti War mvmt, the Womens' mvmt, the Env mvmt, & others  
  The major, early soc mvmts in the US have become institutionalized in that they are widely practiced, important, necessary, & taken for granted part of modern soc structures  
  Some contemporary mvmts include the Nuclear Freeze mvmt, gay rights, intl human rights, animal rights, consumer rights, & others  
  An important quality of soc mvmts today is the development of the soc mvmt industry  
  As the early soc mvmts became institutionalized, they developed the soc mvmt industry which functions both to support &, to a limited extent, create soc mvmts  
 
The soc mvmt industry offers ready made, for sale support knowledge tech, process tech, & physical tech on the production of ideology, soc mvmts, etc. 
 
 
Soc mvmts are highly networked in that many work together & support each other
 
 
Non governmental organizations (NGOs) are closely related to soc mvmts, but are more likely to be engaged in direct assistance or support to a particular class or group of people
 
  NGOs will often try to minimize their ideology in order to raise $$ to support their assistance efforts  
  NGOs & soc mvmts both utilized the soc mvmt industry  
  Soc mvmts, the soc mvmt ind, & NGOs all form a network, which is tightly linked to govt  
  Redclift and Benton (1994) note that little attn is paid to inter soc mvmt relationships; i.e., the extent of soc mvmt cooperation, conflict & it's effect on the shape of society  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Social Movement Orgs
External
Links
  Often "young" or new soc mvmts appear to have no organization in that they seem to be a group of individuals committed to a goal who occasionally get together to pool resources
 
  Young or new soc mvmts w/o any formal org may be understood as a network, or a peer network
 
  Soc mvmts which are peer networks are little different from a circle of friends who pursue their goals of intimacy, entertainment, except that soc mvmts pursue soc mvmt type goals
 
  But the word 'movement' in social movement denotes that they are usually composed of many individuals or groups working toward some common goal & that most successful mvmts are led by one or two large orgs, but there may be dozens of smaller ones as well
 
  The 3rd wave feminist movement that began in the US in the 1970s included feminist orgs such as NOW, the National Women's Political Caucus (NWPC), & the Am Assoc. of University Women (AAUW)
 
 
Formal & informal orgs w/in a soc mvmt often coordinate w/ one another, share resources, personnel, etc. & form coalitions to increase their power & visibility
 
 
Because of this network quality of all soc mvmts, some sociologist consider them to be mere collective behavior, little different from a mass of people, while other social scientists consider them to be unique, more organized, & institutionalized in society
 
  Soc mvmts often engage in lobbying as does an interest group; however, soc mvmts are more than interest groups in that they engage in a much wider array of behaviors  
  Professional soc mvmt orgs often employ interest groups, marketers, pollsters, fund raisers, mgrs, & other experts, on their behalf  
  See Also:  Interest Groups  
  The label 'new social movements' (NSMs) is given to the newest forms of soc mvmts like the civil rights mvmt, womens' mvmts, env mvmt, etc. to differentiate them from older forms of soc mvmts such as the Crusades  
  See Also:  New Social Movements' (NSMs)  
  Non-governmental Orgs (NGOs) are a new form of new social mvmts that are a hybrid btwn charities & service orgs & soc mvmts that perform some of the tasks modern society often attributes to govt  
  Non-governmental orgs (NGOs) are sometimes branches of soc mvmt, sometimes just ind orgs, that perform services that are traditionally done by govt  
 
The similarities btwn soc mvmts & collective behavior are all derivative of the fact that they both perform non institutionalized tasks, i.e. they function in spheres of society that are outside of the norm  
 
The differences btwn soc mvmts & collective behavior are all derivative of the fact that soc mvmts are more formally organized & col beh is more organizationally fluid  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Interest Groups
External
Links
 
An interest group is organized to pursue specific interests in the political arena, operating primarily by lobbying the members of legislative bodies
 
  In the recent past, interest grps were almost exclusively lobbying grps; however, today interest grps engage in an entire range of tasks that support lobbying  
  Interest grps often engage in public education in order to raise awareness of their issue, to mobilize their constituency, & to oppose counter-interest grps positions  
  Public education is often tied to issues around particular candidates & thus interest grps now are, in effect, campaigning for the candidates of their choice  
 
Interest grps today often lobby a legislative body, & more recently have also become involved in the public & admin rules making process
 
 
Interest grps today have also become involved in the implementation of admin rules & serve as watchdogs on govt activities
 
 
In order to accomplish the tasks of lobbying, public rules making, admin rules making, & rules implementation, interest grps must raise money & thus they have a strong public relations branch to educate their constituency & raise money from that constituency
 
 
Interest grps may be distinguished from social mvmts in that most social mvmts have or employ an interest grp to impact govts at the admin level, the legislative level, the executive level, the judical level, & so on
 
 
Interest grps may be linked to a soc mvmt, but they may also be much narrower focusing on just their one issue
 
  Political movements would be a subset of a soc mvmt  in that soc mvmts define a new way of thinking/world view/ideology while political mvmts generally try to reflect existing world views  
 
Soc mvmts do cognitive praxis in that they produce innovative knowledge claims, while interest grps generally only represent existing knowledge claims
 
  Soc mvmts often employ, hire, or ally interest groups, lobbying groups & other similar types of orgs  

 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  New Social Movements
External
Links
  Project:  The Intersection of Culture & Social Structure via Social Issues by Social Group
Link
 
New Social Movement ( NSM ) are the social mvmts that have arisen in the later half of the 1900s in conjunction w/ the rise of democracy & modernization
 
 
NSMs are distinguished from older social mvmts in that the latter were much more rare, often had to develop into a political mvmt or revolution to succeed, did not have the advantages of voice that democracy offers, nor of communications, the media, etc. as modernization offers
 
 
Old social mvmts include the Crusades, the Reformation, revolutions, etc. while the NSMs include the Labor Mvmt, the Civil Rights Mvmt, the Women's Mvmt, the Env Mvmt, etc. 
 
 
The NSMs arose w/ the demise of of traditional working class, the decline of industrial jobs
 
 
Since the 1950s, the Working Class is down from 50% to 20% of the population w/ less than 15% unionized in US
 
 
Structural change in 1st world
 
 
Since the 1950s there is a decline of social democrats: as seen in the Reaganist dismantling of Keynesianism, welfare state & other achievements of the FDRites
 
 
The failure of social democrats to achieve their goals through traditional politics has fostered the fragmentation of the social groups supporting FDRism & social democratic policies into the NSMs
 
 
A strength & weakness of the NSMs is that they must now accommodate diverse groups including the working class, ethnic & gender minorities (minorities in terms of power) and new middle class of NSMs such as the feminists, env grps, peace grps, anti-nuke grps, etc. 
 
  NSMs often offer a broad critique of society as seen in their position that  
  - modern society is based on materialism  
  - modern society is based on individualism in that we often either ignore the problems of others or assume they are individual & not social in nature  
  - science, rationalism, modern society, etc. have the ideology of omnipotence & infallibility, but are flawed, possibly fatally flawed  
 
NSMs often embrace the modernist view of social change & knowledge, while some such as the anarchists eschew the modernist view in favor of chaos theory, post-modernism, nihilism & so on
 
 
The limits of  the modernist NSMs includes the viewpoint that...
 
 
1.  -  knowledge is based primarily on limited scientific knowledge
 
  "Knowledge" is an unexamined combination of Knowledge which is tested, 'valid' science (which has limitations) & Beliefs which are untested 'valid' ideas  
  Environmentalism must be based on more than just environmental enlightenment (physical science knowledge about the env)  
  People view social problems in different ways, using different criteria including scientific knowledge, values, politics, jobs, etc.  
  Scientific knowledge & beliefs are not fixed, rather they are experiencing rapid change  
 
2.  -  science is politicized in environmentalism, abortion, & other social issues that enter the realm of public discourse
 
 
3.  -  beliefs are a product of all levels of social existence
 
  Beliefs are formed through experiences in social structure & culture  
  Just as knowledge is learned through everyday experiences of teaching & ed, trial & error, etc., so beliefs, values, & norms are learned through everyday experiences of faith, tradition, etc.   
Link
The Table on the Intersection of Culture & Social Structure via Social Issues by Social Group shows that knowledge, beliefs, values & norms surrounding an issue vary depending on what structure of society one is functioning in & by the group to which one belongs  
  The concept of master status embodies the idea that people may have a dominant social structure or social group to which they belong which in our society is usually one's occupation  
  However, even one's master status may be significantly influenced by one's relationship to another sphere of life such as ones' family, peers, religion, education, etc.  
  The relationship btwn social issues, social mvmts, social grps, culture, & social structure demonstrates that to a large extent all culture is local, i.e. situationally specific  
 
4.  -  the identity of social problems come & go, i.e. enter & leave the realm of public discourse, on the basis of "knowledge AND beliefs"
 
  Knowledge is changed by science, politics, the media, social mvmts, etc.  
  The concept of the "social construction of reality" holds that the creation of the env debate is a product of science, media, politics, culture, etc.   
 
