Name
of the Project: Epistemology, the Env, &
the Soc Sciences
Discuss why those dealing w/ environmental issues should be concerned
w/ epistemology. In your discussion, look at the issues of epistemology
and the environment from the point of view of three or four of the major
participants in the environmental debate. How might each participant
gain or lose from dealing w/ or ignoring a critique of science, the politicization
of science, the ways of understanding, culture, attitudes, opinions, interests,
ideology, and so on.
That is to say, is being ignorant of the issues an advantage?
Is being knowledgeable an advantage? Why?
This question can be addressed by answering some or any of the following: |
In these questions,
try to envision someone you know or have seen in the media:
1. How can one or two participants in the
envl debate gain or lose from dealing w/ or ignoring a critique of science?
2. How can one or two participants in the
envl debate gain or lose from dealing w/ or ignoring the politicization
of science?
3. How can one or two participants in the envl
debate gain or lose from dealing w/ or ignoring the ways of understanding?
4. How can one or two participants in the envl debate gain or
lose from dealing w/ or ignoring culture?
5. How can one or two participants in the envl debate gain or
lose from dealing w/ or ignoring attitudes, opinions, interests, ideology?
6. How can one or two participants in the envl debate gain or
lose from dealing w/ or ignoring or other factors in epistemology?
|