Internal
Links

Top

 Outline on the  Precautionary Rule
External
Links
  -  Overview of Soc Sci Methods
Link
  -  Research Instruments
Link
  -  Policy Analysis
Link
 
The precautionary rules states that because evidence of harm is uncertain, & error costs are very high, it is acceptable to take precautionary action
 
 
Precautionary steps must be taken because waiting for evidence may be too late
 
 
The PR retains a deterministic version of science:  its temporary imprecision that will be solved, and then everything will become clear
 
 
The PR assumes that knowledge itself will not change, just become more detailed
 
 
The PR may be wrong in its assumption that knowledge will not change because sometimes the old point of view is displaced by a new paradigm or perspective
 
 
The PR accepts that:
 
 
- the variables used by one analysis may not be firmly defined
 
 
- in real world science (as opposed to the lab) there is the possibility of multiple cause effect inferences
 
 
- circumstantial evidence for cause & effect may be legitimate
 
 
On closer inspection, all science is circumstantial (principles & laws are the most firmly est., but even Newton's laws were superseded by Einsteinian laws)
Will old models fit new situations?
 
 
A problem for the PR & for pol an in gen is that there is much less of a consensus of knowledge in the social sciences than in the physical sciences
 
 
The problem for the PR & for pol an of the lack of consensus of knowledge in the social sciences is seen in that there are no laws, the paradigms are in direct conflict & competition, there is little agreement on how the econ operates, there is little agreement on what causes various soc probs, etc.
 
 
WYNNE’S SCIENCE
 
 
Wynne holds that we must 
 
 
- recognize the various definitions/gradations of scientific and social actors
 
 
- solve solutions at various scales
 
 
- allow that rational people, even scientists can be ambivalent
 
 
- prediction & control are not absolute
 
  - demand that pol an & scientists build in flexibility to their programs  
  - not make foregone commitments but instead make tentative commitments & decisions in the area of pol & science  
  - allow circumstantial evidence because all evidence is so, & therefore policy an & scientists must develop levels of evidence  
  - recognize humans do not only maximize & satisfice, they sacrifice whenever a prog is dev  
  Wynne does not recognized that politics, economics, power, etc. chase out flexibility & rational discussion & lead pol an to make hard decisions  
 
JURIDICAL SCIENCE
 
  The idea of juridical science is that scientists, pol an, politicians, public policy decision makers, agencies, etc. should set up a judicial system to decide issues of science  
  Currently society has only the govt juridical system under the Supreme Science Court to judge scientific & policy claims  
  The Sup Ct, the Fed Appeals Cts, & the Fed Dist Cts are appointed by the Pres, & confirmed by Senate  
  In the jud br of govt, scientists, w/ help from journals & research community (universities, research centers, etc.), present findings to courts to determine “scientific truth”  
  Once a ct decides "the truth," only this info may be used in policy making, ed  
  The info, "the truth" disseminated by the media is excluded from juridical jurisdiction  
 
Some social scientists have advocated that that people not be allowed to disseminated "misinformation" through the media 
 
  To prevent or limit misinformation through the media, some social scientists & media experts have suggested that side bars tell "the truth" or give the whole story in much the same way that music video pop ups operate  
  For many social scientists, for too long the study of the env & other soc probs have focused on the production side of econ  
  Pol an, scientists, etc. need to focus on the consumption side  
  Conditions of validity need to be set for the discrimination of production solutions & consumption solutions  

The End
 
Top