5.  -  many social issues are now globalized have have an impact, interest groups, & constituencies around the world, & these diverse groups & levels of analysis are extremely difficult to synthesize
 
 
Env problems, policies, grps, etc. all must comprehend all levels:  global->national->regional->local->personal
 
 
The globalization of social issues can be seen in the dictum, "the personal is political," in that whether I drive a gas hog or an economy car, or whether I heat w/ coal, oil, nuclear/electric, wood, or super-insulation, or whether I eat fast food or from my own garden are all personal choices & global issues
 
 
The difficulty of synthesizing the interests of diverse groups & multiple levels of social existence can be seen in the failure of the env to understand the peripheral nations, the interests of the working class, businesses, & env racism
 

 
Top
 
Table on the Intersection of Culture & Social Structure via Social Issues by Social Group
Social Issue: 
Social Movement or Social Issue that is concerned w/ this issue: 
Culture -->


 Social Structure  \/

 Knowledge

 

Beliefs

 

Values

 

Norms

 

Peers        
Family
 
     
Religion
 
     
Govt
 
     
Military
 
 
   
Economy
 
 
   
Charity
 
 
   
Education
 
 
   
Media
 
 
   
Recreation & Leisure
 
 
   
The Table on the Intersection of Culture & Social Structure via Social Issues by Social Group shows that knowledge, beliefs, values & norms surrounding an issue vary depending on what structure of society one is functioning in & by the group to which one belongs

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Non Governmental Orgs
External
Links
  -  Project:  Video: The Power of NGOs
Link
  -  Video:  Lou Dobbs:  The Power of NGOs             3:47 minutes
Link
 
Non governmental orgs ( NGOs ) are those orgs & networks that conduct govt or state functions which include the new govt functions of charity, family administration, religious admin, militarism, & so on
 
 
Examples of NGOs include all types of orgs from the Red Cross, Family Crisis Support Services, Families of the Military, Greenpeace, etc. 
 
 
NGOs are usually, but not always, non profit; however, they are becoming increasingly business like
 
 
Even non profit NGOs are being organized & administered like businesses
 
 
Etzioni notes that people have varying levels & types of commitments (varying value commitments, utilitarian commitment, etc.) to different types of orgs like NGOs
 
 
See Also:  Etzioni  
 
Profit vs. Non-Profit Orgs
 
 
Non profits have a nondistribution constraint in that they cannot distribute profits to owners or those in control
 
 
Some analysts believe that in non profits mgrs do not have the profit restraint as an incentive to manage effectively in 
- the control of costs
- seeking new mkts
- innovation
- expansion
- etc.
 
 
With the expansion of the number & choices of non profits & NGOs, they effectively compete w/ each other for charitable dollars, & thus do have incentives to manage effectively
 
 
Both traditional businesses & NGOs have incentives to act responsibly & to not engage in anti social acts such as
- taking advantage of consumers
- providing shoddy goods or services
 
 
However, given the scope of the mkt for both businesses & NGOs, it is apparent that a few of both types of orgs produce shoddy products or services, or engage in outright fraud
 
 Link
The Table on the Comparison of Business Firms & NGOs shows that while they vary on a wide variety of qualities, today they are experiencing institutional isomorphism, i.e. they are becoming more alike
 
 
NGOs are frequently more dependent on their org network to function in that a small charitable org may network w/ several other local & national charities in advertising, holding awareness events etc.
 
 
Because of their networking quality, NGOs are often networked w/ one or more social mvmts  
 
See Also:  Social Mvmts  
  NGOs may actually be the parent of a social mvmt, & sometimes as a social mvmt becomes institutionalized, they spin off NGOs  

 
Top
 
Table on the Comparison of Business Firms & NGOs
PW & ?
Org Quality
Economic ( Business ) Org
NGOs ( Voluntary Orgs )
Instit Isomorphic Quality
 
Incentive system utilitarian incentives normative, affective incentives Econ orgs are striving to become more socially responsible while NGOs are increasing efficiency FB MC TF
Commitment resources from the mkt members & constituency bring resources NGOs are utilizing more mkting strategies & tactics  
Structure Complex div of labor w/ horizontal differentiation Simple div of labor w/ a simple structure Econ orgs continually spin off or merge in an attempt to become more efficient while NGOs are becoming bigger & more complex  
Leadership & authority Hierarchical, centralized decision making, prof leadership Collegial, confederated authority w/ a democratic ideology & decision making & amateur leadership Because of scandal at Enron & World Com & others, econ orgs are becoming more responsive to investors & because of inefficiency, NGOs are becoming more hierarchical, centralized, etc.  
Orgl Environment Specialized structure favored in a stable env & orgs tries to become the center of its org network Structure favors turbulent env w/ many orgs in peripheral, dependent position in its org network Econ orgs are experiencing a more turbulent env  
Effectiveness The goals of profits, growth are quantifiable The goals of aggregation & expansion of member interests are ambiguous measures of success Critics on all sides complain how econ orgs are replacing their goals of profits w/ social responsibility while NGOs are replacing their member interests w/ goals of profitability  
The Table on the Comparison of Business Firms & NGOs shows that while they vary on a wide variety of qualities, today they are experiencing institutional isomorphism, i.e. they are becoming more alike  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the   Similarities btwn Social Movements & Col Beh
External
Links
  Soc mvmts are like col beh in that...
 
  -  participants in both do unusual & unexpected things that they would not do if they were not participating in the mvmt
 
  social norms governing the behavior of the participants in both soc mvmts & col beh are new & in flux
 
  -  participants in both do things & hold norms that go against social norms & expectations
 
  -  participants engage in non-institutionalized behavior that may be considered odd or deviant
 
  -  the existence of a soc mvmt, as opposed to the action of an institution, may be relatively short lived, i.e. a few months or years as is the case w/ a fad  
  -  both begin in relatively the same manner in that, an object of attention or precipitating situation brings like minded people together  
  Soc mvmts alter people's behavior just as much as any form of col beh  
  Protests, sit-ins, petition drives, etc. are not part of everyday life for most people, but these things are typical in the daily life of soc mvmt
 
  Participants in a soc mvmt may break laws, challenge authorities, & even publicly denounce powerful people or institutions
 
  It is the perception that participants' behavior is "odd" or "wrong" that links soc mvmts to other types of col beh
 
  Like any other form of col beh, soc mvmts engage in group deviant beh
 
  Important theorists like Turner & Killian, & Smelser note that the behavior of soc mvmt participants is fundamentally different from the behavior of nonparticipants
 
  Fads, crazes, riots, & soc mvmts all entail people acting in ways that they would not act if it were not for a common group definition of the situation & social influence from other group members
 
  Participants in fads, crazes, riots, & soc mvmts are all motivated in that, their participation serves some purpose for them
 
  Participation in any of these forms of collective behavior helps to reduce some anxiety or strain w/in the situation or society
 
  For many social theorists, there is little significant difference btwn soc mvmts & col beh, i.e. btwn a radical protest org & the Y2K hysteria
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the  Differences btwn Social Movements & Collective Behavior
External
Links
Link

SM08f

  Soc mvmts are different from other forms of col beh in that they are organized, often into formal orgs, that in the case of the labor mvmt, the civil rights mvmt, the feminist mvmt, & the env mvmt may be thought of as being institutionalized
 
1 SC
PW
FB MC TF \/
  Most collective behavior is unorganized, or at best a loose network
 
Loch0113 \/
  Riot participants might cooperate for a short time period, but it is usually more of a free-for-all than an organized event
 
 
  Typical col beh leadership comes & goes quickly, if it exists at all in that, whoever manages to grab a crowd's attention can influence the entire group's behavior
 
 
  Soc mvmt participants are often given specific tasks to perform & their may be a carefully designed strategy
 
 
  Leaders of soc mvmts create jobs & make careers out of leading specific orgs dedicated to the cause of the mvmt, e.g., the NRA, Tea Party, Right to Life, AFL-CIO, NAACP, NOW, Sierra Club, etc.
 
 
  While participants in a soc mvmt & a fad appear the same in that they may both engage in unusual behavior to pursue their goal, the soc mvmt participants are usually part of a large org that has, at a minimum, given them tactical & strategic goals
 
 
  Soc mvmts are more deliberate than other forms of col beh in that they are intentionally created & participants carefully decide whether or not to join
 
 
  Col beh is less deliberate than soc mvmts in that col beh episodes occur w/o anyone planning them ahead of time
 
 
  Soc mvmts have pledge drives, membership drives, etc. 
 
 
  Soc mvmts seek publicity as a means of achieving their goal, whereas participants in a fad or craze may seek publicity, but usually such exposure is secondary or simply gives the participants vicarious rewards
 
 
  There is little deliberate behavior in most col beh
 
 
  Soc mvmts are much more long-lasting or enduring than other forms of col beh & indeed the labor mvmt, the civil rights mvmt, the feminist mvmt, & the env mvmt may be thought of as being institutions, i.e. part of the fabric of our social life
 
 
  A riot may last for minutes, hours, or days & a fad may last for a few months or a few years while soc mvmts may endure for decades, if not indefinitely
 
 
  Many soc mvmts only last for a few weeks or years if they fail to gain a constituent base, or if they achieve their goal  
 
  Soc mvmts that seek to change an entire society often last for decades    
  Soc mvmts become rooted in major orgs like the AFL-CIO, et al, utilizing letter head, multiple office suites, large staff, & have budgets of millions of dollars    
  The goals of many soc mvmts are difficult to achieve & long-range in nature so they form w/ the knowledge that it may take generations to achieve    
  Col beh is characterized by its brevity  
Loch0113 /\
FB MC TF /\

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the  Types of Social Movements
External
Links
  -  Project:  Classify the Types of Soc Mvmts
Link
 
Because soc mvmts are so historically new, & because the study of soc mvmts is even newer, & because there are so many types of soc mvmts which are evolving & changing, there are several important types or categories of soc mvmts
 
  Interest Groups  
  NSM  
  NGOs  
 
There are EIGHT types of soc mvmts, including
1.  Transformative mvmts   (aka Protest mvmts)
2.  Counter mvmts              (aka Regressive mvmts)
3.  Redemptive mvmts        (aka Religious mvmts)
4.  Reformative mvmts
5.  Revolutionary mvmts
6.  Alternative mvmts
7.  Communal mvmts
8.  Personal cults 
& some theorists delineate one more, viewing Religious Mvmts as a separate form of Redemptive Mvmt
 
 
The types of soc mvmts should not be confused w/ the various soc mvmts themselves such as the Labor mvmt, the Civil Rights mvmt, the Peace mvmt, the Women's mvmt, the Env mvmt, etc. 
 
 
1.  Transformative mvmts (aka Protest mvmts) are soc mvmts which aim to produce major processes of social change throughout society  
 
2.  Counter Mvmts  (aka Regressive mvmts) are social mvmts who seek to undo social change or to oppose a Transformative or Reformative Mvmt  
 
3.  Redemptive Mvmts  (aka Religious mvmts) are social mvmts which seek to rescue individuals from ways of life seen as corrupting  
 
4.  Reformative Mvmts are soc mvmts whose objective is to achieve some limited reform, change an entire community, & sometimes, but not often, remake the entire society  
 
5.  Revolutionary mvmts are soc mvmts whose objective is to achieve some radical change, & remake the entire, or most of society  
 
Revolutionary mvmts are a type of transformative mvmt
 
 
A revolutionary mvmt hopes to achieve radical change through the elimination of old social institutions & the establishment of new social institutions
 
 
Revolutionary mvmts are rare compared to transformative or reformative mvmts
 
 
Rev mvmts often occur when a series of reform mvmts have failed to achieve the objectives they seek
 
 
While rare, revolutions do occur & are usually historic in nature as seen in countries as diverse as the US, Russia, France, Cuba, China, Iran, Mexico, Zimbabwe, & the Philippines
 
 
Many countries have also experienced unsuccessful revolutions, including Chile, Argentina, Hungary, etc.
 
 
6.  Alternative mvmts are soc mvmts whose objective is to bring about change by securing partial change individuals  
 
7.  Communal mvmts are soc mvmts whose objective is to bring about change by the example of building a model society among a small group
 
 
Communal mvmts seek not to challenge conventional society directly, but to build alternatives to it
 
 
Some communal mvmts create household collectives, popularly known as communes, in which people live together, share resources & work equally, & base their lives on principles of equality (Kanter, 1972, 1979)
 
 
Some communal mvmts develop work collectives, in which people live separately but jointly own, govern, & operate an org that produces & sells some product or service (Rothschild-Whitt, 1979)
 
 
8.  Personal Cults are soc mvmts which occurs in combination w/ one of the other types of soc mvmts
 
 
Personal cults are centered around a person, usually a charismatic individual
 
 
The person at the center of a personal cult is revered by the people in the mvmt & may be elevated to a godlike status
 
 
Personal cults are particularly common among religious & revolutionary political mvmts
 
 
Examples of personal cults include Jim Jones & the People's Temple, David Koresh & the Branch Davidians, Do & the Heavens Gate group
 
 
Personal cults need not all be so radical as seen in fan fanaticism, or in the devotion to a political leader like Mao Zedong, or JFK
 
 
The classification of soc mvmts may be done by ranking them on their Breadth of Change & Depth of Change
 
Link
The Table on the Breadth & Depth of Change in Social Mvmts demonstrates that the breadth & depth of change in society impact the type or nature of social mvmts
 
  Some soc mvmts impact individuals, some impact significant parts of society, & some impact the entire society  
 
Each of the types of soc mvmts may be seen as having a limited or radical change component, & may apply to individual, groups, or all of society, depending on the particular subject of the mvmt
 
 
Giddens notes that emergent structural processes which appear to be becoming institutionalized dimensions of modernity are fostering the development of social mvmts to oppose them
 
 
For Giddens, the emergent processes of capital accumulation created the Labor mvmt
 
 
For Giddens, the emergent processes of surveillance by govt & corps created the democracy / free speech mvmts
 
 
For Giddens, the emergent processes of the military industrial congressional complex created the peace mvmts
 
 
For Giddens, the emergent processes of industrialization created the envl mvmt
 
 
The emergent processes of globalization is creating the anti globalization mvmts, & the anti free trade mvmts
 
Link
The Table on the Emergent Process of Modernity & Reflexive Social Mvmts shows the reflexivity of social mvmts which arise in response to modernity
 
 
Giddens & Beck see these soc mvmts as reflexive in that they respond to a social situation & change fundamental societal relationships & institutions
 
 
Farley delineates FIVE types of soc mvmts, including protest mvmts, regressive mvmts, religious mvmts, communal mvmts, & personal cults
 
 
Giddens delineates FOUR types of soc mvmts, including transformative mvmts, reformative mvmts, redemptive mvmts, & alternative mvmts
 
 
Locher delineates FOUR types of soc mvmts, including alternative mvmts, redemptive mvmts, reformative mvmts, & revolutionary mvmts
 
 
Types of soc mvmts (descriptive approach)
1.  Transformative mvmts    (aka Protest)       Farley  Giddens
2.  Counter Mvmts         (aka Regressive)       Farley
3.  Redemptive               (aka Religious)         Farley Locher Giddens
4.  Reformative mvmts                                    Giddens Locher
5.  Revolutionary mvmts                                 Locher
6.  Alternative mvmts                                     Giddens  Locher
7.  Communal mvmts                                      Farley
8.  Personal cults                                            Farley
 
 
Today, most of the categorizations of social mvmts do not address failed ideologies such as utopianism, Eugenics, etc.
 

 
Top
 
Table on the Breadth & Depth of Change in Social Mvmts

Depth
of 
Change
 
Breadth of Change
 
Specific Individuals
Significant Parts of Society
Entire Society
Limited Change
Alternative
 Mvmts
Transformative, Counter, Communal Mvmts
Reformative
Social Mvmts
Radical Change
Redemptive
Social Mvmts
Personal Cults
Revolutionary
Social Mvmts
The Table on the Breadth & Depth of Change in Social Mvmts demonstrates that the breadth & depth of change in society impact the type or nature of social mvmts
Some soc mvmts impact individuals, some impact significant parts of society, & some impact the entire society

 
Top
 
Table on the Emergent Process of Modernity & Reflexive Social Mvmts
Emergent Processes of Modernity Reflexive Soc Mvmt
capital accumulation labor mvmt
surveillance democ/free speech mvmt
military power peace mvmt
industrialism envl mvmt
globalization anti globalization & anti free trade
The Table on the Emergent process of Modernity & Reflexive Social Mvmts shows the reflexivity of social mvmts which arise in response to modernity

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on   Transformative Movements 
External
Links
  TRANSFORMATIVE MVMTS ARE SOC MVMTS WHICH AIM TO PRODUCE MAJOR PROCESSES OF SOCIAL CHANGE THROUGHOUT SOCIETY   
  Trans mvmts strive for thorough-going change in the society or societies of which they are a part  
  The objective of transformative mvmts is to change or oppose some current social condition or other soc mvmt
 
  The trans mvmt is the most common type in most industrialized nations & includes such important mvmts as the civil rights mvmts, the women's mvmts, the gay rights mvmts, the antinuclear mvmts, the env mvmt, & the peace mvmt
 
  Many transformative mvmts are also reform mvmts in that they seek soc change, but some transformative mvmts only protest, demonstrate, or raise awareness of a current social condition or other soc mvmt, & do not seek or accomplish soc change
 
  The social change aimed for by trans mvmts are cataclysmic, all embracing, & often violent
 
  Examples of trans mvmts include revolutionary mvmts, some radical religious mvmts, millenarian mvmts
 
 
Trans mvmts are often called protest mvmts because protest is often their most utilized & effective method of achieving their goal of societal change
 
  TRANS MVMTS ARE IMP BECAUSE THEY ADDRESS COLLECTIVE ISSUES, I.E. ISSUES THAT CANNOT BE ADDRESSED BY INDIVIDUAL ACTION   
  Trans mvmt are esp important because they often address those social issues that cannot be changed by individual action  
  C Wright Mills makes a distinction btwn personal troubles & public issues in his development of the concept of the sociological imagination  
  See Also:  The Sociological Imagination  
  Personal troubles are those to which we must look the the individual for the solution  
  Public issues are those to which we must look to society, in all of its manifestations:  govt, the family, the workplace, etc. for the solution  
  For Mills, it can be very difficult to tell the difference btwn personal troubles & public issues  
  Because of the difficulty of telling the difference btwn personal troubles & public issues we often say that a person needs wisdom, vision, consciousness, a sociological imagination, etc. in order to make this complex judgment  
  The difficulty in determining the nature of social problems can be seen in looking at an unemployed person in that we must look at the persons' motivation & personal skills, as well as the level nature of unemployment  
  In the social problem of unemployment after we have examined all the factors affecting a person or a given population, we can then make our judgment as to whether the problem is a personal trouble of a public issue, & more importantly, determine the appropriate path to a solution  
  Since the US is the most individualistic society in all of history, we tend to view problems as personal troubles  
  Reasons for personal troubles are often called excuses, even though some of these, such as a physical disability, are viewed as legitimate by society  
  Reasons for public issues are often called explanations  
  Individualizing is the tendency to view a problem as a personal trouble regardless of whether it is a personal trouble or a public issue  
  Collectivizing is the tendency to view a problem as a public issue regardless of whether it is a personal trouble or a personal trouble   
  TRANS MVMTS RAISE PUBLIC AWARENESS, EDUCATE THE PUBLIC, CREATE PUBLIC WILL FOR CHANGE, & THUS OFTEN HOPE TO FOMENT CHANGE THROUGH POLITICAL ACTION, OR OTHER LARGE SCALE ACTION  
  An example of social issues as opposed to personal issues would be energy policy (often addressed by the env mvmt) in that while I can individually conserve energy by turning down the thermostat, drive less, buy a more fuel efficient car, etc., these individual changes will only marginally change my energy consumption   
  In order to significantly change my individual energy consumption, society wide changes are needed such as an alternative energy infrastructure (wind, solar, etc.) & mass transit is needed  
  The purpose of trans mvmts is often to create enough consciousness, i.e. public will, to raise the issue on the political radar  
  When trans mvmts have raised the issue on the political radar, because of powerful entrenched interests, it still often takes decades for the govt / political system to change  
  The vegetarian mvmt is not a trans mvmt because individuals are quite capable of becoming vegetarian on there own, though undoubted such a mvmt would have society wide impacts of the ag & food production industries  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Counter Movements
External
Links
  Counter mvmts are social mvmts who seek to undo social change or to oppose a transformative or reformative mvmt
 
 
Counter mvmts are also known as regressive mvmts because they often seek to take society back, or regress, to an earlier type of social system, undoing the social change instituted by a trans mvmt
 
  Counter mvmts form directly in response to a trans mvmt
 
  Reactionary reformative mvmt are counter movements & they usually form immediately after a progressive mvmt has succeeded in creating changes w/in a society  
 
An example of a counter mvmt is the antifeminist mvmt, which opposes recent changes in the role & status of women & urges them to remain at home & take care of their children rather than seek outside employment
 
  An example of a counter mvmt is the Ku Klux Klan, various neo nazis, & racist "skinhead" groups which believe in white supremacy & favor return to strict racial segregation
 
  The Ku Klux Klan was created in the South after the Civil War to fight the social changes that were taking place  
  An example of a counter mvmt is the anti gay rights mvmt which opposes legislation banning discrimination based on sexual orientation 
 
  Other examples of a counter mvmts are the anti feminist mvmt, militant right wing mvmts, Drunks Against Mad Mothers (DAMM), smoker's rights groups, etc.  
  Counter mvmts form to fight social change to return society to the way it was before those changes took place  
  DAMM seeks to relax some of the recent drunk driving laws & penalties & to return people's attitudes to be more accepting of drivers who have a few drinks  
  Some counter mvmts form in opposition to the general culture & structure of society such as the Rainbow Family, or a group is even more loosely organized, hippies  
  A typical counter mvmt are reformative or transformative because they seek to reverse some specific social change that they oppose  
 
Almost any transformative mvmt that becomes large & influential generates a counter mvmt (McAdam, McCarthy, & Zald, 1988)
 
 
Counter mvmts develop among groups whose interests, values, or ways of life are challenged by the original transformation
 
 
Counter mvmts & trans mvmts often engage in efforts to capture the support of public opinion (McAdam, 1983)
 
 
Opposing interactions btwn opposing mvmts often become a long term, sustained process in which each mvmt reacts & responds to the actions of the other (Meyer & Staggenborg, 1996)
 
 
The action - reaction interaction of trans & counter mvmts can be seen in the struggle btwn the pro choice & the pro life mvmts in the abortion debate
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Redemptive Movements
External
Links
 
Redemptive mvmts are social mvmts which seek to rescue individuals from ways of life seen as corrupting
 
 
Religious mvmts are redemptive mvmts in so far as they concentrate upon personal salvation
 
 
Religious mvmts are soc mvmts which relate to spiritual or supernatural issues, which oppose or propose alternatives to some aspect of the dominant religious or cultural order
 
  Redemptive mvmts want to create a dramatic change, but only in some individuals' lives  
  The goal of redemptive mvmts is the complete transformation of certain people  
  The target audience of redemptive mvmts is narrow & specific  
  Redemptive mvmts want to totally change the lives of their followers  
 
The line btwn a redemptive religious mvmt & a mainstream religion is usually one of institutionalization & general acceptance by society
 
 
The line btwn a redemptive religious mvmt & a mainstream religion can be seen in any of the mainstream religions today, including Christianity, which were originally opposed by general society, but then became accepted & institutionalized
 
 
Many redemptive religious mvmts never become accepted by society & either fade away or remain marginal sects or cults
 
  Examples of redemptive social mvmts include any religious mvmts that actively seek converts, such as the Jehovah's Witnesses & certain Christian fundamentalist & Baptist congregations  
 
An example of a redemptive mvmt is the Pentecostal sects which propose that individuals' spiritual capacities & development are the true test of their worth (Schwartz, 1970)
 
 
Redemptive mvmts include many religious sects, & even some relatively institutionalized churches, that nonetheless oppose some element of the dominant religion or culture
 
 
Jehovah's Witnesses, Christian Scientists, & Mormons are relatively institutionalized but are not part of mainstream religious mvmts
 
 
Some redemptive mvmts combine a religious message w/ political protest, such as the Nation of Islam, aka the Black Muslims, the Catholic liberation mvmt in So Am, et al
 
 
Liberation theology is a redemptive religious mvmt concentrated in Latin Am Catholics
 
 
Other redemptive mvmts include the Unification Church, aka the Moonies so named after Rev Sung Yun Moon, the Hare Krishnas, & the Scientologists, as well as mvmts w/in major religious orgs such as the Pentecostal mvmt w/in several Protestant denominations & the Catholic Church
 
 
These groups want to totally transform the lives of the individuals they "save," but the only way to be saved is to join the mvmt
 
 
Those who join are transformed, but the rest of the population of the world remains unchanged
 
 
Redemptive mvmts don't want people to change just one set of attitudes or beliefs, they want them to become a part of the group in every way & to take on evangelizing as a way of life
 
 
Members of redemptive soc mvmts believe they are changing the world one person at a time
 
 
The Promise Keepers, a religious based, men only mvmt, swept the US in the 90s
 
 
The Promise Keepers are one of the most recent redemptive mvmt in the US
 
 
The Promise Keepers transform the lives of those men who paid a fee to learn how to be better Christian husbands  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Reformative Movements
External
Links
 
Reformative mvmts are soc mvmts whose objective is to achieve some limited reform, change an entire community, & sometimes, but not often, remake the entire society
 
  Reformative mvmts are probably the most common category of social mvmts in American society  
 
Reformative mvmts are a type of transformative mvmt
 
 
Reformative mvmts often concern themselves w/ specific kinds of inequality or injustice
 
 
A reformative mvmt strives to establish new policy in, for example, the env, foreign affairs, or for a particular racial or ethnic grp
 
 
A reformative mvmt does not strive to eliminate or remake social institutions
 
  The goal of a reformative mvmt is to change society's attitude about a particular topic or issue  
  Reformative mvmts do not want to destroy or replace the existing order  
  Reformative mvmts want the existing govt, or society in general, to change in some specific way  
  Examples of reformative mvmts include mvmts against racism or anti-abortion groups  
  Reformative mvmts can be progressive, meaning that they seek to make a change, or reactionary, meaning that they seek to resist or reverse a change  
  Reactionary reformative mvmts are counter movements & they usually form immediately after a progressive mvmt has succeeded in creating changes w/in a society  
  An example of a reformative mvmt is Mothers Against Drunk Driving ( MADD ) which began its push against drunk driving in the 1980s & 1990s  
 
As a reformative mvmt, MADD sought to change laws & attitudes of law enforcement officials, politicians, & citizens toward drinking & driving
 
 
MADD succeeded as seen in the increased likelihood of authorities & people in general seeing drunk driving as a major crime rather than a minor infraction
 
 
The suffrage mvmt, the civil rights mvmt, & the feminist mvmt are progressive reformative mvmts
 
  The suffrage mvmt, the civil rights mvmt, & the feminist mvmt all sought the change of society in one relatively specific area such as women's right to vote, racial discrimination & segregation, or gender discrimination  
  The white supremacy / white separatist movement, the antifeminist movement, & militant right wing mvmts are examples of reactionary reformative or counter mvmts  
  See Also:  Counter Mvmts  
  Whether reformative mvmts are reactionary or progressive, they want to create what they call a better society  
  Reformative mvmts believe that one specific change is the key to improving every other aspect of society  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Revolutionary Movements
External
Links
 
Revolutionary mvmts are soc mvmts whose objective is to achieve some radical change, & remake the entire, or most of society  
 
Revolutionary mvmts are a type of transformative mvmt
 
 
A revolutionary mvmt hopes to achieve radical change through the elimination of old social institutions & the establishment of new social institutions
 
  Rev soc mvmts want to completely destroy the old social order & replace it w/ a new one  
  The goal of a rev is the total transformation of society by destroying the old govt & replacing all current leaders  
  Rev are the most threatening to existing social order, authority, & power  
 
Sometimes revs have specific goals, sometimes only vague utopian dreams  
  Rev is an important example of mass protest operating outside orthodox political channels, but there are other, limited situations in which uprising or outbreaks of social violence occur in the actions of street crowds or mass demonstrations  
  Social mvmts, i.e. loose associations of people working collectively to achieve shared ends, play key roles in revolutions  
  The existence of soc mvmts which receive mass support is a defining characteristic of revolution  
  As w/ any mass action, soc mvmts come into being in many other situations besides those of a rev mvmt  
 
See Also:  The Forms of Revolution  
 
Revolutionary mvmts are rare compared to transformative or reformative mvmts
 
 
Revolutionary mvmts usually occur when a series of reform mvmts have failed to achieve the objectives they seek
 
 
There are "militia groups" in the US who believe the fed govt is evil & want to overthrow it
 
 
The Montana Freemen could be considered rev soc mvmts 
 
  Many soc mvmts have actually led to real social & political revs in their society  
  Most revs intend to create a better society by replacing the power structure w/ one based on different principles  
  The nature of revs have changed over time being extremely rare throughout most of history, then occurring sporadically in the early-industrial era, & these becoming plentiful in the industrial age  
  See Also:  The History of Rev  
  Many countries have also experienced unsuccessful revolutions, including Chile, Argentina, Hungary, etc.  
  While rare, revolutions do occur & are usually historic in nature as seen in countries as diverse as the US, Russia, France, Cuba, China, Iran, Mexico, Zimbabwe, & the Philippines  
  The English Parliamentary Rev in the 1500 & 1600s, the French anti-monarchist mvmt beginning in the 1700s & continuing through the 1800s, the Russian Rev, the Communist Rev in China, & Fidel Castro's socialist mvmt in Cuba all succeeded in completely destroying the existing power structure & replacing it w/ a new idealized social order  
  Almost all 20th C revs occurred in developing societies such as Mexico, Turkey, Egypt, Vietnam, Cuba, & Nicaragua, not in industrial nations (Moore, 1965)  
  The Revolutions that have had the biggest impact for the world in this century were the Russian Rev of 1917, Chinese Rev of 1949, & while the Cuban Rev was less important, it has had a greater impact because of the Cold War & geo-politics  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Alternative Movements
External
Links
 
Alternative mvmts are soc mvmts whose objective is to bring about change by securing partial change individuals
 
 
Alt mvmts do not aim to achieve complete alteration in people's habits or lifestyles, but are concerned w/ changing certain specific traits
 
  Alt mvmts want to create change in some peoples thoughts or behavior in specific areas  
  The goal of alt mvmts is to change the way specific groups think about a particular behavior or category of behaviors  
  Alt mvmts are not concerned w/ topics outside of their stated focus  
  Generally alt mvmts are not threatening to the established social order because they only want certain people to change & only in one particular way  
  Just because alt mvmts are not threatening to the established social order does not mean that they cannot be extreme  
  Some alt mvmts are considered mainstream because they are not extreme, while others are considered radical because they advocate extreme change even though that change is limited & applies to only a small group of people  
 
Examples of an alt mvmts include Alcoholics Anonymous, the health mvmt, abstinence groups, or any group that is concerned w/ changing one characteristic of people
 
  Orgs such as Drug Abuse Resistance Education ( DARE ) Program & Students Against Drugs & Alcohol ( SADA ) exist to keep the young from getting involved w/ drugs & alcohol  
  DARE & SADA aim at one specific segment of the population ( children, teens, & young adults ) & only seek change in one aspect of their behavior & attitudes, those related to drugs & alcohol  
  While DARE is widely accepted in society, groups such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals  (PETA ) is not as widely accepted since its agenda is considered to be more radical  
  A typical alt mvmt is not concerned w/ issues outside of their specific focus  
  Neither DARE nor PETA tries to change people's religious beliefs, exercise habits, or dental care practices because they have a specific area of interest & that is where their focus stays  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the  Resistance to Social Movements
External
Links
  It is in the nature of society, in conflict, that while there is always change, there is also always resistance to change
 
  While people in soc mvmts who seek to change some aspect of society, there are alwys people who do not want the movement to succeed & in fact most soc mvmts are in the minority in that they are foisting change upon the majority of society who either resists or, at the least, is uncommitted & uninvolved
 
  If a majority of participants in society want a change, usually society evolves to that position w/ or w/o the aid of a soc mvmt
 
  The greatest resistence to soc mvmts usually comes from those who benefit from the status quo, or if the mvmt fails
 
  Resistance to a soc mvmt often includes political or social leaders
 
  In the past soc mvmts encountered resistance largely from already organized groups such as big business against the labor mvmt & the KKK against the civil rights mvmt
 
  Today, new soc mvmts such as feminism & the env mvmt must struggle w/ counter mvmt, i.e. mvmts that organize specifically to foil a soc mvmt
 
  Society resists soc mvmts in ways not found w/ other forms of col beh
 
  Revlutionary mvmts meet the greatest reistance but society is also resistant toward some reformative & redemptive mvmts such as the gay marriage mvmt & the polygamous Mormon sects
 
  The greater the change advocated by the goals of the soc mvmt, the greater it goes against the goals of society, the greater the resistance the soc mvmt is likely to encounter
 
  The methods used to resist soc mvmts include ridicule, co-opting, formal social control, violence, & counter mvmts
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Ridicule as Resistance to a Social Mvmt
External
Links
  Ridicule is to laugh at; make fun of; mock, or point out a ridiculous quality of
 
  Ridicule can be effective in resisting a soc mvmt when a mvmts leaders, followers, tactics, & / or goals are belittled 
 
  The ridicule lowers the credibility in the eyes of the general public & thus reduces the changes of enrolling any new members
 
  Talk shows, comedians, political cartoonists, commentators, opposition leaders & members may ridicule soc mvmt leaders
 
  Ridicule may make the leader look like a buffoon, or a greedy manipulator, may make the participants look like mindless fools, or make goals look unrealistic, trivial, foolish, or short-sighted
 
  All of the techniques or ridicule & resistance serve to disarm the soc mvmt & make it less effective in achieving its goals
 
  Ridicule, as opposed to serious discussion, has the advantage that it appeals to emotions & distracts the general public from looking at the real issues
 
  Because ridicule is non-logically, emotionally based, it does not have the test of truth in that who can argue w/ the accusation that they are a buffoon?  or that their goals are just plain silly?  etc.
 
  Soc mvmts & politicians in general often use ridicule to achieve their goals
 
  Leaders of parties, soc mvmts, campaigns, etc. often ridicule each other
 
  Ridicule, emotional attacks, arguments that cannot be truth tested are easiest to notice when reading any publication that caters to a particular political orientation because, in effect, "they are preaching to the choir"
 
  Ridicule in particularly prevalent in newsletters published by counter mvmts, on talk shows, etc. 
 
  Participants in the soc mvmt who are exposed to the ridicule then pass it on to the general public
 

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on  Co-optation as Resistance to a Social Movement
External
Links
  To "co-opt" means to commandeer, to take over & secure for oneself for one's own purposes or to lure an opponent to one's own side
 
  In soc mvmts, an established, relatively powerful group or org neutralizes a soc mvmt org through what looks like cooperation, but is unequal cooperation
 
  Co-optation is a common form of organizational change as delineated in a famous study by Phillip Selznick on the TVA & various orgs in it's network
 
  See Also:  The TVA & Organizational Co-optation  
  Co-optation can be accomplished in THREE ways, by either forming a group w/ a similar name & purpose, or by tempting leaders & members to join a new group, or my "infiltrating" the group & diverting or watering down its goals, or effectiveness
 
  A.  A group can form an org w/ a similar name & similar goals to the soc mvmt it hopes to co-opt
 
  Forming a similar group can confuse the public, who confuses statements coming from both groups
 
  For example, manufacturers have formed orgs like the So Cal Air Quality Alliance & the Am Crop Protection Assoc.
 
  The Western Fuels Assoc., a group of electricity & utility firms formed the Greener Earth society
 
  The Greener Earth Society furthers the notion that CO2 does not cause global warming & are actually good for the env
 
  The names of these groups create the impression that they are part of the env mvmt when they are part of the resistance to the env mvmt
 
  B.  Co-opting can be done by convincing leaders to quit or to join the opposition
 
  Leaders of soc mvmts may be driven by righteousness, but they may also seek wealth, fame, glory, power, etc. 
 
  Leaders whose goals are less than righteous are often persuaded to join the opposition through offers of money, high-status jobs, etc. 
 
  Leaders may even be convinced that they will be able to do more good working w/in the system than against it  
  Either way, the credibility of the leader & their soc mvmt is often harmed  
  Candy Lightner founded MADD but later accepted a job for a lobbying firm that worked for the Am Beverage Institute  
  C.  Co-opting can be done by infiltrating the movement w/ new members in the hopes of diverting goals or decreasing effectiveness  
  Co-opting members may actually be sympathetic to the opposition & effectively be 'traitors' or 'spies'  
  Co-opting members may actually be sympathetic to the the group they are infiltrating but believe in less radical, i.e. more moderate goals, & hope to shift the mvmt to more of a compromise strategy  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the  TVA & Organizational Co-optation
External
Links
  -  Project:  Co-optation in Everyday Life
Link
  Co-optation is a common method of launching a attack against a soc mvmt is through co-optation  
  See Also:  Resistance to Soc Mvmts  
  Philip Selznick wrote the book TVA and the Grass Roots (1966) which clearly defined the process of organizational co-optation
 
  The TVA Act, 1933, creates a govt agency w/ responsibility for the TN Valley & thus the project is run by neither local, state, nor fed jurisdiction
 
  The TVA had a hierarchy of Goals / Responsibilities including...
-  flood control & navigation
-  providing electricity
-  developing nitrate properties, that is, fertilizer
 
  The TVA was to be decentralized in that decisions were to be made at the grass roots level, i.e. local orgs & citizens were to participate in decision-making
 
  Co-optation & the TVA
 
  Co-opting is the 'Process of absorbing new elements into leadership or policy-determining structure of an org as a means of averting threats to its stability or existence'
 
  Co-optation is a two way process where the org itself is changed & it changes it's environment, including other orgs
 
  The org itself (TVA) is affected by the new elements
 
  The TVA was co-opted (diverted) from it's major goals of recreation, forestry, & farm oriented goals
 
  But the TVA affected, co-opted, the local bodies' & individual's goals in return
 
  Often inclusion of one grp meant the exclusion of another
 
  Co-optation occurred when particular groups, i.e. the ag extension service, the land-grant colleges, & the Am Farm Bureau Federation gained power, & the black colleges, the non-farm bureaus, & other fed govt farm programs lost power
 
  Co-optation is not cooperation in that these orgs should have all worked together
 
  Orgs are geared to self-preservation & one way they do this is by controlling their env, & other orgs are part of the env
 
  The control other orgs in an organizational network is a type of control of the env & thus co-optation is a type of control  
 
Thus an org designed to be a change agent can do that, but often change occurs in unforeseen ways  
  The TVA worked w/ some other govt orgs, & worked against many others  
  TVA outcomes:  
  The farmers who were better-off to begin w/ got more aid than before while the farmers who were less well-off to begin w/ got less aid  
  Recreation areas were given over to private businesses which emphasized profit over preservation  
  Forests were logged  
  The TVA got cooperation on flood control, electricity generation, fertilizer run-off from formerly reluctant orgs  
  Selznick concludes that such an accommodation was the only feasible one:  it helped save the major programs  
  The TVA was co-opted to give up control of aid programs, recreation programs, logging programs & more in exchange for flood control, electricity generation, fertilizer run-off from formerly reluctant orgs  

 
Internal
Links

Top

Outline on   Social Control
External
Links
  -  Video:  Social Control                  1:26 
Link
  -  Video:  Norms & Conformity      6:53 
Link
  SOCIAL CONTROL IS THE CONTROL OF THE INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR BY SOCIETY OR CONTROL OF SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE INTEREST OF THE WHOLE SOCIETY   
 
Soc con is an important part of soc stability 
 
  All of us are subject to social control, attempts by society to regulate people's thought & behavior   
 
Much of soc control is done through culture, socialization, & formal control by authorities 
 
 
Soc controls are organized methods for teaching & enforcing conformity 
 
  Cases of serious deviance may provoke action by the criminal justice system, a formal response by police, courts, & prison officials to alleged violations of the law  
 
Durkheim held that in modern society social control was slipping because the old forms, found in traditions, which he called mechanical solidarity, had not yet been replaced by the new form, found in the interdependence of society, which he called organic solidarity 
 
  See Also:  Durkheim   
  Where soc control fails, we see deviance, collective behavior, soc mvmts, crime, alienation, other social problems, & other forms social behavior that are outside the norm   
Link
Examples of Deviance as a violation of social norms   
  A.  FOLKWAYS ARE THE MOST INFORMAL OF NORMS   
 
Examples of folkways include manners, etiquette, customs, normal behavior, etc. 
 
  B.  MORES ARE SERIOUS NORMS THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE WRITTEN INTO LAW   
 
Examples of a more include flag burning, questioning someone's religion or politics, etc. 
 
  C.  LAWS ARE A TYPE OF NORM W/ THE SUPPORT OF THE STATE / GOVT SANCTION W/ EITHER CRIMINAL OR CIVIL PUNISHMENT  
  iCriminal law is law which the state will prosecute 
The body of rules or principles prescribed by authority or established by custom, which a state, community, society, or the like recognizes as binding
 
  iiCivil law is law which allows one citizen to prosecute ( sue ) another   
  SOCIAL CONTROL INCLUDES ALL PROCESSES USED TO MINIMIZE DEVIANCE FROM SOCIAL NORMS; E.G., CULTURE, NORMS, SOCIALIZATION, LAW, ETC.   
  Social control includes all social processes used to minimize deviance from social norms; e.g., culture, norms, socialization, law, etc.   
  There are TWO Types of Social Control   
  FORMAL OR DIRECT SOCIAL CONTROL IS REGULATION THROUGH THE ENFORCEMENT OF NORMATIVE STANDARDS   
  It is often done by a person(s) w/ authority & responsibility   
 
Formal con is defined by legal sanctions & enforced by instits such as the police, the courts, & the various local, state, & fed legislatures 
 
  The formal enforcement of norms is done through the threat of & implementation of rewards or punishments by those who represent an org or instit or the whole society   
  The formal agents of socialization act on the basis of rules & laws most of which are written   
 
See Also:  Formal or Direct Social Control   
  INFORMAL OR INDIRECT SOCIAL CONTROL IS REGULATION THROUGH IDEOLOGICAL OR CULTURAL MANIPULATION   
  It is often done by surrogate human authority such as rules, customs, laws, even machines   
  Indirect social control is accomplished through socialization   
  Indirect social control is the most powerful type of social control   
 
At the heart of informal social controls are relationships w/ significant others (SOs) 
 
  Review:  For Mead, SOs are people whose affection & approval are very important   
  SOs will reward, punish, or use other methods of socialization to enforce the norms of society   
Link
Examples of direct & indirect control   
  Sanctions are rewards for conforming behavior & punishments for nonconforming behavior   
 
There are FOUR Types of Sanctions   
  1.  A FORMAL POSITIVE SANCTION IS A FORMAL REWARD   
 
A formal positive sanction is a formal reward, etc. is applied by a socially recognized actor ( person, organization, institution, etc. ) empowered to give that reward  
 
Formal Positive Sanction are well defined & can only be applied by people w/ proper institutional credentials   
Link
Examples of Formal Positive Sanctions   
  2.  AN INFORMAL POSITIVE SANCTION IN AN INFORMAL REWARD   
 
An informal positive sanction is an informal reward, etc. by almost any actor  ( person, organization, etc. )   
  The Functions of Positive Social Control Methods are social control, inducement, & reward   
Link
Examples of Informal Positive Sanctions   
  3.  A FORMAL NEGATIVE SANCTION IS A FORMAL PUNISHMENT   
  A formal negative sanction is a formal punishment, etc. by a socially recognized actor ( person, organization, institution, etc. ) empowered to give that punishment   
  Formal sanctions are well defined and can only be applied by people with proper institutional credentials   
Link
Examples of Formal Negative Sanctions   
  4.  AN INFORMAL NEGATIVE SANCTION IS AN INFORMAL PUNISHMENT   
  An informal negative sanction is an informal punishment, etc. by almost any actor ( person, organization, etc. )   
  The functions of negative social control methods are social control, deterrence, & punishment   
Link
Examples of Informal Negative Sanctions   
Link
Chart of Examples of FOUR Types of Social Control   
  For Durkheim, the positive consequences of deviance and social control include increased solidarity 
 

 
Top
 
Chart of Examples of FOUR Types of Social Control 
 
Formal 
Informal 
Positive 
Formal Positive 
Pay, grades, awards 
Informal Positive 
Tip, praise, smile, inclusion 
Negative 
Formal Negative 
Fine, pay cut, bad grade, note in a file, 
Excommunication from a religious organization, expulsion from high school, & criminal punishment 
Informal Negative 
No tip, criticism, scowl, ostracism 

 
Top  
Examples of Deviance & Norms 
Men w/ long hair, women in pants    Dress 
Norms: 
Folkways:  dressed in casual clothes for formal occasion 
Mores: no shirt in dept. store 
Laws: 
Criminal:  no shirt, no shoes in food store 
Civil:  copying super model's look 

 
Top  
Civil law 
Body of law proper to the city as distinct from that common to all nations 
Also, the whole system of Roman law 
Hence the body of private law developed from Roman law 
Law pertaining to the citizen as an individual 

 
Top  
Examples of direct & indirect control 

Factory Work: 
Supervisor harangues or beats workers to work faster 
Supervisor issues penalties 
Computer measures output w/ pay proportional to this output 
Elementary school:  Teacher constantly making sure child turns in work 
College:  Prof establishes goals.  It's up to the student to achieve them 


 
Top  
Examples of Formal Positive Sanctions 

A raise 
An awards dinner 
A certificate of achievement 
A reward 


 
Top  
Examples of Informal Positive Sanctions 

Giving an "atta boy" 
Taking someone out to lunch for a reward 
A pat on the back 
A big thank you 


 
Top  
Examples of Formal Negative Sanctions 

Bad Grades 
Expulsion from High School 
Prison 
A ticket 


 
Top  
Examples of Informal Negative Sanctions 

Taking someone to the woodshed 
A talking to 
A frown 
Ostracism 


 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on   Formal Social Control
External
Links
 
LEGITIMATE FORCE
 
  Social mvmts or any individual, group, or org that is pushing for soc change often meets resistance from existing social agents
 
  Change agents & mere deviants want changes or the freedom that social & political leaders do not want
 
  The methods of formal social control include legitimate force, law & ordinances, & informal sanctions
 
  Legitimate force is the force yielded by police, national guard, the army, etc. 
 
  The police et al can be ordered to use legitimate force to quell any public activity
 
  As long as the force is not blatantly excessive, most citizens will not question the tactic of the police et al using legitimate force 
 
  Social control agents can use force legitimately, but any force on the part of social mvmt members will be perceived as illegitimate
 
  Police can physically push protesters out of a park, but protesters cannot legitimately push the police at all
 
  Authorities use of force is seen as legitimate as long as it stays w/in certain bounds allowing appointed officials to use the police & other agents of control, w/in limits, for their own purposes
 
  LAWS & ORDINANCES
 
  The most common use of social control is not physical, it is the norms of laws & ordinances
 
 
Leaders of soc mvmts & other deviants are often arrested for minor crimes that usually would not result in arrest for the average citizens
 
 
Public nuisance & disturbance laws, noise ordinances, & loitering laws are applied selectively against soc mvmt leaders, members, deviants or whomever authorities target
 
 
Jaywalking laws are rarely enforced in normal life, but may be used against protesters, street people or other deviants
 
 
Cities pass ordinances again signs in particular areas, limiting the number of people as a group on sidewalks, etc.  
 
Obscure fire codes may be used to shut down a soc mvmts headquarters
 
  Any soc mvmt, deviant, or other social actor that the authorities do not like will likely find itself the target of all of these tactics & more  
  The authorities technically do not violate any laws when they use this kind of tactic against anyone, but many argue that they are violating the spirit of the law & are exercising an abuse of power  
  It is difficult or a soc mvmt to maintain momentum when it must worry about harassment from law enforcement officers & state prosecuting attorneys  
  Such harassment can even bring the participants of a soc mvmt closer together & increase their passion  
  Constant legal harassment makes it difficult for members of the mvmt to get anything done  
  Ideally all groups would receive equal protection under the law but in reality groups that upset or anger social control agents are likely to receive little or know protection & face a great deal of harassment, resistance, & even imprisonment  
  Physical violence is the most extreme form of resistance to deviance, including soc mvmts
 
  See Also:  Violence  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the  Violence as Social Control
External
Links
  Violence is the most extreme form of social control
 
  Violence is frequently used as resistance to soc mvmts & deviance in general or anyone or any group or org that goes against the norms of society
 
  Violence here must be distinguished from legitimate force which is violence, legally implemented by the police, military, or other authority of the state
 
  Violence must be understood as being "illegitimate" when the state, i.e. society does not sanction it; violence is force carried out unofficially by members of a society
 
  In the sociological sense, violence must be understood as being "informal or formal"
 
  Informal violence is perpetrated by individuals operating on their own or by relatively small informal groups such as a mob, or a lynch mob
 
  Formal violence is perpetrated by individuals, groups, orgs, etc. who operate as part of an org that is not sanctioned by the state, but may be tolerated by the state, e.g. the KKK
 
  Violence against soc mvmt leaders, deviants, or others who are going against the mainstream of society is all to common
 
  Violence by the state should be, & usually is the last resort while violence is all too often a first line of defense against, soc mvmt leaders & members, deviants, etc.
 
  When an individual decides that abortion is murder, & they see that the state is not punishing the abortionists, their logic may be to take the law into their own hands in the form of violence
 
  When an org sees gay marriage as a threat to society, & sees the state not preventing it, their logic may may to take the law into their own hands in the form of violence
 
  In the past 20 yrs. several pro-life individuals have killed, injured, or attempted to kill doctors, nurses & women who are involved w/ abortion
 
  The use of violence as intimidation is a typical rationale for those who try to resist soc mvmts 
 
  Blacks were often lynched by white mobs in w/ the goal of scaring all blacks into submission of Jim Crow laws
 
 
See Also:  The KKK  
 
Pogroms, violent riots of intimidation are the most extreme form of violence against soc mvmts & deviants, lynchings & assassinations are the next most extreme, & beatings & threats re the least extreme but much more common  
  Sometimes violence is part of an organized effort, formalized violence, from a countermvmt such as the KKK or the Pinkertons  
  The KKK, the White Citizens' Council, et al have perpetrated formalized, organized violence against blacks, & a few whites, to resist the social change of increased civil rights for blacks & others for over 100 yrs.  
  Informal violence can be carried out by authorities who operate outside of the bounds of the law  
  See Also:  Police Corruption  
  Many people in the early labor mvmt & the civil rights mvmt experienced undue force at the hands of the authorities, & it still happens today  
  In May of 1970, the National Guard shot thirteen anit-war protesters at Kent State, Ohio & four died  
  An investigation tried to determine if this was a legitimate or illegitimate use of force in that none of the rioters were armed, but public property was being destroyed, but not by these students  
  Illegitimate violence is less common in the US than some other nations  
  While video & legitimate witnesses have made the use of illegitimate violence less common, it still occurs  
  Violence is more likely to occur where there is less democracy & human rights  
  In Tiananmen Square in 1989, Chinese troops killed dissidents   
  Salaam Hussein gassed Kurds in northern Iraq in the 1980s  
  Stalin sent millions of people to their deaths in the gulags in the SU in the 1920s & on  
  The goals of individuals, countermvmts, authorities who use legit or illegit force, informal or formal violence are the same when they use violence:  to resist a soc mvmt, a deviant, or anyone going against the norms of society, to intimidate them, or to punish or kill them & eliminate the threat  
  When violence becomes wide-spread, & organized or sanctioned by the state, it may be thought of as terrorism or state terrorism  

 
Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the  Importance of Social Movements
External
Links
  -  Project:  How Has a Soc Mvmt Affected Your Life? 
Link
  -  Project:  The Types & Importance of Social Movements
Link
  Soc mvmts can influence history, the way individuals live, societies live, & even world events
 
  Soc mvmts that become large orgs, or institutions are the instrument through which people, groups, orgs, nations influence other people, groups, orgs, nations
 
  Soc mvmts have even destroyed societies
 
  The Prohibition Mvmt got alcohol totally outlawed in the US from 1920 to 1933
 
  The Nazi mvmt in Germany began as a workers' soc mvmt & led to the destruction of much of Europe
 
  MADD led the fight against drunk driving & has impacted much of the US adult entertainment industry, the alcohol industry, the police, & all of the drinking public
 
  When a soc mvmt sweeps through society, it tends to influence the judgment & perceptions of many people
 
  W/o soc mvmts, change would be much more gradual & more in the control of the elites 
 
  Prior to the modern era, most soc change occurred only at the behest of the elites as seen in the history of feudal Europe, ancient China, & Rome where change came in the the form of new leaders, leaving life much the same for the masses
 
  Soc mvmts have increased the ability of the people to foment change in their own society by several factors
 
  The importance of soc mvmts is recognized in the US Constitution in the Bill of Rights in the right of assembly, the right to free speech, the right to a free press, & more; & these rights have been modeled by many other model democracies
 
  While all people have the right to vote in a democratic society, elected officials do not always do what people want them to
 
  The labor, civil rights & other mvmts show that public authorities can be mean-spirited, shortsighted, or just plain stupid
 
  Gov Wallace lied to Pres Eisenhower about his true intentions on desegregation & he ordered the state Nat Guard to block school doors
 
 
Soc mvmts make it possible for citizens to change policies created by dictators, elected officials, elites & others in power  
 
Before the advent of soc mvmts, the masses of people had proportionally little power  
  See Also:  The History of Soc Mvmts  
  Not all soc mvmts create "positive change" for the positiveness or negativeness of a given change must always be determined in light of the predominant norms of society; never-the-less, some changes lead toward greater freedom & democracy, such as the civil rights movement, some lead towards less as w/ the Nazi mvmt, & the positiveness of some are still in debate today as in the labor mvmt, the feminist mvmt, & the env mvmt  
  Some mvmts are trying to better society while others are trying to exclude others from opportunities or liberties & some just want to change things back to the way they believe they used to be  
  The importance of soc mvmts is in many ways similar to the importance of orgs & bureaucracy in that all of these social entities allow individuals to have a voice, exert power, & change history, demonstrating the synergy of collective behavior  
  An old proverb holds that 10 sticks bundled together are stronger than 100 sticks that are not  
  In soc mvmts, grps, orgs, bureaucracy we see that the whole is greater than the sum of its part  
  See Also:  The Importance of Orgs in Society  
  Soc mvmts are important because as seen in the history of soc mvmts, soc mvmts are nascent societal institutions, i.e. soc institutions such as the media, ed, rec, religion, etc. all begin as soc mvmts & then become accepted parts of society, & eventually become routinized & institutionalized  
  Soc mvmts are important because they allow people on the bottom of the stratification system to collectively exert more power & influence in society than their status & class positions would normally allow  
  Soc mvmts are important simply because they are a tool for social change  
  Soc mvmts are an effective balance to the power of govt; they are a conduit through which power, info etc. can be channeled to govt so that a public debate can occur on the merits of the proposed change  
  If the media is the "fourth estate" of a democracy, i.e. the fouth branch of governance, then soc mvmts are a "fifth estate" in that it would impossible for society to effectively function if soc mvmts were suppressed  
  The fourth estate is a name often given to the newspaper / media profession  
  Among the members of the fourth estate are those who gather, write, & edit the news for the press  
  Some people use the term to refer to journalists in all news media  
  The phrase fourth estate is believed to have first been used in writing by Thomas Babington Macaulay  
  In 1828, he wrote in an essay that "the gallery in which the reporters sit has become a fourth estate of the realm"  
  Macaulay was adding a term to those already used for the three estates, or classes, of the English realm  
  These were lords spiritual, lords temporal, & commons  
  The three estates later came to stand for govt, while reference to a fourth estate described any other influential body in English political life, such as the army or the press  
  Soc mvmts serve as "watch dogs" on the govt & the media, each focusing on its own area of expertise  
  Soc mvmts are valuable sources of info & constituents for both the govt & media  

The End
 
Top